Josh no disrespect
However if you really think about it Windows XP Pro holes in it, "Like pouring water into a barrel watching to see where it leaks, wait it will.
I mean no disrespect.
However if WXP was this safe virus's would have nothing to latch on, and hacker would not be able to hack us, etc etc.
A friend of mine said once Oh you mean like my Apple.
I have never been rich enough to afford an Apple so I can not say.
However being Bill Gates Helped Steve Jobs and wow low and behold, Apple can now run Windows XP hmmm,...Intresting. Now why would you want to run XP if Apple is so good.
Because you can one friend of mine said.
Yeah ok!. I can understand, however is that Apple still as safe?
Any Apple users out running a dual OS (Apple & WXP) ???
I really can not believe Windows is so safe.
Because nothing is ever 100% safe.
Not routers not firewalls.
Not Windows XP Pro
-thunder7
Also, with all due respect, EVERY OS HAS HOLES IN IT. If you subscribe to any decent security mailing list, you will see that linux has several CORE PACKAGES which have exploits every day. I get more daily notifications for patches I need to apply via apt-get dist-upgrade than I do with windows monthly updates. OSX also puts out patches that fix batches and batches of holes. You just dont hear about these because these OS's are in the minority. But again, I also challenge you to write an OS that is used on millions of different hardware combinations with billions of different pieces of software that havent undergone any quality testing, and make it not have bugs or holes. Windows XP is a very decent OS, and the ONLY exploit I have ever been hit by was blaster. Just because these people are finding holes, doesnt mean the OS isnt usable. Microsoft patches the holes, and they do it well, in my opinion. With the advent of XP SP2, I have never had a single problem with winxp that I havent caused by installing a driver that wasnt WHQL certified, or by some oddball software configuration.
I ask you this, how many of these exploits have hit you that werent caused by you installing something, or visiting a site that has "questionable" content? As f0dder says, the main reason windows xp exploits are so widely publicised is that it is used far more than ANY OTHER OS. Another thing I noticed, that link you posted was a patch from
APRIL, and you said windows update
just now wants to install it. This is a problem, if you arent willing to update regularly (I installed this particular update back in early may), then you are asking to be exploited. A lot of users I see complain about the number of patches microsoft has, then they complain when something hits and that microsoft cant patch fast enough, or that they want to test it to make sure it works. Microsoft is in the unfortunate situation of they're damned if they do, damned if they dont, in the eyes of most tech users.