topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 13, 2024, 8:51 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Last post Author Topic: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review  (Read 74845 times)

IainB

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 7,544
  • @Slartibartfarst
    • View Profile
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
« on: February 18, 2012, 08:51 AM »
    Original post:2012-02-18
    Last updated:2016-12-15 (re: latest version; extended list of features.)

    Basic Info
    App NameFreeFileSync - 01 logo.png
    Thumbs-Up Rating :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
    App URLhttp://freefilesync.sourceforge.net/
    App Version Reviewed$FREE (with Candyware) or $Donate (without).
    The latest version is 8.7
    (and still an excellent backup tool)
    Supported OSes
    • Windows
    • macOS
    • Ubuntu 16.10
    • Ubuntu 16.04
    • Debian 8.6
    • openSUSE
    Support Methods
    Upgrade Policy$FREE (with Candyware) or $Donate (without)
    Pricing and Versions AvailableThe developers put a forced option on users - you either get FFS $FREE with Candyware, OR you start paying periodically recurring licence fee $donations (each time the "thank-you period" ends) - that gets you the temporary FFS Donation Edition with "bonus" (hah-hah) features including:
    • ad-free installation without Candyware
    • auto-updater
    • portable zip package

    SCREENSHOT OF APP INTERFACE:

    FreeFileSync - 02 UI 2012-02-19 030428.jpg

    Introduction:
    I had been trialling several backup alternative solutions and started to trial FFS as a result of reading @Curt's post: FreeFileSync (Open-Source) « on: 2011-04-19, 16:23:00 »
    I quickly discovered that FFS was a superb backup system, and continued to use it.    :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:

    I felt I had to consolidate my thoughts on FFS after reading this excellent comparison and review of 2012-02-17, between FFS and Microsoft SyncToy: Is FreeFileSync Better Sync Software Than Microsoft SyncToy?
    The above review is well worth reading, and I shall not duplicate it here.

    Overview:
    FreeFileSync is a folder comparison and synchronization tool providing highly optimized performance and usability without needless user interface complexity.
    It is highly customisable and includes real-time monitoring capability and maintenance of versions in the backups.
    The website at https://sourceforge....ojects/freefilesync/ lists these features:
    • Synchronize network shares and local disks
    • Synchronize MTP devices (Android, iPhone, tablet, digital camera)
    • Synchronize via SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol)
    • Detect moved and renamed files and folders
    • Show disk space usage with directory trees
    • Copy locked files (Volume Shadow Copy Service)
    • Detect conflicts and propagate deletions
    • Binary file comparison
    • Configure handling of Symbolic Links
    • Automate sync as a batch job
    • Process multiple folder pairs
    • Comprehensive and detailed error reporting
    • Copy NTFS security permissions
    • Copy NTFS extended attributes (compressed, encrypted, sparse)
    • Copy HFS+ extended attributes and ACLs
    • Support long file paths with more than 260 characters
    • Fail-safe file copy prevents data corruption
    • Cross-platform: Windows, Linux, Mac OS X
    • Expand environment variables like %UserProfile%
    • Access variable drive letters by volume name (USB sticks)
    • Native 64-bit support
    • Manage versions of deleted/updated files
    • Prevent disc space bottlenecks via optimal sync sequence
    • Full Unicode support
    • Highly optimized runtime performance
    • Include/exclude files via filter
    • FreeFileSync portable and local installation available
    • Handle daylight saving time changes on FAT/FAT32
    • Use macros %time%, %date%, et al. for recurring backups
    • Case-sensitive synchronization
    • Built-in locking serializes multiple users synchronizing the same network folder
    • ... download and use for free!

    Who this app is designed for:
    FFS would be an ideal automated backup tool for any computer system where the user wished to have a "fire and forget" backup strategy to minimise/avoid risk of data loss.

    The Good:
    • Simple and highly flexible at the UI (User Interface). The user can select 1 of 4 Variants of backup, and within Variants 2, 3, and 4, the user can select Synchronisation Options (Categories and Actions) to establish precise backup procedures. Variant 1 necessitates FFS building a control database to manage the backups, and specifying the rules for that backup, using that database. That same database approach can be selected for the Variants 2, 3, and 4, if required to detect moved files. Refer separate section at the end of this review, entitled Details of Synchronisation Options.
    • An excellent piece of software that so far has done its job very well (as above) on my laptop.    :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
    • The software can automatically check for updates to cope with improvements and new hardware and drivers.
    • The good points of FFS are comprehensively covered in the excellent comparison and review of 2012-02-17, between FFS and Microsoft SyncToy: Is FreeFileSync Better Sync Software Than Microsoft SyncToy?
    • Real-time syncing works perfectly, and is a breeze to set up (I used the Help document). Really good.    :Thmbsup:

    The needs improvement section:
    • I have not observed that anything needs improvement. No annoyances. In any event, the software is updated periodically, to implement improvements and bug fixes.
    • Not so much an improvement as a suggested alternative set-up approach: The user could consider using reparse links (folder junctions) to set up a library for FFS to backup, rather than spell them out individually - as I have done - in the FFS configuration.
    • WARNING: @PhilB66 reminded me that the install now included OpenCandy, so make sure you pick the right setting: (relating to this, see also the Review notes posted on the https://sourceforge....reefilesync/reviews/ - those notes have been copied to the foot of this review, for ease of reference.)

      FreeFileSync - 03 OpenCandy at install.png
    How it compares to similar apps:
    • SyncToy: Read the comparison/review: Is FreeFileSync Better Sync Software Than Microsoft SyncToy?
    • Handy Backup: FFS was certainly good enough to shift me from Handy Backup, which I had been using for years, and with FFS' RealTimeSync module (Handy Backup didn't do that), I am very happy with the outcome.
    • BeyondSync: I had posted a very brief note/review about BeyondSync Standard 4.3, which product worked OK for syncing, but I could not get its real-time syncing to work, and so uninstalled it from my laptop.
    • Other: There was also an interesting discussion on DCF re various backup software (not necessarily FreeFileSync): backup software - file-by-file sets

    When I can put aside the time for it, I intend to trial and report on the backup functionality mentioned in AOMEI Backupper FREE + AOMEI Partition Assistant FREE - Mini-Review, and refer to the report in this FFS review.

    Why I think you should use this product:
    My experience of FFS is that it is a superb backup software tool, and with it's RealTimeSynce module it seems to be a real winner.

    Conclusions:
    Superb backup tool.
    Note that the list of key features given above does not provide a comprehensive list of all the functionality of this software. There are many other features.
    Does what it says it does, and very well.
    This is a picture of a backup disc (note the VERSIONING directory):

    FreeFileSync - 04 Backup as at 2012-04-24 drive H.jpg


    This is a progress report just prior to completing the sync/backup:

    FreeFileSync - 05 Backup near completion.png

    Links to other reviews of this application:
    If you Google FFS, you will find various reviews, but, as above, this one is good: Is FreeFileSync Better Sync Software Than Microsoft SyncToy?
    _______________________________________________

    Details of Synchronisation Options:

    FreeFileSync - 06 Synchronisation Options.pngFreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Review of FFS posted at https://sourceforge....reefilesync/reviews/
    by Slartibartfarst (5 Stars rating)
    2016-12-14

    FFS is an excellent $FREE backup tool. It also has one of the most sound ergonomically-designed GUIs that I have come across. I recommend it to anyone who is looking for good, reliable backup software. Why would you NOT want to use it?
    As a regular and committed user of FFS (FreeFileSync) since 2012, I wrote a very favourable mini-review of FFS at the DonationCoder.com Forum. That review is periodically updated. Only read it for the information it might give as an introduction to using FFS and/or especially for the comments from people on the forum, who are generally keen fans of using good and innovative software - such as FFS, for example.

    FFS is an excellent $FREE backup tool - BUT, the single biggest downside to the tool seems to be the Candyware approach that insists on installing PUPs (Potentially Unwanted Programs).
    I fully understand that the Candyware is done out of necessity for funding and that it may also explain the high frequency of updates/changes released for FFS. However, Candyware is simply a huge PITA - it upsets the AV (Anti Virus) software and MBAM (Malwarebytes) - and rightly so. Goodness knows what CR#P it is trying to install.

    Unfortunately for FFS, Candyware seems to be the single biggest negative reason that many potential and existing users have mentioned to me for NOT using FFS and for instead using some other (and possibly inferior) backup software. I just thought I'd mention that, because it drives users away, which is not a good thing and the developers would presumably know that - so it is probably all done with deliberate method.

    So, FFS is an excellent $FREE backup tool - but the $cost?
    Well, you either pay for it with your time and inconvenience from the repeated PITA of Candyware installs and then (say) stop using it because you get sick of that, OR you stump up a $donation.

    I actually consider that having the forced option to donate and thereby getting a Candyware-less and also a PORTABLE ZIP installer that auto-updates is a relatively smart and sane way to go - so, all kudos for doing that However, no-one likes being coerced by having their arms twisted, and this will therefore probably antagonise some people (I know it does me) and may even put them off and who otherwise could be giving positive WOM (Word-Of-Mouth) advertising - rather than negative - about FFS - to their friends and relatives. This is reflected in some of the comments in the DonationCoder.com Forum.
    ____________________________________________
    [/list]
    « Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 01:33 PM by IainB »

    parttimecoder

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 16
    • Donation code is cool!
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #1 on: April 04, 2012, 11:50 AM »
    Hi IainB

    Thanks for taking the time to review this great sync utility. Over the years I have experimented with most paid, free and open source backup utilities, and was delighted at discovering this one. I have used it with a small backup project thus far and can say that it has just the right feature set so far. I have a client with a 40+Gb data set that I will test this with.

    Again appreciated your review.

    Redhat

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2005
    • ***
    • Posts: 254
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #2 on: April 07, 2012, 10:17 AM »
    Nice review IainB!

    Sounds like a great program. Could you tell me please if FFS can backup to network shares, maybe WebDAV etc. for remote backup?

    Thanks!

    x16wda

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2007
    • **
    • Posts: 888
    • what am I doing in this handbasket?
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #3 on: April 07, 2012, 10:25 AM »
    Network drives - yes definitely.  Anything else will work, I think, if you can get it to map as a drive letter (e.g., with ftpdrive, netdrive, etc).
    vi vi vi - editor of the beast

    kalos

    • Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • **
    • default avatar
    • Posts: 1,824
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #4 on: April 07, 2012, 07:14 PM »
    Does it store different versions of the files for backup and archiving purposes?

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #5 on: April 07, 2012, 08:02 PM »
    Does it store different versions of the files for backup and archiving purposes?

     - I think this might answer your Q:
    It is highly customisable and includes real-time monitoring capability and maintenance of versions in the backups.

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Just did a minor update to the review details in the opening post (now re version 5.2, as at 2012-04-30).

    PhilB66

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2007
    • **
    • Posts: 1,522
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Just did a minor update to the review details in the opening post (now re version 5.2, as at 2012-04-30).
    Thank you for this review, IainB. FreeFileSync installer is now powered by OpenCandy.

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Just did a minor update to the review details in the opening post (now re version 5.2, as at 2012-04-30).
    Thank you for this review, IainB. FreeFileSync installer is now powered by OpenCandy.
    @PhilB66. I knew that, but had forgotten to add it in to the review update. Thanks for reminding me! Done now.

    PhilB66

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2007
    • **
    • Posts: 1,522
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Just did a minor update to the review details in the opening post (now re version 5.2, as at 2012-04-30).
    Thank you for this review, IainB. FreeFileSync installer is now powered by OpenCandy.
    @PhilB66. I knew that, but had forgotten to add it in to the review update. Thanks for reminding me! Done now.
    Good. There is no mention of OpenCandy on the FFS Website. Its SF page and the Readme file too fail to mention OC. I do not mind the "new" ad-supported installer trend at all but the developer should make it public knowledge. When it is done in a sneaky way, my trust is gone. I dumped FFS for that reason.

    SKA

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • ***
    • default avatar
    • Posts: 229
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Use /NOCANDY parameter when starting the installation program, or use a portable package, to avoid installation with OpenCandy.

    Ska

    kalos

    • Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • **
    • default avatar
    • Posts: 1,824
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    this program needs radical GUI redesigning :/

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Just did a detailed update to the opening post review notes (now re version 5.5, as at 2012-07-11).

    tomos

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • ***
    • Posts: 11,964
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Just did a detailed update to the opening post review notes (now re version 5.5, as at 2012-07-11).

    were there any noticable differences between this and previous versions?
    I see the forum and bug tracker are very active :up:
    Tom

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    ...were there any noticable differences between this and previous versions?...
    No - nothing that I noticed, anyway. I was in a bit of a rush though, so could have missed something obvious.

    tomos

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • ***
    • Posts: 11,964
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    ...were there any noticable differences between this and previous versions?...
    No - nothing that I noticed, anyway. I was in a bit of a rush though, so could have missed something obvious.

    Just curious - it's good to know it's being updated and very actively supported :up:
    Tom

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #16 on: September 13, 2012, 08:18 AM »
    There's a comparison at MakeUseOf.com, between FreeFileSync vs. Microsoft SyncToy:
    Is FreeFileSync Better Sync Software Than Microsoft SyncToy? [Windows]
    ...
    The Verdict
    FreeFileSync trumps SyncToy on all fronts. Perhaps it’s not surprising, given that SyncToy isn’t something Microsoft is focusing on – it hasn’t been updated since 2009. Maybe it’s time to take Microsoft SyncToy off our Best Of page and add FreeFileSync? I can’t see a reason to use SyncToy over FreeFileSync.
    « Last Edit: October 30, 2012, 05:15 AM by IainB »

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review (updated 2012-10-30).
    « Reply #17 on: October 30, 2012, 02:40 AM »
    Just did a detailed update and added an image to the opening post review notes (now re version 5.8, as at 2012-10-30).
    « Last Edit: October 30, 2012, 05:20 AM by IainB, Reason: Minor correction. »

    Ath

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • **
    • Posts: 3,629
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review (updated 2012-10-30)
    « Reply #18 on: October 30, 2012, 03:39 AM »
    Just did a detailed update and added an image to the opening post review notes (now re version 5.8, as at 2012-10-30).
    Maybe you should have updated the original message subject as well... :huh:

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review (updated 2012-10-30)
    « Reply #19 on: October 30, 2012, 05:18 AM »
    @Ath: Thanks. There were several with a "wrong" date reference. Fixed now.

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #20 on: November 10, 2012, 04:53 AM »
    2012-11-10: Updates to the Opening Post (still doing a couple of minor changes), relating to:
    • The latest version is now 5.9.
    • A bit about my testing of the RealTimeSync module of FreeFileSync - it's very good!    :Thmbsup:
    • Better comparison notes regarding other backup proggies, now including BeyondSync - briefly reviewed here.

    cmpm

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • ***
    • default avatar
    • Posts: 2,026
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #21 on: November 10, 2012, 07:56 AM »
    The OC deal is removed by Eset Nod32 during installation (after reboot).
    While still allowing FreeFileSync to install.

    FWIW, Eset catches some OC packages and some show up without being detected.
    Some of their install wrappers are considered a threat, others are not, I suppose.

    IainB

    • Supporting Member
    • Joined in 2008
    • **
    • Posts: 7,544
    • @Slartibartfarst
      • View Profile
      • Read more about this member.
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #22 on: January 03, 2013, 10:27 PM »
    Just did a minor update to the review in the opening post. FFS is now up to version 5.10 - mostly fixes for Linux and/or Windows versions, no major new features.

    tomos

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • ***
    • Posts: 11,964
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #23 on: January 26, 2013, 02:46 PM »
    Just installed FreeFileSync_5.11_setup.exe

    I dont mind Open Candy, but this was sneaky imo:

    Screenshot - 2013-01-26 , 21_38_30.png

    OC was already mentioned above, but the reason I'm posting about it again is because the option here is pre-selected.
    Also, it's the last step and if you're not focusing/going too quick you might just think it's the 'I accept ...' terms for FreeFileSync itself, and just click install.

    Just warning in case.
    As said above, probably better installing the portable version and making your own shortcuts
    Tom

    tomos

    • Charter Member
    • Joined in 2006
    • ***
    • Posts: 11,964
      • View Profile
      • Donate to Member
    Re: FreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review
    « Reply #24 on: January 26, 2013, 03:09 PM »
    I hadnt used the versioning before.

    You have to designate/create a folder for older versions (see shot below).
    It then recreates the folder structure (as necessary) within this folder :up:
    Very good :Thmbsup:


    Screenshot - 2013-01-26 , 22_03_08.pngFreeFileSync - automated backup - Mini-Review

    Tom