topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 13, 2024, 9:05 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy  (Read 4212 times)

Edvard

  • Coding Snacks Author
  • Charter Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,022
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« on: February 24, 2012, 09:09 AM »
Oh, this is rich... can't ask for any better

Today we published a new policy. It’s something we’ve always honored, but we’re so firm in our convictions about this particular topic that we felt it necessary to share our stance officially. OpenDNS does not provide content filtering services to governments or Internet Service Providers that contribute to oppression by censoring the Internet for their people.


As of today, I will never use another DNS service.
:Thmbsup:

Stoic Joker

  • Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 6,649
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2012, 11:32 AM »
I can't switch to OpenDNS ... 'cause I'm already using it. :D

Most Excellent News!

wraith808

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 11,190
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2012, 11:58 AM »
The only thing I don't like about OpenDNS is that though it touts that the community polices the filters, the mods can put a filter in place with no recourse for the community.

But yes, it is a great service, and this is an excellent statement.

Innuendo

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 2,266
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2012, 12:29 PM »
I've used OpenDNS for years & the OP makes me feel like I've made the right decision in sticking with them.

Renegade

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,291
  • Tell me something you don't know...
    • View Profile
    • Renegade Minds
    • Donate to Member
Re: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2012, 07:25 AM »
I've wondered before, but this seals the deal. I'm sold!
Slow Down Music - Where I commit thought crimes...

Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. - John Diefenbaker

IainB

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 7,544
  • @Slartibartfarst
    • View Profile
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
Re: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2012, 07:38 AM »
I've been an advocate of OpenDNS for a few years.
However, though this policy pronouncement from OpenDNS looks pretty good on the surface, I still remain skeptical.
We shall see. When the almost inevitable pressure on them (OpenDNS) is brought to bear by some government or other (probably the US), then any tendency to cave in under that pressure will become apparent.

Innuendo

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 2,266
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: OpenDNS updates their censorship policy
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2012, 08:53 AM »
However, though this policy pronouncement from OpenDNS looks pretty good on the surface, I still remain skeptical.
We shall see. When the almost inevitable pressure on them (OpenDNS) is brought to bear by some government or other (probably the US), then any tendency to cave in under that pressure will become apparent.

All this policy states is that OpenDNS will not help an organization or country censor the internet. I really doubt any government would pressure them into providing content filtering. To clarify, OpenDNS has never stated that they will not refuse to cooperate with any investigation into legal wrong-doing. I'm sure they'd handle any logs over to law enforcement officials straight away....and I support that.