topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 13, 2024, 7:33 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: [CHS] Possible to Ignore Particular Address in Browser?  (Read 3645 times)

tomos

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,964
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
[CHS] Possible to Ignore Particular Address in Browser?
« on: March 24, 2017, 05:22 AM »
Can I ensure that CHS will not copy from the browser when at a particular address?

(Couldnt find any related info)
Tom

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,914
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
Re: [CHS] Possible to Ignore Particular Address in Browser?
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2017, 05:30 AM »
There is no way to do that currently, and it would be difficult because it has become increasingly difficult (for security reasons presumably) for 3rd party apps to peek at the current address in the browser.

There are 2 possible workarounds:
1. Use a different browser when surfing to such sites, and mark that browser exe to exclude from CHS monitoring.
2. See if anyone has written a browser plugin that will mark Ctrl+C copied text from certain addresses as being tagged as IGNORE SECURE, which CHS supports as an indicator that it should not copy such text.  I doubt this exists but it would be a nice addon.

tomos

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,964
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: [CHS] Possible to Ignore Particular Address in Browser?
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2017, 05:31 AM »
1. Use a different browser when surfing to such sites, and mark that browser exe to exclude from CHS monitoring.

I can go with this
thanks mouser :up:
Tom