Which was the "political post"?
I really was not entirely sure what you were referring to, you see, as I couldn't see that my posting the pictures of the "US presidents in uniform" (copied from a US website somewhere) was political. Was it insulting? No.
the post of presidents in "uniform" was the post that jumped out at me -- it is clearly, explicitly, by design, an image intended to cast aspersions on the patriotism and suitability for office of obama and clinton. it was unequivocally *created* in order to insult and demean clinton and obama. it is indistinguishable from the partisan images used in political campaigns to damage the reputation of political figures. Anyone familiar with american politics should be able to confirm that to you.
now whether *you* personally posted that with those intentions, or just saw it and thought it was silly and funny but didn't quite understand the political nature of it, i make no judgement and will take your word about.
please don't go anywhere -- you are as much a part of this community as anyone else. but if you really can't tell that that image was meant to attack the character of those two men, perhaps you might consider staying clear of humor involving (american?) politicians.
the worst part about partisan political/religious posts is that they are like a virus -- one person posts something insulting to one side, and then people on the other side feel compelled to reply in turn, and soon everyone is angry. that's why we ask that people refrain from such things.
now let's get back to being silly.
Recent Posts
