topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 15, 2024, 11:06 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: Macro Scheduler, email automation tool at 58%, only today 1st May  (Read 5979 times)

nagar

  • Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
    • Nagarsoft
    • Donate to Member
Mjtnet, to celebrate its 10 years in business, is offering a huge discount (more than 58%) on all versions of Macro Scheduler, its award winning macro automation tool.

Macro Scheduler is a perfect companion of Direct Access (text substitution and application launcher) which is offered to donation coder users at special price.

For those who don't know Macro Scheduler, it is Windows Automation Made Easy. The only solution with VBScript built in, a dedicated windows automation language with over 200 functions, full variable support, a native code editor and debugger, a macro recorder that creates real human code and the ability to create standalone EXE files. Powerful and flexible for the advanced user yet easily mastered by the novice.

You can get more information about macro scheduler from http://www.plimus.co...p?contractId=1653836

Macro Scheduler Standard at $40 (instead of $97)
https://www.plimus.c...p;couponCode=BDJ10YR

Macro Scheduler Pro (with EXE compiler) at $81.24 (instead of $197)
https://www.plimus.c...p;couponCode=BDJ10YR

--
Andrea Nagar - Nagarsoft
http://www.nagarsoft.com
Discover the power of Direct Access to speed up your personal computing experience by reducing time consuming, repetitive tasks through the use of abbreviations.

Perry Mowbray

  • N.A.N.Y. Organizer
  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,817
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
I just had a look at the Image Recognition functionality (here): awesome!!

I guess it takes a bit of time to find images within screens... but amazingly handy when dealing with non-standard GUIs. Not sure it's worth the cost over AutoIT or AHK?
« Last Edit: May 01, 2007, 04:16 AM by Perry Mowbray »

nagar

  • Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
    • Nagarsoft
    • Donate to Member
Macro Scheduler has a number of exclusive features (image recognition is one of those). On top of that you get first class support which is something you should consider too.
--
Andrea Nagar - Nagarsoft
http://www.nagarsoft.com
Discover the power of Direct Access to speed up your personal computing experience by reducing time consuming, repetitive tasks through the use of abbreviations.

Darwin

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,984
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
I'm with Perry... that is amazing. I probably don't... no scratch that: I definitely do not need this kind of functionality but I'm already hankering for a licence. The banker will K-I-L-L me if I spend a penny more on software though  >:(

Perry Mowbray

  • N.A.N.Y. Organizer
  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,817
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
It's funny how events group themselves together... Serendipity I think is an appropriate description  :)

Anyway, one of the things I did at work today was to automate the setting of specific (and temporary) printer settings for the girls that I manage. I did it with some AutoIT scripts.

Not a difficult task, I presume that it would have been similar AHK, but it involved:
  • opening and iterating through the printers in the Printers Folder
  • Selecting the correct printer
  • Opening the Printing Preferences by sending KeyStrokes to the window

MacroScheduler would have approached the problem in a completely different way, by:
  • actually looking for the graphic display of the required printer in the Window list
  • and clicking where it found it!

Both work, but I'd love to know how the two approaches compare in terms of speed and resources etc.

[You could all sorts of other neat stuff too, like looking at photos and seeing if they contain other defined images... I saw this done as a search tool somewhere once, where you could draw something on a canvas and the search engine would go off and look for images that resembled your drawing (or other photo)... where was that  :-\  :-\ ]