avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 29, 2023, 10:10 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: CLION: A new (cross-platform, commercial) C++ IDE  (Read 6126 times)


  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,891
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
CLION: A new (cross-platform, commercial) C++ IDE
« on: September 11, 2014, 11:37 AM »
A new C/C++ IDE (development environment) was recently made available for download, by the folks at JetBrains, who have developed some impressive commercial coding tools. It's called CLION.
It's cross-platform, running on windows, mac, and linux -- but note that this means it will run on these platforms, NOT that you can use it on one platform to target another.
It's also a commercial tool as far as I can tell -- which is currently available for free early (beta) testing -- someone let me know if this turns out to be wrong.

Looks interesting -- one appealing aspect is that it seems to use a relatively-standard build/project system (cmake), and uses the standard gcc compiler, making it more compatible with standard c++ coding.

See also: Qt, Dev-C++ (free and open source), Codeblocks (free and open source), Visual Studio, C++ Builder.


  • Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 1,198
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: CLION: A new (cross-platform, commercial) C++ IDE
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2014, 01:27 PM »
The video demo indeed looks impressive. I can't try it myself though as it requires a JVM ;)


  • Developer
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,187
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: CLION: A new (cross-platform, commercial) C++ IDE
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2014, 02:34 PM »
It looks promising, and I agree using CMake is probably not a bad thing. I've been happy every time I found projects using CMake instead of autotools/autoconf.

One issue with the current version is that it only supports a very specific 32-bit MinGW install (and does not work with the popular MinGW-w64 builds).