topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday December 12, 2024, 5:56 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: Simple Checklist for repeating actions (fast turnover)  (Read 3123 times)

tomos

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,964
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Simple Checklist for repeating actions (fast turnover)
« on: January 28, 2014, 05:52 AM »
Looking for a simple checklist (windows) app:

Background:
I have a very long list of entries/numbers - I have to double-check these with info from other sources.
Occasionally due to new info that also relates to other entries, I have lost track of what has been checked.
(Not good if I miss something :-[)


I thought a simple checklist would be helpful:

  • Once the list is done I would need to be able to clear the [ticks] easily
  • Ideally I would be able to enter the entry/number I'm working on somewhere in the window
  • Ideally I could have multiple instances


Did do a search but couldnt see anything that fitted my needs - but my search-fu aint so good...
any ideas?
TIA
Tom

skwire

  • Global Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,287
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Simple Checklist for repeating actions (fast turnover)
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2014, 08:31 PM »
tomos, perhaps this new app I wrote might fit your needs:  https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=38115.0

tomos

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,964
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Simple Checklist for repeating actions (fast turnover)
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2014, 03:39 AM »
tomos, perhaps this new app I wrote might fit your needs:  https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=38115.0

thanks skwire!
Yes, I can still use this (already trying it out).
Tom