AdBlock for ChromeApp Name | AdBlock for Chrome |
App URL | https://chrome.googl...urce=chrome-ntp-icon http://code.google.c.../p/adblockforchrome/ |
App Version Reviewed | 2.5.31 |
Test System Specs | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.20 GHz 16 GB RAM 128 GB SSD system drive
|
Supported OSes | N/A |
Support Methods | N/A |
Upgrade Policy | Freeware |
Trial Version Available? | N/A |
Pricing Scheme | N/A |
Author Donation Link | N/A |
Reviewer Donation Link | N/A |
Screencast Video URL | Unknown |
Relationship btwn. Reviewer and Product | N/A |
Intro:Blocks ads on web pages in Firefox, Chrome and Safari.
AdBlock for ChromeI have used this app extensively for a prolonged period. My review is based on that experience, and not reading specs or installing it for 10 minutes.
Who is this app designed for:For anyone interested in getting rid of ads on web pages.
The GoodIt filters many ads. A lot of good work done there. It's comprehensive.
Works well on some sites, but primarily those without many ads.
The needs improvement sectionThe plugin simply doesn't work well for people that use many tabs, or on web pages that include many ads, especially those that use JavaScript.
The plugin will make many web sites unresponsive or cause extreme delays in scrolling. These difficulties are far from minor. They are critical failures that make the software essentially unusable, except for those that are immortal and can wait for extremely long periods, e.g. minutes.
Scrolling problems include unresponsiveness and "chunking" with each scroll-wheel click taking several seconds or longer.
Disabling or uninstalling the plugin resolves all these issues immediately.
Why I think you should use this productIf you are a very light web user, then this might be for you.
How does it compare to similar appsI have yet to see an app like this that works decently. So, it fails just as badly as all the others I've tried.
ConclusionsThis is another fail for the web.
The basic premise of the development is a horrible, irresponsible, failure that a tiny bit of foresight could have forseen. It relies on an interpreted language when a compiled language is needed. This task cannot be done in JavaScript. It needs real muscle to do properly.
This is not really a reflection on the developers as far as I can tell. I have yet to see any highly-functional JavaScript-based plugins or extensions (like this plugin) that actually work decently for the web at large. (I have seen some that work beautifully for specific web sites though.)
Again, this is a problem with an interpreted language being used to do what a compiled language should be used to do.
Links to other reviews of this applicationUnknown. Not interested in the opinions of people who read specs or post based on a few minutes of use, e.g. CNET.