topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday March 29, 2024, 10:17 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Last post Author Topic: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!  (Read 28179 times)

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #25 on: October 05, 2008, 08:12 PM »
I think it's just a tiny bit more than simple semantics, but you're absolutely right. ;D



Grorgy

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 821
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #26 on: October 05, 2008, 08:16 PM »
Crippled demos should be labelled as such, if people want to download a movie of how it works then fine, but let the punters know what they are getting!

Darwin

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,984
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #27 on: October 05, 2008, 09:11 PM »
I think it's just a tiny bit more than simple semantics, but you're absolutely right. ;D

 :D

zridling

  • Friend of the Site
  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,299
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2008, 09:30 PM »
[Carol]: FSF approach is just plain stupid (IMHO).

Most non-free software in the world today is not sold, but licensed. From complex operating systems to tiny games or screensavers, end users of the software have a license to use it under conditions laid out in an End User License Agreement (EULA). This agreement lists out the conditions under which the user can use the software -- often restrictions are imposed on the use to which the software can be put. In almost all cases, users are explicitly prohibited from "taking the software apart" to study how it works, cannot modify or improve it, are only allowed to make a single copy of the software (for backup purposes) and are strictly prohibited from distributing copies to other people. (Much of the open source model is one of distribution.)

I openly credit Vista's original EULA for pushing me toward Linux. Thanks again, Microsoft; it was the best thing you've ever done for me! But then recently, the highly popular open source Mozilla Firefox browser was severely criticized for creating a pop-up dialog of Firefox's EULA, a piece of software which needed no "branding" EULA. Mozilla Foundation’s Mitchell Baker quickly responded to it as a mistake.
__________________
Most of us are never going to open the hood and retool the source code. But there's intrinsic value in using free/libre software, since most of the world cannot afford to send money to Redmond for its proprietary products, much less trust a corporation to do the right thing by us. Not Microsoft. Not Google. Not IBM. Not Apple. Not Goldman Sachs....

Besides, all data composed by governments (and many key industries) should be open source that follows open standards. Stephen Fry explains it well: http://www.gnu.org/fry/
« Last Edit: October 05, 2008, 09:33 PM by zridling »

Darwin

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,984
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #29 on: October 05, 2008, 10:06 PM »
I openly credit Vista's original EULA for pushing me toward Linux.



No pun intended, eh Zaine?

Carol Haynes

  • Waffles for England (patent pending)
  • Global Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,066
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #30 on: October 06, 2008, 04:18 AM »
[Carol]: FSF approach is just plain stupid (IMHO).

Most non-free software in the world today is not sold, but licensed. From complex operating systems to tiny games or screensavers, end users of the software have a license to use it under conditions laid out in an End User License Agreement (EULA). This agreement lists out the conditions under which the user can use the software -- often restrictions are imposed on the use to which the software can be put. In almost all cases, users are explicitly prohibited from "taking the software apart" to study how it works, cannot modify or improve it, are only allowed to make a single copy of the software (for backup purposes) and are strictly prohibited from distributing copies to other people. (Much of the open source model is one of distribution.)

I openly credit Vista's original EULA for pushing me toward Linux. Thanks again, Microsoft; it was the best thing you've ever done for me! But then recently, the highly popular open source Mozilla Firefox browser was severely criticized for creating a pop-up dialog of Firefox's EULA, a piece of software which needed no "branding" EULA. Mozilla Foundation’s Mitchell Baker quickly responded to it as a mistake.
__________________
Most of us are never going to open the hood and retool the source code. But there's intrinsic value in using free/libre software, since most of the world cannot afford to send money to Redmond for its proprietary products, much less trust a corporation to do the right thing by us. Not Microsoft. Not Google. Not IBM. Not Apple. Not Goldman Sachs....

Besides, all data composed by governments (and many key industries) should be open source that follows open standards. Stephen Fry explains it well: http://www.gnu.org/fry/

I am not arguing that all of that isn't true. What I would argue is the the FSF definition just isn't rational. There are free things in this world that don't fit those criteria and I would argue that the FSF definition is an abuse of the term FREE - in fact that have chosen to restrict the meaning of the word free to their own narrow definition. In fact saying that software is only free if it is subject to GNU is a contradiction in terms - how can something be genuinely free if you have to agree to a license before you can use it, modify it or anything else?

Are all software writer and companies that provide free software now supposed to fall under that definition or find another term for their software?

I actually think it does a disservice to the software community because there are already so many categories for software that it is becoming ever more confusing. To redefine FREE to a narrow and specific meaning is just plain daft and adds even more confusion.

Personally I think there should be a limited set of definitions:

Open Source: Source code included.
Free: Costs you nothing.
Registrationware: Free but you have to register the product (e.g. DonationCoder stuff, AVAST AV etc.)
Shareware: Try before you buy
Commerical: Buy it - like it or lump it.

I suppose any of the last four could have an addtional OS (Open source appended) and 'licensed' if that is required (I have come across OS software in all those categories).

So Linux would become: Linux (Free/OS/L GNU)
AVAST Free would become: AVAST (FREE/L Avast)
DC's FARR would become: FARR (Registrationware/L DonationCoder.com)

I don't think GNU should be an implicit license in any definition - many software writers hate GNU and they shouldn't be penalised for refusing to use it. Their software can still be considered free if it is open source and not charged for but with a 3 line license: "Give it to whoever you like but complete and in tact", "Use and abuse it however you like", "Provided as is, no guarantees - use at your own risk".
« Last Edit: October 06, 2008, 04:25 AM by Carol Haynes »

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #31 on: October 06, 2008, 08:03 AM »
I don't think GNU should be an implicit license in any definition - many software writers hate GNU and they shouldn't be penalised for refusing to use it. Their software can still be considered free if it is open source and not charged for but with a 3 line license: "Give it to whoever you like but complete and in tact", "Use and abuse it however you like", "Provided as is, no guarantees - use at your own risk".

Why not just remove (or ignore) the loaded word "free" and simply point interested parties to the license that governs the use of the product. That's what it really all comes down to anyway.

Maybe it would be easiest for everyone if something that's being released under GPL simply carried the short label FOSS-GPL2 or FOSS-GPL3. That could also work for BSD and Apache, etc. Ideally, these designations could be registered as a trademarked "flag" whose use is restricted to products that comply with the terms of the GPL license.

All other licenses (i.e. as set by the author and which vary by product/company) could be just labeled EULA. Or not, since it doesn't matter to the FOSS crowd what you do if you choose not to be a part of their movement.

On the subject of authors being "penalised for refusing to use [GPL]," I really don't think they are. As the matter of a fact, I don't think they can be. FSF has no authority to do anything other than voice an opinion of how they feel things should be. That, and challenge the people that want to have it both ways by calling themselves something they're not. Participation in the free software movement is completely optional. To go back to my earlier comment, if you really want to share something, then share it. Otherwise don't. That's your prerogative. No need to hate anybody.




« Last Edit: October 06, 2008, 09:56 PM by 40hz »

Carol Haynes

  • Waffles for England (patent pending)
  • Global Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,066
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #32 on: October 06, 2008, 11:56 AM »
I agree with what you are saying but the problem is that all over the internet there are different definitions of the same thing. What we need is a standard definition for different types of software.

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #33 on: October 06, 2008, 02:26 PM »
Good point. But in order to have a standard, you need a governing body to establish and enforce it. And who can you trust to do that any more? (We can thank ISO for a lot of that!)

To my mind, the real problem is that there has been a concerted effort on the part of a lot of closed source software publishers to create as much confusion and misunderstanding as possible about what was (up until a few years ago) generally understood by the terms "free" and "open." (Does a certain individual whose last name begins with a "B" ring a bell?)

I learned something many years ago when I worked for one of the Fortune 100 tech companies. When you're a well-heeled company, there is a three pronged approach to dealing with innovations or trends you are unable to control.

1: Try to get the innovation outlawed. Claim it is dangerous, immoral, or (in the USA at least) argue that it is communist/socialist in its goals and therefor threatens the economy, the family, the church, or jobs.

If that sounds far fetched, SCO made such an argument back in 2003.

"The GPL violates the U.S. Constitution, together with copyright, antitrust and export control laws,"


Also, whenever possible, throw in a touch of  xenophobia for good measure. (ex: "Did you know that Linus Torvalds is from Finland? Did you know Finland's right on the border with Russia?" - or my favorite: "I don't know if I want to trust my company's data on software that has so many foreigners working on it. Those people all hate us and they'd do anything to hurt this country!")

2: Spread confusion. Attempt to render the name of the product, or its rallying cry meaningless. Release something that works the opposite way and call it the same thing. Redefine the terminology to be either narrower or broader than originally intended. Dismiss the innovation as "nothing new" or equate it with something that already exists. As a last resort, attempt to trademark or otherwise take ownership of the terminology and diffuse any momentum that it may have. Look how well that's worked recently with the term "green." Green has been rendered virtually meaningless now that it has been extensively co-opted by industries that are anything but.

3: Resort to the BIG LIE. Just keep repeating your position and ignore reality. Do it often enough and you can get a certain percentage of the population (usually the ones that just want the issue to go away) to side with you no matter how crazy your arguments are. If you can sponsor a bogus "independent study" to support your contentions, so much the better. Creating a captive "trade group" or "industry council" is also wise. Especially if the name masks the true nature of the organization. (ex: call a group that is set up to encourage the wider adoption of software patents something like: The Society of Professionals for Software Innovation.)


My former employer used many of the above tricks. And from what I am seeing, the above tricks are still successfully being employed today. :(

If you want people to stop being confused about software licensing - stop confusing them8)

« Last Edit: October 06, 2008, 10:36 PM by 40hz »

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #34 on: October 06, 2008, 10:35 PM »
To momentarily get back to the original topic:

Your current PBX = trixbox CE

http://www.trixbox.c.../trixbox-ce/features

TrixboxCE.gif

All-in-one distro based on Asterix that allows you to set up your own full featured in-house telephone system.

Features include:
   
* Unlimited Extensions
    * TDM/SIP/IAX Trunks
    * Remote Extensions
    * Voicemail
    * Fax Support
    * Voicemail to Email
    * IVR Menu System
    * Ring Groups
    * Call Queues
    * Conference Rooms
    * Follow-Me
    * Time-Based Routing
    * Music On Hold
    * Paging and Intercom
    * Web Access to Voicemail
    * Admin Status Screen
    * Package Manager (for easy updates)
    * Phone Provisioning Tool
    * Network Settings Tool
    * Enhanced CDR Reports
    * Echo Cancellation - OSLEC (Open Source Line Echo Cancelation)

Davidtheo

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2008
  • *
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #35 on: October 07, 2008, 10:15 PM »
I would have to say Kingsoft Office and Kingsoft Internet Security (KSO07, KSO09 and KIS9).  :D  ;D

For Office work and computer Security.

 


mahesh2k

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 1,426
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #36 on: October 09, 2008, 06:12 AM »
Maybe some free online application mentioned here can be useful :

http://www.smashingm...prove-your-workflow/

Redrik

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #37 on: October 10, 2008, 05:49 AM »
Back to the original question, if you need some software for your home accounts (free) or your business (up to about 10 employees) for about $180 with nothing more to pay ever and free updates, try Acclaim Cashbook (www.acclaimsoftware.com).

The business stuff is not free but it's incredibly cheap for what you get and over a short time period you can get it to do most of the work for you. Perfect for people with more important things to do.

I'll admit to being a retired accountant. I had all my business clients using this software (even the bigger ones although they also needed some other tools). The money they had to pay attracted them at first but the ease of use kept them all happy.  As for me, I get bored easily and I'm kind of lazy so I enjoyed having very little boring stuff to do. It also allowed me time to look like a 'Business Guru" because I had lots of time to create "miracles". Much more fun.

Sorry to interrupt the tangential semantic discussion. People like me have no sense of humour.

terribleterryc

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 17
  • Mile High Denver Member since 2007
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #38 on: October 10, 2008, 08:52 AM »
Reference original topic:

Not a program as such but a web site:

Hemlock Society
http://www.compassionandchoices.org/

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Programs you can use during a financial meltdown!
« Reply #39 on: October 11, 2008, 02:34 PM »
If you've financially melted down to the point of where you no longer even own a PC, consider getting a USB key and loading it up with a bunch of free no-install portable apps. http://portableapps.com/

portableapps_homepage_cr-13.jpg

Plug your key into an obliging friend's PC and you have everything you need to get some work done. All you have to do is save and unplug when you're finished (or your friend needs her machine back so she can get some of her own work done) and you're ready to roll. If you still need a machine to work on, just hop on your bicycle and pedal on over to some other friend's house...

And remember: You're no longer digitally homeless - thanks to portable apps you're now a TechnoNomad! :Thmbsup:


PortableApps.com Suite and PortableApps.com Platform
your computer, without the computer™

http://portableapps.com/suite

Included Applications

PortableApps.com ScreenshotAll versions of the PortableApps.com Suite include the integrated PortableApps.com Menu (pictured at right) and the PortableApps.com Backup utility along with a set of custom icons, an autoplay configuration, folders and a quick start shortcut. In addition, the packages include:

    * Mozilla Firefox, Portable Edition (web browser)
    * Mozilla Thunderbird, Portable Edition (email)
    * Mozilla Sunbird, Portable Edition (calendar/tasks)
    * ClamWin Portable (antivirus)
    * Pidgin Portable (instant messaging)
    * Sumatra PDF Portable (PDF reader
    * KeePass Password Safe Portable (password manager)
    * Sudoku Portable (game)
    * Mines-Perfect Portable (game)
    * CoolPlayer+ Portable (audio player)
    * OpenOffice.org Portable* (office suite)
           - Writer (word processor)
           - Calc (spreadsheet)
           - Impress (presentations)
           - Base (database utility)
           - Draw (drawing)

*Note: The Light Suite includes AbiWord Portable (word processor) instead of OpenOffice.org Portable.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2008, 12:59 PM by 40hz »