3926
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows goes Open Source?!!
« Last post by wraith808 on April 05, 2015, 05:07 PM »People said the same thing about .NET.-wraith808 (April 05, 2015, 11:18 AM)
One difference. .NET was documented. To program Windows using the API without being left behind you had to get "undocumented Windows" programming books. Some guy had to sit there for months debugging the OS to see what MS did when they wrote their own programs that they didn't tell us.
It's hard to believe a company that didn't want to document the Programmer's API calls would open up the source to the whole enchilada. But if I see it I'll believe it. But if they are really going open source do they have to do these trial balloons? Like if people react with "so what?" they won't but if people say "oh wow!" they will? Strange business.-MilesAhead (April 05, 2015, 03:11 PM)
But as you notice with .NET, the parts that were open sourced where the most recent version. They didn't just open up everything back to 1.0.
Projects under the stewardship of the .NET Foundation currently include the .NET Compiler Platform ("Roslyn") as well as the ASP.NET family of projects, both of which were open sourced by Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. (MS Open Tech). Xamarin has contributed several open source .NET projects, including the very popular Mailkit and Mimekit projects.
I expect to see the same thing with Windows. You aren't going to get everything just dumped out there. They'll package it, and slice it up. I don't see it as any less far-fetched than the idea that .NET would go open source. They've seen the future, finally, and realize that selling the OS is no longer the way to stay on top, and causes them more problems in the long run, it seems.
But time will tell.

Recent Posts
.


Any chance you can implement a new feature/option?