topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday June 18, 2025, 1:23 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 ... 127next
2851
Living Room / Re: PDAs - any use?
« Last post by rjbull on May 28, 2006, 04:07 PM »
If you are in the arena for a PDA, I would suggest moving to the pocketpc line of products.

My instant reaction is to say  Palm  just because it isn't Microsoft, but I get the impression that Palm are fading and Pocket PC are rising.  Purely objectively, and only as far as I understand it, the Palm OS is lighter-weight and Palms still give you more bang for your buck.

2852
superboyac,

I see the screenshot of MyBase on their Web site contains lots of graphics, but I recall seeing a comment on the Keynote site to the effect that RTF is a bad format for graphics because it has to be read line by line, so is slow.  What's your experience of that?

Does MyBase have good Boolean searching, and is it indexed?  Did they fix the searching bugs now that the 5 beta seems to have turned into a full release?

Thanks in advance...
2853
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 28, 2006, 03:45 PM »
Harrie,

You're welcome, I just wish I'd prefaced my last post with the caveat "some assembly required."

The Free Software for DOS Web site associated with the VDE site is fascinating...

2854
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Locate 3.0 - great HD search tool!
« Last post by rjbull on May 28, 2006, 03:43 PM »
For "bleeding edge" :P searches, the built-in search of xplorer^2 full seems to do the trick.

The one in Total Commander is excellent  :)  For some purposes, I use a command-line program also called Locate, by Charles Dye

Not blindingly fast, but a myriad of useful options, especially if you need to build batch files, or prefer command lines.

2855
Site/Forum Features / Re: Show new threads?
« Last post by rjbull on May 28, 2006, 03:23 PM »
I don't seem to have been very clear.  Try again.

I'd like to see a list of threads that had been started since one's last visit.  Just the thread titles and links, not details of individual messages.

2856
Living Room / Re: PDAs - any use?
« Last post by rjbull on May 28, 2006, 03:19 PM »
Thanks, folks!   :Thmbsup:

@Gothi[c]: if they made A5-form-factor laptops with all-flash memory, I'd be interested...

@jgpaiva: smartphones seem to be killing stand-alone PDAs, but they are expensive, and (I think) the screens and keyboards are both small.

@tsaint: Kay Shapero said she downloads novels from Project Gutenberg onto hers and reads them while waiting in line.  Her Web site even has a link for spare screws for Palm Tungsten T series, for people in the US.  Sounds like you get a lot use out of yours.  The instant-on and long battery life sound very appealing.

2857
Living Room / PDAs - any use?
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 04:05 PM »
I keep thinking of trying a PDA, most likely a Palm.  This is because I write lots of things down in a Filofax-type notebook, but then I can't find or manipulate them afterwards.  Are PDAs really useful forn that kind of thing?  I get the impression that quite a few people are starting to abandon them, but that those who do are mostly the GTD crowd who find PDAs don't fit what they want.  Whereas, what I want is mostly a portable text snippets database.  And, PDAs are still well above pocket money, if you decide you don't ge on with them.

Thanks...
2858
Site/Forum Features / Re: Show new threads?
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 03:10 PM »
forum help: https://www.donation...ction=help;page=post
(i really need to make a link to that forum help somewhere)

Yes, please!  It's the sort of thing it would be nice to have unobtrusively at the top of every forum page.

as for unread threads - the closest is a Recent Threads list, found in the top box where it says Greetings XXXX,
look for the link "Show recent topics".

Yes, but, that shows individual posts.  I wanted a way to be made aware of completely new threads I hadn't seen before, and which I might easily miss if they aren't very busy, as the Recent Threads list only shows 10 items.

Thanks...
2859
Site/Forum Features / Show new threads?
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 02:55 PM »
Is there a way to see just new threads since last visit - not individual posts, just the headings for the threads?

Is there a cheat sheet for the codes used for things like colours, lists, spoilers, etc., all in one place?

Thanks...

2860
Official Announcements / Re: User Profiles ... a request
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 02:46 PM »
  • if people are male or female (you can't always tell with nicknames)! Currently the forum stats say there a 9 males for every female on the site and I am pretty sure this isn't true.
-Carol Haynes (May 27, 2006, 01:25 PM)
But one CarolHaynes is worth at least 99 men?  ;)

2861
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Locate 3.0 - great HD search tool!
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 02:43 PM »
how blazing fast Locate is :)

But you have to keep its indexes up to date, which takes time.  OK, you can schedule that, but it still has to be done.


2862
Living Room / Re: Humour - how about a giggle column ...
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 02:40 PM »

Being an Evil Overlord seems to be a good career choice. It pays well, there are all sorts of perks and you can set your own hours. However every Evil Overlord I've read about in books or seen in movies invariably gets overthrown and destroyed in the end. I've noticed that no matter whether they are barbarian lords, deranged wizards, mad scientists or alien invaders, they always seem to make the same basic mistakes every single time. With that in mind, allow me to present...

The Top 100 Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord


2863
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 27, 2006, 02:31 PM »
author=brotherS link=topic=344.msg26520#msg26520 date=1148721550]
I'd trash every program that tries to separate me from two of my best friends: Ctrl+C and Ctrl-V

Using macros to run ClipText gives seamless access to the Windows clipboard from DOS programs; press whichever function key you've assigned, plus one other letter, job done.  No more trouble than Windows Ctrl-C / Ctrl-V.  Some of us still prefer the productive environments we already have, rather than trying to build something similar all over again, probably at great(er) expense, in Windows.  I bitterly resented Gate$ pirating Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V, which are important WordStar control keys, and date to before Windows was invented   >:(  Oh, dear, better not start on that...

If you like "small" free Windows editors, you might take a look at TED Notepad which is one of the most powerful small ones.  Because I like WordStar editors I sometimes use WSedit at http://www.hypermake...nglish/overview.html  which gives you both WordStar keys in a CUA-compliant WinGUI editor, so you can have clipboard access as well.

2864
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 26, 2006, 09:47 AM »
rjbull, would you mind giving examples of how you use ClipText?  (Some diehard WordPerfect DOS users might be interested).  I looked at the whole site (nice) and from what I see, it's not quite a program to make copying between Windows and DOS apps as easy as Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V, correct? 

Harrie, you're correct,  ClipText is a command-line program to either take text from a file and send it to the clipboard, or to take text from the clipboard and send it to a file, with certain options.  That's all it does on its own, but, I use Eric Meyer's Visual display Editor VDE.  Like most good editors, VDE can be "programmed" with macros.  Its macro language includes features like flow control, the ability to run external programs, and a degree of user input.  The talented John Woodruff wrote an extremely clever macro to automate ClipText operations under VDE.  That macro isn't on the Web site yet but details are in the quote below, which is from John's post in the VDE mailing list (hosted at Topica):


   The [v.v:WRZ] macro below uses Horst Schaeffer's
ClipText utility to provide VDE with Clipboard access under Windows NT/XP. It also works with Win 95 and above.

   After starting the macro, respond to the "? Esc!"
prompt in the header by pressing W, R, or Z:

[W]rite: Marked block in the current VDE file is the source:

   Selected VDE text is APPENDED to file C:\V.V
   ClipText then OVERWRITES the Clipboard with C:\V.V
   Use [Z]ap before [W]rite IF ONLY the CURRENT marked
     block should be copied into the Clipboard, not an
     accumulation of entries.

[R]ead: The current VDE file is the target:

   ClipText APPENDS the Clipboard contents to file C:\V.V
   VDE then reads C:\V.V at the cursor and marks the
     incoming text as a block.
   Use [Z]ap before [R]ead IF ONLY the CURRENT Clipboard
     contents should be pasted into VDE, not an
     accumulation of entries.

[Z]ap: Erases file C:\V.V but does NOT access the Clipboard

======= Macro ====================================================

[F01]<Esc >[v.v:WRZ]<QN>
[Esc]:[Esc]!_
[Esc]W
^KW+C:\V.V[Enter]
[AltR]CLIPTEXT FROM C:\V.V /DOS[Enter][Esc][Esc]!]
[Esc]R^KS
[AltR]CLIPTEXT TO C:\V.V /APPEND /DOS[Enter][Esc] ^KB^KRC:\V.V[Enter]^QP^KK[Esc]!] [Esc]Z ^KJC:\V.V[Enter]

======= Notes ====================================================

   File C:\V.V is an arbitrary choice, but whatever file is
used, it's necessary to state the full path in the macro. Reason: The ^KW and ^KR path is the path of the current file, whereas the [AltR] shell path is set when the VDE session is started, subject to being changed later by other DOS commands.

   The ClipText /DOS switch causes extended ASCII characters
to be translated. I've included it in both the [W]rite and [R]ead routines, but it can be edited out. The ASCII/ANSI character conversion is similar but not identical to that in VDE's ^[ and ^] commands.

   The initial ^KS in [R]ead is a safety feature, making
it possible to use ^KL^F to status back from a Read/Only lockup in case of Graphics Overflow due to too many different translatable extended ASCII characters in the source text.


In other words, being able to use ClipText seamlessly requires the editor to have reasonably good macro abilities of its own, but I believe WordPerfect has that.  Obviously, the implementation would be very different, but skilled WordPerfect users should be able to adapt the principles.  By the way, VDE can read and write WordPerfect files, and can even be made to behave with a degree of "WordPerfect-likeness" itself.  Quoting VDE.DOC:


    WORDPERFECT - /P mode reads and writes files in WP v.4 format.  /F mode
 reads WP v.5-6 or WP for Windows files, and writes v.5 format (which can also
 be read by v.6, or imported into WPfW).  Both modes support some formatting
 features and underline, boldface, and super/subscript; /F also supports
 italics and strikeout.  You can edit in VDE using a command set much like
 WordPerfect's by using the supplied WP.VDF key definition file, which makes
 the function keys call up the MenuBar in a manner similar to WP commands.


Hence VDE might be a useful adjunct for WP users, even if they don't go over to it full-time.

Horst Schaeffer's software is excellent, and he's one of the nicest people you could deal with, very generous and helpful :)


Hope that helps.


2865
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 26, 2006, 08:08 AM »
There are so many good editors around... is it really worth running an old DOS editor?

Yes - it's WordStar style, my fingers are used to it, it loads fast, and I prefer DOS-type screens for editing text.  Despite the "crudity" by WInGUI standards, I find them easier on the eye.  My particular editor, VDE, has been moderately updated so it can deal to an extent with LFNs, and a macro using Horst Schaeffer's ClipText command line tool takes care of interactions with the clipboard.


2866
Living Room / Re: End of 35mm film - long live digital - or is it?
« Last post by rjbull on May 26, 2006, 08:01 AM »
Actually one of the good things about Canon EOS cameras is they can use the same lenses as the film versions and with the advent of 35mm CCDs you get exactly the same expected 'use of the lens'.
-Carol Haynes (May 26, 2006, 06:54 AM)

I'd forgotten that, but I thought it was still in the realm of if you have to ask, you can't afford it...  you can get top quality and versatility from second-hand film gear costing a few hundred pounds (if that) that might be an order of magnitude more expensive with digital.

Sheffield isn't that far away - but not close enough to pop in for film processing (like a 4 hour round trip at least).

There's still Postman Pat and his black-and-white cat...

Compare the results from cameras such as the Voigtlander Vito B from 1954 and the Leica CL from 1974

I rather wish I'd acquired a Leitz Minolta CLE, though I heard they're rather fragile.  The idea seemed to me great for a hiking / sightseeing camera.

As already pointed out though there is still the issue of transparencies. Can you actually do transparencies at all with digital?

I believe so, though I've not heard of it being done.  There are those big Fuji machines that scan transparencies using a laser and write out the results, also using a laser, onto normal "Crystal Archive" photographic paper.  Seems no reason why they couldn't write onto film like that from a digital file.  Most people will ask, why would you want to, when you can get digital projectors?  Albeit, they're another expensive item.


2867
Living Room / Re: End of 35mm film - long live digital - or is it?
« Last post by rjbull on May 26, 2006, 06:12 AM »
Presumably if 35mm cameras start to disappear it won't be long before processing becomes difficult too
-Carol Haynes (May 26, 2006, 04:54 AM)

I look through Amateur Photographer every week (mostly for the adverts), and haven't yet seen anything about Canon dropping film camera manufacture.

I only (normally) shoot 35mm transparency film, and get it processed at a local professional photographer's place on the nearest tradng estate.   They shoot some digital, but still enough film to put an E6 process on every day.  Maybe it won't be so easy for casual users to find processing houses, but no doubt larger mail-order places like Peak Processing - oops, now Peak Imaging - will keep going for quite a while.  Peak are in Sheffield, I think, not a million miles from the CarolHaynes mansion?

It's not just the film, either.  Lenses and ancillaries aren't always available for digital cameras, and if they are, they're very expensive.  I've not yet seen a shift lens for digital advertised, for example; very wide lenses are rare or non-existent; no digital Hasselblad XPan yet (OK I know you can make panoramas digitally, but it's extra work).

2868
Living Room / Re: Humour - how about a giggle column ...
« Last post by rjbull on May 25, 2006, 04:08 AM »
If your mind is in need of a boggle, try the The Definitive Exploding Whale Site

I owe this one to Kay Shapero, who wrote a filk (science fiction folk song) about it.

2869
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 25, 2006, 03:49 AM »
Edvard,

I LEARNED Autohotkey from the help file. I simply typed what I thought I might need in the search box and read into the topics that came up.

Still hard going, because it's more a reference manual.  It doesn't make it very clear (to me) when and where you'd choose WinClose or WinKill, for example; more information required...  I understand the AHK forums are very active, though.

Speaking of PowerPro...
[...]
No, just those possessing bullheaded persistence. I'm as dumb as your average American, and I figured out how to put PowerPro to pretty good use.

Dumb as the average America who worked on the space program, maybe!  :)  But I still think PowerPro is hard.  I'm not the only one - even such a Titan as CarolHaynes says so;

Trouble is it is just too damn complicated to make use of. I have a very short attention span and every time I think "I'll have another go at PowerPro" it holds my attention for about half an hour and then I want to throw something at it.
full message/thread here

Edvard, can I coax you into doing some kind of min-review of PowerPro?  So that we can get an idea of its strengths and weaknesses compared to other macro programs, and how to approach it?  I couldn't even figure out how to make buttons specific to a particular program   :-[

p.s. because I can't afford 30 bucks for a fancy text editor, I use SciTe.

I "grew up" on DOS, and prefer WordStar editors.  I still use my DOS WordStar-style programs for getting any significant amount of text down on disk.  One of the nice things about AHK is that, when you run a DOS program under Win2K, AHK's hotstrings still work, if slightly slowly.


2870
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 24, 2006, 08:31 AM »
each time I press Ctrl + F11 to have a list of all hotkeys & hotstrings, as follows:

Thanks - probably would be if I used EditPlus   ;)

I can't see the images.  Are they not available from the server yet?

2871
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 24, 2006, 05:56 AM »
I'd still like a point-and-shoot GUI for both hotkeys and hotstrings.
Try watching less TV to unclutter your mind ;)

TV?  I've almost no use for TV.  I READ BOOKS  :D

AutoHotkey [...] perfect for the (even only slightly) advanced user.

Yes, I'd agree, on the whole.  It's mostly the Win98 etc. legacy that's keeping me interested in alternatives.  Macro Express, for example, is superifically more friendly, with incomparably more eye candy and a more glossy packaging, but its macro editor is still bewildering, largely because of the sheer volume of "stuff" available.  AHK may not be so glitzy but it's fast becoming the first recommendation for everyday macro tasks.

But oh, if they'd develop a point-and-shoot GUI shell for hotkey/hotstring files...   ;)

2872
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 24, 2006, 05:39 AM »
Harrie,

Speaking of having a hard time remembering a slew of hot keys, that is one reason I very much like and use the program ActiveWords.   (Yeah, I use several programs simultaneously - Instant Text, ActiveWords, AHK!)
[...]
I'd love to do a review of ActiveWords some time soon! 

In the meantime, here's a link 
ActiveWords ($49.95 USD :o) looks like a combination of parts of DC's FARR and AutoHotkey to me. It seems to aim at more novice PC users, right?


Here I somewhat agree with brotherS. From the blurb on the ActiveWords site, it doesn't seem to do anything much more or different from AHK or any other competent general-purpose macro program like Macro Express.  I'll be interested to see your review of it  :)  The license is cleverly generous, in allowing an individual to use ActiveWords on any computer available to them (if I read it right) for a (moderately expensive) one-off fee.  Looks a great way to generate goodwill.

Your system works for you, but still requires a prodigious memory for shortcuts.  That's why I keep banging on about a point-and-shoot interface for the rarer ones...

Please take a look at the predictive text for ms word thread because I've quoted some of your other posts and links.

2873
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 24, 2006, 05:27 AM »
brotherS,

I can only recommend to spend some time with AHK, it's truely amazing what you can do with it! I too started at a complete AHK newbie.
Regarding Win98: get rid of it as soon as you can, you will enjoy life more. Been there, done that...

Yes, I've been dabbling a bit lately and it looks very useful.  AHK strikes me as not so much an application as an application development kit, though.  That means that the incorrigbly computer-shy might be more rapidly productive with something like SuperKeys for hotstrings and/or one of the targeted hotkey applications, perhaps Hotkeyz that was zridling's previous best choice before AHK, simply because they're complete applications and behave as such.  Having said that, you don't have to do very much with AHK to get basic productivity out of it.

As for Win98...  I'm not going to toss my home laptop into the skip as long as it still works adequately, although I think I wish I'd pushed the boat out a bit more at the time....

2874
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 24, 2006, 05:06 AM »
Babis,

With autohotkey you don’t have to remember any key combinations.
You can launch anything simply by typing a word of your choice
return

But this is just the same problem - you have to remember lots of shorthand triggers.  OK, they're arguably easier than arcane key combinations, but while it's easy to remember the ones you use all the time, it's harder to remember the rarer ones.  That's why I'd still like a point-and-shoot GUI for both hotkeys and hotstrings.

2875
General Software Discussion / Re: Finally, a robust keyboard shortcut app!
« Last post by rjbull on May 24, 2006, 05:02 AM »
Edvard,

I don't agree that PowerPro is hard, just complex. You must learn what it CAN do, then HOW to do it, then figure out WHAT you WANT it to do.

You mean, its an application suited to people with advanced degrees in mathematics, who make their living as system analysts, and play chess as a hobby...  i.e., relentlessly logical...   :o

And while you may have stated the ideal case, in practice the cart is before the horse.  My scenario is more likely to be: "Oh.  I have to do this job 50 times (and maybe never again), and they want it this afternoon.  How can I speed that up now?"

This takes Patience and Perseverance which also takes Time. These things, taken as a group, are lacking for most people.

You got that right   :(

After that, PowerPro is (almost) everything I need. I use Autohotkey because I quite dislike the PowerPro scripting, and I can compile into .exe's and impress my boss!

I'm surprised that you dislike its scripting, which I wouldn't have thought all that different in difficulty.  After all, looking at AHK's help file is overwhelming for a newbie.

Pages: prev1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 ... 127next