topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday December 14, 2024, 2:28 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Last post Author Topic: Man names son 2.0  (Read 20801 times)

MilesAhead

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2009
  • **
  • Posts: 7,736
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2009, 03:05 PM »
What happens when the next child comes along? Presumably a new version will be an upgrade and therefore they lose the right to the original version!

Presumably the poor kid will be relagated to a dusty cupboard where old software goes to be out of site (until the tidy up and throw out).

Seriously though how many parents actually think about the consequences when they inflict names on their offspring!

I once new a teacher called Rhoda, she married a friend called Andrew Dick.

Needless to say he adopted her surname after the wedding otherwise she would never have gone to school again!

With the hyphenated names it could get pretty weird eventually.  You could get a person with family name something like Butcher-Baker-Candlestick Maker .NET 10.9

app103

  • That scary taskbar girl
  • Global Moderator
  • Joined in 2006
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,885
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2009, 03:16 PM »
Hmmmmmm, I don't see the big deal.  The dude just came out of the dark ages of using Roman Numerals.  If he named the kid Jon Blake Cusack.dll that might be a different story(or even a whole library.)


If he did that, the "terrible twos" would give a whole new meaning to the term "DLL Hell". And 2.0 might give a new meaning to "terrible twos", now that I think about it.  :P

MilesAhead

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2009
  • **
  • Posts: 7,736
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2009, 03:22 PM »
Hmmmmmm, I don't see the big deal.  The dude just came out of the dark ages of using Roman Numerals.  If he named the kid Jon Blake Cusack.dll that might be a different story(or even a whole library.)


If he did that, the "terrible twos" would give a whole new meaning to the term "DLL Hell". And 2.0 might give a new meaning to "terrible twos", now that I think about it.  :P

Not only that but if somebody moves out of the house a message might pop up "This shared library is not being used by anyone.  Delete it?"  :)

Target

  • Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 1,832
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #28 on: October 13, 2009, 05:30 PM »
and did they get a birth certificate or EULA?

MilesAhead

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2009
  • **
  • Posts: 7,736
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #29 on: October 13, 2009, 05:35 PM »
and did they get a birth certificate or EULA?

"By cutting the umbilical cord you accept this license agreement" the nastier parts of which cannot be examined until the kid takes a crap!!   :hanged:

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,859
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2009, 05:39 PM »
40Hz names man "Dork."  :P


Darwin

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,984
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2009, 10:43 PM »
and did they get a birth certificate or EULA?

"By cutting the umbilical cord you accept this license agreement" the nastier parts of which cannot be examined until the kid takes a crap!!   :hanged:

Ah yes, the Meconium clause...

MilesAhead

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2009
  • **
  • Posts: 7,736
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #32 on: October 14, 2009, 12:34 AM »
So the kid is bound to be a stool pigeon?

This reminds me of a cartoon I saw in Playboy.  A flying saucer is coasting just above the tree tops.  The alien and his wife are obviously on vacation.  The husband says to the wife, to her disbelief, "this is a planet where everything they eat turns to sh*t!"  She's utterly horrified!! :)

cranioscopical

  • Friend of the Site
  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 4,776
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #33 on: October 14, 2009, 07:38 AM »
So the kid is bound to be a stool pigeon?
I think one could pooh pooh that idea!

MilesAhead

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2009
  • **
  • Posts: 7,736
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #34 on: October 14, 2009, 02:56 PM »
So the kid is bound to be a stool pigeon?
I think one could pooh pooh that idea!
-cranioscopical (October 14, 2009, 07:38 AM)

If he's annoying, just tell him to scat. ;)

edit: hmm, the way this conversation is going the mod may flush this thread instead of deleting.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2009, 02:58 PM by MilesAhead »

cranioscopical

  • Friend of the Site
  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 4,776
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #35 on: October 14, 2009, 03:23 PM »
the mod may flush this thread
Might depend on which operating cistern he's using.  ;)

MilesAhead

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2009
  • **
  • Posts: 7,736
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Man names son 2.0
« Reply #36 on: October 14, 2009, 03:38 PM »
Hmmmmmmmm, they should add a "nose pinching" avatar for this subject matter. :)