topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday December 16, 2025, 3:47 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 ... 101next
901
Mini-Reviews by Members / Vivaldi: Promising yet.
« Last post by Tuxman on November 07, 2015, 09:33 AM »
Basic Info

App NameVivaldi
App URLhttp://www.vivaldi.com
App Version Reviewed1.0.303.52 (Beta)
Supported OSesWindows, OS X, Linux (unknown minimum versions)
Support MethodsForums and a (write-only) bug tracker as well as a quite helpful IRC channel
Upgrade PolicyFree updates (for now)
Pricing SchemeFreeware (for now)
Screencast Video URLhttps://www.youtube..../watch?v=qaaOfO4p348

1Y2CaAh.png

Intro:

I've been using Mozilla Firefox since its humble beginnings as Phoenix (from the ashes of the Mozilla Suite). Having been a rather proud user for quite a while, I don't quite like the direction Mozilla is taking, including the oversimplified Australis UI and some other weird decisions; however, the latest beta 43.0 made DownThemAll! 3.0 (beta), one of the last extensions which stuck me to Firefox, not work anymore due to some signing issues. DTA!'s author had already said that he will stop further development when Firefox gets rid of XUL support which will be "soon" anyway.

So, basically, that's the last straw for me. Mozilla is obviously not interested in having me as a user and extension developer anymore, so I'm available for the browser market again. It is a nice coincidence that I have been playing with Vivaldi for a couple of months now. The only thing that held me back was that it is Chromium-based, but since Mozilla is turning Firefox into just another Chrome clone, it really does not matter anymore. (Yes, I am aware of Pale Moon, but I'm not too sure that it will survive although its author claims a bright future.)

Actually, Vivaldi is quite impressive even after some time spent with it.

Who is this app designed for:

Vivaldi is interesting for those who want a nice-looking web browser which offers more options than Edge and looks better than Maxthon. :) Ramblings aside, Vivaldi was invented by the same guy who was responsible for the pre-Chromium Opera browser, so it can be seen as just another Opera 12 successor, being in a productive competition with Otter (for those who look back to the original experience).

The Good

The first thing you'll notice: Tabs on the left side. Tabs with preview thumbnails on them. Tabs on any side you wish. Amazing. :) Also, the browser window is automatically colored in the favicon's primary color. (This can be turned off.) Additionally, Opera 12's best UI features are present here, including a sidebar panel. (Note that there doesn't seem to be MDI support [yet?], you can only see one tab at a time.) At least the UI is not boring.

Vivaldi also understands most of Chrome's add-ins (see below for why this is not quite complete yet) and it can be configured rather well. It has built-in mouse gestures (I know some people like them, I personally don't) and configurable key shortcuts. The underlying Chromium engine renders pages pretty OK, although on some systems (like mine) you'll have to disable GPU "optimizations" (via vivaldi://flags) to unblur the text. This usually happens with all Blink-based browsers though.

The needs improvement section

Vivaldi is not the fastest browser when it starts. While looking at the running processes, I remember again why Chromium actually sucks so much:

4MnHKpH.png

Vivaldi opens one process per active extension and tab, so add-ins like The Great Suspender (basically simulating Firefox behavior) and trying to get all other add-ins fixed so they remain in the background (the Developer View of the add-in manager shows it) will probably help.

While we're at add-ins: I noticed that some add-ins which (theoretically) work with Vivaldi need some refinement. FoxyProxy opens two new tabs after the installation, Xmarks's buttons do not do anything; often those are already known bugs but reporting them will mostly lead to a response. It seems that Vivaldi gains traction by now. I also found one bug in Vivaldi, concerning the vivaldi://flags window, but that was already known too.

TL;DR: Don't expect a bug-free browser environment by now.

Why I think you should use this product

If you don't care too much about Chromium's quirks, Vivaldi might be the best Chromium available.

How does it compare to similar apps

"Similar apps" - in terms of "Opera 12 successors" - are rare, and, as far as I know, all of them are based on Chromium. The most advanced "other one" is Otter which makes a slow progress too, but it has a completely different project direction.

Dxl66gR.png

For those who want the real deal (the "original" Opera 12 feeling), Otter might be the better choice. Vivaldi, on the other hand, comes with fresh ideas. I don't know if Vivaldi is, in comparison, "better" than <your favorite browser>, but it's well worth a try.

Conclusions

Vivaldi is the best Opera 12 since Opera 12's demise. 4/5 unless they fix the "needs improvement" part.
902
Meanwhile, Firefox 43.0 beta is out. And DownThemAll! 3.0 is not working anymore due to the mandatory add-on signing.

I guess it's time for me to search for a new browser after ten years of Firefox.
903
Maybe they just regularly have an eye on the Mozilla release servers.

Which is actually a bad idea, given that releases may contain bugs and be replaced before they are announced.
904
Firefox 42.0 stable is out - only Softpedia shows it though.

I found it on BetaNews. And on eMule.

I like the Mute This Tab button.  :-*
905
Living Room / Re: The end of the hard disk
« Last post by Tuxman on October 21, 2015, 04:03 PM »
I thought Western Digital stood for quality once.
906
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 19, 2015, 11:04 AM »
IIRC the reason is not entirely true, but YMMV.
907
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2015, 06:26 PM »
So, now I can blame you for my having installed µBlock Origin + uMatrix.

Nooooooo!

I don't know why (?) you settled on µBlock instead of  µBlock Origin

Both are developed in parallel, both copy from each other. I guess it depends on the mood. ;)

As they use the same ad-blocking filter lists, it should not matter much anyway.
908
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2015, 05:32 PM »
The combination of RefControl + Request Policy lets me control which 3rd-party domains get contacted at all

That's the whole point of uMatrix.

Does uMatrix block trackes on the 1st-party domain, including both POST and GET based ones?

Blocking trackers is what (good) ad blockers are for. µBlock has lists for that.

And does it come with a big library of known trackers, or do you have to write your own rules for everything?

^ The lists ...

NoScript allows me to block scripts (and other active elements) on the 1st-party domain, as well, as it allows me to allow requests (images, stylesheets, ...) on 3rd-party domains without allowing scripts to be executed there. Does uMatrix handle the same usecases (and without a lot of manual rule entries)?

All of those: Yep.
909
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2015, 04:23 PM »
I didn't get to looking at uMatrix yet - does it fully cover what RefControl + RequestPolicy can do?

It does different things with the same result. :D

Wouldn't do without NoScript.

What does NoScript do for you that uMatrix doesn't, except eat more RAM?

About Ghostery: I, personally, prefer my trackers blocked. I don't want to see them, I want them to just be away. :)
910
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 18, 2015, 02:44 PM »
with stuff like Adblock Origin, Ghostery, Certificate Patrol and (if you can suffer it) RequestPolicy + RefControl + NoScript.

... or just µBlock + uMatrix.
911
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 17, 2015, 10:27 AM »
What do you do at work? Review old-fashioned non-HTML5 porn sites?  :huh:
912
Living Room / Re: Patch your Flash! Version 19.0.0.226 (October 16, 2015)
« Last post by Tuxman on October 17, 2015, 09:21 AM »
Maybe people should generally abandon Flash.
913
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 13, 2015, 01:43 PM »
MinGW is an emulation layer.
914
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 13, 2015, 11:57 AM »
Then answer my previous question: "What is your definition of native?" - and, while you're add it, elaborate on why it matters.

Native equals "not requiring some weird emulation layer", and it matters because of performance, maintainability and quality.
915
Yes, but you can enforce it.
916
Easy Youtube Video Downloader Express 9.02
HTML5 Player for YouTube™ 0.1.0
YouTube High Definition 41.0

As you already use Greasemonkey, have you considered replacing these three by one userscript yet?
917
General Software Discussion / Re: LogMeIn purchases LastPass
« Last post by Tuxman on October 10, 2015, 09:25 AM »
According to the comments on Hacker News, I seem to be the only one who left LastPass before this acquisition. I'm such a hipster.

But Xmarks is still great (because there is no alternative with Firefox synchronisation).
918
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 09, 2015, 06:52 PM »
that would still classify as native.

No.

BTW: How many languages does the git "native" Windows version actually use? Mercurial uses one...
919
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 09, 2015, 03:57 PM »
Last time I checked, the Windows version of git was a weird cross-compiled Cygwin build.
920
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 06, 2015, 08:13 PM »
No, it does not. Unless you have a weird definition of "native".
921
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 06, 2015, 07:59 PM »
At least hg comes with native tools on Windows.
922
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 05, 2015, 04:30 AM »
git suffers from the wrong people using it. As everyone is using git, the whole thing is a growing bubble. Waiting for the explosion...
923
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 05, 2015, 03:21 AM »
Why not?
924
Developer's Corner / Re: Resources for learning git?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 05, 2015, 03:11 AM »
git is dead.
Use hg.
925
General Software Discussion / Re: What online services do you pay for?
« Last post by Tuxman on October 05, 2015, 03:10 AM »
What services do you pay for, and what makes them worth the cost, to you?

Hmm, I guess I'm lucky:

  • My Dropbox already has enough GiB from some promotional things, collected over the years.
  • I stopped using LastPass when I needed mobile access in favor of KeePass.
  • I strongly dislike software which I need to rent, I prefer to own it.
  • I am sane enough to not even consider Netflix to be a useful addition to my life. (Also, I know where to get most streamed series much earlier, cough.)

This shrinks down my recurring payments for online services (I guess servers and webspace don't count?) to TIDAL (the last "good" streaming service; however, it can only be an addition to a real music collection, not a replacement) and Perfect Privacy (my VPN provider). Both are worth the cost because there are no good free alternatives.
Pages: prev1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 ... 101next