topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 15, 2025, 6:51 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 ... 101next
801
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 03, 2016, 08:41 AM »
Evaluation version is free and has no limitations (I believe).

A nagscreen when saving is a limitation.

You could try this one:

"... Lime Text is a powerful and elegant text editor primarily developed in Go that aims to be a Free and open-source software successor to Sublime Text ..."

Not quite actively developed.
802
Probably the ad provider doesn't support HTTPS.
803
General Software Discussion / Re: TeamViewer hacked?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 02, 2016, 03:25 PM »
today's standards for security

So?
804
Ouch:

The vulnerability will not be fixed. The indirect costs of switching to HTTPS (like lost advertisement revenue) make it a inviable solution.

Open Source sucks.
805
General Software Discussion / Re: TeamViewer hacked?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 02, 2016, 02:03 PM »
For what reason do you assume that? Good faith?
806
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 02, 2016, 01:12 PM »
Nothing can produce worse code than a HTML generator. Not even you.

Also, there's not really much needed for your own HTML-based website.
Simple ones are easy (see the source code).
807
General Software Discussion / Re: TeamViewer hacked?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 02, 2016, 12:37 PM »
There is no sane reason to use TeamViewer which, by defaults, routes your shared desktop over U.S. servers.
808
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 05:16 PM »
The mindset is "Oh, a guy with a problem. Let's spend some time on talking about the guy with the only helpful (if a little less friendly though) answers instead of helping him ourselves", obviously.
Go on!  8)
809
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 05:06 PM »
There's not much helping him more than pointing out that the way he wants to do it makes most people mad at him.

(Pfff, -5 points. Who's not helpful here?)
810
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 04:52 PM »
And I urge him to stop.
811
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 04:28 PM »
"HTML generators suck!" "OK, what about this HTML generator?"
Seriously: Dickhead.

If you can't write HTML, you might consider to use Markdown instead.
Or just stop annoying us and learn HTML.

"Not cool".
Very fitting for this thread.
812
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 04:20 PM »
You spoiled the web with another badly written, useless website. Congratulations.

Learn HTML and stop being a dickhead.
813
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 04:12 PM »
That's because you'll need to make it readable for the web server. But, still, please don't. It's horrible.
814
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 03:27 PM »
It actually occurred to me that Word can save files as HTML...

Please don't.
815
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 01:43 PM »
free
SublimeText :-)

 :huh:
816
General Software Discussion / Re: What website has the fewest files?
« Last post by Tuxman on June 01, 2016, 01:38 PM »
Notepad. It will generate help you to "generate" exactly one file.

Whyever you would even need more than one.
817
DC Member Programs and Projects / Re: blogcpp: Static blogging in C++17
« Last post by Tuxman on May 26, 2016, 09:38 AM »
seems like a new a approach to drew attention to your threads)))

What was your search term?  ;D
818
General Software Discussion / Re: FINISHED - Looking for VPN recommendation
« Last post by Tuxman on May 23, 2016, 06:26 PM »
Booooo!
819
DC Member Programs and Projects / Re: blogcpp: Static blogging in C++17
« Last post by Tuxman on May 22, 2016, 07:36 AM »
It feels like a sweet language indeed. New libraries = no more Boost needed.  :-* Would surely do it again.
820
DC Member Programs and Projects / blogcpp: Static blogging in C++17
« Last post by Tuxman on May 21, 2016, 11:45 PM »
Yadda yadda. No one reads my threads anyway. Penis!

Information and download: https://blogcpp.org
Sources and readme: https://code.rosaelefanten.org/blogcpp

(Yo mouser, don't you think it's time for a new subforum "The Bin, including Tuxman's software"?)

Sleep and stuff. G'night.
821
- oops. I should learn to read. -
822
Site/Forum Features / Re: Adding back an Ignore Thread feature?
« Last post by Tuxman on May 16, 2016, 04:43 PM »
So I'm thinking I may add back the Ignore Thread feature.

I could need a "Ignore threads by a certain user" feature, effectively hiding all threads (regardless of how many people answered) by certain users.  8)
823
General Software Discussion / Re: Looking for VPN recommendation
« Last post by Tuxman on May 12, 2016, 12:50 PM »
I've been using Perfect Privacy for a couple of years now. VPN, Squid, Socks5, SSH, even allows cascading of multiple servers. Also, they don't save your logs - they've been raided without success.

You can't be more secure than that. Well worth the price.  8)
824
Developer's Corner / Re: Boost as a symbol for the npm'ness of C++
« Last post by Tuxman on May 09, 2016, 01:47 AM »
gcc's stdlib is its own problem, indeed. I admit that I try to avoid gcc whenever I can, so probably my actual question is invalid for that compiler.
825
Developer's Corner / Re: Boost as a symbol for the npm'ness of C++
« Last post by Tuxman on May 08, 2016, 04:43 PM »
if you need something (non-trivial) that somebody else has already written, there's a good chance you won't be doing a better job at re-implementing the wheel.

If somebody else has written e.g. a Markdown parser class in ~ 250 LOC which depends on Boost, there's a good chance I can do it in ~ 250 LOC too and without several GiB of additional dependencies. (Which is what I did when I wrote this rant.) Third-party code is OK for me - third-party code with a trailing dependency hell is not.

I like to be able to debug my own problems.
Pages: prev1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 ... 101next