Did she deserve to go to jail?
Purely on the charge of sending her kid to school where she shouldn't have? I personally don't think so. And neither does anybody else I've talked to.
As far as the drug possession and sale charges go, reaction is mixed. Almost everybody I talked to thought 12 years was very harsh, but that automatically suspending it after 5 actual years served was reasonable. I still think it's a little heavy. But I'm dubious about the value and effectiveness of incarcerating people for long periods of time unless they've committed an act of extreme violence and we're concerned they'll do it again if released. But that's just me.
-40hz
Let's not forget that there is a child here.
True story. My cousin was shot and killed by his wife. They showed that though it might have started as an argument, that she put the gun against his head and fired after she shot him from across the room and severed his spinal cord. She was found guilty.
His own mother plead for leniency. Why? Because she was not a career criminal. Because sending her to jail wouldn't bring him back. But most of all, she had come to know the woman, and knew that
her four kids would be put into the system while their mother was in jail for a crime that she would never commit again.
If we're really about rehabilitation, and getting people out of the system, the effect on the children should be considered. Should these people not be punished? No. But is jail an effective punishment or deterrent in cases like these? Studies have proven otherwise....
...and what about the child? After being in the system, there is a higher than normal chance that he will stay in the system, either as a dependent of the social services program, or incarcerated just like his mother.
We are all of us pieces in many different hidden games.
-40hz
*sigh* 
-wraith808