topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 10:19 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 ... 73next
601
Living Room / Re: digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 06, 2013, 07:29 PM »
Which makes me wonder how one of those little desktop scanners would work for this.  You know, the type that the doctors offices use to scan your drivers license and insurance cards.  You would think it would be perfect for negatives, but I've never used one, soooooo.....

is this you trotting off to buy one for 'testing purposes'?
602
Living Room / Re: DOS Attacks
« Last post by Target on June 06, 2013, 03:59 AM »
Looked at the subject and thought, "Does anyone still use DOS for virii?", or that one of my batch files had gone berserk  :P

I thought he'd made a typo and it was related to that funny animals thread :huh:
603
Living Room / Re: digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 05, 2013, 08:35 PM »
  There are some photo/picture programs that have an option to copy a color picture from an ordinary scanner and reverses it to a negative, and visa-versa.  Can't remember what this option is called, it was in UI PhotoImpact 8.  Unfortunately, PhotoImpact 8 don't work under XP anymore ever since one of MS's famous update patches, but I think it's also included in PhotoShop among others.  In the free Photo.net, you can select Adjustments > Reverse Colors and get the same effect.....

yep, but unfortunately the results from our flatbed scanners are abysmal. 

Flatbeds aren't generally built to do this kind of work - you need plenty of light on the back of the film/slide and they just don't work that way
604
Living Room / Re: digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 05, 2013, 05:49 PM »
Just as a matter of interest, what make/model camera?

we have 2 Lumix - a now aging FZ5 (5Mp), and a 16Mp point and shoot (the model escapes me) that lives in my wifes handbag

could be worth looking into firmware 'hacks', though I'm wary of bricking a device :o
605
Living Room / Re: digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 04, 2013, 11:19 PM »
You use the standard 2 or 10 second delay timer along with manual focus, (if your camera has that).

DOH!!  I hadn't thought of that :-[

I'll have to look into the manual focus bit :Thmbsup: (I'm not much of a camera buff, in case you hadn't sorked that out already ;D ;D ;D)

606
Living Room / Re: digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 04, 2013, 09:34 PM »
thanks for that - I'd already seen some similar articles.  I actually did a few experiments with a couple of different light sources and a handheld camera - the results were significantly better than with our scanners, but you can't do this with a hand held camera and expect anything like good results :-[

Only trouble with this solution is that neither of our camera's have a facility trip the shutter remotely, so focusing and shooting is hands on process :o

FWIW the 'scanner' I'd been looking at was like this one.  Reviews for these (where they're available) are so mixed as to be worthless

607
Living Room / Re: digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 04, 2013, 07:20 PM »
Does this count?.

I'd forgotten about that, thanks!

it's worth reading for the subsequent sorting & cleanup  :Thmbsup:

I used one of the cheap slide flash scanners that you can get for about $50 these days.

I was kind of leaning that way, simply because it's likely to be a 'throwaway item' at the end of the process (though how long that might take is open to conjecture).

I'd be interested to know where you've seen them for $50 though.  Best I can find locally is Target at about $75, though that appears to be unbranded.  Regardless of price or PoS they all seem to spec out the same...

Anyone else got any experience with these things?  I googled but didn't come up with much

A lot depends on the original condition of the slides, in my case they were 25-30 years old and most had some mould/specks/dust/etc.

What kind of archival are they looking for?
BTN, (Better Than Nothing), or the best they can get?

I can't comment on their condition.  Like your's, I suspect these will be 25-50 years old, and it's unlikely that they've been stored under perfect conditions.

As to results, based on the audience and the age of the slides, I'd say option 2 quality wise, though clearly we want aim for the best we can get

quote]If you don't mind a bit of DIY and you have a digital camera, I've got a Silicon Chip article I can send you.[/quote]

I'm always up for a project so please send :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
608
Living Room / digitising slides
« Last post by Target on June 04, 2013, 06:23 PM »
anyone here have any experience with converting slides and negatives to digital images?

We've been tasked to do this for some relatives, and I'm not sure how best to approach this.  I don't have a lot of funds to spend, and given that this is a pretty finite task I'm reluctant to spend too much anyway

FWIW I really have no need for another scanner (I already have 2 multifunction printers), but the cheaper options (something like this) aren't exactly inspiring me to confidence

609
now let's get back to being silly.

finally something I'm qualified for ;D ;D ;D
610
that sure is some incontinence suit he's wearing there (and it doesn't look like it's helping)
611
General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
« Last post by Target on May 06, 2013, 12:50 AM »
And that's why I said it seems your problem is Activision (publisher) vs. Steam (distribution platform).


I got that, but I doubt the publishers could force an update through somebody elses platform.  Pretty sure that's where Steam becomes culpable (remember, steam isn't in this for love).

CoD hasn't really been a single-player game for a long time.  They make their money because people play online.  And so, day zero, the game is already outdated.  That's a problem for physical sales.

understood, but online or offline is irrelevant here because ALL physical sales are in the same boat.  Who in their right mind would buy a product that won't work at all unless you spend 2 or 3 (or more) times your original purchase price with another provider before it will work (hmmmm, me apparently :wallbash:)
612
General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
« Last post by Target on May 05, 2013, 09:34 PM »
Seems a shame that the nation that developed the Web infrastructure cannot seem to provide access to all its residents.

But the software publishers are selling a product that is separate to internet.

They assume that not only does everyone have access, but that it's gigabit access with unlimited downloads. 

I can understand online registration, but the rest of it is pretty presumptious, if not descriminatory.
613
Cool!!  Many thanks for your generosity!!
614
General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
« Last post by Target on May 05, 2013, 05:56 PM »
BTW, the 35GB install seems excessive - it only takes up 14.2GB on both my XP and Win7 machines.

That was the disk space requirement stated by the installer.  I thought it was excessive too - it was quite a 'What the?' moment when I was doing the install.

Which third world country is the one you live in?
For comparison purposes (and I really don't intend to brag, it's not good enough for that) even the most remote village in Turkey has reasonable (4-8 Mbit) dsl connections available, with unlimited data costing 30-40 dollars a month. If you agree to a data cap of 6GB per month you get to pay no more than 15$.

Australia.  Not a third world country by any means, but a big country with a small population and lot's of 'empty' space.  We live too far from the exhange to get DSL, and will never get access to cable, so our only options are dialup or wireless (or satellite...).  Dialup is, well, abysmal, and wireless is sometimes not much better (it's recently been below Kb speed). 

But that's not the point.  And as far as I see it it is a Steam problem.  This my PC, Steam is a portal.  If I want to buy or download something from Steam, I'll do so, and if I don't, I won'tMy choice...

As it stands, Steam presumes, and I get no say (I've already checked don't automatically update this product).  Worse, there's nothing to indicate what it actually is that's being downloaded, ie it says game X is being 'updated', but there's no detail or description, nor is there anything to indicate how many such 'updates' might be required.

Software patching is an accepted practice, but removing all options, including personal choice, is a bit extreme (I wonder what Renegade would say about that ;D)
615
General Software Discussion / Steam, and customer satisfaction
« Last post by Target on May 03, 2013, 01:26 AM »
Apologies to all 'cos I know this has been done before, but I really need to vent

<RANT>

As a gamer I'm a relative newcomer to the world of Steam, and I have to say I'm not seeing the value.  Actually, it probably is an excellent model in many ways, but in others, well it's less than stellar

I have, over the last couple of months purchased physical copies of several games (call me old fashioned, but I prefer to get something tangible when I hand over my cash), but for the most part I am unable to play them because steam won't let me!!

Latest installment is CoD MW3.  I couldn't even install it without a steam connection (hang on, didn't i just pay good money for this?).  I live in a rural area so even connecting to Steam can be a trial.  It eventually installed fine (EGAD!! requires 35G of disk space!!) but when I went to play, steam said, hang on, there's an update (WTF? I just paid for this and now you're telling me I can only play on your terms?).  The update was only (!!) a few hundred Mb, so I let it update.

Great, says I, now lets play.  Oh wait says steam, theres another update, and its 14Gb!!!

Are they serious?  I mean I already paid for the game.  What if I don't need, want or care to apply the updates?  Don't I have some say here?  I accept that there are going to be bugs (there always are) but most of the time they affect online and/or multiplayer usage.  I play almost exclusively single player, and I never play online, so it's pretty rare for those sort of issues to be of any concern to me whatsoever.  Why do I have to apply a 'patch' for something that's unlikely to change my experience in any way.  In fact, by insisting on applying the update that's exactly what's happened. 

Then there's the issue of size (yes, size does matter).  As I said, I accept that there are going to be bugs, but if you have to 'patch' 14Gb then you should be refunding peoples money 'cos there's something seriously wrong.  Either that or you're peddling some serious bloatware (in which case you should ashamed of yourself, and you should refund peoples money). 

It's worthwhile noting that 14Gb is equivalent to 14 months of my data allocation.  I could run over I suppose, but I'd to have to sell a kidney to cover the excess usage charges just to find out whether I can play the game, or that there are more 'updates'.  I suppose I could invest in an additional data pack, but a 2 year contract makes this a pretty damn expensive game, and it would still take a few months to download it all. 

I've even searched for alternative sources for the updates, but no, it appears you can only get them through steam. 

Now I don't have an issue with Steam per se, as I said, in many ways it's an excellent model, but wouldn't we be far better served with something more like windows update where all updates are not only 'optional', but you can also see both what they are and how bloated big they are.

and remember I said this is the latest installment?  I can't even go back and play some of the other games I have installed because Steam has decided they all need patching as well, despite the fact that I've set ALL my games not to update automatically.  Way to go guys...

Anyone else have a complaint about steam?  I'm sure I can't be the only one >:( >:( >:(

whoa! form a queue people!

</RANT>

616
Post New Requests Here / Re: Turn a batch file into an AHK script.
« Last post by Target on May 01, 2013, 12:15 AM »
can we see the content of one of the 'on' batch files?

seems like it would be more logical to start from scratch instead of building a tool to control a tool to control a tool to control a tool...
617
Community Giveaways / Re: SteamGifts Giveaway: THQ Pack
« Last post by Target on April 29, 2013, 05:19 PM »
entered - ShootH3r3...
618
Living Room / Re: What to do with an SSD after it fails
« Last post by Target on April 25, 2013, 07:27 PM »
619
Living Room / Re: portable furniture
« Last post by Target on April 10, 2013, 07:02 PM »
not quite rollup, but google cardboard furniture and you'll find plenty of hits for simple and 'cheap' DIY furniture.  

Upside is that if it gets a bit shabby you can always just make another one, and if you have to move, you can turn it into boxes ;D ;D

some examples

http://www.foldschoo...gallery/gallery.html
http://www.instructa...board-Chaise-Lounge/
http://www.curbly.co...-cardboard-furniture

There are plenty of commercial offerings as well, though they mightn't be cheap

620
General Software Discussion / Re: Wanted: Simple EML viewer
« Last post by Target on April 09, 2013, 05:02 PM »
here's another one, just in case...

MailViewer
621
Living Room / Re: Cheap LED torches/flashlights - any good?
« Last post by Target on April 04, 2013, 07:14 PM »
...has that "reach out and touch someone" power, and is what I use with my 12 gauge at night....

WTF? here's hoping I never actually meet you at night :o
622
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by Target on April 03, 2013, 08:26 PM »
Tony Monaco, hammond organ player extraordinaire, gives the most concise explanation I've ever seen of all the awesome things about this legendary instrument.  With a performance!  Tony is also the most willing and prominent educator for this instrument out there, as far as I know.

if you're into organs, this might amuse you



This guy is from 'World of Organs' in Adelaide (Sth Aust). 
623
Living Room / Re: When to trust co-workers with your income?
« Last post by Target on April 02, 2013, 10:14 PM »
if you're still looking, I can introduce you to a nigerian prince...
624
Community Giveaways / Re: games giveaway
« Last post by Target on March 29, 2013, 06:55 AM »
curious about how to go about joining the group - I have a steam acct, but all I get is "membership by invitation only"
625
General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking Little App w/Specific Actions
« Last post by Target on March 15, 2013, 01:52 AM »
Well, most of my apps I have "assigned" to a specific monitor. When I install a new app, it takes me some time before I can decide which monitor it belongs to. Two things: all video is on the left. Web browser or anything I'm reading goes on the riight.

so apps could be assigned to one of 2 lists (left or right) and they could be positioned accordingly.  Anything else would float pending allocation

Not sure what you meant by "all other movements are effectively random".

Two big things are high on my list. One is which monitor should an app appear, and of course some have to be tossed back and forth.
Pages: prev1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 ... 73next