topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 7:39 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 ... 264next
5501
Living Room / Re: Sorry, This Post Has Been Censored
« Last post by IainB on March 04, 2012, 07:01 AM »
I find that one of the most saddening things about censorship driven by Government/State/Commercial Lobby organisations is the scope that it affords for potential and actual oppression of people in societies that, in historical terms, have only relatively recently (since WW2) been able to live in peace and freedom. The German surrender to the Western Allies and the Soviet Union took place in late April and early May 1945 - that was only 67 years ago, but probably before most of us reading this will have been born. The German surrender would probably not have been made then - if ever - if the Allies had not been strengthened by America joining the fight after the attack on Pearl Harbour by the Japanese in 1941.

This freedom and peace was earned with great difficulty and at the dear cost of hundreds of thousands of lives sacrificed for us in WWII, and arguably in WWI. The people from the oppressing countries in those wars were embraced by the victors and invited into that freedom. But as soon as that freedom came into being, it was to be under attack from all sides by ideologies hostile to it.

The advent of the Internet has heralded an incredible acceleration in communication, the transfer of knowledge and the enablement/fostering of freedom, reaching like a light deep into the darkest recesses of some of the most oppressive States, surprising despotic regimes like a Trojan Horse.

It became clear from various statements and acts over the last few years that oppressive regimes wish to be able to control and censor the Internet within their own countries, and (in the case of the US) censor the Internet in other countries - i.e., outside of their sovereign domain. Now it is becoming abundantly clear that regimes within "free democracies" are already moving progressively to control and censor the Internet within their own countries - e.g., including the US, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the EU countries.

I had been of the view that the current generations that are of the age to contemplate inheriting the Earth were not up to the task. That they undervalued history and the price of freedom and had shown themselves to be too apathetic and disorganised to do anything to confront the oncoming onslaught on their freedoms.
But I hope I was wrong, because I have just read about a new "manifesto" for freedom that has been drafted (in pastebin - here), which could help us to confront whatever is the latest piece of repressive legislation or proposal - e.g., including FRAND, SOPA/PIPA/ACTA/TPP or TSA or RIAA/MPAA or WIPO or Google or Facebook, or Google redesigning their country URL links to allow for (on an as-required basis) country-by-country filtering (censoring) on a national basis by those countries' governments.

From the Techdirt post Josef Anvil’s Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week:
… So where does all of this lead? To Glyn Moody’s article about the “We, the Web Kids” manifesto, my FAVORITE post of the week and possibly my favorite post EVER on Techdirt. This one article encapsulates almost everything that is discussed in this forum. Whether the debate is about SOPA/PIPA/ACTA/TPP or TSA or RIAA/MPAA or WIPO or Google or Facebook, we have to accept the fact that we are all far more connected than ever before, some of us are even hyperconnected, and it has changed us. We no longer just accept the opinions of “authority,” we want FACTS, we want data, we want the truth (or close as possible). This article details a fundamental shift in the way people THINK, and it’s not just the “web kids.” Personally, I didn’t grow up with the web, but I’m certainly not so blind as to miss how integrated into my life it is. Before the web, I didn’t talk to people all over the world on a daily basis, now I do. How I consume media is completely different, as I get to choose what, when, how, and why. In other words, the way things are done has CHANGED because of the internet.

This manifesto is a wake up call to politicians and corporations around the world. Your citizens and consumers have changed. They are becoming or have become a part of the digital era. They Skype, Tweet, FB, and IM their ideas, opinions, and comments without giving much thought about the process. They Google everything, they shop on their phones, they record video and post it before the “real news” can, they text while in meetings, they create with Gimp and NVU, they work with OpenOffice, and they consume media thru Netflix, HULU, Spotify, Grooveshark, HuffPo, and YouTube. They want to throw away physical storage and move stuff into the “cloud,” if you let them. They don’t want to hear that consumers shouldn’t dictate the market, because they know how to write reviews and share information. They don’t want to hear about laws being bought, and are willing to speak out and challenge the “old ways.”
(read the rest here.)
5502
Living Room / Re: Sorry, This Post Has Been Censored
« Last post by IainB on March 03, 2012, 06:41 PM »
Talking of censorship...this proposal seems to be more than slightly relevant.
Media fears for freedom as watchdog unleashed
I never would have supposed that the Ozzie government would propose such a thing, but there we are:
The proposals, issued yesterday by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy, also seek to widen the scope of federal oversight to cover print, online, radio and TV within a single regulator for the first time.
Finally, there's to be some "regulation". That should fix the naysayers.
5503
Living Room / Re: Sorry, This Post Has Been Censored
« Last post by IainB on March 03, 2012, 06:13 PM »
Censorship badge.jpg
5504
I was browsing through my feed to blogs.msdn.com and followed up an interesting post: Create your own mobile video recorder or animation stand[/u]

In that post there was reference to DirectX SDK AMCA that interested me, and I tracked that down to: Noel's Home Page.
I thought I would make a note of it here for DCF members - it looks like it has some quite interesting software - described as "beggarware" by the author.
5505
Living Room / Re: Amazon pulls thousands of e-books... and the SFWA strikes back
« Last post by IainB on March 03, 2012, 03:36 PM »
I recall that on old Penguin books (a book publisher that I used to read a lot of books from) it would say on the cover somewhere "Not for sale in the United States of America", OWTTE. I didn't bother to find out why it said that, but I guess it was/is related to the same copyright legislation peculiar to the US.
What is the effect of it though?
Presumably you can buy any book title you want in the US, but just not those from certain publishers?
Except maybe those banned books - e.g., "The Catcher in the Rye". (Which I don't think is banned anymore.)
5506
I think that this thread could be used to provide some hard evidence in support of the supposition that the camel was designed by a committee.
5507
Living Room / Google Chrome gets US State Dept approval?
« Last post by IainB on March 03, 2012, 01:41 AM »
Secretary Clinton Announces State Department Use of Chrome
Looks like quite an impressive "Win" for Google here.

The post avoids the usual cliché of "excited", but unfortunately replaced it with another adjective - "enthusiastic". This is presumably a mistake - should have been "enthused", the back formation from the noun "enthusiasm".
We’re enthusiastic to be leading the charge to bring an enhanced web browsing experience to State employees executing the critical U.S. diplomatic mission around the world!
5508
Living Room / Re: 2600 Snow Pirates Help Cloud Recovery!
« Last post by IainB on March 03, 2012, 12:05 AM »
This post and comments really made me LOL.
But it's also a sad reflection on the reality of our way of life as we accelerate the evolution of technology.
The technology we enjoy the use of can become a double-edged sword to be used against us by the State police.
Of course, this technology is always used purely for our own protection and for "the greater good".
5509
Cute.
However, the "prostitute to politics" section in the science part is missing. ;D
Well, besides that("prostitute to politics"), there is probably a lot more that you could add to both models to represent them as they might appear in operation today, but the diagrams could become a little busy.

After their disgraceful breach of their own code of scientific ethics against making pronouncements and apparently advocating taking science on trust/authority rather than proof, I am no longer entirely sure which model version the Royal Society subscribe to.

However, I would think that anybody could be forgiven for presuming that it might be a foregone conclusion (QED) that the Science model is categorically not what is taught/understood in climatology calamatology at the UEA in the UK or at Penn State U in the US - though I hear they do offer a damned good Master's course in Astrology.    ;)
5510
I'm not so sure whether this is more properly regarded as a joke or a statement of fact, but either way it made me and my 10-year old daughter smile:
EDIT - Just as an interesting sidenote: I realised on looking at it that the improvement loop around theory is similar to the theoretical CMM Level 5 iterative/incremental process improvement for software development, first described in the book Managing the Software Process (1989) by Watts Humphrey.
Science v Faith 01.jpg
5511
Living Room / Re: Amazon pulls thousands of e-books... and the SFWA strikes back
« Last post by IainB on March 02, 2012, 10:22 PM »
What is not clear is if Amazon dropped IPG does that mean all the customers who have bought IPG product have had it removed from their Kindle accounts? Amazon did this before.
My recollection is that they did not do this when they had the dispute with MacMillan.  They just stopped selling the books, but left any already purchased on user's devices.
However, they did remove copies of Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm from user's devices - the reasoning being that Amazon (or the publisher) didn't have the right to sell them in the first place. For all I know, they may have had a legal obligation to do that.
I couldn't recall exactly what happened or the order it happened in, but I do recall being seriously annoyed over it at the time. So, I googled to get the facts:
"Why did Amazon remove copies of Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm from Kindle?"

Summary:
Spoiler
The close of this July 2009 incident was probably by Amazon issuing a statement:
"When we were notified of this by the rights holder, we removed the illegal copies from our systems and from customers' devices, and refunded customers. We are changing our systems so that in the future we will not remove books from customers' devices in these circumstances."

What apparently happened:
Amazon caused the automatic deletion of only certain copies of George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm from customers' Kindles - copies that had been sold for US$0.99 by a supplier called Mobile Reference, which sells ebook versions of books that are in the Public Domain, for the price of about US$1.

The US has copyright laws peculiar to itself, and Mobile Reference apparently did not have the right to sell Orwell's novels in the US - but it did elsewhere - because 1984 and Animal Farm were/are still under copyright protection in the United States.
So Amazon had effectively enabled the sale under US breach of copyright.

Thus, when Amazon was notified that copyrighted material was being sold on the Amazon store in breach of copyright, they (presumably) acted to stop the sale and rectify the situation. They just didn't seem to tell anyone very clearly that that was what they were doing though.
The removal was enabled due to the Kindle being configured to automatically sync up with the user's Bookshelf via the electronic book reader's WhisperNet wireless service. When Amazon removed the unauthorized books from customers' accounts, they were also removed from their Kindles.

Subsequently, Amazon sent a rather too cryptic e-mail to customers:
"We recently discovered a problem with a Kindle book that you have purchased. We have processed a refund to the payment method used to acquire this book. The next time the wireless is activated on your device, the problematic item will be removed. If you are not in a wireless coverage area, please connect your device to a computer using your USB cable and delete the file from the documents folder."

There are apparently multiple copies of 1984 still for sale on the Kindle, except that they are not sold for US$0.99 from any company that has no rights to sell them. Other ebooks published by Mobile Reference that do fall under public domain in US law are also still for sale.

Amazon apparently has had to perform widespread recalls from the Kindle on at least two other occasions in the past, and the company apparently sent out the exact same notification:
  • 1. Ayn Rand's books were put up on the Kindle Store without consent from the Ayn Rand Institute and had to be pulled down.
  • 2. Unauthorized copies of Stephenie Meyer's popular Twilight series had to be removed as well.

Reportedly, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince was offered for sale at one time, for a few hours on one day, though electronic versions of the books had not been authorized.

Amazon's actions above were not completely justifiable. The two ebooks may have been "illegal" copies, but they were purchased by the customers in good faith. In the real world, if you purchase stolen goods, you don't get to keep those goods, but you would normally be properly informed of the situation. That is arguably where Amazon messed up.

Instead of being forthright about the incident and telling customers that it had sold unauthorized ebooks (and had done so in the past), Amazon merely told customers that there had been "a problem" and in Cavalier fashion deleted the offending books.
Removing such titles from a customer's Bookshelf and deleting them from the Kindle may be Amazon's standard policy, but the inadequate communication about what actually happened led to a public and media backlash that seems to have echoed around the "crowd-source memory" of the Internet since the event in 2009.
Amazon's approach to rectification was pretty abysmal - e.g., they could instead have offered customers a legitimate replacement copy of 1984 or Animal Farm and absorbed the difference in cost, because it was Amazon's mistake in the first place.

This case and the others before it highlighted a major problem with Amazon's Kindle Store. The retailer shouldn't have been selling copyrighted material in the first place, and will almost certainly by now have taken a serious - albeit belated - review of its acceptance policies to avoid similar occurrences in the future. By comparison, Apple appeared to have already had stringent reviews of the legitimacy all applications submitted to its iPhone App Store.

Some customers might justifiably feel concerned that Amazon could take legitimate books off their Kindle overnight because a publisher changed its mind, or even "burn down" their library. That is unlikely, as presumably Amazon has by now put policies into place on the Kindle Store so it won't need to recall unauthorized ebooks in the future (as above):
"We are changing our systems so that in the future we will not remove books from customers' devices in these circumstances."

One apparent implication of this that I had not understood before doing this bit of research is that, because of copyright restrictions in the US that do not apply in non-US territories, US consumers are prevented from purchasing material cheaply (or at all) that is otherwise in the Public Domain and available in external territories.
Is that true?
5512
I didn't mean for baby killing to really enter in here... It was merely meant as a radical example. Please forgive the diversion...
I understood that. I did apologise for "chipping in".

@wraith808's comment seemed pretty apposite:
Without quoting the text rendered in the referenced text (and having to add the spoiler tag), it would appear that it is an argument of semantics rather than substance, and that after-birth abortion is a euphemism on the same level as collateral damage.

We presumably are capable of using and hiding behind the same cold logic - developed using our natural intellectual faculties - to rationalise (say) SOPA, FRAND, etc. to meet our confirmation bias as we might use to rationalise (say) "after-birth collateral damage" or the toxic gassing of thousands of Kurds. These things start off as an idea or concept, and we have the power to move them into reality by our actions.

The experience gained from past decisions made by unelected EU Statists would seem to hold out little credible hope that they will not move to enable further potential erosion of freedoms in the area of free software in (say) FRAND. There's not much more I could add to that.

However, lacking similar experience of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva (the authors of the paper After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?), then we might be able to hold out a reasonable hope that they may be wanting to help the medical profession to arrive at a better resolution of the current issues around abortion/infanticide. I hope so, at any rate.

The Journal of Ethics also publishes a Response to the paper, from a Catholic Theologian. He is on the side of the victim of abortion/infanticide - the foetus. His details are:
Charles C. Camosy is Ast. Prof. of Theology at Fordham University in New York City. He is author of Too Expensive to Treat? and Peter Singer and Christian Ethics, and blogs at CatholicMoralTheology.com.

Camosy opens his rational response with:
Spoiler
Despite the wide public outcry over their article, Giubilini and Minerva’s arguments in defense of infanticide are nothing new. Peter Singer has become one of the best known philosophers in the world in part because of the attention he has received from defending the practice.
Infanticide was such an established part of the culture of ancient Greece and Rome that Christians and Jews became subjects of public mockery for opposing it. Even today, infanticide is consistently practiced in places where the Judeo-Christian tradition does not serve as a moral foundation, such as China and India.

He ends with:
Spoiler
For many people, but perhaps especially for Christians who are committed to nonviolence and special concern for the vulnerable, these conclusions are morally repugnant and can produce strong emotional reactions. And it is often appropriate to react with strong negative emotion in response to a great and violent injustice directed a particularly vulnerable population. I know, for instance, that when I first started reading Singer’s arguments about infanticide I became very angry, and today I believe quite strongly Giubilini and Minerva’s arguments are fundamentally wrongheaded. And yet, something needs to be said about the way many have reacted to their
article. Though anyone advancing an argument in the public sphere on a controversial issue should expect to get strong negative attention (especially when doing so in a deliberately provocative way), it must be said that the personal attacks and threats of violence that have been leveled at Giubilini and Minerva—especially when the attacks come from those who identify as Christians—have been absolutely disgraceful. That hate and vitriol are spewed by people on all sides of these controversial debates is nothing new, but Christians are called to love and solidarity even with those who oppose us on massively important issues like this. When we behave in ways which undermine our own values of love, solidarity, and respect for life, we not only fail to live the life to which Jesus called us, but we also undercut the effectiveness of our own arguments.

By contrast, the FRAND proposals have, up until now, apparently been prepared in relative secrecy and at the behest of the commercial software lobby group. Who is going to be given the opportunity to speak on behalf of the victim (Freedom) - in opposition to the proposals?
Erm, well, erm, nobody, it seems. You are probably going to have to protest if you want an opposite point of view to be heard at all.
Of course, you could nominate someone - how about Mr Petr Mach, the chairman of a Czech libertarian party, the Free Citizens Party (SSO)? He is a leading Czech libertarian and euroskeptic.

Hmm. He would seem like a good choice - but wait, he likely as not will definitely be prevented from having an opportunity to be heard at all - e.g., here. The last thing the unelected EU Statists might want, it seems, is to have their undemocratic, dubious and shaky proposals debated in an open forum.
Of course, some people might say that this was an uncomplimentary and racist thing to say about the unelected EU Statists, but I couldn't possibly comment.

What I would say though is, "Thank God for people like Charles Camosy and Petr Mach", and as for those multi-millions of foetuses killed (before and after birth), well, I would apologise to them that we do not remember their all-too-brief existence collectively, in the same way that we remember (say) the Holocaust - the genocide of a scant 6 million Jews.
"Don´t be afraid to see what you see." (Ronald Reagan)
5513
WFC sits in the background watching the Windows Eventlog, when it sees a program attempting to connect to the network it opens a requester and you can add a rule to Windows Firewall to allow/block.
Thanks. Interesting info.
As a result of reading that, I went and did a bit of research, and have decided to download WFC and trial it.
5514
You're aware free W7FC only monitors certain folders?
I didn't know it monitored any folders. I thought it was just a firewall control.
Have I got that wrong?    :tellme:
5515
...because I think the comments exposed that I didn't have a good reason for doing it other than basic curiosity.
Sorry. Yo no comprendo. When is that (basic curiosity) not a good reason for running an experiment?
The conclusions/evidence that you might be able to draw from such an experiment could help to develop a hypothesis or idea, no?
5516
Living Room / Re: UK Police Test 'Temporarily Blinding' LASER
« Last post by IainB on March 02, 2012, 02:28 AM »
Hmm. We really seem to demonstrate a need to control other people don't we?
Not just the British, but the Japanese apparently also seem to be doing some worthwhile research in disturbance control: Speech-Jamming Gun Silences From 30 Meters
Speech-Jamming Gun Silences From 30 Meters
by samzenpus

MrSeb writes "Japanese researchers have created a hand-held gun that can jam the words of speakers who are more than 30 meters (100ft) away. The gun has two purposes, according to the researchers: At its most basic, this gun could be used in libraries and other quiet spaces to stop people from speaking — but its second application is a lot more chilling. The researchers were looking for a way to stop 'louder, stronger' voices from saying more than their fair share in conversation. The paper reads: 'We have to establish and obey rules for proper turn-taking when speaking. However, some people tend to lengthen their turns or deliberately interrupt other people when it is their turn in order to establish their presence rather than achieve more fruitful discussions. Furthermore, some people tend to jeer at speakers to invalidate their speech.' In other words, this speech-jamming gun was built to enforce 'proper' conversations."
I always thought Shintoism was their most effective tool for this sort of thing - and so it was, up until the point when the interfering Americans identified and addressed two systemic causal problems in Japanese society - the Shinto religion and the emperor's state rites, both being embedded in the Japanese paradigm, along with "patriotism".
Spoiler
The politicization of Shinto was typified by a Japanese Ministry of Education ruling of 1932 which acknowledged that Shinto shrines were non-religious establishments for fostering patriotism. State Shinto became a mouthpiece for the militarist regime of the 1930s. After Japan's defeat in 1945 the American Occupation authorities decreed Shinto's disestablishment, ending State Shinto. The emperor's state rites were recategorized as the private rites of the imperial family. End of problem - apparently.

5517
Living Room / Re: Sorry, This Post Has Been Censored
« Last post by IainB on March 02, 2012, 01:46 AM »
There is another agenda there...forced malnutrition.
Well, that might explain it, but I'm not so sure, though there does seem to be something very odd about it.
It's an organic vegetable farm for goodness' sake!

I didn't realise it until I read this that organic farmers are under attack in this state to the extent that they need a legal defence fund (Is that right?), and the health department official concerned may have become unhinged or possibly been exacting some kind of vicarious revenge for this.

Looks like your "Health Department" (Southern Nevada Health Department) over there might actually be potentially injurious to public health and - using this farm raid an example - definitely injurious to public legal and/or Constitutional rights.
Hopefully, it could only happen in America. Sheesh.
5518
Living Room / Re: Sorry, This Post Has Been Censored
« Last post by IainB on March 02, 2012, 01:24 AM »
Did you see this update IainB?
Thanks for the link. Oddly enough, I could not "see" that link you sent. My browser got there OK, but nothing was displayed. Was not a 404.
Maybe they block access from non-US sites? I've only come across that on video links before.
In any event, I found another link about it, here.
5519
Living Room / Re: Sorry, This Post Has Been Censored
« Last post by IainB on March 01, 2012, 05:37 PM »
I know that this thread is about Censorship of the Internet in general, but I read something curious today - Health department raids community picnic and destroys all food with bleach - that makes me wonder if that Internet censorship is not just a single narrow aspect of a much larger overall strategy of state censorship in the US, driven presumably by commercial interests rather than by genuine state security interests.

I am at a loss otherwise as to how to explain how this seemingly sort of Stazi invasion can be condoned, let alone authorised in law as an act by a government agency against a perfectly law-abiding "feast of friends" (I think this is what it is called).
What sort of thing is this action? Is it true? Was it necessary because a crime had been or was about to be committed? Was it  a "Monsanto" Stazi? Who knows?
Maybe I am missing something that would help me to to understand that it all makes perfectly good sense, but at this point it seems to be a perverse and frightening form of censorship. I can't imagine such a thing happening in New Zealand, though after the recent terrifyingly excessive and exemplary Dotcom raid/arrest, the NZ police have demonstrated that anything is possible.
5520
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: HTTPS Everywhere (Firefox add-on) - quick review
« Last post by IainB on March 01, 2012, 04:28 PM »
"SSL Observatory" looks like a really constructive and potentially very useful research idea.
Note that there's now also a Chrome version of the HTTPS Everywhere add-on.

From the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Deeplinks blog: HTTPS Everywhere & the Decentralized SSL Observatory

February 29, 2012 | By Peter Eckersley
HTTPS Everywhere & the Decentralized SSL Observatory

Earlier this week we released version 2.0.1 of HTTPS Everywhere for Firefox, and also, a new beta version for Chrome! You can install HTTPS Everywhere here: [link not copied]

Firefox users will find a number of improvements in version 2.0. In addition to support for four hundred more sites, a crisper user interface, and translation into a dozen languages, there is a new optional feature called the Decentralized SSL Observatory. It detects and warns about security vulnerabilities as you browse the Web. Firefox users can turn on this setting from the Tools->HTTPS Everywhere->SSL Observatory Preferences menu, or from the HTTPS Everywhere toolbar button, which looks like this:
[Screenshot of HTTPS Everywhere Firefox toolbar button not copied]

In that Preferences page, check the box marked "Use the Observatory": [Screenshot image not copied]

If you turn on this feature, it will send anonymous copies of certificates for HTTPS websites to EFF's SSL Observatory database, which will allow us to study them and detect problems with the web's cryptographic and security infrastructure. The Decentralized SSL Observatory is also capable of giving real-time warnings about these problems.

At the moment, the Observatory will give warnings if you connect to a router, VPN, firewall or similar device that has an insecure private key due to the random number generator vulnerabilities that were recently discovered by two teams of researchers, using data from the SSL Observatory and other sources. We will be adding more kinds of certificate and key auditing to the Decentralized Observatory in the future.
5521
Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Clipboard Help+Spell: Tips and Tricks
« Last post by IainB on March 01, 2012, 10:49 AM »
I had previously posted about this on the DC forum Rearranging the CHS display to give a conventional 2-pane display.
I have sort of moved it to this "Tips and Tricks" topic thread on the suggestion of bob99, but modified it in the process.

Subject: Modifying the CHS Main UI (User Interface) window.

The main CHS window has 3 "panes" , each with a tab:
  • Tree: which displays a category tree for favourites or filtered items.
  • Grid: which displays a brief extract or name of a clip record.
  • Memo: which provides the details of a clip record, and some metadata.
You can drag these panes around. I dragged them into a more conventional "2-pane display" format, as described in the above post - see the screenshots also. (I don't want to duplicate that post here.)

But I have improved on that.
In the main CHS window is a menu item Layouts, which gives a drop-down list of preset layouts. One is called "Standard", and that is the one that provides the default layout of the 3 tabbed panes that you get when you first started up CHS.

First, I dragged the 3 panes (in the Standard layout) into this configuration:
Spoiler
CHS GUI 01.jpg


Second, I right-clicked on the Tree tab, to select auto-hide.
Spoiler
CHS GUI 02.jpg


Third, the Tree tab then hid itself. I reduced the width of the "Grid" tab.
Spoiler
CHS GUI 03.jpg


Fourth, I saved the new layout under Layouts, as "3-pane hide", so I can invoke it whenever I want, and with the preferred order of sorting as well.
Now, I think that is very handy.     :Thmbsup:
5522
General Software Discussion / OneNote hotkeys reminder popup - AutoHotkey script
« Last post by IainB on March 01, 2012, 09:13 AM »
For any Microsoft OneNote users...
After posting this re Windows 7 hotkeys reminder popup - AutoHotkey script
This can be a handy and time-saving script...
- I thought it might be useful/helpful to do a similar thing re the Microsoft OneNote hotkeys reminder popup that I referred to.
So here goes:

You could change the details in the script to display just those Hotkey combos that you might want to be reminded of.
You could also organise them more nicely than I have.    :-[

The popup is invoked by pressing the Win+O hotkey combo. (Which was "free" or "unreserved" in my installation.)
The popup window can be closed by either clicking on the OK button or by pressing the ESC key.
Here's the script:
Spoiler
;-------------------------------------------------------------------
#o:: ; Display panel of OneNote hotkeys per OneNote Help
TextOut=
(
ONENOTE Hotkeys:
================
F11 - Toggle full page view
Ctrl+M - Open new OneNote window
Ctrl+Shift+M - Open a small OneNote window to create a side note
Ctrl+P - Print current page
Ctrl+N - Add new page at end of selected section
Ctrl+Shift+N - Add new subpage to current group of pages
Ctrl+A - Select all items (press several times to increase scope of selection)
Ctrl+Shift+A - Select the current page
Ctrl+A - {In a page group} select all pages in the group
Ctrl+Shift+( - Increase page tab size
Ctrl+Shift+) - Decrease page tab size
Alt+Shift+UpArrow - Move selected page tab up
Alt+Shift+DnArrow - Move selected page tab down
Ctrl+T - Move the insertion point to the page header.
Alt+PgUp - Go to first page in current visible set of page tabs
Alt+PgDn - Go to last page in current visible set of page tabs
PgUp - Scroll up in current page
PgDn - Scroll down in current page
Ctrl+Home - Scroll to top of current page
Ctrl+End - Scroll to bottom of current page
Ctrl+DnArrow - Go to next paragraph
Ctrl+UpArrow - Go to previous paragraph
Ctrl+Alt+UpArrow - Move insertion point up in current page, or expand the PgUp
Ctrl+Alt+DnArrow - Move insertion point down in current page, or expand the PgDn
Ctrl+Alt+LftArrow - Move insertion point left in current page, or expand the page to left
Ctrl+Alt+RtArrow - Move insertion point right in current page, or expand the page to right
Alt+DnArrow - Go to next note container
Home - Go to beginning of line
End - Go to end line
LftArrow - Move one character to left
RtArrow - Move one character to right
Alt+LftArrow - Go back to the last page visited
Alt+RtArrow   Go forward to the next page visited
Alt+Ctrl+PLUS SIGN on numeric keypad - Zoom in
Alt+Ctrl+Shift+PLUS SIGN - Zoom in
Alt+Ctrl+MINUS SIGN on numeric keypad - Zoom out
Alt+Ctrl+Shift+HYPHEN - Zoom out
Ctrl+S - Save changes - unnecessary in OneNote
)
MsgBox, %TextOut%
return
;-------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's the popup:
Spoiler
Screenshot - 2012-03-02 OneNote Hotkeys.png

5523
I never knew Win+B, that's a really nice one :-*
Yes, it is nice. I didn't know most of these Hotkeys when I started!
I got the hotkeys initially from the URL referred to in the AHK script, then discovered more by using Win+[Key] to see what happened and researching the result a bit.
I cribbed most of the AHK script from somewhere - I think it might have been the AHK site (they have a lot of useful stuff there). I modified it a bit though, to suit my peculiar needs.

I've done something similar for MS OneNote Hotkeys too.

if I wanted to do similar for a different program could I just replace your hotkeys text with something else using an editor and run it in AHK?
Yes - I don't see why not. That's what I did - as above, I used the same approach for MS OneNote Hotkeys. (By the way, I consider myself a relative novice with AHK. I learn something new most times I use it. It seems quite a powerful tool.)
5524
Agnitum Outpost and Windows 7 Firewall Control (PAID version)seem to be regarded as being "the best" in most of the reviews where they are mentioned.
Great add-on for the Windows firewall http://www.sphinx-so...com/Vista/order.html
The free is very good. The "Plus" is - well, a plus :) And BTJ had it on sale sometime back and it was a plus+plus.

+ 1 for that.    :Thmbsup:

I'd rate W7FC as definitely worth trying out - "suck it and see".     :Thmbsup:
I'm still using it. I thought about upgrading it to the paid version two nights ago, but then decided it was unnecessary - the combination of Windows 7 Firewall and W7FC has shown itself to be a really effective and minimalist approach. (Suits me anyway.)
One of the things I compared it with was Agnitum Outpost - by the reviews (I haven't trialled Outpost yet).
5525
General Software Discussion / Re: BULK Rename Utility
« Last post by IainB on March 01, 2012, 07:46 AM »
@crabby3: Many thanks for this. That looks like a seriously powerful utility. It apparently does things I have wished I could do with xplorer²'s superb bulk rename, but cannot.
Going to download it now...    :)
Pages: prev1 ... 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 ... 264next