topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 5:53 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 ... 471next
5401
General Software Discussion / Re: Fake Reviews: Amazon's Rotten Core
« Last post by 40hz on August 29, 2012, 10:30 AM »
... the New York Times revealed that the use of fake reviews is widespread. ...

Try to search Slate.com for jacob silverman   against enthusiasm
-his original post is about the very same problem on facebook.


Link to article here.
 :)
5402
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 29, 2012, 08:18 AM »
Apple and all the other big players will continue to get away with stealing innovations and claiming them as their own thanks to the recent changes made to the US patent law.

With the America Invents Act of 2011, which was signed by President Obama on September 16, 2011[8] The law will switch U.S. right to the patent from the present "first-to-invent" system to a "first-to-file" system for patent applications filed on or after March 16, 2013 [9] Many legal scholars[10][11][12] have commented that such a change would require a constitutional amendment. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress the power to “promote the Progress of ... useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to ... Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective ... Discoveries.” These scholars argue that this clause specifically prohibits a first-to-file system because the term "inventor" refers to a person who has created something that has not existed before.

Under the first-to-invent system, when two people claim the same invention, the USPTO would institute an interference proceeding between them to review evidence of conception, reduction to practice and diligence.

What this effectively does is remove the argument of "prior art" from the formula. As long as you have a large enough staff - and deep enough pockets for the filing fees - you can flood the patent examiners' desks and thereby guarantee that nothing rational will emerge from the USPTO ever again.

Once this is in place after mid-March 2013, the parties with the most money can jam the entire system indefinitely. Especially since the legal argument over who actually invented something just got thrown out the window.

So now the new mantra will be: File Early - File Often.

About the only hope for this will be if some US judge takes a cue from the South Korean judge and determines that all smartphone companies and their products are infringing on the patents of one or more of all the others - and therefore bans the sales of all smartphones in the USA. And said ban will continue in effect until such time as the companies finally get together and work out a cross-licensing plan they can all agree to.

Solomon.jpg

"Let the child be divided." (3000 years later - King Solomon still RULZ!) ;D :P

But that would probably be making what the real problem is too obvious for comfort. So i guess I won't hold my breath waiting. And truth is, Apple would rather see the entire world go down in flames than concede a single inch.
5403
General Software Discussion / Re: Boot Disk Failure: after replacing hard drive
« Last post by 40hz on August 29, 2012, 07:44 AM »
LOL! ;D ;D ;D

Well, if it's any comfort, I've often had really really stupid things like that when dealing with hardware, programming or debugging. Spend ages trying more and more esoteric stuff, only to realize that you should be smacking your head against the wall for not seeing the obvious =)

Or me the first time I encountered one of those super-deluxe Compaq NetShelter server racks and not being able to find the keyboard tray. Something that prompted the client's office manager to ask "Um...remind me...how much are we paying you per hour?"
 ;D
5404
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 28, 2012, 08:47 PM »
As bad as politics are in the US, they aren't *that* overt.

Yet. ;)
5405
General Software Discussion / Re: Boot Disk Failure: after replacing hard drive
« Last post by 40hz on August 28, 2012, 08:44 PM »
Yay!

Please forgive all of us for not asking if it was plugged in.

That is supposed to be the first tech support question you ask. ;D
5406
General Software Discussion / Re: Boot Disk Failure: after replacing hard drive
« Last post by 40hz on August 28, 2012, 01:48 PM »
You could try disabling the hardware BIOS discovery feature by selecting the "OS is plug&play aware" option in the BIOS settings if there is one. That sometimes prevents that problem from occurring since P&P discovery won't take place until after Windows loads.
That should only affect stuff like IRQ assignments and device initialization, and not affect boot order, though.


*gobsmack*

Absolutely right. I was thinking of the Auto assign Boot Device Priority setting some boards have. :-[

5407
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 28, 2012, 01:39 PM »
It's amusing to me that Apple has painted themselves into a corner with their "innovative design" when the future of personal computer interfaces and functionality will probably more closely resemble something like this:



5408
General Software Discussion / Re: Boot Disk Failure: after replacing hard drive
« Last post by 40hz on August 28, 2012, 10:11 AM »
IF the drive is formatted as a primary partition, has the bootable flag set, and does not contain your OS, what edbro suggested is most likely the problem. Usually your system will try to boot off the first primary/bootable drive it "discovers." Some BIOSes seem to reorder the boot sequence after a drive is replaced. Probably has something to do with how discovery works fror that particular BIOS/mobo combination.

You could try disabling the hardware BIOS discovery feature by selecting the "OS is plug&play aware" option in the BIOS settings if there is one. That sometimes prevents that problem from occurring since P&P discovery won't take place until after Windows loads.
5409
Living Room / Re: What books are you reading?
« Last post by 40hz on August 28, 2012, 09:25 AM »
The 351 Books of Irma Arcuri: A Novel by David Bajo

351-cover.jpg

The publisher's synopsis sums it up quite well:

Throughout mathematician Philip Masyrk's peripatetic life, there has been only one constant: Irma Arcuri. Their ongoing love affair has endured his two marriages and her countless travels. But now Irma has vanished, leaving Philip her library of 351 books, including five written by Irma herself. Buried somewhere within her luxuriously rebound volumes of Cervantes and Turgenev, Borges and Fowles, lies the secret to her disappearance-and Philip soon realizes that he is trapped within their narratives as well. Who is Irma Arcuri? What is really hidden in the library? And most importantly, whose story is this?

Bogs down in a few places. And the inevitable sex scenes weren't handled all that well. (It's harder to write a good piece of erotica than most people think.) And none of the characters are even remotely likeable. Something that surprised me considering the story works reasonably well despite that.

My only complaint was that the reveal and payoff didn't quite do enough justice to the premise and build-up. Which is unfortunate since this is a story about playing a variant of the god-game. But it's a brainy-fun read nevertheless. If you like Fowles, especially his book The Magus, you'll feel right at home here.

For technical reading there's Nmap Network Scanning: The Official Nmap Project Guide to Network Discovery and Security Scanning by Gordon Lyon and Nick Marsh's most excellent NMAP Cookbook.

nmap1.jpg  nmap2.jpg

I always suspected I wasn't using NMAP to anywhere near its full potential. Turns out I was right.

I'm about half way through Lyons' book. And I'm 'page hopping' Marsh's book at the same time. Both are good. Together they're very good. Recommended. :up:



5410
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 27, 2012, 01:36 PM »
Especially when, as also written in the Jury instructions, damages are not supposed to punish, but only to compensate for losses.

Actually, US patent law does allow for the awarding of punitive damages when it can be shown the infringement was significant and "willful." But in practice, the courts don't usually award them since most companies (or at least companies big enough to be able to pay punitive damages) can demonstrate the absence of willfulness by obtaining and following competent independent legal advice on issues relating to the possibility of patent infringement. In short, if your attorneys felt a patent in question was either invalid or not applicable to what you're doing, you're mostly off the hook for willfulness. (But not necessarily infringement.)

It's a not hard and fast rule how a court determines the degree of willfulness involved. But even where a court does find willfulness, it seldom awards the legal maximum of treble damages.
5411
So in layman terms that particle or organism farts oxygen and intakes something else? if nothing else it could be used for the underwater diving and also for terraforming or say in space.

Now if I could only find a goat that eats tin cans and craps gold bullion!! :)


Doesn't the US government have one of those? Wasn't that how they were going to pay for all those military expenditures in the Mideast - and the justification for not including any of it in the federal budget for the last 12 years?
 :-\

5412
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 26, 2012, 01:40 PM »
^ "To the vector belong the spoils." ;)

5413
Seems legit...

http://stm.sciencema...ontent/4/140/140ra88

http://www.scienceda.../06/120627142512.htm
http://www.nature.co...n-injections-1.10899
http://www.huffingto...eathe_n_1634101.html
http://gizmodo.com/5...ve-without-breathing


Thx St6 & ct! You just made my day. :Thmbsup:

It almost sounded too good to be true. And even if the headline claims are semi-exaggerated, just knowing something like this is in the works gives me reason to smile.

Ain't science a beautiful thing? :)
5414
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 26, 2012, 12:13 PM »
Too late. I just patented the point.
Please contact me to arrange licensing before creating any geometric constructs.
 :P
5415
Living Room / Re: Neil Armstrong, first man on the moon, dies
« Last post by 40hz on August 26, 2012, 12:09 PM »
I guess this was the only way Neil could travel further than he had gone before. His was a life well lived.
5416
Living Room / Re: Wikileaks - Julian Assange Granted Asylum by Ecuador
« Last post by 40hz on August 26, 2012, 11:52 AM »
^Not so much republican as praetorian guard. There is an element within the US government whose mantra is: "Patriotism does not get elected every four years."

Now you know why the Founding Fathers were so opposed to what we today know as government bureaucracies and career politicians.
5417
Developer's Corner / Re: This reads like my life...
« Last post by 40hz on August 25, 2012, 09:23 AM »
^That's probably it. (My memory for pop culture is definitely impaired.) :)
5418
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 25, 2012, 09:22 AM »
[Now I'm wondering if I patent rounded corners on a triangle... :P

Go for it! (I'd do it now while there's still time.) ;D
5419
Developer's Corner / Re: This reads like my life...
« Last post by 40hz on August 25, 2012, 07:38 AM »
Wasn't area code + 555-1212 the way to get that area code's directory assistance operator? Still is too - except now you say a city name last I checked

To have the phone ringback you dialed 1191 and immediately hung up where I lived.

And yeah, I've been told 555 is the exchange prefix that goes nowhere. It was supposedly created to give Hollywood and TV shows some dummy numbers to use in movies. Urban legend has it some big movie back in the late sixties inadvertently used a number that turned out to be somebody's real home phone, and they supposedly sued and won for "megabucks." Sounds like bunk to me, but there's probably a small grain of truth in there somewhere.
5420
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 25, 2012, 07:28 AM »
Isn't there some way I/we/people could make known to Apple what I/we/people think of them ? No ...?

What makes you think for one minute Apple could possibly care what anybody who doesn't completely agree with them really thinks? They never have before. They had a ideological walled garden long before they built their technical one. They've always had an "Us vs Them" mindset.

When you're dealing with self-confessed "genius" you get a lot of that. :-\

Apple was built in the image of a man who never got over the fact his parents put him up for adoption - and who wanted to be seen as an innovative genius - even though he was the single least technical and creative member in a group of true computer wizards.

There is not enough payback in the entire world for a person with that much baggage. And Apple's mindset reflects that.
5421
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 25, 2012, 07:18 AM »
It will be interesting to see what happens in the European and Australian courts LOL

I rather doubt that we'll actually find out the exact amounts of the bribes... ;D

Why bother with bribes? Why not just threaten to extradite any non-cooperative judiciary en masse to the United States to stand trial for impeding US law - or better yet, to simply be detained indefinitely and without charges for being "found" to be a threat to US "national security?"

The US government has the authority to do all of that. And they ought to know since they gave themselves that "legal" authority a few years back.
What it's starting to look like for 2012
1984.jpg

:P
5422
Living Room / Re: Apple v Samsung Verdict is in
« Last post by 40hz on August 25, 2012, 06:08 AM »
Lets see: you got an American business + Amercan law being abused to stifle competition and "protect" (largely non-existent) American jobs + election year nationalism playing in the background + California court and jury versus an 'evil' and 'thieving' South Korean company who is arguing for rationality and fairness, and maybe just a touch of sanity? Hmm...tricky...

Did anybody seriously expect any different an outcome? :-\

Oh well. It ain't over yet folks! That was just the opening act.
5423
Living Room / Re: Tech support — why bother?
« Last post by 40hz on August 24, 2012, 04:05 PM »
My Lil Cthulhu is made by a company called Dreamland Toyworks in case anybody's interested. It's ridiculously overpriced at $30 USD and gotten rather hard to find of late. But if you're a true connoisseur of eldritch horror it's a must have.

There's also a most excellent Cthulhu Fez if you're a real diehard - or maybe just in need some serious psychiatric counseling. Available from Fez-O-Rama! I want to costume an entire dancehall band in white dinner jackets, scarlet Zouave pants - and this fez! ;D (We'll be playing a lot of Tom Waite and Madness songs too!)

fez.png

In his house at R’lyeh, dead Cthulhu waits dreaming… wearing this spiffy fez!

 :Thmbsup:
5424
This reminds me of why I am wary of dual boot set-ups. Someone could write a Windows virus to attack your Linux system files, or a Linux virus to attack your Windows system files. In either case any normal antivirus software would not be running.

Not sure if that exists in real life, either.

I suppose you could create code that would copy something malicious onto an NTFS partition from the Linux side and still be fairly stealthy about it. Especially now that most distros include r/w support for Windows file systems by default.

But it would need to be fairly sophisticated in order to get its payload in ahead of the antimalware on the Windows side before Windows boots up. Not to say that you couldn't just nuke the Windows AV system (or all the Windows partitions for that matter while you were at it) since Linux ignores any Windows file security settings. (That's why a live Linux CD can be used to recover data off a password locked Windows disk.)

Hmm...

Romping on Linux from the Windows side would be a bit harder since Windows doesn't have any out-of-box ability to access NIX filesystems. Hardly an insurmountable problem. But it would be one more barrier to get past.

Probably the only way you could really protect yourself in that scenario would be to use full disk encryption on both systems.

 :tellme:
5425
General Software Discussion / Newest malware now able to target virtual machines?
« Last post by 40hz on August 24, 2012, 12:09 PM »
This just posted at Tom's Hardware (link here)

Crisis Believed to be First Malware Infecting Virtual Machines
12:20 PM - August 24, 2012 by Wolfgang Gruener - source: Symantec

Crisis, a previously detected trojan, has turned out to be much more sophisticated malware than originally described.

Instead of just infecting Macs, Crisis also infects Windows PCs as well as Windows Mobile devices and, for the first time, a VMware virtual machine. Security researchers originally believed that the malware was limited to simply monitoring the applications Adium, Firefox, Skype and MSN Messenger.

Crisis is distributed via social engineering and tricks a user into running a Java applet Flash installer. The malware then identifies the operating system and uses the respective executable file. The trojan is carried in a JAR (Java ARchive) file, which is based on the ZIP format and usually includes Java class files, metadata and resources in one file to distribute a Java application or Java libraries.

What makes Crisis interesting is that it appears to be specifically looking for virtualized environments and is therefore believed to be the first malware to spread onto a virtual machine.

Tech details can be found over at Symantec. (link here)

The threat searches for a VMware virtual machine image on the compromised computer and, if it finds an image, it mounts the image and then copies itself onto the image by using a VMware Player tool.
.
.
.
It does not use a vulnerability in the VMware software itself. It takes advantage of an attribute of all virtualization software: namely that the virtual machine is simply a file or series of files on the disk of the host machine. These files can usually be directly manipulated or mounted, even when the virtual machine is not running as is the case above.

This may be the first malware that attempts to spread onto a virtual machine. Many threats will terminate themselves when they find a virtual machine monitoring application, such as VMware, to avoid being analyzed, so this may be the next leap forward for malware authors.

Just one more thing to have to start looking for. >:(
Pages: prev1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 ... 471next