Recent Posts
I really like Duplicate Finder. An especially nice touch was when it told me that I was deleting all copies of a file. I tried a few other duplicate file finders and hated them.
It's not directly possible, unless you can persuade the user to install an activeX control, because...Hi JonTheNiceGuy and welcome to the site!
In order to dial the phone, you need access to a Modem. The modem dials the number, and then the user is told to pick up the phone, at which point, the user would hang up. Old programs which would do this (and I can't remember any off the top of my head) would use this sort of sequence.
1) Do you want to dial the number?
2) User clicks "Yes"
3) Open Serial port (to Modem), send characters AT (response OK), AT DT 0123456789012
4) Pick up the phone
5) After a specified delay, hang up the modem
In order to get access to the modem, you'd need either an activex control or a java app. I don't know enough about either to do this!
Alternatively, there are services (which I can't find with a simple google search right now - but I'm sure if you're creative you'll find them), where a third party server dials the user and the business and then connects the two lines together. The third way is to take that in-house, and make it so that the user enters their phone number into a form, that goes into a queue at the web site, which is then reeled off to the PBX at the webserver end.
Lastly, you could use a VoIP solution like Asterisk, and then establish SIP connections in between either the business and the user, or between two users, well, let's just say with VoIP, the world is your mollusc.
Jon-JonTheNiceGuy (January 02, 2008, 04:52 PM)
i can advise to use replay media catcher to capture all kind of stream audio it's cool
-kamalrohit (December 30, 2007, 10:09 AM)
Please post URLs for widely unknown programs if possibleIt's not on http://fileforum.betanews.com/ (as I said above that's often a bad sign), found it on http://www.applian.c...ia-catcher/index.php - no freeware.-brotherS (November 21, 2005, 07:34 AM)
Are you using "filesystem in a file" with TrueCrypt, or do you use direct partition encryption?The latter.-f0dder (December 22, 2007, 06:53 AM)
Whatever the case, as long as the TrueCrypt volume is formatted NTFS, it should have support for big files. But if you're using "filesystem in a file" and the container is on a FAT32 formatted drive, well...I just tried that (after a backup-f0dder (December 22, 2007, 06:53 AM)
) and got the message that it already is NTFS.The drive is formatted FAT32, the truecrypt drive is NTFS.Ah, I see! So I would have to format the drive and start from scratch to have full NTFS support for big files on the TrueCrypt-formatted partition?
TrueCrypt does not change the underlying file system. Even TrueCrypt cannot see a partition or drive until it is mounted, it only sees the underlying file system, in your case, FAT32.
The drive you purchased was preformatted FAT32. TrueCrypt wrote data on the FAT32 drive. When mounted this is a NTFS drive. When not mounted only information about the underlying file system, FAT32, is available.-e712 (December 21, 2007, 10:53 PM)
It sounds... strange. But no idea, really. Can you post some screenshots of compmgmt.msc/disk management, and the right-click properties etc?Could do, but not much to see there... and compmgmt.msc/disk management shows nothing because it's an external HD.-f0dder (December 21, 2007, 04:01 AM)
If you're anything like me, the first thing you do when you start the computer is to check your emails and feeds. An hour or two later, you might get something else done, if you remember what you intended to do in the first place.I suggest you do this:-JennyB (October 26, 2007, 09:38 AM)
"Only as needed" is defined as once every 2-3 weeks when things start going wrong and I can't do what I want, such as getting Paintshop Pro to open.Same here. I can get my Windows 2000 to run for a maximum of about 4 to 6 weeks, then things tend to get ugly. Sometimes even a BSOD.-app103 (November 23, 2007, 01:05 AM)
I've used Locate32 and really liked it but then I tried File Tracer, just out of curiosity. Locate is a more refined program - far better GUI, way more customizable. I have to say though, when it comes to sheer power and low resource consumption File Tracer is God! Locate pushed my CPU to 40% and beyond whenever it indexed the drives.Strange, I just had Locate update one DB and CPU usage never went above 10%, most of the time it was more like 4%.-nosh (November 30, 2007, 12:52 PM)
Locate consistently sat at 1.5% CPU in my case even when it was not doing a thing.That's strange too, Locate here is idling at 0% and jumps to 2% now and then. No idea why, might be a bug.-nosh (November 30, 2007, 12:52 PM)
Does anybody use Locate alongside any of the content search engines such as GDS? I like the content search but love the speed of Locate. Any problems running both?No problem.-edbro (November 30, 2007, 01:11 PM)
