topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 22, 2025, 10:59 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 203 204 205 206 207 [208] 209 210 211 212 213 ... 470next
5176
General Software Discussion / Re: What went wrong with Linux on the Desktop
« Last post by 40hz on September 14, 2012, 10:21 AM »
I am trying to re-get acquainted with latest linux (due to some ankyloses at work)

does that pain to install a single app still exists? compiling, getting dependencies, etc?

I hoped that it would become someday easy to install software in linux, like in winxp, but I saw so many people in the linux community that seemed they were excited with such long install procedures, so I gave up

I think it still is. I just saw some article the other day about (I think) some software update not being in "this edition of uBuntu." Some people like the whole "reinstall it all" thing, but as a long time Windows user, just gimme the app. : )

It's not all that common that you'd need to compile and install with today's distros. About the only time you'd need to do that is if you wanted the most bleeding-edge release (i.e. "unstable" or beta) of something. Which is fine as long as you're willing to forego the quality control that takes place before something makes it into a distro's repository. Don't forget that most F/OSS developers work independently so there's no guarantee compiling their app and installing it won't break compatibility or screw up your Linux environment. Backporting and dependency checking are a large part of the reason why distros started doing repositories in the first place. As is security. You can be relatively sure you're gremlin and malware free if you install from an authorised repository.

So until you get more familiar with Linux, I'd suggest you forget about compiling and stick to what is available in the repositories until you gain that experience.

Like Tao said: "Just gimme the app."

I agree with him 100%. So use the repositories as much as possible. That's what they do. That's what they're there for. :) :Thmbsup:
5177
Living Room / Re: Community Documentation done right - Slackware's new 'doc' project.
« Last post by 40hz on September 14, 2012, 10:09 AM »
The bigger part is a call to the Slackware community to get more involved. They want to expand the resource base from it's current small how-to/FAQ format to a full-scale info resource for Slackware. That would include application how-tos, projects, etc.

Regarding total creative freedom, I don't see how some responsible editing and 'QC' flies in the face of that. I see it more as "write and give what you will" but not with the automatic assumption that everything you send over, no matter what, will hit the wiki as-is. Please note too that this isn't so much a "tool for conviviality" as it is a tech documentation project. Philosophical and procedural discussions and debates are better left to the forums and irc channels. And Slackware already has plenty of those.

Tech documentation does not that often come down to things that are purely a matter of opinion. At least not usable tech documentation. There are, in fact, correct answers when it comes to many, if not most, technical questions. And there are usually optimal (or at least better ways) to accomplish certain things which most people who are knowledgeable in a given technical subject will agree on. Articulation and awareness of "best practices" and a "common body of knowledge" are usually what characterise good technical docs.

I think right now the front page is a bit of a hodgepodge because the project has yet to get into full swing. So it's currently providing what's available - which is essentially the old docs. The larger goal will be to pull that hodge together into a more streamlined and organised wiki as additional resources and articles become available.
 8)
5178
From the comments above, was it BDJ or the vendor?


You'd still need to hold BDJ somewhat responsible. "Your website = your responsibility." Either BDJ removed the comments - or they allowed them to be removed. And since the end result is the same no matter who is most directly responsible, BDJ can't simply dump it on some 3rd-party and walk away. Especially in the absence of any clearly stated policy about notifying users that the vendor is in control of everything that appears on the page - provided that actually is the case

Unfortunately, such a policy might have a negative effect on the perceived credibility of BDJ in general, so it would be interesting to have BDJ officially state exactly who gets to moderate comments and what the policy and process is for comment moderation. Because right now, only BDJ can clarify what's been going on with the RoboForm offer.

There's also chance this is all one big misunderstanding. But if so, it's BDJ that will have to straighten it out since the rest of us can't do much more than speculate.
 :)

(Note: For the record: I'm a fan of BDJ. I've bought things through them before and I've been quite happy overall with the experience.) :Thmbsup:
5179
Living Room / Community Documentation done right - Slackware's new 'doc' project.
« Last post by 40hz on September 14, 2012, 09:13 AM »
If you've ever browsed the computer section of your local bookstore you've probably noticed the dearth (if not complete absence) of Linux titles. The relatively small demand for Linux information, as opposed to Windows or OSX, makes most big tech publishers reluctant to commit to printing large tomes about what is still a small part of the consumer computing world. And what little does make it to bookshelves is usually confined to one of the 'big three' distros (Ubuntu, Fedora, SUSE) along with an occasional book on one of the better known server-type Linuxes such as pfSense or Centos.

Some 'specialist' flavors of Linux like LFS, Arch and Gentoo have always had their own good quality docs available on their websites. But that's the been the exception to the rule for most distros.

One of the oldest (and still excellent IMO) Linux distributions is Patrick Volkerding's Slackware. Slackware was first released in 1993 and has continued through 13+ stable versions as of this day, making it the oldest still actively maintained distro in existence. Linux would not be where it is today without Slackware.

Because Slackware's 'product' philosophy differs from most other versions of Linux, it's gradually become less and less mainstream than those heavily funded and promoted distros such as Ubuntu and RedHat. Which is a shame. Because Slackware is a very modern, well-maintained, and carefully crafted version of Linux.

One of the biggest problems with Slackware (and Linux as a whole) is the general lack of comprehensive and easily found technical documentation. You can always Google and run down various information sources. There's usually a small doc collection to be found here, or a knowledgeable blogger there. But that's not the same as having an official "book" that's both easy to find and actively maintained.

Part of the problem is certain misguided individuals in the larger Nix community. These are the idiots who view having to dig for information as a necessary rite of passage to the nirvana that is Linux. The other part of the problem is that good technical documentation is hard to write and tedious to edit. With the end result being that the "docs" for a distro usually never get beyond the talking stage. (Note: even the big distros usually try to fluff it off with a small collection of how-tos and FAQs - and relegate all unpaid support requests to a volunteer-staffed help forum. Hardly an ideal solution for the average enduser.)

Slackware has recently decided to do something about that.

Enter "SlackDocs" the Slackware Linux Documentation Project:


slackwaredocs.png

Project Charter

Knowledge is power. Scattered and unfocused power is useless. To state it plainly, the vision and the ultimate goal of the Slackware Linux Documentation Project is to become the primary worldwide resource for all Slackware related information. This is a lofty goal, indeed. However, there is confidence that venerable Slackware Linux, the oldest actively maintained distribution of GNU/Linux, has the user base to accomplish this goal. You are invited to join and be a partner in this endeavor.

Who can help? Anyone can, from your uncle Ed who tinkers with Slackware on his old laptop to Linux gurus with development level skill sets. All are welcome. All can contribute something of value to this project. A wiki type resource such as this thrives on community. You've seen for yourselves what the GNU/Linux and Open Source communities have done in the past and are still doing today. Working together, the potential for success is greatly increased.

This project will need article submissions that run the entire gamut of Slackware knowledge. There will be a need for serious technical articles on hardware control, software applications, Slackware Linux implementations in business and personal computing, system administration, etc. Articles will also be needed from the every day Slacker on topics ranging from simple howtos to complicated resolutions and workarounds.

Submitted articles, as with most wiki type resources, will be peer reviewed. Corrections may be needed, amendments added, and so forth. No article should be deemed unimportant. If it has relevance to Slackware Linux and will assist someone somewhere to better utilize this operating system, then it is a worthwhile article. What is being done here is being done for others. This is an archive of knowledge being built for the future. Your participation will be the mortar that holds the bricks in place.

In order to fulfill the goals of this project, a reliance on civil discourse and the presence of a strong spirit of cooperation will be necessary. The rules here are simple. Be kind and considerate in your dealings with others. This project is not about individuals. It's about a community sharing and working together toward a goal. Your ego will not be a part of the Slackware Linux Documentation Project. Please leave it in the coat closet by the front door before you login.

That is the our contract with one another and with the future.

Many times, projects such as these start with good intentions only to 'peter out' once the initial blush of enthusiasm wears off. In the case of the Slackware however, there's far less chance of that happening because there's an already a well-maintained knowledgebase that's been running for years courtesy of Slackware loyalist Eric Hamleers. Eric has been chartered to bring the new doc project to fruition. And looking at the charter page on the new wiki, it seems he has a very clear idea of how this project needs to operate in order to be a success. It's worth a read by anybody who is doing (or planning) any sort of community project. Everything is clearly spelled out and made completely transparent, including an explanation as to why DocuWiki was selected for the project site.

One of the most interesting things is how they plan to get around the problem with most online-only wiki-based documentation: downloadable daily snapshots:

The choice for DokuWiki was made for several reasons; its syntax makes it more suitable for writing documentation as opposed to MediaWiki, which is more general-purpose. Also, DokuWiki is self-contained in a single directory and does not require an SQL database, which makes it highly portable (the intention is to make a “daily snapshot” tarball available for download once the Wiki foundation is complete).

All in all, a very nice move in the right direction. Let's wish them well! :Thmbsup:

5180
Find And Run Robot / Re: New kid on the block - Pipy
« Last post by 40hz on September 14, 2012, 02:25 AM »
Thx philtsc! Downloaded it. I'm gonna give it a try. :)
5181
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Postbox 3 - $9.95
« Last post by 40hz on September 14, 2012, 02:20 AM »
^And they do offer a free 30-day trial. So if you use an IMAP account, there's really no harm to be done if you want to give it a try. That $9.95 price is very reasonable if you later decide to keep it.
5182
General Software Discussion / Re: instant linux on winxp
« Last post by 40hz on September 14, 2012, 02:11 AM »
The issue of guest OS has been solved. It's in cloud based apps and HTML5.

Well that's certainly good news!  :P

(Sorry. I just couldn't resist.  ;D )
5183

Hmmm....I'm under the impression that you still do not have to have bought the product from Amazon to post a review.

Diva is correct. I just tried it and you can as long as you're signed in to your account. Maybe I was confusing that with how you're no longer allowed to publish anonymous reviews. Which makes good sense IMO.
 :)
5184
I became curious enough that I decided to Google using "Amazon remove negative reviews" and found some discussions over at Amazon about events similar to what I experienced.

One post from 2008 described an experience virtually identical to mine where another reviewer ran afoul of the same unpublished review guideline:

It's a little long...
In reply to an earlier post on Jul 15, 2008 4:15:36 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jul 15, 2008 4:18:12 PM PDT

gentle as a daisy says:

No one should doubt by now that Amazon won't hesitate to remove a negative review, but here's some more evidence (that has the kind of irrational quality that has characterized most of my dealings with Amazon):

- I posted a negative review that was removed, apparently upon complaint by the author of the book I reviewed

- Amazon's explanation was that:
"Our guidelines do not allow discussions that criticize authors or their intentions."

Wow! That knocked my socks off. Reviews shouldn't be permitted to criticize authors or their intentions? Really? I can't say, for example, that "Author X's historical fiction intended to depict 19th century marketing practices accurately, but the author failed in that intention as can be seen from the following examples"?

Worse yet, check out the Amazon reviewing guidelines: there *are* no injunctions against criticizing authors or their intentions.

The root problem as I see it is the lack of transparency in the removal-decision process. Customers (remember when Amazon was "consumer-centric"?) have access only to Customer Service, *not* to the mysterious "Review Team" that makes the editorial decisions concerning review removal. Customer Service mediates between the consumer and the Review Team. There is no direct channel of communication to the Review Team. The end result is the kind of message I've quoted above, which justifies the removal of a review on the basis of a violation of a guideline that doesn't exist.

The appropriate way to respond to a situation like this is to recognize that the entire review environment within Amazon is a farce, and the obligation of the reviewer is really to capitalize to one's best advantage on the opportunities for parody, satire, and the theater of the absurd. Under the circumstances, the only kind of review that should be considered offensive is one that presents itself seriously and straightforwardly as an objective review.


I also spotted many comments about how 1-star ratings seemed to mysteriously vanish. And reports of how many who questioned why were routinely told it was because of "server problems." This prompted one person to observe how curiously "selective" Amazon's server problems were, since it never seemed to happen to 5-star reviews.

Even more interesting were the allegations of self-censoring on the part of those who wanted to get (or maintain) "top reviewer" status. From some of what I read, I gathered that posting negative reviews could jeopardize your "top" rating if enough people voted your reviews "unhelpful." Apparently some authors mobilized their fans (or had a boatload of phony IDs) in order to carpet bomb negative reviewers and damage their credibility. As one guy said, there seems to be some books and authors you just don't give a bad review to on Amazon.

If true, it shouldn't surprise. There's no system so bulletproof that somebody won't eventually discover a way to game it. Especially if there's money to be made by doing so.

However, while all this was interesting to read, it mainly seemed to be happening between 2007 and 2009. I didn't see anything recent about this sort of thing.

Hmm...I wonder if Amazon eventually got more consistent and transparent; - or if 'the word' got out and people mostly gave up on posting negative reviews and comments over at Amazon...


5185
there's two amazon comments threads AFAIK, but both those threads are about reviews being paid for. I havent heard of reviews being censored...
I too am astonished to hear that a negative review by 40hz was taken down on Amazon at the request of the book's author.  What possible justification could there be?  Yes, I'm aware that some positive reviews are paid for, and some negative reviews are concocted by competitors, but Amazon's agreeing to remove a presumably knowledgeable review boggles what's left of my mind.

(Correction: it was the film school book rather than the tech book review that was taken down by request.)

I had strongly suggested that the author might have spent less time being so self-righteous and spent more time focused on his main topic. I'm guessing that that part was protested as a personal attack of some sort - which is something I later learned (from an acquaintance who sells through Amazon) could get a review taken down. I tried to get it clarified what had happened. But all I got back from Amazon was that it was removed by request. [Note: If I still have a copy of that e-mail (extremely doubtful since it was around 2004/5) I'll post it.]

As to why the tech book review disappeared, I have no idea. It was a critical review, but no more strongly worded than anything else I've seen up  there. However, one day it was there. Then, a few weeks later, it wasn't.

Note too that this all happened some years ago, before any of this user review stuff was taken that seriously. So there may have been other policies or practices in effect at the time. I think you now need to actually buy the product from Amazon before you're allowed to review it. There was a time when you didn't. All they did back then was include an indicator as to whether or not you were a 'confirmed' (i.e. you bought it from Amazon) owner of the product.

Either way, I haven't written an Amazon review or given a rating on anything I've bought from them since. Nowadays, I just shop there because I like their service and selection.

5186
Living Room / Re: Windows 8 Pro will now include option to downgrade to Windows 7
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 08:07 PM »
I want to thank Microsoft for Windows 8 - I really do.

I published an article in 3 local newsletters about what is coming in Windows 8 and have got a lot of work building new Windows 7 boxes and upgrading Vista and XP before 7 disappears off the shelves.

Thanks Microsoft. ;-)

Please write a blog post about this so I can share  ;D ;D

 ;D ;D ;D Yes. Please do!  :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
5187
Living Room / Re: Trick-or-treat caramel onions
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 06:16 PM »
^Like making yogurt or cheese. Start with a small batch of fermenting fruit which somebody gave you. (I think the person who stated it got champagne yeast from a home brewing store.)
Put it in a large glass topped jar. Add drained canned fruit. Cubed pineapple, peaches, and pears work best. Fruit cocktail also works. Add back a little of the canned syrup from the peaches or pears. Gently mix, cover, and leave alone for a few days. Sniff and consume when alchohol level gets where you want it. Reserve a few ounces as the starter for the next batch.

If you let it sit too long the alcohol content will get too high, which ruins the fruit flavor - and also kills the yeast culture. So you need to be eating and replenishing your batch on a regular basis.

Thats about it. :)
5188
Living Room / Re: NSA Whistleblower interesting technical details
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 06:04 PM »
To those who pull strings, ongoing violent crime is a win-win. Especially for the proponents of expanded government authority.

Alas, this is a hard truth.

In fact I would not doubt that the bulk of the recent hacking attacks by Anonymous and it's subsidaries, have in fact been the handiwork of government operatives running covert.

I've suspected as much. Especially anything that claimed to have penetrated major government or military networks.

Breaking news of such things drives people into a security frenzy, and after their local IT department informs them that the best isn't perfect, they turn to the government to put a stop to such wrongdoings. Which of course means more hassle for the honest people on the internet, as regulations and intrusions into privacy become the main event.

Every tyranny has had it's birth in a national emergency.

The Roman emperors gained their power when the Roman Republic willingly handed it over to them in the face of a military emergency. Hitler rode into power following the Reichstag Fire. Queen Elizabeth gained her real power (and created the first modern police state) in response to the demands of her own subjects to deal with the threat from Spain and the Roman Church. And the United States threw out it's Constitution, and systematically betrayed every one of it's founding principles, first with the Civil War, then with the Cold War, and then finally and completely with the advent of the "War on Terror" - while the members of the Senate and Congress cheered.  Incidently, the "War on Terror" really isn't a 'war' so much as it's a marketing tool. It's the newest riff on the concept of the "endless war." Something effectively put to good use by none other than Chairman Mao. (Since every revolution eventually becomes a new power - which in turn sets the stage for the next revolution - the most efficient way to avoid a counter-revolution is to make sure the current "revolution" never ends. Sweet!)

Too bad most people can't be bothered to think about history.

Heh...

Too bad most people can't be bothered to think.

5189
General Software Discussion / Re: instant linux on winxp
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 05:45 PM »
Kalos should really consider running Portable Ubuntu.

@kalos - I'm +1 w/Shades here.  Even if Portable Ubuntu isn't the most recent version, or being actively maintained, it does do exactly what you're looking to accomplish.
5190
Living Room / Re: Windows 8 Pro will now include option to downgrade to Windows 7
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 05:41 PM »
@Tao - FWIW I sincerely hope you are right and I am completely wrong about this. My outlook has been pretty bleak when it come to where this technology is heading. And I much prefer the future your vision perceives.

No joke. I want to be dead wrong about all of this. I really do. :) :Thmbsup:
5191
Living Room / Re: Trick-or-treat caramel onions
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 05:36 PM »
I've tried keeping fresh fruit in alcohol -it did keep- but it wasnt very successful tastewise. OTOH I've tasted dried fruit soaked for a few years in strong alcohol and it tasted good.

I've done that too with dried apricots, pineapple, and some canned cubed fruit. We call it "stoned fruit" in my house. It's great on frozen yogurt. We make brandied pears for the holidays, which are also great, but don't really keep that well. It's sort of a seasonal treat around here, making it's first appearance at Thanksgiving and then very occasionally up until New Years Day dinner. I've also done fermented fruit with canned fruits although I no longer have the 'seed' culture. I got tired of throwing so much of it out because people weren't eating enough of it. (You have to keep adding new fruit and consuming the old so it doesn't get too strong!)

FWIW I'm not so interested in it keeping most stuff for years. Anything that's good doesn't last too long around here. If we like it, we'll just glom and then make more. And anything that isn't too popular just ends up getting tossed or mulched. I'm more interested in discovering new recipes.
 ;D
5192
General Software Discussion / Re: instant linux on winxp
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 05:22 PM »
VMWare and such are very slow

That depends largely on the machine and available RAM.

my solution would be to utilize live cd's, but without running them from a cd player, which makes them sluggish

is there a virtual cd player that can load a live cd?

Think about it... A virtual cd cannot create a separate OS environment because the cd player itself is running under the same operating system it's loaded on. So to go back to a previous post, you can only have one OS in control of a physical machine (i.e. one that is hardware.)

So unless you put the second OS on some sort of virtual machine, it can't be done. Sorry. :)

-----

Did you try running Linux from a USB2 key yet? That's much faster than optical media once it boots up.
5193
Living Room / Re: Shit Apple Fanatics Say
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 05:06 PM »
People with Macs like to have sex WITH their computers.

OMG! Is it FRIDAY already?  :o  ;)
5194
always check who is answering the questions > The one answering is usually the one moderating. Today the censor is Siber, not Bits. There is only little reason to accuse Bits du Jour in this case

Very true. But in all fairness to Steve, when somebody posts on a website, there is a presumption they either are the site owners; or are being allowed to speak on behalf of the site owners.

So unless a conspicuous disclaimer is posted, it would be easy for somebody not to know that. Or to realize that the "moderating" was being performed by anyone other than the site ownership.

5195
Here is my current post on Bits ! I do not know if it will get posted or not, due to the activation of the moderation queue

@Steve - I'm betting that post is not going to run 'as is' - assuming it runs at all.

-------

FWIW Amazon allows something similar. I posted a detailed and (in places) negative review of a popular tech book, which was later taken down at the request of the author. Had the same thing happen to my somewhat critical review of the book The 30$ Film School.

I gather this sort of thing happens more often than we'd expect.
5196
Living Room / Re: Trick-or-treat caramel onions
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 04:38 PM »
^"We wants it we does. Gives it to usss!"  ;D

Now that I'm definitely gonna try. We've already got glass topped canning jars...and some nice brandy nobody is drinking. All I'd need to get is some grapes - and I have to do some grocery shopping tonight anyway!

Mix 1 tea. lemon juice with 1/4 c. honey 2 Tab of Drambuie or cognac with 1 lb seedless green grapes mix well Let stand in fidg four hour before serving. Pour over1./2c. sour cream and brown sugar to taste. return to fridg til ready to serve. Serve in champagne or large stemmed wine glass.
kades

Just have to try a few variations and see which combo of sugar/honey/citrus juice works best. :up:

Or maybe try this one
 8)
5197
Living Room / Re: Shit Apple Fanatics Say
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 04:31 PM »
^gender neutral too. neatly avoids the whole straight/bi/gay issue. ;)
5198
Living Room / Re: Windows 8 Pro will now include option to downgrade to Windows 7
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 04:28 PM »
For those of us who held on and skipped Vista and went straight to 7, I for one shall report that 7 is just fine and all the techies who cared just turned off Aero in fifteen minutes (as soon as we figured out where they moved all the options to!)

Spot on! :Thmbsup: (I never run with Aero. Haven't from day one either.) However, most smart money thinks Metro (or whatever they end up calling it) will be difficult or nigh on impossible (by design) to disable. Just like it was almost impossible, for a while at least, to completely remove IE without breaking Windows.

It's not gonna go away (or get stuffed on a back shelf with the Christmas ornaments) without Microsoft putting up a fight. Microsoft does not simply walk away from a major investment in coding - or voluntarily admit their design or paradigm was wrong.

Same deal for the ribbon - I installed a plugin into Office that put all the old menus back, and went back to work. (However see elsewhere for my opinions how the game changes when you can *make your own ribbons!*)

Also a valid point. Unfortunately, with the industry trend of gradually moving over to more controlled ecosystems, 3rd-party "fixes" and hacks are going to become harder to come by. Microsoft wouldn't even need to be as draconian as Apple with their arbitrary and capricious AppStore policies. They could simply add a license clause to their programming tools that specifically forbids a developer from distributing software that disables or "works around" fundamental Windows (or other product) features and capabilities.

"When your enemy goes to ground, leave them no ground to  go to." as was said in Serenity. Which is smart. Because you don't need to control what your users do so long as you can control what most of the platform's developers do.

And while jailbreaking is always an alternative, that's a arduous trail that has no ending. We don't want to go there - even if we can. Trust me on this one! I've done the "crack your iPhone" thing. It's far more trouble than it's worth in the long run...unless you get off on that sort of thing.

In my case, I just wanted to be able use my phone - not make a whole career out of playing tit-for-tat techwar with Apple. (Note: My next phone won't be an iPhone because of that. I'd rather just get something new than flack with a company about how their product works.)

 8)

5199
Living Room / Re: Shit Apple Fanatics Say
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 03:57 PM »
It is a cult. Here's an recent example (link to full article here).

I took the liberty of bolding some of the more "religious" passages... ;D


The iPhone 5 is without a doubt the best telephone on the market yet everyone seems to be completely underwhelmed by it. This has very little to do with the device itself and more to do with the expectations we hold for it. When the iPhone was introduced in 2007, the most sophisticated smartphones were Blackberrys and Treos. It was a touch screen god-send to a world of Motorola RAZR flip phones. It was truly something that had never been seen before. At that point, Apple made it clear they were eight to ten years ahead of any competitor. But that gap has leveled in the last five years. While Apple continues to make the best phone on the market, with the best application community behind it, we’re no longer seeing quantum leaps in their products’ abilities.

Maybe it’s because Jobs is gone. But the iPhone 3G was barely a step up from the original. And the iPhone 3GS was essentially the same device as the iPhone 3G. It was only the iPhone 4 that ushered in a new kind of design sense and internal components to follow. When people complain that the new iPhone isn’t better than the older versions, they really mean to say “It doesn’t look that different. How could it be any better?”

My iPhone is the product I interact the most regularly and intimately with. It exists with my person. The only thing that could challenge it for time in contact is my wallet and I spend a lot less time interacting with that. Before my current iPhone, I had my original iPhone for three years. I refused to let go of it in favor of newer models because the plastic build of the 3G and the 3GS felt cheap and reductive of the personal interaction implicit in the phone/phone-owner relationship. My original iPhone felt right in my hand. The anodized aluminum backing wore where my hands touched it until it was smooth. It is that type of connection between person and product that is seldom possible. In fact, I fear it’s something so rare that to someone who hasn’t owned an iPhone, iPad, or other Apple product the language I used to describe such a bond seems downright silly. The point: the iPhone 5 has—for lack of a more accurate metaphor—soul. And it’s soul is found in the painstaking engineering and design that went into the product. No company but Apple can manufacture something that carries so much life.

The iPhone 5 won’t make your draw drop. It does not present itself like alien technology as the original iPhone did five years ago. It is, however, the best phone on the market for the soul, precision, and standard of excellence it embodies.


This is the typical Apple fanbois speil.

Not impressed by an Apple product? That's your fault because you're either stupid (because you're not an Apple customer) or a jaded ingrate (if you are an Apple customer)!

Beginning to doubt the hype? Well...that may be because the demigod Steven Jobs no longer dwells among us mere mortals. So we must expect mistakes to be made now that our lives and destiny are no longer safe in Steve's almighty hands. (This is a favorite fallback whenever some criticism is so glaringly obvious that it's impossible to just wave it away.)

Having problems with that weird erotic/sexual subtext you keep getting? Well, it's obvious you've never had a real relationship with anything or anybody, which makes it obvious you lack sufficient "soul" and maturity to be able to understand. So piss off!

Oh lordy, lordy, lordy...why do we continue to listen to these people? ;D
5200
Living Room / Windows 8 Pro will now include option to downgrade to Windows 7
« Last post by 40hz on September 13, 2012, 03:35 PM »
From the Department of "So Much for Doubling Down" comes this bit of news as reported by PC World and several other sites:

Microsoft Will Allow Downgrades From Windows 8 to Windows 7 , Vista
By Gregg Keizer, Computerworld   

Microsoft will allow users of Windows 8 Pro to downgrade their new PCs to Windows 7 or even Vista, according to the operating system's licensing agreement.

Not surprisingly, users may not downgrade to the still-used-but-slated-for-retirement Windows XP.

Downgrade rights -- which let customers replace a newer version of Windows with an older edition without paying for two copies -- are available only in Windows 8 Pro. That fits with previous practice: Only Windows 7 Professional, for instance, was allocated downgrade rights.

"Instead of using the Windows 8 Pro software, you may use one of the following earlier versions: Windows 7 Professional or Windows Vista Business," states the software license agreement for the version of Windows 8 Pro that will be installed by computer makers (OEMs) on new PCs.

<Read full article here>

It's interesting that PC sales have tanked disastrously in the last six months for many computer manufacturers. And that despite the fact that server and network device sales have increased significantly.  Much of the loss of PC revenue has been blamed on tablets and smartphone sales. But I wonder if that's the whole - or more significant reason.

In the past,  the introduction of a new version of Windows has generally been counted on to boost PC sales. This time around however, I wonder if there is enough concern (especially in business circles) that corporate buyers are hesitant to commit to larger numbers of PC purchases out of concern for potential productivity issues that might be introduced by Microsoft's new dream child?

I can't speak for all businesses, but I've installed the Windows 8 Release Preview on some laptops and ran it past a few of my clients. I did not hear one positive thing said about it by any of them. About the best reaction it got was a worried "I guess we'll have to see" that was immediately followed by a concerned "How soon did you say this is gonna be Windows?" And most reactions to the Metro front end ranged from negative to unprintable.

However, now that it's official you can downgrade, it will be interesting to see if desktop PC sales start making a recovery. Obviously they'll never return to their former level of sales now that so many niche alternatives are available. But it is interesting that the drop was so precipitous that several (usually) savvy PC manufacturers were caught completely off guard by it.

If you're in IT, it's gonna be a "fun" Fall, that's for sure. :-\


Pages: prev1 ... 203 204 205 206 207 [208] 209 210 211 212 213 ... 470next