topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 12:31 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 [194] 195 196 197 198 199 ... 309next
4826
General Software Discussion / Re: New Folder 2 2.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2011, 03:40 PM »
the most handy solution is to create a new subfolder folder when you double click on the empty area of a folder view, imo
That means moving your hand from the keyboard to the mouse and then back to the keyboard - definitely not very handy.

The best is a decent filemanager, but MilesAhead's solution is decent for those who stick to explorer.

no, I think you are wrong: you don't move your hand from the keyboard to the mouse, you most often have your hand to your mouse already!


I'm mouse oriented also.  That's why I use AHK to do the hotkey part. It has better Mouse Hotkey support than AutoIt3.  For me it's just easier in most cases to use AutoIt3 to do the guts of the app.  Also AHK is superior when it comes to passing the keys on.

Eventually I should have some scheme to change the hotkey without having to close the app and edit the .ini file.  But one step at a time. :)

4827
General Software Discussion / Re: New Folder 2 2.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2011, 03:10 PM »
the most handy solution is to create a new subfolder folder when you double click on the empty area of a folder view, imo
That means moving your hand from the keyboard to the mouse and then back to the keyboard - definitely not very handy.

The best is a decent filemanager, but MilesAhead's solution is decent for those who stick to explorer.

Yup.  FreeCommander has F7 for new folder. I got used to that key.  My program passes the key on if not on desktop or in explorer folder.  With QTTabBar explorer isn't so bad.  Esp. on Windows Seven the folder button on the Taskbar lets me close all folders at once.

Also I made a hack to open Explorer folders spaced out on screen from paths in a text file. It's easier to take an existing folder set file and Save As in an editor than to use a Layout in FC.
4828
General Software Discussion / Re: New Folder 2 2.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2011, 03:05 PM »
FreeCommander I've used for a long time. It has F7 already for new folder. I let it pass through to app windows.
the most handy solution is to create a new subfolder folder when you double click on the empty area of a folder view, imo

Edit the ini file option for Hotkey.  Try some of these until you find something you like:

http://www.autohotke...com/docs/Hotkeys.htm

Edit: I added the above link to the Readme

4829
General Software Discussion / Re: New Folder 2 2.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 05, 2011, 10:01 PM »
New Folder 2  2.0 A rewrite of New Folder program.  Now it uses an AHK hotkey handler exe.  This provides much smoother pass through of the hotkey when neither the Desktop nor an Explorer Window is active.  Application handling of their shortcut keys should be normal.

The main processing is still done with an AutoIt3 app. I may use this approach for AutoIt3 unless they improve the hotkey handling.  AHK just handles it more cleanly.
4830
General Software Discussion / Re: New Folder 1.02
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 04, 2011, 11:25 PM »
New Folder 1.02 Small changes in the code.. error checking etc..

The Readme now has a link to a page with detailed AutoIt3 hotkey information.
4831
Anyone know how to set LastPass to auto login all sites at once?

I dread the thought of editing each one individually just to tick the box.

Edit: seems like there isn't.  Have to remember to click AutoLogin as I traverse 'em.
4832
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 04, 2011, 02:21 PM »
I guess having the perfect swap setup is quickly approaching the snake oil status, pretty much like all the optimization tricks that no longer bring quantifiable benefits today.

Well said! And likely very true too. :Thmbsup:



You mean if I go to "my really damn quick PC" dot com it won't make my PC really damn quick, even though I'm running with only 7% free disk space and have 44 windows open?
4833
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 04, 2011, 02:18 PM »
Ram disk is so Win98 anyway.


4834
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.2.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 03, 2011, 03:09 PM »
The program with the use of ==/====> is going well.
I'll take a look to treePagGen

 :)

OK. :)
4835
General Software Discussion / New Folder 2 2.4.2.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 02, 2011, 11:47 PM »
New Folder 1.0 Just a simple Hotkey to create a New Folder on Vista or Windows Seven.

Please note Requirements at the top of my hotkeys page:
http://www.favessoft.com/hotkeys.html

Default hotkey is F7 Function Key.

To create a new folder, Desktop or an Explorer Folder Window should be the "active window."  On Windows Seven, it just sends the Control-Shift-n hotkey built into Windows Seven.  On Vista it either provides an InputBox to get the new folder name, of if Desktop is active it just uses macros to use the built in New=>Folder in the context menu.

You may change the hotkey using the .ini file.  See AutoIt3 help file for hotkey syntax.
The readme has a link to the AutoIt3 download page if you want to use a complex hotkey instead of changing the function key number.

4836
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.2.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 02, 2011, 03:28 PM »
At the present moment I have no problems with clipboard, but I can't see the comments after created. Not with the arrows keys, and not with the left click mouse over the icon.
 :-[

Seems in relation with the option to no problems with the clipboard. When I deactivated the mode =/==> come back the comments.

When it shows "=/==>" on the Tray Icon, the hotkeys just exit without doing anything. It gets the file name using the clipboard.  It saves clipboard text, but anything else would bog it if I swap it around every time you hit a key or click. It's a compromise.  You need to disable while using clipboard graphics or other stuff, then enable when using for comments.  The only other way is shell extension.  That has it's own problems besides not working in 64 bit. I think this method works fairly well.  Anytime you use hotkey macro it's going to be a bit touchy.  The other method I did was a TreePad file.  But then you have to look stuff up and enter text pretty much manually. I didn't see any command line option to open TreePadLite to a search.  You're pretty much stuck with opening the comment file and hitting Control-f.

TreePadGen

4837
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 02, 2011, 02:28 PM »
If they improved swap file that's fine but by the very nature of file systems I would tend to guess the partition swap is a lot closer to the low level calculations that file systems use to manage the files. Therefore it's awfully likely there's another layer on top of that for the file system that's not there for the partition management.

Actually, swap in Linux is a lot more accessible and tweakable than it is in Windows. And better documented. If you have multiple swap spaces you can prioritize which gets used first. You can  temporarily or permanently tweak what set of conditions triggers a swap ("swappiness"). You can also very easily enable or completely disable swap from the command line. I tend to do that on machines with a lot of RAM. I'll enable swap only if I'm doing something that needs it. Then I'll disable it afterwards.

Good two part article on it here. Part-1 gives the main details. Part-2 gets into tweaking.

You can also temporarily or permanently swap to either a swap partition - or a swap file on a regular partition. That comes in handy if you ever discover you didn't create a big enough swap partition for your requirements. A swap file fixes the problem very nicely until you  around to resizing some partitions (also easy to do in Linux) to give you a bigger space if you prefer to keep swap on its own partition.

Yessir! Swap is a whole 'nother beast on Linux.  :Thmbsup:



I know.  See my previous posts esp. the one with "round robin" in the text.
It's almost unbelievable Windows has done nothing in all these years regarding swap.
Maybe those guys from DEC quit and nobody else at Redmond has the talent.

I wonder if anyone has info on Windows 7 prefetch vs. swap?  I have a feeling it does stuff like swap stuff out so it can prefetch stuff on the preferred list in.  It would be interesting to know if setting page file max would have any effect. It might be more conservative if it knew there was a limit other than free disk space? Probably no way to know for sure.

But those type of tweaks was what made Linux an adventure.  What killed it for me was the editors. The only thing Windows-ee was Kylix ide editor. It just got distracting trying to remember how to navigate in Emacs.  And the help was weird. Kind of needs total immersion to really do it well. I always had the Windows partition crutch. Pretty much had to as some devices I had to initialize with Windows.  Then once warm I could boot Linux and use 'em. :)

Even today if I ask about a Linux editor that feels like a Windows editor I get the same suggestions I tried then.  Word processors when I want a text editor. The ones I found with Windows type hotkeys tended to be configured in lisp or python. Just kept me from thinking about what I was typing because I had to think how to type what I was typing.

But it was fun.
4838
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 02, 2011, 01:45 PM »
@f0dder, I think it's pretty much a distinction without a difference. Again we are back to usage. If some dude loads up his 10 GB spread sheet once every six months and thereby forgets to account for it in settings due to the infrequency, it could conceivably crap out on him. Your settings may safeguard in that case.  But I never use 10 GB spread sheets. So I don't see the advantage of guarding against what's never going to happen. I don't loan my PC out for others to use.

For me, min=max when using swap at all is more than sufficient.

I'm not about to load Linux to gather stats. If they improved swap file that's fine but by the very nature of file systems I would tend to guess the partition swap is a lot closer to the low level calculations that file systems use to manage the files. Therefore it's awfully likely there's another layer on top of that for the file system that's not there for the partition management. t's pretty much who owns how many blocks on the partition where. Can't get much simpler. One virtue of running a slow 486 with 12 Mhz bus was that any optimizations could be felt viscerally. I didn't have to run a benchmark.  The machine was so slow I could see and feel the difference in responsiveness.  Also watching the disk LED. Partition was noticeably faster. I ran comparisons when setting up my swap scheme(and yes I ran them forward then back to disallow any file system caching).

Swap Partition placement does make a difference.  Since my 2 physical drives had such a speed and size disparity I was prevented from doing all swap on the non Linux drive.  But I put the swap partition on the fast disk hosting Linux between the 2 partitions I used for Linux file system.  Tended to swap back to center rather than making wide swings to fetch. Not much thrashing at all esp. with supplemental swap on the other physical drive.  Also I did have settings if the universe changed and I had some giga-unimaginable memory requirement, a swap file was created on the fast disk.



But either method would work. Right now I'm back to running no swap since I tend to use light weight processes. Resource meter tends to show this machine running with almost a GB of memory on Stand-by. I don't think it's going to crash loading Firefox if I already have Chromium open.

But, if someone used either method I don't think they'd notice the difference. All I can tell you is in all these years of running swap min=max whenever I check it with PageDefrag it shows one big chunk. Like years after I set it up that way. Once I got a PC with 2 GB then I got away from swap altogether. My 8 GB machine sure doesn't need it for my use.
4839
Developer's Corner / Re: Next step up from Autohotkey
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 11:08 PM »
AHK and AutoIt3 have the same roots.  I use both.
You know the watch-my-fingers automatic script generating utility that comes with AHK?  Does it work any better with AutoIt3?

I haven't tried it.
4840
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 05:52 PM »
Don't see the point of those fixed size partitions these day, really - for the same reasons as my arguments against the fixed-size windows paging file. There were technical reasons for it back in the olden days, but Linux has supported file-based swap for a while now.

It supported file based swap when I was using it. It's just that partition based is more efficient. Read how it works with partition based swap before making assumptions.

I notice your post is filled with implications such as "blindly follow" etc.

So your remedy is to blindly follow you instead of my 16 years of experiences using and watching my systems? Tsk tsk.  Debate tactics rather than argument.

btw I took swap off. I don't need it now that I have Bookmark Sentry to fix my Chromium bookmarks. :)

In these arguments everyone ignores usage.  People who have 20 windows open constantly are going to use more ram than people like me who have a couple open and close what's not needed.  I don't run 20 Tabs in Chromium.  The usual for me is 3.  "What's best" shouldn't even be asked until you ask "how to you use your system?"  Otherwise it's just tail chasing.

4841
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.2.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 05:47 PM »
Done . I will continue using the program all the time with Ditto to see is something happen....

 :P

Thanks for your feedback. I appreciate the updates.
4842
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 03:19 PM »
Aiyy!! Yet another swap argument!  Anyone know where I can get a copy of the MS official press release with the conventional wisdom that one must always run swap?

otoh I might get bagged for posting (c) material.


4843
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 03:02 PM »
Run your machine your way.  This has worked for me across many machines across many years. No maintenance no crash. The "so what" is having to reboot the machine and defrag the page file for no reason that I can think of. If you really think "so what" then just let Windows manipulate the page file in the first place. No stress. :)
1) I can't remember if windows will only shrink the paging file on shutdown, you might be right on that point... but you're going to do that in due time. Can't really see why you'd reboot just for the shrinking?
2) you don't need to defrag - when the pagefile is shrunk to minsize, the additional extent(s) are simply removed, and you're back to your 1-fragment file.

I really don't understand the reasoning behind setting a fixed size. Either you have a ludicrously large pagefile, or you acknowledge you can run OOM. IMHO it's pure logic to set a minsize to "somewhat more than you expect to see (and have measured) under normal use", and without maxsize (or a "sanity limited" maxsize if you must) - you get the best of both worlds:
1) no fragmentation under normal working conditions
2) perhaps fragmentation, but temporary so (without needing a defrag), instead of running OOM.

So, is there a flaw in my reasoning? Or are you just sticking to "that's the way I've always done it, because I read on some tech site that's it's the thing to do"?  :P

If the page file size never even approaches the minimum what's the point of having a larger maximum? I can see if people run memory hogs like giant spread sheets.  But for my usage there's no need for it.

It's my experience that people argue about swap more than they actually use it.
I only have 2 GB ram on this machine and ran for 4 years with no swap.  So why should I subscribe to your formula?  On my side I have about 16 years of experience with my method.  On your side I have theory.

A better solution all around is a swap partition a la Linux.  You definitely do no fragment your system partition.  If the emergency case arises you can set it to create swap file(s) dynamically if needed.  I had Linux running on a 486 with a fast EIDE drive and a slow SCSI drive.  The fast drive the swap was much faster.  But by setting the swap "round robin" to the swap partitions on each drive I got smoother performance. The speed of the system was the same but the EIDE Linux was running on didn't thrash.

The Windows options are almost laughable.  Everything is squeezed through the straw of a file system.  They could fix it but they don't care.
4844
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 02:15 PM »
Fixed size pagefile is a bit silly, by the way. Set it to a large-ish minimum size to avoid fragmentation, but why set a fixed upper size? (OK, the one reason I can think of is shutting down a runaway leaking 64bit process before it fills your drive... but that's about it).
Setting the maximum guarantees it won't be fragmented. I've removed page file, defragmented the disk.  Then enabled paging with min=max.  Months afterward checking the page file for fragmentation shows it never needs to be defragmented.  Zero maintenance.
Setting the pagefile to a reasonable minimum size means you'll never get fragmentation under normal working conditions, but if you should need the extra swap... however unlikely... it'll be available rather than your application running OOM. If you've got little enough memory (or extreme enough applications) that you need swap, that seems to be far the superior solution to me.

And even if you do get into the extreme situation and it causes fragmentation... so what? Once system is back to normal memory usage, the file will be shrunk and you're back to your minimal-size file in one fragment.

Run your machine your way.  This has worked for me across many machines across many years. No maintenance no crash. The "so what" is having to reboot the machine and defrag the page file for no reason that I can think of. If you really think "so what" then just let Windows manipulate the page file in the first place. No stress. :)

In fact I only got OOM because I ran a brute force script to load pages in Chromium to refresh favicons(at that time Chromium lost favicons on nearly every snapshot update.)

Now that I have Bookmark Sentry extension I may as well disable the pager.  But it doesn't seem to hurt anything so I guess I'll say "so what." :)

4845
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.1.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 01:38 PM »
Okis Miles. I try.
Yesterday happen again the disfunction interacting with clipboard and ditto and have to close comment explorer.

Best Regards
 :)

Try double-clicking the Tray Icon so that you see
"=//=>" when you hover the mouse on the tray icon instead of
"==>"

That should temporarily disable messing with the clipboard for arrow keys and mouse.
Or you can right click the Tray Icon and click on Arrow ToolTips to remove the check mark next to it. It does the same thing.

Let me know if that prevents the side effects.
4846
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.2.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 01:35 PM »
Comment Explorer 2.2.0.0 Minor code clean up.
4847
Living Room / Re: Anyone else using Ramdisk in Windows 7?
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 12:31 PM »
Fixed size pagefile is a bit silly, by the way. Set it to a large-ish minimum size to avoid fragmentation, but why set a fixed upper size? (OK, the one reason I can think of is shutting down a runaway leaking 64bit process before it fills your drive... but that's about it).

Setting the maximum guarantees it won't be fragmented. I've removed page file, defragmented the disk.  Then enabled paging with min=max.  Months afterward checking the page file for fragmentation shows it never needs to be defragmented.  Zero maintenance.

On my 8 GB machine paging is disabled.  On my 2 GB machine I have a 4 GB page file just because I got one out of memory error in 4 years running no swap due to having a dozen Chromium tabs open while doing a video mux.  No swap is the best swap unless you have to use some memory hog app. I prefer lightweight processes unless I'm getting some kick-ass performance that justifies the bulk.

4848
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.1.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2011, 01:24 AM »
Comment Explorer 2.1.0.0 Added Taskbar Progress for Windows Seven to Comment Compaction routine.

(It makes for messy code, especially in scripts.  But it looks cool.) :)

4849
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 2.0.0.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2011, 05:52 PM »
Comment Explorer 2.0.0.0 Added ProgressBar to Compact/Purge functions.  Also added dialog for Compact function in FolderMode to verify the file to be compacted.

Windows Seven Taskbar Progress is on the ToDo List.
4850
General Software Discussion / Re: Comment Explorer 1.9.1.0
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2011, 05:50 PM »
The program only saves text that's in the clipboard. Not graphics.  That's why I have Double click Tray Icon to disable.

If it's another issue I still don't know what you mean.

edit:

Also I notice from the screen shots you seem to use Icon View.
For commenting I think you'll get better results with Details View.

There's no need to have the program run all the time.  I launch it to
comment my downloads or look through the comments. It's not really
designed for system wide heavy duty file annotation.  That needs to
be either in the file system itself, or a full blown file manager program.

The facility should have been added to Windows about a year after the
first PC Mag shell extension to comment files.  12 years later and still
waiting for MS to get the hint.


Pages: prev1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 [194] 195 196 197 198 199 ... 309next