topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday June 15, 2025, 2:38 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26next
476
Find And Run Robot / Re: farr v2 planning - use cases and action idea
« Last post by nontroppo on July 02, 2006, 09:31 AM »
Wow! i think these thread get lost in detail and the way forward becomes unclear. sorry not to provide input sooner (bussssssy bee).

to go back to quicksilver - it has no clear edit box but visual indicators:

http://docs.blacktre...quicksilver/overview

it makes no clear distinction between actions and files IIRC (though it is now a long time ago that i last used it) - i think that is good. as it is visual, keyboard guides lists as FARR but with no clear edit box (a very simple UI).

so at first push - i'd want FARR to mix actions and files together. select [object] and you can launch it straight away (action would do nothing). press tab and the next selector comes up, again allowing files or actions. NOW if an action was specified first then to start with the next list can be just files (however think about nested actions described in the other thread).

by using a modifier, the list would be restricted as discussed here. so power users get the benefits of better focus and performance without forcing it on all users.

i likes jan-S's suggestions in the previous thread for a closer way to integrate into FARRs existing UI (the stack of files / actions). However quicksilver has this done visually which i think is more intuitive.

PLEA:
There are many other useful things FARR 2 can achieve. Performance is my #1 issue at the moment and there are many other things in the bugtracker. Please don't block all development of FARR waiting for the perfect solution to this as it won't happen. Incremental updates and some experimental builds will get us further than long theads (over 100posts spread over two threads) with endless possibilities  ;)

477
Find And Run Robot / Re: farr v2 planning - use cases and action idea
« Last post by nontroppo on May 19, 2006, 01:58 PM »
i need to sit down and read over the weekend - I will get round to it  :-[ :P
478
General Software Discussion / Re: completely unjust disregard for 'farr'
« Last post by nontroppo on May 16, 2006, 07:34 AM »
nitrix-ud: I think what you are noticing is that FARR searches anew each time. Try reducing the number of scanned directories (especially recent documents). FARR currently rescans directories on each key press. This will not be an issue for future versions as we hopefully will have some form of index.
479
General Software Discussion / Re: Process Explorer V10.11
« Last post by nontroppo on May 16, 2006, 07:31 AM »
when minimized it uses ~0.54% CPU - when running ~3.2%. that compares to ~0.11% for windows  task manager and ~1.8% running.

Try reducing update frequency to 2 seconds.

I've never noticed it disrupt scrolling in Opera here. What happens if you turn the graphs off?
480
General Software Discussion / Process Explorer V10.11
« Last post by nontroppo on May 14, 2006, 04:04 AM »
Knowing what exactly is happening to your machine is a pretty fundamental thing when using a computer. Windows has a built-in task manager, but it is primitive.

A wonderful, free alternative is Process Explorer from SysInternals. There isn't information you can't glean from it. It is very customisable, and a great feature are "column sets" - you can save views dedicated to I/O, memory and whatnot and easily switch between them.  My screenshot shows my "general" view of essential resources for each app, this is all customisable.

You can determine working set memory use not only for apps, but dependent DLLs; and you can see which DLLs and handles an app has open.

If a file is locked, it will tell you which app has it opened, it will run google searches on processes you're not sure of. Minimised to the systray it uses few resources and its animated icon keeps you aware of CPU (tooltip tells you the most hungry current app without even opening it!). The new version contains a host of details and more "history" displays to keep track of e.g. I/O operations per-app over time. There are lots of neat touches throughout.

I never leave home without it... ;)

http://www.sysintern...processexplorer.html (which is also a great source of other software)
481
and if people suggesting new ideas can write feature requests into clear and succinct bugs in the bug tracker that would really help too...
482
mouser, why not make a wiki page for each broad topic: plugins, search modifiers etc so that we can focus things down. Currently there are lots of ideas dispersed in different threads which I believe is not so good for development. wiki pages are great for unifying idea's and drilling down to core concepts.

i tried logging in but i cannot create an account - there is an error on the login page...
483
General Software Discussion / Re: completely unjust disregard for 'farr'
« Last post by nontroppo on May 11, 2006, 05:32 AM »
IMO launchy has been succesful for two reasons - eye candy is the main one, and utter simplicity the second.

launchy is not bad, you can manage directories and extensions to search. The skinning engine allows alpha transparency. It doesn't use too much RAM (more than FARR though). It uses an index, and indeed the results come back faster than FARR.

It ain't close to FARR in terms of features, but then not everyone cares for features!  :o

484
More abominable code no doubt. I don't understand how they manage to write such poor markup. If you've ever had a peek at their HTML it would make a novice blush, and the baroque javascript mess that powers their AJAX is impenetrably convoluted. What ever happened to pride in your work...
485
General Software Discussion / Re: email client. Opera's M2 vs. the Bat
« Last post by nontroppo on May 10, 2006, 03:10 PM »
I had a paid licence for the Bat, and was the biggest fan of it for a long time (helping beta testing). It was, and is, an excellent piece of software.

I would spend time crafting complex filters to organise my folders.

However, then I tried M2, and at first hated the disorder (compared to the baroque control of the bat). But then I "got" it, use access-points and let it do the hard work. Mailing lists automatically fell into place, discussions with people all ordered without me having to lift a finger. Not having to maintain folders and decide where content had to go. Read RSS and allow access points to aggregate information into dynamic tagged collections no matter what its source (i.e. whether it is a mailing list, forwarded mail or a feed doesn't matter if it is about the same topic). Being a tweaker and lover of CSS - the fact I can style my mail display is great.

Opera has a fully configurable UI, so I can tweak if I want to (build my own mail buttons etc, change key bindings and use mouse gestures to perform actions on mails).

M2 is not perfect, there are areas where more spit and polish wouldn't go a miss. IMAP is getting a big overhaul for Opera 9, and the storage format has changed to make it more robust.


urlwolf: did you try the accounts selector? right click in mail panel toolbar and "Customize" > Buttons > Mail and drag the account selector to your toolbar. That filters views to specific accounts. And when you switch the account - the compose button composes from the active account. I think this solves your issue?
486
General Software Discussion / Re: Find and Run Robot got an Award
« Last post by nontroppo on April 11, 2006, 07:38 AM »
Congrats mouser - well deserved - FARR rocks!
487
What really amazes me is the insect kingdom -- some of the most complex communities/social/political structures in nature aren't lower mammals, but insects.  Bees, especially.

For anyone living close to London, the first annual Pestival is happening soon:

http://pestival.org/index2.html

Through appreciation of “insects in art and the art of being an insect”, the Pestival aims to create positive PR for this 400-million-year-old, highly evolved taxon that has had thousands of years of bad press.

We are building up a fantastic programme of talks, demonstrations, workshops, art installations, films, music and performance, fusing art and science to reach out to a broad, interested audience of homo sapien adults and children.

There will be several fascinating talks, including one by a Forensic Entomologist on what maggots teach us about a crime scene. Sherlock Slimes and Dr. Antson anyone?
488
How about the old Operas (eg v5) which would let you create new windows which could be tiled or cascaded within Opera?
You could create a "linked window" (or windows) to show the url you clicked on in an originating window.
Don't know if its still possible or not - would like to know.

Yes, it is is absolutely possible in V8.5 and the latest V9 technical previews. It has been hidden more and more in the prefs to make it look liked tabbed browsing (not to scare new users), but you can get a full "multi-page" power mode as Opera has always allowed (and now is uber fashionable) since V2.x back in the last century...

You can custom program commands in the menus to do specific stuff like split-screen mode in the later versions, for example I have:

Item, "Create linked and tile" = Minimize all & Restore page & Create linked window & Tile horizontally
Item, "Split-screen mode" = Minimize all & Restore page & Duplicate page & Tile vertically


489
490
Looks very nice, congrats to sembal (and JoTo for the review). Shame it is for IE only, and I imagine it would be very difficult to port over.

note most of the features are available in other browsers, but this integrates it all together in a clean way.

another essential for web developers is a request / HTTP header debugger. I long used proxomitron, which can regex and rewrite headers on the fly and log all HTTP requests. But a nicer UI is available with the name of Fiddler, an excellet HTTP debugger:

http://www.fiddlertool.com/fiddler/

the great thing is that this is cross-browser.
491
Though I don't use it, AdMuncher is really brilliant software. The developer coded it in assembler for a long time, commited to low resource usage and hugely optimised. It is quality through and through.

Proxomitron is great (I've used it for years), but it is NOT for "it just works" functionality; some filter sets are great but I think AdMuncher is better for newbies. I'd give my dad admuncher while I'd use proxomitron (though I look forward to regex and header mods, i need to check it out again). Sadly the author of proxomitron died and the code is now frozen in time - it still works great but there will be no more development (though see below).

This is a better web site for prox: http://www.proxomitron.info/index.html

Good forums: http://kyeu.info/proxo/forums/index.php

There is also an open-source clone of prox: http://proximodo.sourceforge.net/

And a "smarter" proxomitron type app: http://bfilter.sourceforge.net/
492
General Software Discussion / Re: IE 7.0 Beta 2: Any takers?
« Last post by nontroppo on March 23, 2006, 07:43 AM »
I get sick of all the ACID, ACID, ACID clammoring. A benchmark, not a priority -- and by no means the true measure of a browser--not yet, anyway.

I have mixed feelings on Acid2 myself. Yes, it has been misrepresented in what it is supposed to achieve, and supporting it will not make cross-browser dev headaches go away completely. But it really does test a series a fundamental building blocks that have never been properly addressed. Of course web devs have been hacking round browser bugs since the WWW was born. The IE 7 team has tried to fix all the glaring bugs in existing things it breaks (which is good[1]), and simply cannot address the changes Acid2 requires. Neither can Mozilla till the gecko core gets a serious reworking. It took Opera a year to implement its fixes.

Though the test itself looks "dumb", the techniques behind it aren't - solid positioning, min/max-width/height, generated content, CSS tables and others would make a clear difference in what web developers can achieve, and what users would experience. That is important for accesibility and many other things...

----
[1] I DO welcome IE7 - anything that is less of a buggy mess that IE6 was is warmly greeted!
493
Update: gizmo can interoperate with GoogleTalk, and will soon allow voice too - allowing open client-agnostic IM+voice chat cross-platform. http://www.gizmoproj...com/google-talk.html

M_S - what is meebo exactly - I didn't want to try it as I was worried it was a 3rd party getting access to my passwords via a web page!
494
allen: did you report that to the bugtracker (I did just in case). I believe it may actually be a regression, though the CSS2.1 spec is not entirely clear on the expected behaviour.
495
General Software Discussion / Re: IE 7.0 Beta 2: Any takers?
« Last post by nontroppo on March 22, 2006, 10:21 AM »
so, any takers...? or is it too little, too late...

{beware: browser criticism ahead - wear hard hat!  8) }

Well as far as web standards go, much too little too late. Thay have basically hacked and patched up an old dinosaur of code. The rendering engine (the core of a web browser) still fails to support HTTP/1.1 properly, fails to support XHTML properly, fails to support CSS2 properly, fails to support the DOM properly. They have added no new technologies since 2001. There is a litany of misrendering of web standards[1]. They did fix some bugs that have been untouched for 5 years!!!

Security is better; indeed that is so, but it could hardly of been made worse...

UI - a cold calculation to add the minimum number of features copied from other products to keep enough people on-board. Nothing innovative.

----
[1] Standards help users greatly as well as developers BTW before we get into that avenue.
496
What a sad mess the IM world is. Many users are locked in (in the sense that cross-network requires multiple logins / hacks)both because of their vendors, as well as their platform...

I have to cross-platform chat (mostly to Mac users), and I'd like the option of voice (I can only dream of video)as well as IM. That decimates the options out there. Most of them have reasonable windows versions, but poor hacked Mac ones. I also really dislike all the proprietary protocols.

For that reason Jabber is the bright hope for IM ( http://www.imfederation.com/ ), none of the ugly proprietariness of MS/Yahoo/AOL. Anyone on a federated server can talk to each other. Both iChat and GoogleTalk are Jabber clients. GMail allows jabber chatting through a web browser which is neat.

One cross-platform free IM that has a very rich feature set (whiteboards, file transfer, voice, IM and lots more)and is wonderfully programmed (and actively developed) on all supported platforms is Bitwise:

http://www.bitwiseim.com/

They use a proprietary network sadly, though they are at least clear that it is to do with security and privacy, rather than the market-domination strategies of the others. The forums seem friendly and helpful.

Though the hope for propietary free IM / voice (unless Google pulls its finger out and releases a cross-platform client) rests with the Jabber based Gizmo:

http://www.gizmoproj....com/learn-more.html

I haven't tried it but it does voice / IM.

Of course, Skype does IM as well as voice (and file transfer)

http://www.skype.com/

For IRC, I use Opera's built-in client - It uses Opera's rendering engine so I can style my IRC window using CSS. It does all I need.
497
Find And Run Robot / Re: use cache to improve FARR start
« Last post by nontroppo on March 17, 2006, 03:42 PM »
stop taunting us!  :tellme:  ;)

masu: there are bugs requesting this, e.g. https://www.donation...cking/view.php?id=78
498
Find And Run Robot / Google Desktop 3 - FARRified
« Last post by nontroppo on March 17, 2006, 09:18 AM »
Hi all,

Don't know whether anyone has tried it, but Google Desktop Search now has a popup search field (hit CTRL twice). If you enter application names they are indexed so come up and thus it can be used as an application launcher.

gds.png

It doesn't do any smart stuff (e.g. being adaptive and using heuristics like FARR), but it does seem to weight start menu entries.

mouser - could we get the CTRL+CTRL key sequence as an option in FARR, it is quite a good and accesible key sequence (good for left+right handers and doesn't require chording two keys together..._
499
Find And Run Robot / Re: FaRR running slowly?
« Last post by nontroppo on March 09, 2006, 08:22 AM »
the freeze for a couple of seconds thing may be a bug regarding searching networked files..
do you guys with the slowdown have a lan?

ah, it seems my freezes are indeed due to this, however my previous install didn't do this so obviously, weird...

and +1 for an option to keep FARR in memory more aggresively, a turbo mode! - it uses so little of it anyway...
500
Find And Run Robot / Re: FaRR running slowly?
« Last post by nontroppo on March 08, 2006, 06:25 PM »
it does seem that the latest v1.09 freezes for a couple of seconds while searching on several quick keypresses once it is focussed for me.

what happens if you turn the history display and skin off?
Pages: prev1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26next