topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 22, 2025, 1:22 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 170 171 172 173 174 [175] 176 177 178 179 180 ... 364next
4351
I was just wondering :) - DOS programs have a disadvantage running under windows since they need some virtualization... and won't run at all under 64bit windows (outside of full emulation, like dosbox). I still use plenty of console applications, but it's been several years since I've used anything 16bit. Seems like the 32bit version is DJGPP, no wonder it's quirky on NT based operating systems then :)
4352
General Software Discussion / Re: What is your boot time?
« Last post by f0dder on December 01, 2008, 08:09 AM »
Curt: you didn't actually run 700+ programs at the same time, do you? Only the running apps sucks up ram :)
4353
rjbull: Eek, using 16bit dos executables under win32? Why haven't you searched for a replacement tool? :)
4354
Curt: why would you limit windows update, though? It's not one of the heaviest CPU eaters, and it's single-threaded anyway...
4355
Living Room / Re: Can someone help with my understanding of TOR (The Onion Router)?
« Last post by f0dder on December 01, 2008, 12:42 AM »
By default µTorrent only allows the connection to the tracker to be proxified, but it has an option to specify if you also want the peer to peer connections to work through the proxy as well. I can only imagine how immensely slow that must be though, even more if someone uses Tor.
Thanks for the clarification!

And yeah, you'd likely get abysmal speeds if you routed all torrent traffic through TOR. If you only routed tracker requests, it would be pretty pointless, though.
4356
Developer's Corner / Re: DC loads fast. What is the secret.
« Last post by f0dder on December 01, 2008, 12:40 AM »
Gothic: it's not only the server specs, I bet, but also has a lot to do with the hosting facility and the quality of it's peering. Here from Denmark, I have 21 hops/170ms to www.donationcoder.com - and the site absolutely flies :Thmbsup:
4357
Living Room / Re: Can someone help with my understanding of TOR (The Onion Router)?
« Last post by f0dder on November 30, 2008, 05:56 PM »
Lashiec: isn't the proxy support only for the tracker HTTP connection, though? Or does it work for the p2p connections as well? (If it does, I've severely misunderstood things :-[).

Thanks for the Torcap link, didn't know about it :)
4358
General Software Discussion / Re: WINDOWS 7 THREAD (ongoing)
« Last post by f0dder on November 30, 2008, 10:59 AM »
Well, the old reference rasterizer is typically <1fps iirc, so they've probably done some work. But it's still somewhat pointless for gamers, as soon as a software rendering path is taken, frame rates drop to unplayable. It's really mostly useful for developers as a tool to check if graphics glitches is a bug in their code, or flaky video card drivers.

As for faster than intels integrated solution, keep in mind that they compared a beast of a processor, and intel's GMA was (afaik) designed with relatively low power consumption in mind... a quadcore at 3GHz running maxed out isn't exactly low-power ;)
4359
DC Gamer Club / Re: Steam, and the gift of game...
« Last post by f0dder on November 30, 2008, 09:51 AM »
 :-*
4360
app103: when was Python scripting added to PSP? In the annoying Corel versions, or previously?
Previously, in V8, while it was still a Jasc product. Corel's first version was v10.
Thanks.

Didn't know it had python scripting, duh - that makes it an even more useful tool than it already is :)
4361
General Software Discussion / Re: Is XP really that good?
« Last post by f0dder on November 29, 2008, 06:16 PM »
Linux is not well designed. Its a hodge podge of competing design philosophies with no coherent vision, no standardized API's on which other developers can build apps, and a new project starting every week which tries to fix the failed efforts of the previous ones. Note I am not talking of the kernel, which IS decent, but all the user level subsystems such as video, sound, the filesystem etc.
Hear ye, hear ye!

It's a darn messy hodge-podge, and documentation sucks. When it works, all is good, but as soon as something breaks... *b00m*. Unless you're a hardcore developer or have some serious google-fu elitism, you're S-O-L.

Well, that is all very open to debate :P Having to fix endless XP machines of friends (registry errors, infections aplenty, horrible performance), having to recommend from the tidal wave of poor alternative software (more in number yes, not always in quality), I can't say it is better for users at all.
That'd be the norm for any OS (of the currently available) if it was the dominating product. As soon as you get a zillion shit-for-brains people using something, it'll go horribly wrong :). Users mess around alot, and linux is more fragile than windows. Users will figure out how to run everything as root, and then they'll go wreck their system.

Yeah, the Windows API is pretty messy, and it's very clearly visible that it has legacy all the way back to win3x... but at least it is properly documented, covers more or less everything you need for core OS services (without requiring third-party libraries), etc. I wouldn't mind playing around with OS X, but why oh why did Apple choose Objective-C for Cocoa? :-s

faster or just as fast (KDE and Gnome are just as fat and bloated as Windows counterparts)
Well, Windows has never run as fast on any system I've put them on. And Vista is infinitely slower than XP. If KDE and Gnome are just as bloated, then Windows must be inherently much slower.
In my experience, linux has always felt slower than windows. Applications start slower, including second-time launches when everything is cached - and even if you do horrible hacks like statically binding libraries. The UI also feels less responsive than Windows, even if using the native nvidia drivers (probably has to do with the X11 protocol) - the OpenGL desktop acceleration stuff doesn't help much, but it sure does make your system unstable.

They find the whole repository system easier than anything for Windows - and it is only really possible for free software.
It's only familiarity that makes most people think it's easier.
Oh really?

*mumbles something about having to manually edit configuration files as soon as you want to do anything out of the ordinary... like getting a multiple monitor setup working*
4362
Living Room / Re: Can someone help with my understanding of TOR (The Onion Router)?
« Last post by f0dder on November 29, 2008, 05:48 PM »
Only works with software that is able to connect using proxy - which rules out things like bittorrent.

Theoretically I guess it would be possible writing a network card driver that would make it possible to route all traffic through TOR, but it would be a nontrivial task, and it's not how the system currently works.
4363
General Software Discussion / Re: WINDOWS 7 THREAD (ongoing)
« Last post by f0dder on November 29, 2008, 05:45 PM »
And you can play Crysis without a graphics card (in slooooow-motion) :P:

http://www.istarteds...-only-albeit-slowly/
Hm, what's so new about this? The DirectX SDK has included a reference rasterizer (ie, software-only) for ages.

Cloud sucks.
4364
Living Room / Re: Why Windows Rules: the QWERTY phenomenon?
« Last post by f0dder on November 29, 2008, 05:18 PM »
Zaine, the analogy would have worked if the de-facto product was flawed compared to the alternatives - QWERTY is clearly handicapped compared to DVORAK, as mentioned previously... for most other markets with a dominating product, this isn't the case.
4365
Coding Snacks / Re: What language is the best for a new programmer to start with?
« Last post by f0dder on November 28, 2008, 06:47 AM »
IMHO it's a bad idea to start with C, there's simply so many ways to shoot yourself in the foot, and using the str* libc functions is the path to doomTM. If you really want to start with C, instead use C++ as as "super-C" - ie., still learn procedural programming, but using things like std::vector instead of malloc/free, and std::string instead of bloody char arrays. You can always go back and learn "pure C" if you need to.

Yes, C/C++ is my main language, but I doubt it's the smartest way to start. JAVA, on the other hand, is much more newbie-friendly (it's easy to get graphics, for instance, which gives many people a decent feeling of success), and it's structure is so similar to C++ (and C#) that it's pretty easy making the shift later on.

Python or JavaScript (in a suitable host) would be interesting languages for teaching as well. Or frameworks like Processing (java-based) - again, because it gives encouraging Success ExperiencesTM compared to boring console output and abstract crappy useless "Mammal, Dog->Dachshund, Cat->Siamese" class hierarchies.
4366
Hm, on my system NetBeans seems about as heavy as eclipse - and it loads a bit slower, and takes up more RAM. I also kinda prefer Eclipse's GUI, it has a lot of nice defaults that saves a bit of manual work. I only spent around 15 minutes with NetBeans, seemed like a less polished product than Eclipse.
4367
General Software Discussion / Re: Is XP really that good?
« Last post by f0dder on November 28, 2008, 03:25 AM »
XP is pretty OK at managing memory, it's a bit too conservative wrt. using free memory for caching, imho.

32bit XP can't utilize 4gig (or above) memory (technically it can, but MS has disabled the capability), 64bit XP or 32bit server OSes can handle "quite a bit more than 4gig".

Also, it's really a question of how much memory the applications you run use.
4368
I generally find it more useful to reduce an application's priority rather than tying it to specific CPU cores - especially if the program is multi-threaded!
4369
I've always wondered... what the heck *is* BurnProof?
The ability to stop the burning process and resume it, with the laser position within... oh, some hundred nanometres (iirc) of the last burn position, as specified by the CD/DVD specs. Apparently that's a non-trivial task?, since it was added quite some years after burners became mainstream.
4370
Living Room / Re: Top 10 Ways Not to Cook a Turkey
« Last post by f0dder on November 27, 2008, 06:10 PM »
Friction, baby... friction.
4371
Living Room / Re: How to tell if your cat is plotting to KILL you
« Last post by f0dder on November 27, 2008, 05:57 PM »
Haha Phil, that had me laughing pretty good :D
4372
Hm, I doubt CPU strain would be very high from file indexing (unless something is very wrong with the indexing application), and CD burning doesn't require a lot of CPU power anyway... but indexing of course has a lot of disk load (why oh why wasn't I/O prioritization added before Vista?).

BurnProof/whatever-each-vendor-calls-it does save you from coasters, but it's still best not to rely on it - burn quality is lower if BurnProof has to kick in.
4373
General Software Discussion / Re: How to make a local copy of an ancient Web forum?
« Last post by f0dder on November 27, 2008, 05:53 PM »
agentsteal: what you did might not be unethical, but please keep in mind that mouser could probably be held responsible if a post like that was allowed on this forum. Laws are crazy like that.
4374
Living Room / Re: Why Windows Rules: the QWERTY phenomenon?
« Last post by f0dder on November 27, 2008, 11:18 AM »
But "better" has to have quantitative benefits.  Just because the kernel is way cooler or open source or from anyplace but Redmond shouldn't (and doesn't) matter. 
Thing is, it isn't. It's not the POS it used to be, but it's still inferior to the NT kernel :)
4375
Living Room / Re: How to tell if your cat is plotting to KILL you
« Last post by f0dder on November 27, 2008, 04:22 AM »
No thanks needed. It was on 1st page of Google results ;)
-fenixproductions (November 27, 2008, 04:16 AM)
Doh - just shows how lazy I am :-[
Pages: prev1 ... 170 171 172 173 174 [175] 176 177 178 179 180 ... 364next