3501
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Mini Review: Install Creator Pro
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on February 08, 2010, 12:44 PM »How does it compare to our beloved NSIS?-scancode (February 08, 2010, 12:41 PM)
Not a clue
Recent Posts
How does it compare to our beloved NSIS?-scancode (February 08, 2010, 12:41 PM)
| App Name | Install Creator Pro |
| App URL | http://www.clickteam...g/installcreator.php |
| App Version Reviewed | v2.0 Build #24 |
| Test System Specs | Asus Xonar D2 Ultra Fidelity 7.1 PCI Sound Card |
| Supported OSes | Win XP/Vista/7 |
| Support Methods | Forum/E-Mail/Phone/Mail/Fax |
| Upgrade Policy | No Info Found |
| Trial Version Available? | Available - No Nag Screens, Includes Ad at End of Installer |
| Pricing Scheme | Standard or Professional Version |
| Reviewer Donation Link |  Donate to Stephen66515, the Review Writer |
| Relationship btwn. Reviewer and Product | Current Customer |
Personally i think code like this is desperately needed. I calls these "User Management Systems" as opposed to "Content Management Systems (CMS)".
For a coder developing a web application, there is an abundance of heavy bloated CMS frameworks, and an almost complete absence of UMS frameworks. And I have found myself choosing a CMS as a starting point just to get the user/group management, when what I would have really preferred is an actively developed and powerful UMS -- without all the crazy content management stuff.
One thing I can't tell from looking through the site is what kind of support for Access Control Lists it has -- this is an important aspect in my view -- a way to assign and manage generic permissions for users and groups.
Meta comment: This is a good example where the thread would be easier for people to find and notice if it wasn't a poll but was titled more directly, like for example "Quadodo and other User Management / Login Frameworks", etc. Please everyone when you post remember that people may be searching for and browsing threads in future weeks, months, years, and you want to make it easy for them to anticipate the contents of a thread when reading it's title.-mouser (February 07, 2010, 04:45 PM)
The domain name for this is www.quadodo.net but the links to documentation provided on the download page (http://www.quadodo.net/downloads.php) use www.quadodo.com, which redirects you off the site (in my case, to a bad URL collection scam site).
Even if the product itself were bulletproof, this is the kind of thing that scares me away real fast.-xtabber (February 07, 2010, 10:21 AM)
I promise not to ink him haha.This was never my intention. It is about pros and cons of browsers here, so what's wrong with contributing?Telling people that they are wrong in their choice of browsers, telling people that YOU and ONLY YOU are correct when it comes to giving Firefox its acronym, and posting pointless comments is the problem we have here, and the fact you seem intent on dragging the conversation into some random argument. Now please, no more totally pointless posts, stay on topic or go post on another forum. If you would like to reply to this post, keep it on topic and no more bloody arguing, its just getting old now.
I readily acknowledge that Opera has its shortcomings, and do choose not to use some of the less useful features, notably the inbuilt BitTorrent client (which has never worked well for me),-Ampa (February 06, 2010, 03:02 PM)
It should, too.-Tuxman (February 06, 2010, 05:41 PM)
but still contains features that I cannot get in FF and loads websites a hell of a lot quicker than some of the other browsers I use...but anyway, this isn't an Opera vs. Firefox debate, so CAN WE GET BACK ON TOPIC PLEASE? If you want a debate about those 2 browsers specifically then go make a new post 
Opera does not, but Opera better should.
Also, the bookmarklet is nice for roboform but it is no roboform toolbar.
Might want to change CHOSE to CHOOSE ;-)