topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 11:34 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 [130] 131 132 133 134 135 ... 175next
3226
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Pledge: Track My Stuff!
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 11, 2012, 06:24 PM »

I sometimes find a useful metric is "what is this app doing that a spreadsheet won't?"

A. List of Games.
B. Status1 = Who has them
C. Status2 = Who to yell at to get the game you care about back
D. Notes1
E. Notes2

3227
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: And so it begins.. NANY 2013
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 11, 2012, 06:22 PM »
Almost time? Pffft. That's mouserese for 'Oh, I'm right on time.' after certain people remind him there's nothing on the forums about it yet...  ;D

Is there an English-Mouser rosetta stone yet?!    :o
3228
General Software Discussion / Re: Shape Shift 1.0.9.0 and MoveIt 1.2.5.4
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 11, 2012, 06:20 PM »
Ridiculously off topic but I get a kick out of your 4 level versioning Miles. Miles Away from Firefox!   :-*
3229
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: And so it begins.. NANY 2013
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 11, 2012, 05:23 PM »
Uh. Oh. FEAR NANY 2013!!
3230

Meanwhile in Canada,

http://www.theglobea...bill/article4602164/

"John Ibbitson: The quiet death of the Internet surveillance bill ...

C-30, you will remember, would grant the federal government and law enforcement agencies the power to obtain information about individuals who are online without having to apply for a warrant."

Aka Canadian SOPA.

So we won another one. More attempts to follow.
3231
Living Room / Re: How to tell if the Universe is a computer simulation
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 11, 2012, 03:44 PM »
Since vision seems to be our most convincing sense

ROFLMAO ... that was a joke ... right?

Naw, "most" - out of several more even less convincing senses! If you think hearing is convincing, listen to the election debates!  ;D

For all the chaos of sight, I think most of us have banged into objects in the dark.
3232
^ took me a minute to click there
groan....
 ;D

Those are the best kind!

Here's one that's even worse!
Once upon a time there was a dull witted farmer who had two horses. He could not tell them apart. They ran the same speed, were the same height, and both liked oats. Once day he measured them and he was very happy! Now he could tell them apart!

Wait for it ...

The grey horse was two inches taller than the chestnut horse!

3233
A silly little joke for the Olympics but I'm late, oh well.

Did you hear the one about the Olympic Runners? Sorry, I can't tell you - it's racist!  :P
3234
Living Room / Re: Major ISPs to implement "Six strike" rule
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 11, 2012, 03:36 AM »
@Tao - I'm impressed! Relatively few people know that Vonnegut appeared in a Dark Visions collection.  :Thmbsup: I take it you're a sci-fi buff?

I used to be, with a specialty in older SF from second hand stores. From that it morphed more into a Harlan Ellison specialty because his storytelling cadence was different from anyone else's I'd ever seen. Briefly, Ellison was really good at complex emotional depictions. It became my own personal version of a scavenger hunt because his books were tricky to track down in those days.

Nowadays I've been posting more online, though I have a feeling fairly soon that I'll be reading a bit more again.
3235
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 12:18 PM »
Seraphim hit his 100th post.

3236
Living Room / Re: An Odd DoS Attack
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 12:15 PM »

40hz with the winning analysis again.

This is why I am starting to get grumpy at news, it's not worth reading the "half articles" anymore without waiting a week for the "other half" to hit.   :mad:
3237
Living Room / Re: Major ISPs to implement "Six strike" rule
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 11:30 AM »
"So it goes," as Kurt once said. ;D

As in Kurt Vonnegut. I believe that was in the Dangerous Visions anthology. Much more starts to get NSFW.
3238
Living Room / Re: US judge orders piracy trial to test IP evidence
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 10:58 AM »
Don't forget, in the absence of a specific law or a 'generally understood and accepted standard or responsibility' (i.e. common law) there can be no legal liability or culpability.  If it's not an actual law, then there's no law to be broken. And in the absence of a violation of law, no enforcement action is possible either. And that remains true no matter how pissed off that may get some people. That's why there's so much effort to clear up legal gray areas like this one.

I haven't forgotten, and that is what I meant by they are trying to put the pieces in place. Somebody discovered that there's benefits to be had by converting grey areas into black ones, then labeling all of the US as criminals until proven innocent.

Addenda: I have stayed away from torrents. I have watched youtube clips to my hearts content, but the minute I went to Sidereel (honeypot site?) and absently clicked "download" I got an ISP warning like 2 days later. That scared me because it smelled of the future.
3239
Living Room / Re: Major ISPs to implement "Six strike" rule
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 10:53 AM »
Sure 40hz, that's a good description of the problem, and most of what I was getting at. So taking the easy example, someone makes a funny cat picture, they have the automatic copyright, it goes viral, 'cuz tha internetz Likez doing that, and then you have 666,000 cases of copyright infringement.

So I suggested CC because it's the most famous of the alternatives, but 666,000 people "hoping" that the Cat-Picture-Creator-Guy isn't a jerk is just asking for trouble. That's what I feel needs an answer - some easy method to take the "implied" license (which one? SA without even a BY?) and make it obvious, and make it stick in court.
3240
Living Room / Re: Halloween would be less popular if...
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 10:48 AM »
(Satire)
Miles is clearly a terrorist since all of Retail now hates him.
(/Satire)
3241
Living Room / Re: RFID Tracking IDs in Schools - Non-compliance = Exclusion
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 10:09 AM »
Local school here requires finger prints to use the lunch service (and they take both thumbs - just in case you lose one!).

Don't know about anyone else but if I lost a thumb I don't think my first thought would be 'how do I get my school lunch?' !!!

See, these guys have forgotten what Bullies are. In twelve seconds I see Bully taking a kid's hands and slamming them on a stove, thus ruining his fingerprints forever. Bully gets "suspended". Kid gets in trouble with Authorities for the rest of his life.
3242
Living Room / Re: US judge orders piracy trial to test IP evidence
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 10:06 AM »
^I think it would be fairly obvious that a landline would probably be considered more than "close enough" considering it needs to be installed somewhere. And that location is not much open to debate unless you allow for somebody hacking a central station circuit at a telco.

It's also a moot point for most users since most WAPs (in the US at least) are connected to a physical landline or cable. So a landline is part of the equation in most circumstances.

The only time wireless comes into play is when somebody is arguing anybody can easily (debatable on both points) hack a wireless connection, and therefor the person who is paying for the connection it gives access to, shouldn't be held liable in the same manner they would be if they gave somebody physical access to their home or place of business in order to use their landline/cable directly.

So yeah...if wireless is "close enough" you can count on hardwired connections being seen as "even closer."  :)

That's why I brought it up, because these guys like "footholds". So if it's "just you" on a landline, I guarantee there's enough victims ... er... users who might one of these years fall into a really nasty law about "it's the user's fault". It's like they need the requisite number of preliminary pieces in place before they use the Trump card to seal the lockdown.
3243
Living Room / Re: US judge orders piracy trial to test IP evidence
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 09:37 AM »
The landline doesn't really matter. The assumption is that most people use wireless Internet at home. Wired landline to the router/modem, then wireless to the computers. If it's not secured, anyone can use the connection. Just drive up to the place within wireless range, connect, and there you go. Kind of like what Google does. ;)

It does matter, and I asked my question for a reason, because chunks of Americans don't have wifi. So you get a question like "do you have a wifi set up?" and if the answer comes back "no", where does that leave you? I turned OFF my wifi because I do all my computing from my desktop, so why do I need a wifi again if I only live in one room?

Nice Chewbacca attempt though.  :Thmbsup:

So I repeat, if someone has no wifi, is a landline IP address "close enough" to determine a user? Because except publicity "Streisand" problems aside, this isn't very far from saying "you watched a tv clip on youtube, and you had Reasonable Doubt that Cucumber2265 wasn't an authorized source, here's your fine."

Addenda: What I am getting at is that if you make it the *user's* burden to try to source materials, you get a whole lot of trouble reeeeeeeallly quick. And all because we can't separate copyright into "types". Look at the pictures we like to post. Look at the "recommend videos" threads. Basically, look at "Sharing" which is all of Web 2.0. I'm getting chills seeing the conflicting forces here. Going all Grade C Prophet, I remember very little of anything, but I distinctly remember about 1999 and 2000, at the Dot Com boom and crash, Y2K, early 9-11, that "all the tech has been done except minor updates on features." So even skipping the whole Mobile movement, and a couple new drugs, I was right. Once there is no world class innovation left, "we all just sit here staring at each other getting bored" and that's where we are now - "bored" = "IP lawsuits." ((Look at the accidental pun, Internet Protocol address lawsuits to protect Intellectual Property. Or if Apple gets involved, iP. )

Extra Credit: Do you know how *hard* it is to source something? Most men like a little pr0n now and then. It's usually framed to hell and uploaded to 5 sites. Can you imagine trying to find the original creator of that? Or if that makes you squeamish, even the cat pictures are almost impossible to source.



3244
Living Room / Re: US judge orders piracy trial to test IP evidence
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 09:33 AM »
I'm undecided about which exact mechanism this goes through, whether it's "court victory and criminalize open wifi" or if they just do what the conspiracists were saying and "buy the court ruling" in their favor. Not that we've been slavishly adhering to the law lately anyway, but it gets harder to fight a law if it gets nice and crispy than if it's in the "grey zone". So it's like this is the obligatory first step, let's be cynical and say it goes in favor of the plaintiffs, then it gets appealed, which affirms, and the Supreme gang decides "not to hear" and so it becomes law-by-bench, maybe with a helpful law passed by Congress.

3245
Living Room / Re: Major ISPs to implement "Six strike" rule
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 09:27 AM »
In one sense all this would go away if we had a grassroots movement to make stuff Creative Commons etc. Except corner cases, the minute you make something BY-SA the problem basically goes away. But part of the current partial victory of the copyright brigade is making CC seem somehow second class. I mean, there's Pro-copyleft/_____ sites out there, and on the bottom says "Copyright ____, All Rights Reserved". (Really?! Copyleft for everyone but you?!)

3246
Living Room / Re: Major ISPs to implement "Six strike" rule
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 10, 2012, 12:45 AM »
How much of a slowdown is it?  One of the major reasons I haven't worried about it (and I don't torrent either, so not a big deal there).  I just hear about the false positives, and that's the major reason I'm looking (in addition to being able to connect to home while I'm out).

I look at news Combo style. Combine this with that PA trial where the judge "wants to know if IP = person". Cue the cynicism, if they manage another gamey trial, even going to youtube could become dangerous because you are viewing "unauthorized content". (Pay no attention to the secret accounts uploading that content.)
3247
Living Room / US judge orders piracy trial to test IP evidence
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 09, 2012, 11:52 PM »


http://www.bbc.co.uk.../technology-19887765

"A landmark case in the US will test whether internet piracy claims made by copyright firms will stand up in court.

Such cases rely on identifying the IP address of machines from which content was illegally downloaded as evidence of wrongdoing."

(Grump: The US needs the BBC to tell us our news. /Grump)

Slashdot was all over the wireless wifi topic, but if I were the defense I'd be worried they didn't split the topic into what happens with boring ordinary landlines. I'll leave that to my betters: can a landline IP address do what the prosecution wants or does that get shifted and bundled too much?







3248
DC Gamer Club / Re: Dishonored for $45
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 09, 2012, 11:10 PM »
That resale case lurking in the Supreme Court might bear on this too. The price of a game used to also factor that used copies were beginning to show up.
3249
General Software Discussion / Re: Transpose 2.3.1.3
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 09, 2012, 11:06 PM »
I wrote an AHK hotkey awhile back to Transpose the 2 characters left of the caret in some editors and browsers.  I added a couple of Mouse hotkeys for Chrome-based browsers.

The compiled program is available for download:

http://www.favessoft.com/hotkeys.html

Program source and icon are included.  See the Readme.txt for info how to add editors and browsers to the supported apps in the AHK source.


Heh I just tried this out today. It's rather cute! What confused me was that a lot of the US uses the word "cursor", and a "caret" is a ^ key, so I couldn't figure out what I was supposed to use a ^ for.

Edit: Not as useful for me as I had hoped, the kinds of errors I make tend to be wrong-letter errors, anmd no amount of sswitching will help. (Errors left in for demonstration.)

3250
Living Room / Re: An Odd DOS Attack
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 09, 2012, 02:32 PM »
Should it be called a DDOS? Was it Distributed?

When I saw DOS I was thinking someone had a weird program from 1988 or something.
Pages: prev1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 [130] 131 132 133 134 135 ... 175next