topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 11:00 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 [104] 105 106 107 108 109 ... 404next
2576
Developer's Corner / Re: Windows Update Controller
« Last post by wraith808 on January 03, 2017, 11:57 AM »
Thanks!  I'll have to check that out!  :Thmbsup:
2577
Developer's Corner / Re: Windows Update Controller
« Last post by wraith808 on January 03, 2017, 08:14 AM »
Have you tried using virtual machine for testing?

Nope.  Mostly because with Windows 10, I haven't really figured out how to get a licensed version into a VM since I don't have a version of windows 10 for it. :(
2578
General Software Discussion / Re: YNAB moving to a subscription model
« Last post by wraith808 on January 02, 2017, 09:56 PM »
Nope.  Still using YNAB 4.
2579
Developer's Corner / Windows Update Controller
« Last post by wraith808 on January 02, 2017, 12:08 AM »
This project started as an entry for NANY 2017, but because of issues detailed in the thread, I didn't feel great releasing it.

As I already have the app ready to go, and just need to iron out said issues, I figured I could workshop it here with some others if anyone was willing.  I'm also going to add a couple of other features around Windows Update and controlling it, so I figured I'd change the name.

To the primary issue- when I set the correct registry keys, the Windows UI for Active Hours does not register the change, though the registry keys are set correctly.  Not only does it not register the change, it changes back to the default.  I also made a change in the windows UI, and it does affect the registry keys that I expect, and saves the changes.  I've tried it on 4 different machines, and the behavior is the same on all of them, so I don't think it's anything machine-based.  They are all Windows 10 Home (1607/14393.576).

I figured that a picture is worth a thousand words.

First, the interface.



Basically, if you set the active hours for longer than 12 hours, it will find a 12 hour window that works based on your current time, and set the config file to be the whole length, and the registry keys to be that 12 hours.  I was working on this very early in the morning, so when I set the span from 8AM to 11PM, it saved that to the application config (the bottom controls), and set windows to the computed span, i.e. 8AM to 8PM.

Then, the registry.



As you can see, the ActiveHoursStart key is set to 8, and the ActiveHoursEnd key is set to 20, as I expected.

Then I open the active hours dialog.



It was set to 10AM to 10PM before this, but as you can see, it reset the dialog to 8AM to 5PM.

The registry still shows the correct thing.  But will it honor the registry?  I don't know.  I've set 3 of my computers to never reboot unless I manually reboot, so I only have one computer to test on.  I have it currently set in the registry to active hours that do not overlap the 8-5 timespan, so I guess if I'm paying attention at the time, I'll see.  But the kicker is that I have to be paying attention.

The code to make the change is quite simple:

Code: C# [Select]
  1. public void SaveData()
  2. {
  3.         if (this.DataHasChanged)
  4.         {
  5.                 this._LoadingData = true;
  6.  
  7.                 try
  8.                 {
  9.                         using (RegistryKey registryKey = Registry.LocalMachine.OpenSubKey(@"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsUpdate\UX\Settings", true))
  10.                         {
  11.                                 var activeHours = this.GetActiveHours(Convert.ToDateTime(this.UserActiveHoursBegin).Hour,
  12.                                                             Convert.ToDateTime(this.UserActiveHoursEnd).Hour);
  13.                                 registryKey.SetValue("ActiveHoursStart", activeHours.Item1);
  14.                                 registryKey.SetValue("ActiveHoursEnd", activeHours.Item2);
  15.                         }
  16.                         this.Config.AppSettings.Settings["ProgrammedActiveHoursBegin"].Value = Convert.ToDateTime(this.UserActiveHoursBegin).Hour.ToString();
  17.                         this.Config.AppSettings.Settings["ProgrammedActiveHoursEnd"].Value = Convert.ToDateTime(this.UserActiveHoursEnd).Hour.ToString();
  18.                         this.Config.Save(System.Configuration.ConfigurationSaveMode.Modified);
  19.                 }
  20.                 finally
  21.                 {
  22.                         this._LoadingData = false;
  23.                         this.DataHasChanged = false;
  24.                 }
  25.                 this.LoadData();
  26.         }
  27. }

Any thoughts?
2580
N.A.N.Y. 2017 / Re: NANY 2017: MMAHW! (Make My Active Hours Work!) - Cancelled
« Last post by wraith808 on January 01, 2017, 02:06 PM »
On another point, if someone wants to help and let me know if the behavior on their machine is the same behavior I'm seeing on my machines, I'd appreciate it :)
2581
N.A.N.Y. 2017 / Re: NANY 2017: MMAHW! (Make My Active Hours Work!)
« Last post by wraith808 on December 31, 2016, 10:17 PM »
I can be the change I want to see!  Hopefully, it won't trigger the Microsoft update to fix the hole in their scheme.

Apparently, my fears came true.  All of a sudden, though the registry keys are set correctly, it stopped updating in Windows.  I thought it might be the tweaks I did to get it to not restart at all, but I tried on a machine that I'd not put those tweaks on.  So, as a result, even though the NANY is done, I won't be releasing it.

A little more information:

Formerly, when I ran the application and changed the times, it would show up in the registry and in the interface.  Now, it only shows up in the registry, and the interface in the active hours is set back to default, i.e. 8AM - 5PM.  The only time it used to do this was if I tried to set it for longer than 12 hours.  If I set it through the regular interface, it does indeed use those registry entries.  But with the interface acting strange, I don't feel comfortable releasing it for anyone's use.
2582
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: FolderViewer on Shareware on Sale
« Last post by wraith808 on December 31, 2016, 08:18 PM »
I guess the only reason I was asking, is I saw this:

This is a 1-computer lifetime license, for commercial or noncommercial use
No free updates; if you update the giveaway, it may turn become unregistered
No free tech support
You must download the installer before this giveaway has ended
May not be resold

And usually when I see something like that, I check the main product to see if I want to buy it... because no way am I agreeing to that.

At http://www.matirsoft.com/, the feature product is FolderViewer.  They didn't have the price readily visible, just a buy now button, so I was skeptical, especially since the product seems to have so many features- but it's only $10.  Seems cheap for what it purports to do.
2583
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: FolderViewer on Shareware on Sale
« Last post by wraith808 on December 31, 2016, 02:18 PM »
But what I'm asking, is Google Desktop Search even still a product?  I looked it up, and the only downloads are from third party sites- not google.  Looking into it a bit deeper, it appears that it was discontinued by Google in 2011.  So that con seems not to really be a con, unless you go out of the way to make it so.
2584
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: FolderViewer on Shareware on Sale
« Last post by wraith808 on December 30, 2016, 06:35 PM »
I tested version 4 and was pleasantly surprised. But because the program uses Google Desktop Search - and I don't want Google to be in my home - I removed it within the trial period.


Is Google Desktop Search still a product?
2585
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: FolderViewer on Shareware on Sale
« Last post by wraith808 on December 30, 2016, 12:46 PM »
If anyone has any opinions after use, they would be appreciated.
2586
Screenshot Captor / Re: sending screenshots to a file
« Last post by wraith808 on December 28, 2016, 11:41 AM »
Seems like he wants to send screenshots of text to a folder, and the screenshots should be labeled in varied ways by the content of the sentences.

so, if he's taking a screenshot of the sentence "four score and seven years ago", it would be saved to a screenshot labeled "four score and seven years ago.jpg"
2587
Activation/License/Language Help / Re: license key
« Last post by wraith808 on December 23, 2016, 11:29 AM »
Is this considered a universal key? If not...how do i obtain a universal lincesne key that would work for basically any program

The universal key works for any of mousers programs.  Not with any program. You have to purchase one from a winrar distributor here.  You can also get it free with TrialPay: http://www.trialpay....443a&tid=6rGGip1
2588
Activation/License/Language Help / Re: license key
« Last post by wraith808 on December 23, 2016, 09:05 AM »
Ok so with a rar. File if i purchase the key it will work in any rar. Based apllication?

Incorrect.  It would work with WinRAR.
2589
Living Room / Re: Interesting "stuff"
« Last post by wraith808 on December 22, 2016, 06:29 PM »
Energy Department issues a statement that they're not evil after Stranger Things.

https://energy.gov/a...ut-energy-department
2590
Living Room / Re: British companies to face big fines if data breaches occur
« Last post by wraith808 on December 21, 2016, 10:35 PM »
Aren't both of these threads (this one and this one) talking about the same thing?

This thread is talking about a regulation that makes companies legally responsible for protecting against breaches (and disclosing them), the other thread is about a ruling that prohibits governments from requiring all emails for all users to be retained for 1 year.

Both of the threads have the common, uh...  thread... that the ruling or regulation is by the EU, so there is the question about whether they will apply to the UK.

But as you said, they have a common thread, so discussing them in separate threads seems self defeating, since there will be much crossover. 
2591
Living Room / Re: Movies you've seen lately
« Last post by wraith808 on December 21, 2016, 09:55 PM »
I also saw Rogue One.

I'm still trying to figure out how I feel about it. It was a decent film. Probably better, in my opinion, than the last 4 Star Wars episodic movies that were released (so 1-3, and 7). It had some really great moments, but also some silly/pointless moments. There were some things that happened that make no sense to me and as far as I can tell were never explained. They used CGI to resurrect or make young again a couple of actors from the original trilogy (episodes 4-6). The CGI was pretty good, but still not good enough to avoid the Uncanny Valleyw. I feel they did a good job of making Darth Vader feel menacing and powerful. But there was a weird moment in there where they had Vader make a CSI-like sunglasses-pun. Then again, maybe it was subtle enough that most people didn't catch it.

I saw it today (my Christmas gift from my  son), and I rather liked it a lot more than I expected.  The space scenes got that feeling that I had when I was a kid going in a way that the others  didn't.  The CGI on Tarkin didn't affect me (UV) as much as the other.  I liked the way that they tied up loose ends from some of the dialog in 4, and liked the way that they tied everything in.  It was also more ambitious and risky than I expected a Disney vehicle to be, which was a good thing.  And totally agree that they made Vader a lot more menacing- put back some of the menace that had been stolen from him in some adaptations of him.
2592
Living Room / Re: Movies you've seen lately
« Last post by wraith808 on December 21, 2016, 09:50 PM »
It assumed you'd seen BvS?  I didn't catch that, and so didn't lose out on anything from that.

I think so. It mentioned a few times things like "what if we're not so lucky next time?" which was a reference to Superman being super powerful, but benevolent. I figured that the general idea of BvS (AFAIK) is that Batman thinks Superman is too powerful and therefore must be stopped because no one should have that much power. And the general idea of Suicide Squad is "we need to stop people/things who are too powerful." So I guess I just assumed it was a reference to BvS because I haven't seen it and don't know what happens in it.

I thought that was a reference to Man of Steel, not BvS.  Especially since the other aliens that were there were just as powerful- but Superman was the one that survived.  Never put together that they could be referring to BvS.

As for the characters, the following is all my opinion, so of course very subjective:

It might be because you haven't read the comics?  Admittedly, with a cast that was this large, it was inevitable that some people would get the short end of the stick... I knew slipknot's position because of this.  And I do think that your complaint has merit beyond what you say- it's bad writing.  More than the BvS link, I thought this was the point where they relied on you already knowing the characters, though I'm not sure offhand of a better way to execute it in the time given.  They are doing a better job with Justice League, but I still give the credit to Marvel, as they were willing to give the major characters in the Avengers their own movies (for the most part), and not rush the project to market as DC is.  I'll go down your list interjecting what makes each special- at least the ones I know.  I also linked the names up to the wikipedia entries.

Captain Boomerang sounds like one of the silliest supervillains ever. The movie gave no reason or information whatsoever why he was so evil and threatening as to be locked up with the likes of Harley Quinn or Deadshot. It also gave no indication of his "special abilities" that would make him an ideal person for the squad. He's a criminal who can throw a boomerang. Big whoop! That's even more lame than Hawkeye (who I think is pretty lame).
There have been a few different incarnations.  The first had no particular background that would seem to make him villain worthy- other than the fact that he made his boomerangs, and they had varied effects, paired with the unusual nature of the weapon, made him a threat for Flash.  In Arrow (the TV show) they added the angle that he was Australian Special Forces, and an assassin.  So it was his skills with an unusual modified weapon and the ability to get creative with the effects that makes him dangerous.

Slipknot maybe had potential, but obviously went completely unused, so we'll never know.

Nah... he was used the same way in the comics.

Killer Croc reminded me of some mashup of something from Spiderman and The Thing from Fantastic Four and the movie gave me no reason to care about him.

The comparison you're probably drawing is between The Lizard (1963) and Killer Croc (1983), and the parallels are valid, but given more flesh in the comics, as the backgrounds are totally different.

Harley Quinn was the only one of the group (not counting Joker as part of the group) who I knew of before the movie began and I didn't understand her role or her "abilities" in the film. Just because she's crazy doesn't mean she would survive combat (or "perform" it) any better than anyone else.

Her ability is in all honesty chaos, similar to Joker.  Her inclusion is more a matter of her popularity in the comic medium, and her popularity there is driven by the fact that she is a relatable female character.

Katana was an unknown who was good with, you guessed it, a katana. But Deadshot could have easily shot her dead before she got to him, so what's the point of her?
You underestimate her, and the Katana.  She has great mystical powers from being tied to the Katana and all that have ever been killed by the sword.  When Flagg said she could take all of them out easily, he wasn't kidding.

Katana is a highly proficient hand-to-hand combatant and swordswoman, having studied martial arts as a child and later being trained by the samurai Tadashi. From her time with the Outsiders and Batman, she has also developed strong tactical skills.

Katana's Soultaker sword, along with its non-powered twin, was forged in the 14th century by Muramasa, whose swords were said to be cursed and make those who were evil commit evil acts. It sometimes takes the souls of those it kills, storing them inside the sword, where they can engage in limited communication with whoever wields it. These souls can be reincarnated by the means of a sacred ritual, under which they serve their summoner, even if it is against their will. In The New 52, the Soultaker is established as being the 'Sword Totem' of the Outsiders, meaning like the other totems it supposedly bestows immortality and enlightenment upon its wielder, although some like Green Arrow are skeptical of the literal truths of these claims.

Her powers are kept deliberately vague, pretty much so they can cast them to what they need them to be by the souls that are in the blade.

Diablo was somewhat interesting but his character and backstory wasn't developed/revealed enough until too close to the end of the movie. Ultimately I didn't really care about him or his story outside of the small part it played in the film.

He's quite similar to the Ghost Rider in form- another one of those where DC and Marvel cross.  He's cursed to be the host for a minor demon, and has pyrokinesis because of that.


Deadshot was the only one who, by the time the movie ended, I felt I'd like to know more about and see a movie about. That said, I kind of feel the novelty would wear off pretty quickly if they tried a full-length film all about him.
Deadshot, other than Bronze Tiger (they didn't show him for some reason), and of course Deathstroke (who they will have in the next Batman film).  They have had many different incarnations of him since the 40s, but the one characteristic that has defined him (that they took out) was that he has a deathwish and was a tragic character.

Floyd's parents were the most powerful people in his town, however, they were known to despise each other. Eventually Floyd's mother claimed his father had become "too abusive," prompting Floyd to kill him. When Floyd took the shot from his tree house, he missed and killed his brother, Eddie, instead. From that moment on, Floyd swore to never miss another shot again.

Probably his most defining trait is a desire to die in a spectacular fashion, this being his primary motivation for joining the Squad. He feels he has no reason to continue living, and, while he does not want to commit suicide, he simply does not care if he dies. Various reasons have been cited for this, but the most common thread in them is his parents' peculiar hatred for one another.

I liked the story in the movie... but it still took something from the character that I grew up liking- the original anti-hero long before Wolverine came on the scene.

The Joker was a joke.

Agreed.

Enchantress was a super powerful being whose actions largely make no sense.

I think her actions made sense, but they just didn't do a good job of conveying them.  Sort of like in the comics; they never really knew what to do with her.

June Moon was the host for an ancient god-like being (Loa related, but they didn't go there- she also didn't know this until near the end of her run in the suicide squad; she just thought that the totem had done something to her, and it was the totem that was her power).  They can't exist outside of their host, and it is possible for the host to resist them, but the more that the host uses the powers, the less control they have.  Waller captured her totem (her heart), and it could be used to destroy her.  Even after her brother (who was truly a god) protects her, and gives her access to his powers, she was still subject to her totem, just not as much.  But as long as she was under his protection, she ignored that fact, in favor of world conquest.  It gets sort of sketchy from there.

Incubus was a super powerful being whose actions largely make no sense, and whose name I only know after having looked it up on IMDB.
Incubus was the entity that was inside of June's brother, and more powerful than she.  They did an OK job of explaining this, I thought, if less than they should have.

Flag was OK, I guess, but I couldn't figure out what made him any more special than any of the other military folks.

They needed a handler.  He was it.  Nothing really special about him.

Waller was OK, I guess, but I couldn't figure out why Deadshot, or anyone else, for that matter, didn't just smash/break/shoot/steal her phone/tablet and then kill her and Flag.

Again, her position was that she did have the killswitch and was the power behind the throne, and that was the reason that they were just after her tablet with her alive, rather than dead.  If she wasn't in range of the tablet, their bombs go boom.  Not in range also means dead.  She's supposed to be very much a ruthless power behind the scenes type of person, that thinks several steps ahead of the opposition.

2593
Living Room / Re: Movies you've seen lately
« Last post by wraith808 on December 21, 2016, 04:00 PM »
I saw Suicide Squad.

It was OK. It assumed I had already seen Batman vs. Superman (which I haven't), so some minor details of the plot were lost on me. But my biggest gripe about the movie is that it introduced a bunch of random characters (twice!) that nobody has ever heard of and expected me to care about them without giving me a reason to. That and the plot was generally stupid from beginning to end.

It assumed you'd seen BvS?  I didn't catch that, and so didn't lose out on anything from that.  Though I had a hard time seeing through the plot.  I didn't have the same problem with the characters, other than Joker.  For the hype, he was very inadequately used.
2594
General Software Discussion / Re: Word experienced an error
« Last post by wraith808 on December 21, 2016, 03:46 PM »
Did you try the Open and Repair feature in Word?

https://support.micr....com/en-us/kb/893672
https://support.micr....com/en-us/kb/918429
https://social.techn...-document?forum=word
https://support.offi...11-a699-1786ac734bc3

If so, what result did you get?  Is your copy of word updated to the latest version?  Sometimes a patch can help. 

Another possibility for recovery is to right-click on the file in Windows Explorer and choose Properties>Previous versions and see if there are any shadow copies available.

You can also try openoffice- it has been known to be able to open corrupt word files.  There are also many paid offerings to do this if this file is that important- they aren't cheap, and I have no experience with them.

Without knowing other information, it's hard to troubleshoot such.
2595
Living Room / Re: British companies to face big fines if data breaches occur
« Last post by wraith808 on December 21, 2016, 03:35 PM »
Aren't both of these threads (this one and this one) talking about the same thing?  Which is one of the reasons for the confusion of that last post... it would seem good to discuss both in the same thread?
2596
General Software Discussion / Re: Word experienced an error
« Last post by wraith808 on December 20, 2016, 06:19 PM »
Hi Curt.

Only one file gives an error.

What version of Word are you using?
2597
General Software Discussion / Re: Word experienced an error
« Last post by wraith808 on December 20, 2016, 10:53 AM »
Not saying you're wrong, but when I see something that makes me think it might be spam, I put it in the report to the mods space, so as not to out someone who might be asking for help legitimately...
2598
DC Gamer Club / Re: Mass Effect 2 *FREE* on Origin
« Last post by wraith808 on December 20, 2016, 12:22 AM »
Not sure what you have to do, but it doesn't work for me.

As a note, however, Dungeon Keeper is free right now.

https://www.origin.c...e-games/on-the-house
2599
General Software Discussion / Re: Social Bookmarking
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2016, 07:51 PM »
The one that I use is pinboard.in.  It's only as social as you want it to be, which is my primary reason for using it.  And it has an RSS feed, just for you, or for you+your network.
2600
Credits?  Skype is free under the circumstances that you say.  There are several other IM clients that are free also.
Pages: prev1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 [104] 105 106 107 108 109 ... 404next