2426
Recent Posts
I am shocked - shocked I say! - to see that there appear to be no previous threads on the whole "hyperlapse" thing (according to the Search at least). This is a variation of timelapse where the camera actually moves *large* distances (as opposed to the small dolly shots of most timelapse) while maintaining (relatively) smooth motion, creating an amazing combination of realistic and surreal imagery and motion. It really just has to be seen to be appreciated. This is an excellent introduction to what can be achieved:
https://vimeo.com/102841196-JavaJones (May 17, 2015, 04:28 PM)
That vimeo video is really incredible. I'd be curious how difficult it was to get it to look like that, and what kind of equipment was used. Looks amazing.-superboyac (May 18, 2015, 09:22 AM)
I came across this description:I had to import and customize the NEF files before Ifrom this video -
equalized them with the great LR-TIMELAPSE from Gunther Wegner. (http://www.lrtimelapse.com/)
(Adobe Lightroom is necessary)
The observed jpeg had then to be droped into virtual dub and were rendered as avi.
When this was done, I had to stabilize the sequences manually frame by frame (AE motion tracker) and rendered each of them in 3 different sizes: (4928x3264 pixels, 1920x1080 pixels, 1024x768 pixels)
Last but not least the snippets were edited fitting to the beautiful title "Diving Through The Blue" by the respectable composer and musician Valentin Boomes.
https://vimeo.com/50238512
Tbh I dont understand half of that description - but it does sound like a lot of work. Surprised the stabilizing has to be done manually. Also not sure what exactly the LR-Timelapse software does.
They seem to generally use full-frame cameras - I guess if you're going to put all that work in, you may as well start with a quality image.-tomos (June 18, 2015, 04:13 AM)
)Win8.1-64 and now Win10 are not so horrible for me, because, for a year or so, I've been progressively using these excellent $FREE (Donations accepted) bits of software from Winaero:-IainB (August 28, 2015, 09:37 AM)
Delerium - Karma album-MilesAhead (August 28, 2015, 08:31 AM)
I find the whole uBlock/uBlock Origin thing to be an unfortunate and confusing mess.agreed --mwb1100 (August 28, 2015, 05:46 PM)
Not free at all: Tweak-10-Curt (August 28, 2015, 07:17 AM)
I started this thread on one computer with a new NEC monitor and I definitively see the background shine through the foreground picture.-ralfs (August 28, 2015, 01:19 AM)
How to use the above code?
0. Disable User Access control [temporarily] - Once this task of deleting files / folders is completed,
you may want to re-enable User Access Control. To disable UAC,
go to Control Panel > User Accounts > Turn User Account Control on or off ; then uncheck the
option "Use User Account Control (UAC) to help protect your computer" and click OK. Then restart the computer.
1. Copy/paste the code to Notepad
2. Save the file with the file name as: DeleteFiles.bat to C:\ drive [any location is ok - you need
to go to the relevant location using the command line in step: 4]
Note that the 'Save as type' should be selected as "All Files (*.*)" before you click the Save button.
3. Go to Command prompt
4. Type CD \ to go to C:\
5. Type DeleteFiles foldername and then press Enter key
By default, the folder name is C:\Windows.old.
If the Windows.old folder resides in D:\ [or a different drive], then enter the drive letter accordingly
along with the folder name.
6. Then you will notice a lot of operation in the command window and the script will end with
"Exiting..." . Press any key to exit the script.
Then you will find Windows.old folder is completely removed - Note that with this method the
contents of Windows.old folder will not won't be sent to the Recycle bin.
DeleteFiles.bat can be run without supplying the folder name also - in that scenario, it will
consider Windows.old folder present in the current drive from which you run the batch file
well,I'm currently using Enpass (www.enpass.io)-40hz (August 25, 2015, 12:53 PM)
are you using that with any kind of two-factor authentication?
Edit// I took the liberty of changing the thread title to "LastPass alternatives with two-factor authentication? (including premium LP)"-tomos (August 25, 2015, 02:46 PM)
No. But as no user data is stored on their server (which is only used to sync between devices) would it be all that necessary? The data is encrypted by your device and remains on your device(s) so I don't see where some man-in-the-middle attempt would make any difference. All data is encrypyed and local. You wouldn't even need to decrypt in order to synchronize. It would be a little more work for the local clients - but EnPass wouldn't need to worry or know about any of the the actual data.
Am I missing something?-40hz (August 25, 2015, 04:29 PM)
I'm currently using Enpass (www.enpass.io)-40hz (August 25, 2015, 12:53 PM)
But the the killer is child window display. My program which has a main window and child windows for entry, report etc. show very odd. It shows WinXp button in child windows !!-anandcoral (August 25, 2015, 11:42 AM)
But like most users, I also request MS to understand desktop users too.
http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=5114704#xx5114704xx-anandcoral (August 25, 2015, 11:42 AM)
Also I thought somebody wrote a script for another poster that created .url shortcuts from links in a text file. It was not too long ago.-MilesAhead (August 22, 2015, 07:23 AM)
yes, there was a thread on the topic anyways - saw it when searching for the other related threads...-tomos (August 22, 2015, 02:08 PM)
Surely he must first find & keep the license key?-Curt (August 23, 2015, 09:49 AM)
Man tries to rob bank with a gun drawn on a piece of paper-Arizona Hot (August 17, 2015, 08:22 PM)
He plead guilty to armed robbery? Was he actually armed? Details seem missing from the story.-Deozaan (August 23, 2015, 12:14 AM)
I agree. Details seem a bit sketchy.-MilesAhead (August 23, 2015, 05:38 AM)
I really did laugh out loud at that one Do you really need 3 threads in this forumsection to ask 3 times the same question?
Oh, and the other 2 already have been answered properly, too...-Ath (August 22, 2015, 03:17 AM)
Also I thought somebody wrote a script for another poster that created .url shortcuts from links in a text file. It was not too long ago.-MilesAhead (August 22, 2015, 07:23 AM)
now a new phone from them - or simply with that OS, would be a good option - a nice move away from all this lack of security and privacy.-tomos (August 21, 2015, 04:53 AM)
Because it's open-source, malware producers don't have to empirically hack it. They can study the source code instead.-Arizona Hot (August 21, 2015, 12:46 PM)
We previously explored Play Service's update implications, but it is a huge weapon in the fight against Android forks. Play Services is a closed source app owned by Google and licensed as part of the Google Apps package. Any feature you see move from "normal" Android to Google Play Services is also moving from open source to closed source. This app pulls off the neat trick of not only enticing users with exclusive, closed source features, but locking in third-party developers with Google's proprietary APIs as well.
Taking the Android app ecosystem from Google seems easy: just get your own app store up and running, convince developers to upload their apps to it, and you're on your way. But the Google APIs that ship with Play Services are out to stop this by convincing developers to weave dependence on Google into their apps. Google's strategy with Google Play Services is to turn the "Android App Ecosystem" into the "Google Play Ecosystem" by making a developer's life as easy as possible on a Google-approved device—and as difficult as possible on a non-Google-approved device.
If you use any Google APIs and try to run your app on a Kindle, or any other non-Google version of AOSP: surprise! Your app is broken. Google's Android is a very high percentage of the Android market, and developers only really care about making their app easily, making it work well, and reaching a wide audience. Google APIs accomplish all that, with the side effect that your app is now dependent on the device having a Google Apps license.
I usually get through with FF & Youtube Unblocker.-bit (August 21, 2015, 02:06 PM)
