2251
Living Room / Re: Netflix Mocks Amazon's Drone Delivery with Video!
« Last post by 40hz on March 03, 2014, 01:57 PM »Seriously! It'd be dull without Ren around. 



I already typed this so I'll post it anyway.-Stoic Joker (March 03, 2014, 11:31 AM)



If you can't afford an upgrade why not go with free LibreOffice ?+1 for that, and LibreOffice generally does a fine job with the Office 2002 file formats.-Carol Haynes (March 03, 2014, 03:53 AM)-x16wda (March 03, 2014, 05:27 AM)
Panzer, PM me your email address and I'll send you another copy.-kyrathaba (March 03, 2014, 07:44 AM)


Especially since I already paid for it. 


Clement Lefebvre has announced the release of Linux Mint 201403 "Debian", the distribution's rolling-release variant based on Debian's "Testing" branch: "The team is proud to announce the release of LMDE 201403. Highlights: update pack 8; Cinnamon 2.0; MATE 1.6; latest Mint tools and improvements; support for EFI and GPT. If you're new to LMDE, welcome to Linux Mint Debian! LMDE in brief: Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE) is a semi-rolling distribution based on Debian 'Testing'; it is available in both 32-bit and 64-bit variants as a live DVD with Cinnamon or MATE; the purpose of LMDE is to look identical to the main edition and to provide the same functionality while using Debian GNU/Linux as a base." Here is the brief release announcement with screenshots, system requirements and links to known issues and the changelog...
Will I be able to re-install and run Word and Excel 2002 easily?-AndyM (March 02, 2014, 10:50 AM)
Worth a watch for fun. It gets better as it goes along, making it very worthwhile.-Renegade (March 02, 2014, 07:45 AM)

And Lucy Liu is just plain hot!![]()

C'mon... worth watching just for her~!![]()

And it seemed to get junked up quickly once the Windows versions came out. But it was a very capable general purpose double-entry accounting solution. One which enforced accounting standards fairly well. And for a while it was one of the least expensive SMB accounting packages that still allowed you to "drill-down" to transaction detail level and allowed BOM 'assemblies' in inventory - so that put it well ahead of the pack for many years. All in all a decent bit of software that got the job done. 
I see the points of all involved, but I don't see anything inherently evil in what they're doing. They basically have a rock and a hard place, and are trying to make the situation as best as they can for all.-wraith808 (March 01, 2014, 12:08 PM)
Just wondering if there are any opinions here. (Their marketing guy has been fielding some pretty vitriolic things with grace under pressure, I might add- and the thread is surprisingly civil for that).


blog has post regarding some of Mozilla's latest 'monetization' antics that I think apply equally well to some of the transparency and honesty issues raised by Wraith here. Blunt and spot on - with some of the funniest rephrasing of corporate newspeak (Users' content experience = Enema treatment with GPL licenses) I've read in a long time:Firefox, Directory Tiles, Advertisements, and Honesty
Updated: February 19, 2014
No, I am not going to do what everyone else has been doing. And that is quoting the original announcement by some Mozilla hobnob, telling us how they intend to use the tiles page, which shows nine thumbnails for most frequently used sites, to display ads to first-time users. Anyhow, that is the background story.
And this is my story, or rather, my interpretation of what is happening here, and how the world should react to this latest move by Mozilla. Not that long ago, I entertained you by my Firefox suckfest article, which tells about how Mozilla is becoming Chrome and their latest wannabe user interface called Australis, or rather Ausfailis. Now, we will talk about integrity and honesty
.
.
.
Why so angry?
Not angry. I have NO problem with Mozilla making money. Honestly. Really. I want them to have a sustainable finance model. But I demand honesty. That's my only beef with this whole bullshit. If they change the name of this program to We want money, I can relate to that and I can appreciate that. But I cannot accept it when they treat me like some moron with a double-digit IQ, and pretend to give me valuable content in the form of the shittiest and useless personalization would-be fascism.
Mozilla, try honesty for a change
Let's see what gives. Try this approach instead. Call the Directory Tiles program a revenue program. Tell users this is in order to get more money and sustain the browser so they aren't left with monopoly like there was one in the days of Internet Explorer, and tomorrow Chrome. Tell them this is optional, and that you can actually disable the tiles, so you need not have to suffer stupidity. Indeed, you can always disable the tiles. Here's how you do it:



Tooting my own horn here, nothing to get excited about:(see attachment in previous post)
-Edvard (February 27, 2014, 08:16 PM)


After the Japanese middle school girls singing crushing metal, I had to swing the other direction for a bit.
Ah, CandyRat records, you never fail me...
I am not normally a "pianer-lissenin'" type of guy, but this is pretty darn cool. Very Vince Guaraldi vibe to it, which I like very much.-Edvard (February 01, 2014, 11:41 AM)
