topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday December 20, 2025, 6:40 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 ... 470next
2126
In the midst of all the depressing legal news about Executive Branch excesses comes this TechDirt post that offers a ray of hope in the person of U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II:

wright.jpg

Judge Otis Wright Slams 'Made Up' Government 'Plot' Designed To Ensnare Gullible Poor People
from the finally dept


For years now, we've been writing about the FBI's now popular practice of devising its own totally bogus "terrorist plots" and then convincing some hapless individual to join the "plot" only to later arrest them to great fanfare, despite the fact that everyone (other than the arrested person) involved was actually an FBI agent, and there was no actual danger or real plot (or real terrorists) involved. In fact, we just had yet another such story. We've written about similar occurances over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again -- and, depressingly, it seems that courts repeatedly uphold this practice as not being entrapment. Many have been questioning why the FBI is spending so much time and money creating fake terrorist plots that don't seem to protect anyone (but do give the FBI/DOJ lots of big headlines about "stopping terrorism!"), but the courts have basically let it go.

However, it finally appears that one judge thinks these kinds of things go too far -- and it happens to be Judge Otis Wright, whose name you may recall from being the first judge to really slap down Prenda law for its obnoxious copyright trolling practices. Reader Frankz alerts us to the news Wright has dismissed a case involving the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) for a similar "made up crime" and completely trashed the government for doing these kinds of things. As with his order in the Prenda case, I urge you to read his full dismissal which is granted for "outrageous government conduct." Judge Wright, it appears, is not one to hide his opinions about those who abuse the legal system. The ruling kicks off with a hint of where this is heading:

    “‘Lead us not into temptation,’” Judge Noonan warned. United States v. Black, 733 F.3d 294, 313 (Noonan, J., dissenting). But into temptation the Government has gone, ensnaring chronically unemployed individuals from poverty-ridden areas in its fake drug stash-house robberies. While undoubtedly a valid law-enforcement tool when employed to target or prevent demonstrated criminal enterprises, reverse stings offend the United States Constitution when used solely to obtain convictions.  <more>

You can download a PDF of his dismissal ruling here. It's a terrific read - and well worth the time. :Thmbsup:
2127
Living Room / Re: What happens when Hollywood gets involved with a Kickstarter
« Last post by 40hz on March 20, 2014, 05:06 PM »

Google = the Internet but Apple = the entertainment industry


Spot on the sugar with that one! :Thmbsup:
2128
^ ...that is sooooo NOT gonna happen....
2129
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 20, 2014, 03:25 PM »
See! I'm not a 100% raving mad lunatic! ;D

that's not a given, there could just be 2 of you now :o

@Target - Brill! :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:

You also don't have to have 100% correlation in order for something to be considered statistically valid enough to be accepted as fact.

"It's near enough for beer" as the saying goes. ;D
2130
Nothing personal but I'd be a lot happier if I thought there was a chance  you guys were wrong. There really isn't though.

D'accord
! I'm sure we'd be happier too.
2131
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 20, 2014, 03:08 PM »
Y'know one of those things that I really can't stand when watching a show... Stupid f*ck scenes. I hate them. I can't stand idiotic sex onscreen for no reason. If I want to see that, I'll get some porn.

Ren, you're utterly hopeless. I don't think this planet is big enough to hold a second brush as broad as the one you paint with.

But we wouldn't have you be any other way. ;D :Thmbsup:

And I still don't think the presentations made at TED are part of some vast AREA-51 level conspiracy like you seem to think they are. Peace! 8)
2132
The single biggest barrier to redesigning Windows isn't a techncal issue. From my experience working for a Fortune 5 (not 500), the real problem is that any major change of direction in any large corporation will require that somebody (or some cabal) very high up in the hierarchy be called conclusively wrong.

In an era of stock analysts and personality cults in corporate governance that's about as likely to happen as the Catholic Church (my religious background so put down the torches please) renouncing the Doctrine of Infallibility. As in: "that is so NOT gonna happen," as the 7-year old daughter of one of my clients once put it.

To change direction and redo Windows is to admit the current paradigm (and all the silly arguments previously made for it) were wrong.

That doesn't slot well with Wall Street, because they've previously hailed the chief as "a genius" in public.

That doesn't slot well with the alpha-type personalities at the helms of most tech firms either. Because it calls into question just what it is that they (or any human being for that matter) brings to the party that they're worth "billions and billions" to parrot Carl Sagan. These are not the type of persons who want to admit a good portion of their success was far more due to being in the right place at the right time than it ever was to their intellectual brilliance, personal courage, ot their uncanny ability to see the future and make it real. These are gods we're talking about. And gods only exist as long as somebody still believes in them. (Watch the movie August for a great treatment of that topic.)

Nope, I've said it before and I'll say it again (with thanks to Gerry Weinberg). It's not a technical problem - it's a people problem. And any time it clearly isn't a people problem - you'd better look harder and again.

 8)
2133
One was convincing individuals to license Office rather than buying it.

To be honest, IMO that's the only part of their new business model that makes even small sense within an admittedly limited number of use cases. Where it fits, it fits very well. For the rest of us...uh...I doesn't.

Attempting to create a walled garden isn't something that's going to be tolerated willingly. Especially now that enough developers have seen what Apple's iStore arrangement got them. One locked platform is bad enough. If Microsoft thinks to follow in Steve Jobs footsteps, they'll have a long uphill battle ahead of them. And at this juncture, they really can't afford to get into one.

The Win 8 desktop brings nothing of significance to the mix. It's different for the sake of different, ugly to look at, and makes little sense without a touchscreen. To call  it an improvement over the past is like saying Alcatraz was better than Levinworth Penitentiary because at least Alcatraz is in California and by the ocean. Microsft has to get off the way of thinking that says "Now sucks less!" is the same thing as "New and Improved!" when it comes to product design. (And while we're on the subject...could Microsoft please hire at least one designer who has some sense of color esthetics? Because whoever came up with that Fisher-Price color palette for Windows 8 either needs an eye exam-  or a new job. Preferably in the fast food or hospitality industry.)

IMO Windows needs a total ground up redesign, not unlike what Apple did with OS X.

Exactly. They could just license the Mach kernal (like Apple) did and wrap their own nonsense around it. Like Apple did. Seriously, why reinvent the wheel? The requirements and design principles of an OS are clearly understood and pretty well time-tested by now. There is a right way to do an OS.

Where the creativity and "Oooo-ahh!" comes in is in with the user interface. If you want to spend effort and resources coming up with something "insanely great" (or whatever  ::)) put the effort into the design and testing of the user interface. That and providing reliable hardware drivers. Do that and your millions of customers will love you forever - even if a few thousand consultants will "hates you forever gollum...gollum"  for putting them out of business by your doing so.

Of course Microsoft could just use the elegant Xfce windows manager...nah! Too easy. Too obvious.

Oh yeah...one more thing Microsoft? Ditch the Registry if you're still thinking in that direction? That was yet another "innovation"  that never really worked that well in practice. The simple fact that Microsoft itself frequently violated their own guidelines regarding the Registry - and also never fully (publicly) documented it - says all that really needs to be said about it.

What Microsoft needs to do is sit down and code an OS that both works and provides what's needed. Not constantly try to wow people with things they neither want or know how to use. Leave that for your app developers.

 8)

P.S. Microsoft - Either bring back stand-alone Flight Simulator or open up the source code for non-commercial use? Do at least something genuinely generous for once? That could be the start of a whole new "genuine advantage."
2134
General Software Discussion / Re: Joint Text encryption on PC and IOS 6
« Last post by 40hz on March 20, 2014, 08:24 AM »
I use PGP/GPG to handle email encryption on the PC and Android (via APG).  Surely there is a PGP/GPG client for IOS?  Forgive me, if not, as I don't own an iPhone.

Take a look at iPGmail and oPenGP in the app store.

Can't vouch for either since I don't trust my iPhone to begin with. It's a proprietary black box - so any sense of real personal data security you may have is either wishful thinking, or misplaced hope at best.

About the only "signal security "that's still workable is a single-use cipher pad used in conjunction with a piece of paper delivered by a human courier. If a message truly needs to be kept secure - keep it off the grid. Completely off.
 8)
2135
Non-Windows Software / Re: *NIX: Favorite GUI File Managers?
« Last post by 40hz on March 20, 2014, 08:12 AM »
I wonder if at some point they'll go for displaying in the same tab as a file / directory listing with synchronizing the current directory.

That would be handy. Maybe somebody could suggest it? They devs are on Google+ here.

I'd do it myself - except 40hz doesn't do Google+ for reasons not worth cluttering up this thread getting into. ;) 8)
2136
Well, I'm disgusted by this now, after reading this self-explanatory post in OutlinerSoftware.com:
[url=http://www.outlinersoftware.com/topics/viewt/5315/15]Outliner Software: OneNote for Mac on the horizon...
Is this the deal breaker? Maybe. I don’t want or need all my work notebooks, which I keep on my PC at the office, floating around on SkyDrive or on my other devices. Indeed, there is no such thing as a free lunch.

Steve Z.

Sounds very much like a deal breaker to me.

re: free lunch

When it comes to Microsoft, nothing is ever "free." There's always a gotcha. And what 'deals' they do offer (e.g. Office 365) always come prix fixe.

If you're more the à la carte type, you're SOL when ordering from Microsoft's menu. :-\

(Note: the best way to keep your head on straight whenever dealing with the Gnomes of Redmond is to repeat three times: Microsoft does not offer deals. They negotiate licensing. It's a small seeming but very significant difference.) :tellme:
2137
You might want to link an updated video (like your old one below) to the thread  to show GridMove in action. I suggest this because half the Windows users I talk to don't even know what Aero Snap is - and think it's a bug or a glitch when it happens. This is a handy little app if you're in the habit of working with several open windows so it'd be a shame if somebody missed out on it because they didn't 'get' what it did.



 :Thmbsup:
2138
The projects that interest me the most right now for the Raspberry Pi are using it to power either a laptop using the Motorola Atrix dock or a DIY Linux tablet.


Until the iPhone came out I didn't realize how close something like that might be. There was an interesting product introduced about 10 years ago called the Mobile Computing Core which incorporated the general idea but never really had a shot in the real world.

Much like the Alan Kay's Dynabook concept. Or the OLPC for that matter. If something causes a sufficient enough ripple in the tank, the sharks will soon circle and attempt to cripple or kill it. Look at all the 'venue shopping' and legal chicanery the opponents of Aereo are engaging in trying to find one court that will side with them against innovation, (Note: I understand they finally - after significant defeats in a half dozen coutrooms all over the USA - found a sufficiently clueless magistrate in the person of US District Judge Dale Kimball of Utah. There is now a Fox sponsored injunction against them in Salt Lake City and Denever. That's two of the top media markets in the world - as I'm sure we can all agree. :P)

I'm rather amazed the Pi and Arduino made it this far without somebody trying to IP litigate them out of existence. I guess  they're still not perceived as a sufficient enough threat.

But tomorrow's another day, right? :-\
2139
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 19, 2014, 10:59 AM »
The TED Conferences are a lot like that. Much, in fact, like a major film festival: there's an "in" group - and there's everyone else who's also attending. That doesn't detract from the films being shown - just what private parties you'll be invited to afterwards. If that's the sort of thing that offends you, then you're better off staying home. Because that's pretty much how the world works about 90% of the time. And TED is no different.

Oh, I totally agree.  It's just that though it's obvious to *you* and to *others* that they aren't fully altruistic and philanthropic, they present themselves as that way.  And that's one of the few things that I totally and utterly despise.

I understand.  :huh: But doesn't that leave a lot of despising to do since so many public entities ("Konigen, Kirchen, und Dumheit") do the same thing. I just want to get pissed off every so often. I don't want it to become my full time job. ;D (kidding...)
2140
I can't help but think Windows-RT will eventually go the way of Windows CE (now CE was one cool and fast little OS!) and Surface the way of Zune.

Don't forget the Windows Tablet PC.  That's where I got bitten.

Hear ya! ;D

I don't even buy Microsoft mice any more after the last three wireless units I purchased crapped out within three months. One of their USB nano receivers also fried and nearly took out a USB port on my GF's new Win7 laptop. I burnt a finger pulling it out. It was that hot. No joke.

It's back to Logitech AFAIC. Those trusty little Logitech M325s  :Thmbsup: are unkillable. (Or at least they are in my world.)
2141
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: BitDefender Leap Year Sale - Any Product for $29
« Last post by 40hz on March 19, 2014, 10:39 AM »
And here's something that tells us what a brave new world we now live in. From BitDefender's legal page (emphasis and underlines added):

Bitdefender reserves the right to cooperate with any legal process and any law enforcement or other government inquiry related to your use of this Software and Services. This means that Bitdefender may provide documents and information relevant to a court subpoena or to a law enforcement or other government investigation. In order to promote awareness, detection and prevention of Internet security risks, Bitdefender may share certain information with research organizations and other security software vendors.

Bitdefender may also use statistics derived from the information to track and publish reports on security risk trends. By using the Software and Services, You acknowledge and agree that Bitdefender may collect, transmit, store, disclose and analyze such information for these purposes. You declare that all the data that you provide will be true and accurate and undertakes to inform BItDefender of any changes to said data. You have the right to object to the processing of any of his or her data which is not essential for the execution of the agreement and to its use for any purpose other than the maintenance of the contractual relationship.

"Or other inquiry"??? Did they just say "other inquiry"??? :huh: That's a pretty nice little weasel way to put it.  Well...I guess that means if some law enforcement or government entity "requests" your info, a court order isn't really required under this wording is it?  :tellme:

This is not a knock on BitDefender BTW. By now I'm sure all the other players have similar wording buried someplace deep within their EULAs. :-\

2142
@Jibz: Was this experience (above) purely from using the FREE OneNote download/install? Was it the 32 or 64 bit version?

It was using the free version, and I downloaded the 32-bit installer, but like 4wd mentioned, it appears to have installed the 64-bit version.

Apparently Microsoft knows better than you "where you want to go today."  ;D

Gotta loooove that cloud! :Thmbsup: ;)
2143
Non-Windows Software / Re: *NIX: Favorite GUI File Managers?
« Last post by 40hz on March 19, 2014, 01:04 AM »
One dual-pane alternative for Gnome/Cinnamon/MATE users is sunflower-fm. I have it installed for those times when dual-pane is the best way to go. One thing really nice is that Sunflower has an embedded system terminal you can open in a tab within the file manager.

There's a slightly dated video that runs through most of the feature set:

2144
...that said, after using iOS, it does still feel in its nacency to me.

Agree. A tablet computing experience is what it is. And I personally don't think it's quite there yet. It still feels like there's something minor but important to the user experience that's still missing from all these devices. Sorta like a mouse before they put a scroll wheel on it.

But...that said...having spent several hours in both the Apple and the Microsoft stores putting the iPad and Surface through their paces, Apple wins hands-down on every front. It's just a more mature and polished product. Probably to be expected since it costs about 2-3 times as much as a "comparable" Surface tablet.

As far as RT goes, Microsoft's Exec-VP Julie Larson-Green had this to say when asked:

"We have the Windows Phone OS. We have Windows RT and we have full Windows. We're not going to have three. We do think there's a world where there is a more mobile operating system that doesn't have the risks to battery life, or the risks to security. But, it also comes at the cost of flexibility. So we believe in that vision and that direction and we're continuing down that path."

Since Windows 8 and the Windows Phone are a go, that third named OS, lowly little Windows RT, seems to be on it's way out. Especially considering Microsoft is the only player still selling it now that Dell and all the other manufacturers have officially discontinued their RT product lines.

I can't help but think Windows-RT will eventually go the way of Windows CE (now CE was one cool and fast little OS!) and Surface the way of Zune.

Wince50.PNG

2145
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 19, 2014, 12:06 AM »
@Wraith - I guess I'm a little colorblind in the "non" profit end of the spectrum. ;D  I have been ever since TV Ministries, hospitals, well-heeled universities and colleges have all had that legal distinction conferred on them. Like so many other charming things of the past (i.e. 'public' broadcasting) I don't really think the designation 'non-profit' means much beyond tax treatment these days. Especially now that political action groups can also be non-profit "educational" organizations.

But I think we're getting a little away from the earlier point made by Renegade who was saying the TED talks are something the world would be better off without.

To clarify my position, what I'm saying is: regardless of the organization behind the talks, or the possible motivation of its sponsors (motivations which I suspect are both numerous and varied) this does not take away from the fact that there is considerable value in continuing to have such a venue. And that a deal of good (intentional or otherwise) comes out of it.

I'll neither attack nor defend the Sapling Foundation, the organization or policies behind the TED conferences, its corporate sponsors, or the issue of what a "real" non-profit organization should or shouldn't be. That stuff is what it is. All I am interested in - and will speak in favor of - are the presentations or talks themselves. I'm only interested in what (some) of the presenters have to say. Because in most cases I would have never heard about them except through TED.

So I'm willing to put up with whatever may or may not be going on in the background. FWIW - if it's "wheeling & dealing" ...well...that's gonna go on regardless of whether or not the venue continues. The real movers, shakers, and makers (along with the takers, and fakers) all know each other, and can (and do) talk to each other even when TED isn’t in town. So it's not like they need some excuse to get together since they could just as easily pick up the phone. Because that's how the tech world works.

The TED Conferences (as opposed to the actual presentations) remind me of this 'foxhunt' around where I live. It's a pretty exclusive country club sort of thing with all that implies.

A few times a year this place opens its grounds to the general public for an event. Usually for some local charity. If you go you'll see the usual invisible dividing line that separates the club members from the rest of the world. It's not an overt thing. But it's there just the same. Because these people know each other. They do business with each other. They speak the same language and generally dress the same. Their kids go to school and play with each other. So the average event visitor stands out like a sore thumb.

Does that mean they're a bunch of elitist snobs? Well...some of them are to be sure. But most are very polite - unless unduly crowded or put upon.

The TED Conferences are a lot like that. Much, in fact, like a major film festival: there's an "in" group - and there's everyone else who's also attending. That doesn't detract from the films being shown - just what private parties you'll be invited to afterwards. If that's the sort of thing that offends you, then you're better off staying home. Because that's pretty much how the world works about 90% of the time. And TED is no different.

allaccess.jpg

I'm happy to skip all that nonsense and just enjoy the actual show.
 :)
2146
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 18, 2014, 07:01 PM »
@SB - ROTFLMAO!

I cannot stand that guy. :Thmbsup:
2147
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 18, 2014, 06:04 PM »
Where does that money go?

It's published on their website. Or was last I looked.

That's a *lot* of money to think that they only "facilitate public forums on random topics".


Ever attend a 2-day trade or industry insider conference? Those aren't cheap either. These things go on convention budgets. Depending on the location, the facilities, and the number of days, it can add up fast. I just spent last Saturday night at a small inn about 300 miles from where I live. Cost for the night = $235. The week before I was in NYC at one of the Hiltons since I couldn't find anything else for the days I needed to be there. Price per night $424, I've also worked in a hotel. Back in the 80s when they hosted conferences where I worked, the conferences were getting an average of $800-1200 a day to attend. A now defunct guitar Workshop I used to attend offered a 5-day program that ran in a resort someplace out west. Cost to attend = $5250 to $6000. The normal price for the very same workshop held at a local boarding school in my state during summer recess = $1200 for the classes plus an additional $800 to stay in a school dorm room with four other people.

TED seems to be on the higher midrange of what these things tend to charge.
2148
Living Room / Re: Against TED talks
« Last post by 40hz on March 18, 2014, 05:44 PM »
I still can't help thinking anything that helps tear down info silos and helps make technology and deeper thinking more accessible to a general audience can't be a bad thing. The intended audience is savvy enough to separate the wheat from the chaff without the need for self-appointed guardians to tell them it's all bullshit and they shouldn't be watching any of it. Not that these guardians are doing anything that interesting or significant on their own to offer TED's audience an alternative. (I've called out a few of the more hipster types and asked why they weren't doing something to replace it. Most of replies were worthy of a 15-year old in both the choice of language and debate tactics employed.)

Corporations aren't interested in disseminating what they've discovered or are working on. Government isn't interested beyond slapping a TOP SECRET sticker on as much science as possible. Universities aren't interested. They're too busy building patent portfolios and putting their scholarly papers behind paywalls -  when they aren't out trolling, or slapping their faculty with DMCA notices for having the audacity to post their own work on their own personal websites.

TED is far from perfect. It's presentations can be elitist, questionable, or trivial at times. And it's certainly not everybody’s cup of tea. But it is better than most of what's out there - despite the popularity of all the faux-science and "paranormal phenomenon" shows on the so-called 'science' channels if you're not a diehard UFO or conspiracy buff.

And it's definitely better than nothing. Because there isn't much else like it should you look around.
 8)
2149
Living Room / Re: Dumb question but ...
« Last post by 40hz on March 18, 2014, 01:08 PM »
Like the old kid TV show host (Sandy Becker? Chuck McCann? Fred Hall? Sonny Fox? - it was one of them) used to do with his character Mr. Backwards. ;D
2150
Living Room / Re: What happens when Hollywood gets involved with a Kickstarter
« Last post by 40hz on March 18, 2014, 01:01 PM »
Almost all of them have an iTunes option, so why not a Google Play option?

Probably for the same reason half the movie studios and networks seem so intent on squeezing Netflix out lately. It works too well - and they don't control it.

(And iTunes is as rabid about DRM and proprietary platforms as the studios are. So that was a match made in heaven as far as the media old guard is concerned. Not that Google is all that much better once you get beyond outward appearances IMHO. :)
Pages: prev1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 ... 470next