topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 7:29 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 ... 63next
1251
CFDButton is nice, but it's lacking several features.

ChalkTrauma did say that he'd be willing to add suggestions, maybe you should enumerate them?

Maybe it might even fill this gap:
or inspire someone (here?) to programme something (even) better ?

 :-\
1252
GOE 2007 Challenge Downloads / Re: CFDButton - GOE Challenge 2007 Entry
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on March 14, 2008, 08:24 PM »
@Perry Mowbray: I was able to make the runtime work locally by including the manifest in the install, so if you download the portable install now, it should work without needing to install the runtime.

I also created a new install for people who want the runtime local to the app and not installed SxS in system32, as MS would have you do it :)

Let me know if you see any problems...

Should have replied here before... sorry... absolutely not problems now  :Thmbsup:
1253
Thanks for the props Perry...  :D

 ;) Couldn't help it: I love it!!  :Thmbsup:

I work mostly off a portable drive

Which is why I use CFDButton (otherwise I'd never have it at work  :mad:)
1254
Have you tried CFDButton (which was a GOE 2007 entry)?

It's what I'm using at the moment: simple and great. Doesn't do Office, so I'm wondering if it'll have issues with AutoCAD as well??
1255
I, like tomos and most people here, use a few different applications, probably depending on what I'm trying to store.

What's missing, at least for me, are the links between the disparate systems.

Some, like SurfuLater and ToDoList, offer the ability to link to items within their data with special urls (what are they called again?): at least that functionally gets you from one to the other...
1256
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 11:27 PM »
Today must be my day for senior moments.   :-[

Perry, I checked my default email client and it was set to Outlook.  I changed it and it works like a champ!

Not necessarily...

Today Windows Firewall turned itself on all by itself (I've used ZoneAlarm for years)  :huh:

 :Thmbsup: Glad it's all fixed!
1257
General Software Discussion / Re: subline text: some innovative text editor!
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 09:28 PM »
it's $59; a bit expensive for a notepad replacement :)

Well, Windows is a bit expensive for a Linux replacement.  :P

 :D :D :D :D
1258
My interest goes up with the number of people interested  ;)

Is that nearly 3 then?

Question: Is UltraPDF as standard standard or a 995 standard only? I wasn't sure when they mentioned Office viewers  :-\
1259
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 09:01 AM »
I also love the Roll-up / Roll-down as standard option in the window  :-*
1260
The actual framework should probably by different for different subject types, but thinking about software reviews/experiences/comments, I've always thought that an organisation that:

1. Separated the software into Categories and/or SubCategories
2. Had an "article" that gave an overview and collated results of Member Reviews (a bit more Wiki-like that could be co-authored)
3. Member Reviews (or Mini-Reviews) as its children, which should also include some standard Review items (Synopsis, Score, Conclusion for example)
4. Comments/Experiences can be posted about the software against the Review/Mini-Review
5. Members can vote for various aspects

So for example we had the Category: Productivity Software / Text Editors. And imagine that there were 10 reviews of 7 applications.

The main Text Editor article would present the standard scores and findings of the reviews (maybe Averaging the multiple values) and include Synopsis and Conclusion from the reviews. As reviews are updated and more done, the main Article is updated as required (maybe old reviews are dropped off as they are not appropriate for newer versions?). Comments about the Reviews and experiences of other users are added to the Reviews (much like the Mini-Reviews are now).

For software I'd love to see a Poll like counter that members could post that they use the software, and/or it's their main application for that class.

All well and good  :-\ but the main point in what I'm saying is that I think having a little more organisation, structure and co-authoring would help develop and present the wealth of talent and experience we have here.  :Thmbsup:  :Thmbsup:
1261
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Bits Du Jour and GAOTD one-day deals
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 08:33 AM »
Still sounds like a good idea to me, Steven (and that's exactly how I understood your original post)  :Thmbsup:

+1 Still sounds sensible to separate short term and longer term specials  :Thmbsup:
1262
Difficult to answer as I'm in a state of flux at the moment (because of the advent of WikidPad), moving from mainly Word Processing to mainly Wiki -> WP.

But as an example, the one I've just about finished is the basis of a Testing Plan for some software integration we're doing at work.

Because the whole thing is pretty convoluted (and I wanted to play ;) ) I used WikidPad.

The process started by just collecting the foundational information, requirements and other data, then linking all the base information together. Then I started writing the plan, linking to data, requirements, etc as it fit; in a similar manner to the little wink I posted in the WikidPad Review.

I added issue and track tags to mark what needed testing and what the results should be. Used attributes to mark certain pages. Reusing Insertions was of great benefit (Insertions in WikidPad are like Included Text, some page that can be re-used in another page)

When I had done all I could in WikiPad I exported it to HTML and posted it for comment from my peers.

Once it gets the green light it will need to migrate to an environment where the actual testing data can be collected and collated.

But overall I was pretty impressed with how the Wiki performed in enabling me to marshal my thoughts. The process going from bare bones (which is what I think you really meant by "outline") to detailed was very smooth. But as was mentioned elsewhere, Wikis really come into their own when there is a lot of previous material that can serendipitously finds its way into your pages because of the Wiki Linking system.
1263
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 07:52 AM »
@Perry, repeat continuously works nicely :Thmbsup: -
I did like the warning in imagine but can imagine that [in imagine ;D] getting annoying too

I'd think (I resisted the temptation   ;) ) that you can define that behaviour. You can in irfanView.
1264
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 07:46 AM »
I feel dumb... You're right, that works. (unfortunatelly, opera won't accept it, though, but no problem :)).

 :-[ No, I meant my question was probably dumb... but glad it works. [Opera won't work with a standard OS setting??]

Ok, so i just found out another interesting thing!
I mentioned about moving the image when out of full-screen: that can be done with right-button drag! smart :D

 :up: I just accidentally found that too  :D
what I miss in most viewers is the option to zoom into a selected area of image
Oh, but MaxView won't let you down on that! Try pressing ctrl and dragging with left button! :D

Great  :Thmbsup: Thanks! I read it on the website, but it didn't seem to be working (don't ask me, it's OK now)..
1265
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 07:34 AM »
what I miss straight away in Faststone (compared to imagine) is that it wont go from last file in folder back to first ("Jump to the first file?" box pops up)

Hmmm: I don't get that happening? I can keep scrolling through all the folder's images continuously going from last back to first, etc.

Try the "Repeat Continuously" toggle. I couldn't find any documentation, but that seems to do the trick:

Screenshot - 2_02_2008 , 12_36_51 AM.png

also miss the modifiable shortcuts..

I agree! In this day and age, it all should be configurable...

what I miss in most viewers is the option to zoom into a selected area of image

IrfanView zooms like this and it is very handy to get to a particular spot at a high zoom quickly.

I like the pan in MaxView though...
1266
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 07:12 AM »
I just downloaded this program.  It is much faster than the windows default viewer.  Is there anyway that I setup Thunderbird as my mail client instead of Outlook?  The software defaults to Outlook and I added Thunderbird as an external program but that didn't help either.

Probably a dumb question, but you have set up the default email client correctly? The following works for me...
Screenshot - 2_02_2008 , 12_05_02 AM.png
1267
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 06:55 AM »
Maybe we all should send an email (as a more realistic indication of the functions support)  :D
;D I already sent mine, and pointed the developer to this thread.
Let's not annoy him to death (or he might get mad at us and not implement it :P), but get the max people to post here supporting his software instead!

I'll bet you that this approach will get a better result (not to say about the warm feeling inside for the developer ;) )

You could be right: I guess it depends on how the developer deals with bugs/requests. I would have thought that a new email about an issue was an indication of the level of need. But I'd hate to annoy him to death...

BTW: My version emails out of Thunderbird just fine
  :-\ ... so I didn't send my email anyway  :D
1268
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: FastStone MaxView Mini-Review
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 06:32 AM »
And i'll send the developer a mail!

Maybe we all should send an email (as a more realistic indication of the functions support)  :D
1269
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: WikidPad - an IDE for your thoughts
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on February 01, 2008, 05:44 AM »
My apologies for any offense taken by my referring to WikiPad as an outliner. 

No offence taken  :Thmbsup: WikidPad does Outline... it's just that that is such a small part of its capabilities.
1270
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: WikidPad - an IDE for your thoughts
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on January 31, 2008, 10:10 PM »
I downloaded and tried WikiPad and I tried some others as well. I've decided that outlining is not for me as a writer.
If you tried it and it doesn't fit your mindset, that's fine. But for the benefit of others reading, I feel compelled to point out that WikidPad is not an outliner. Actually, I imagine that some wiki purists would be aghast at such an implication.

WikidPad uses a tree control, typical of outliners, to show the set of links radiating out from a given page. This shouldn't be interpreted as a representation of the wiki's informational structure. It's really just a navigational shortcut.

In data structures terms a wiki is a directed graph. It has (potentially) many incoming links to each page and many outgoing links. In an outline, a given node can only have one incoming link -- its parent. But a wiki allows any node (page) that relates to another to offer a link to it, leading eventually to a very densely packed structure.

Perhaps more importantly, if you're consistent about the way you name things in a wiki, you'll find that the interconnectedness arises all on its own. You don't need to intentionally create a link; the link manifests itself based on the usage of similar terms.

 :Thmbsup: Thanks for that: very well said!! ConnectedText has a map like navigation pane that possibly demonstrates the structure more accurately.

gr3.png

It's very gratifying when working in a wiki to discover that you've already done something that you forgot about. As you're describing a related concept leading up to another page, you find that the link is already populated; simply by thinking descriptively and consistently, you've created a knowledge web that not only holds together, but reinforces itself.

Very true! In my short time using WikidPad I've found that WikiPageName Completion is very useful... if your naming is consistent.
1271
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: WikidPad - an IDE for your thoughts
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on January 31, 2008, 09:38 PM »
can someone help me get going here!! (as said earlier I've no wiki experience :( so far)

OK, I'll attach a very quick wink of some editing in WikidPad. You basically just
1. Type your thoughts
2. Select the word/s that you want to become a link to a new page
3. CamelCase them or surround with square brackets (which will turn them into a link)
4. Access the link by double click (which will take you to a new page)
5. go to #1 and start typing again (if you think that's cyclic, wait till you see the wink  ;))

Here's a flash of the process (If you open it in your browser it'll work):
* WikidPad.swf (2599.49 kB. 39x28 - viewed 973 times.)

BTW: Can you insert inline flash here??  :-\
1272
+1 for helping

I'm sure I've mentioned things like this previously. I think being able to organise software reviews (for example) into like categories would be of great benefit. So for example, you could have a Text Editor Round up that summarised and linked to Members' reviews of various Text Editors.

A bit more blogie??
1273
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: WikidPad - an IDE for your thoughts
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on January 31, 2008, 07:33 AM »
That's GREAT review!

Thanks  :Thmbsup:

One similar app is ConnectedText.

I think you've just jogged my memory, I have looked at ConnectedText previously but never downloaded and tried it.

It's an impressive website! Beats WikidPad's hands down!!  :'(

It's also US$30 plus US$68 for an additional USB license! It would want to be good  :huh:

I have chosen it over Wikidpad mostly because I wanted web export, and didn't want CamelCase, but regular space between words in exported html.
ConnectedText supports other scripting languages as well, besides Python, through Windows ActiveScripting. So you can have Ruby, Perl, etc. And it has plugins - I use CT to store code snippets, and it comes with Highlight plugin so my Ruby code is nicely highlighted.

That certainly sounds impressive.

There is also TeX plugin and some graph plugins - just enter some data and graph is created on the fly.

WikidPad also supports some graphics generation:
WikidPad allows access to some graphical applications which take some sort of script to generate images. You can include the script in a wiki and let the applications generate the appropriate image to show it in HTML preview and export.

The supported applications are:
  •     MimeTeX to generate mathematical formulas
  •     GraphViz which is a set of applications to generate directed and nondirected graphs
  •     Ploticus to generate plots and charts (as you might have seen in your favorite spreadsheet program)
  •     Gnuplot to generate mathematical plots
-WikidPad Help

But I have not played with it (so didn't mention it  :-[)

If Wikidpad didn't insist on CamelCase, I would have used it now, but ended with CT instead and I'm happy with it as well.

You can enclose your text with square brackets to Wikify them:
[This will be a Wikified link]

In WikidPad the keyboard shortcut is CNTRL+J, for example:
Editor:
Screenshot - 1_02_2008 , 12_20_19 AM.png

HTML:
Screenshot - 1_02_2008 , 12_20_52 AM.png

Thanks for reminding me of ConnectedText (did you find both programmes similar to use?)

edit: Added ConnectedText purchase price
1274
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Bits Du Jour and GAOTD one-day deals
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on January 30, 2008, 09:05 AM »
I was envisioning a child board of Found Deals and Discounts called something like: "Daily Deals". Perry's idea is good as well, though - have a Bits du Jour child board and a GiveawayoftheDay childboard. But then what do you do with short term deals from other sites/vendors?

No you're right Darwin, I don't think you'd really split them: having a Daily Deals type thing is more what I was thinking (just not typing); then all the short term deals can go together (which is really what we want isn't it?)
1275
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Bits Du Jour and GAOTD one-day deals
« Last post by Perry Mowbray on January 30, 2008, 08:19 AM »
As there are a couple of places on the web that offer daily deals (GAOTD and Bits being just two), would it suit to have them as child boards of Found Deals and Discounts?

I agree about any automatic scraping of those sites though, I'll visit if I've time or I appreciate a DC member recommendation.
Pages: prev1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 ... 63next