topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday April 24, 2024, 12:22 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - epaalx [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1]
1
Well the whole point of DRM is to artificially limit what users can do with content and their machines. That sound like working against users to me.
No, the point of DRM is to enforce an agreement that you implicitly make with the content provider. They own the content, so, they have right to dictate the terms.
Don't like the agreement (including the DRM)? Don't get the content! DRM issue solved.

2
These days, with pay-per-click and click-throughput statistics dictating renumeration, trusting a blogger is impossible because there's a financial motivation to attract contraversy or consensus.
Computers are getting more complicated and I reckon there's a deep misunderstanding of Vista and many people who can't handle it will scoff at it. Oh well, that's life and Microsoft is in computer business, so, they gotta live with it.

However, with a first paragraph:
"Windows Vista .. These features will make your computer less reliable and less secure. They'll make your computer less stable and run slower. They will cause technical support problems. They may even require you to upgrade some of your peripheral hardware and existing software. And these features won't do anything useful. In fact, they're working against you."
the blogger is obviously already preaching to Microsoft mongers. Personally, I don't know any one, except virus writers, who write software to work against the user, so, this is ludicrous. I admit sometimes software has some negative impact on the user, but never against the user.

However, the stupidest paragraph in the article:
"It's all complete nonsense. Microsoft could have easily told the entertainment industry that it was not going to deliberately cripple its operating system, take it or leave it. With 95% of the operating system market, where else would Hollywood go? Sure, Big Media has been pushing DRM, but recently some--Sony after their 2005 debacle and now EMI Group--are having second thoughts. "
Microsoft has not implemented Blu-Ray playback into Vista's Media Centre, and it seems, never will (perhaps until 7 and even that isn't confirmed). (There are messy 3rd party software, but when I read forums, owners are constantly having problems, in comparison to hassle-free Media Centre.) So, the result -  Vista (and Windows in general) cannot play Blu-Ray and what is Hollywood doing? Absolutely nothing - the PC/HTPC Blu-Ray playback is a mess, and Hollywood either don't care or likes it like that. So, where is it that Microsoft is dictating terms to Hollywood?

Oh, by the way... I don't mind DRM. Actually, I don't care about DRM. As long as impact of DRM is known (for example, with HDCP) my decision to use DRM products will be made on case-by-case basis just as any informed customer should. [Of course, same cannot be said for hacker's OSs, like desktop Linux, which will never support DRM.]

3
In fact a similar application does pretty much this already, called UEPos (http://www.pallium.com/uepos.php)... except that it rebuilds the MDI using static values.
Here's the quote of how he does it for UE...

How Does UEPos Work?
(This technical description is only for the curious. Others may safely ignore. )
UEPos locates the UltraEdit-32 frame (outer) window by name. It looks for a window named "UltraEdit-32 - " in the top
level window list. Yes, it can be fooled by windows that are not actually UltraEdit's but the extra " - " at the end reduces
this risk. Also, if there are no documents open, UltraEdit's frame window title lacks the trailing dash, so UEPos simply
does nothing if UltraEdit doesn't have an active document.
Once the UltraEdit-32 frame window is found, UEPos searches the frame window's children for a child window of the window class "MDIClient", which is the parent of MDI document windows in the Microsoft Windows operating system.
Once the MDIClient window is located, it is sent a message to report its "active child" window. That's the document window that UEPos manipulates.
Finally UEPos uses the command line options to calculate a new screen rectangle for the window, validates it, then applies it to the window with the Windows API call SetWindowPos.

4
unfortunately this probably isn't something that could be written as a generic tool that would work in 3rd party programs...
I'd agree with you if it wasn't for Allsnap utility (https://www.donation...dex.php?topic=2455.0) which has an option in the Properties called Snap MDI windows, which indicates that it is possible to know the MDI window locations.
Given that all programs seem to offer the same style of MDI functions, my guess is that they all use same MDI API.

5
My first request, ever....

When I'm editing many files in UltraEdit I usually have them tiled so that I can utilise the whole of the MDI.
However, if I wish to resize one of them, then I'm forced into resizing all the other ones manually to accomodate the dimensions of the resized one. I would like this to be automatic.

In the attachments you can see what I want...  Before: I have three files open, currently occupying all the space in the MDI window. After: I resize the lower window and the other two get automatically resized too re-occupying all the space in the MDI window.

Pages: [1]