@wraith808:
How can stealing be justified? 
-BartelsMedia
I didn't say he was trying to justify anything- but that you were trying to justify your attacks. When it comes down to it, unless a process is patented (which I think is stupid beyond reason- software patents stagnate the market), or he took your code and reverse engineered it to add to his product (which I don't think happened either), there was no theft involved.
leave me as a customer cold on PhraseExpress
I just wanted to make you aware that if you wear a fake Rolex and believe it is original, that it is not so original. If you continue to wear it with pride and don't care, well... no problem. In this particular case, we do not share the same opinion about the value of originality and authenticity.
-BartelsMedia
That analogy is so wrong as to make me shake my head. Trying to apply material concepts to ideas is what makes laws surrounding software and media so convoluted and wrong minded. If he's copying you, make your case based on price and promotion- not based on attacks. If he is truly copying you, you get what kind of lag time while he tries to replicate what you have done and make a release? Without attacks on a third party forum, you had come close to convincing a person that had been using DirectAccess for quite a while (me). How did this happen? I became aware of PhraseExpress on Bits and on this Board (in a positive manner). I also saw other reviews in places. Just those things began to convince me- the attacks were unnecessary.
It is
those attacks that turn me off from the product in all truth...