Recent Posts
.the lack of progress over 6 years, posting maintenance as something new (new as in refreshingly or innovatively new, as defined by most normal people) during a publicly advertised fundraiser event such as this, then as I said I have no issues with you and am not bound to answer any of your questions-lotusrootstarch (March 07, 2011, 08:18 PM)
Nope.@nosh, @PhilB66, @Ath,Why, because we are (hetro) males that like the looks of these fine young-ladies?
You've all been moved to the questionable conversation list
-barney (March 07, 2011, 08:53 AM)-Ath (March 07, 2011, 09:07 AM)
, not content .
?) members, and they might not look with pleasure 'pon such a redesign - unless, maybe, you included a hunk of the day, as well .Now regarding banning users.. We have to ban several users per day for trying to spam the forum -- usually by sticking advertising links in their profiles that no one ever sees -- so there is plenty of banning that happens, but never for anything other than advertisement spamming.-mouser (March 07, 2011, 09:40 AM)
. Even extreme language or attitude(s) are seldom a valid cause for such an action, although I've been in forae that were pretty casual about using the process 
. As an enforcement, it is well nigh useless - too easy to rejoin with a different alias/email address. And if a reputation for banning is acquired, some folk will avoid joining just for that reason.
.@nosh, @PhilB66, @Ath,I'm not all that certain that I'd enjoy converse with someone attracted only by appearance
I would.-nosh (March 06, 2011, 11:26 PM)
.Oh dear, oh dear!
Someone seems to be trying very hard to be tiresome. Let's not squabble. There are enough of us here to decide whether and how changes will be made, and no one voice is likely to prevail, no matter how shrill.-cranioscopical (March 06, 2011, 09:55 PM)
. By that same token, appearance-wise, most forae haven't changed much, but they're still active. If we enjoy a site, we return, regardless the appearance. Frankly, I'm not all that certain that I'd enjoy converse with someone attracted only by appearance - anyone that interested in ephemerals prolly wouldn't have an outlook that would be attractive to me 
. The important part of any site is the meat of it, the content contained therein.
.
.) So does a third of the rest of the world - more on that another time, perhaps - so change for the sake of change is well nigh antithetical.
, that's because I'm somewhat inebriated ... but not enough to dis-enable rationality (I thimk!) .), but maybe some of the AutoIt/AutoHotKey stuff?
- so I thought I'd ask if anyone knows of an equivalent to at least those two (2) languages.
. I'm a bit trepidatious about attempting such a translation, but so far I'm saved by lack of opportunity . Not certain which is more frustrating . - that allowed me to create new email addresses. Could not something like that be done, but for forwarder creation? .But having it automatic so that you can simply enter the email address without creating it and have the server automatically accept it for you. Or have a quick utility to give you the email address that the server would automatically recognize. It could be done very easily with symmetric encryption and GUIDs or unique codes.-Renegade (March 05, 2011, 12:05 AM)
. Might be a bit complex, though. The main hosting control panels of which I'm aware are cPanel and Plesk, but a number of hosting companies roll their own. Still, I'd think that the aggregate genius that is DC could come up with something workable .... I've got over 350 email forwarders on one domain. When I start getting spam on one of 'em, I redirect the forwarder. Most of the spam I see is on unique email addresses I've used to sign up for different Web sites - prolly not intentionally released by the site(s) in question, as a sniffer parked on server traffic could do the job - but the standard response is, "You leased, loaned, or leaked this address: it is now closed." It's amazing how little spam I receive any more . ., and that was what was causing all the errors. I'll take his word for it, this is his field of expertise ... but ... flutter ? Sounds just a step or two down from the old Iomega ZIP drive click of death . .. Generalities of the, "You should do better," nature don't really admit of much discussion. When the what could be better is specified, then there are grounds for discourse. To date, save for your comments, I haven't seen any .... Seems some things just can't be fixed .. Easus running from a separate disk on same machine, so don't think the CD would make any difference, and by the time I got to Nuke, too frustrated ... .)No one but the charity and none are the answers for the smart alecs out there.-wraith808 (February 22, 2011, 01:48 PM)
..What you mean is that donors get automatic update check (with no nags), whereas the "free users" need to manually update (and get a "please donate" message when they do?)? That actually doesn't sound half-badI don't think this is a good idea, especially for people who have lots of DC apps and are already a donor.Quick clarification -- I meant to say that such messages would not be shown to donors who have put in a license key.-mouser (February 23, 2011, 08:28 AM)-jgpaiva (February 23, 2011, 08:41 AM)
..Or even 10¢. Agree with that but... perhaps can't access a mechanism by which to pay that 10¢?-cranioscopical (February 22, 2011, 05:59 PM)
.)... help the coders on the site ...That's easy enough to initiate - set up a commercial section, visible from the top level. Then those that wish can establish IDs, mention strengths, reference previous accomplishments.-mouser (February 22, 2011, 04:13 PM)
... and the fear of risking their financial information with some site they don't know about ...-mouser (February 22, 2011, 12:04 PM)
.. Oh, well, 2011 is young yet ... they're bound to get at least one (1) better paper in the remainder of the year. 
