topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 19, 2025, 6:17 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 131next
951
Living Room / ICANN set to open the TLD flood gates
« Last post by Josh on November 03, 2010, 06:07 PM »
icann_ars.jpg

After decades of operating with no more than 21 generic top-level domains, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is preparing to start registering up to a thousand top-level domains in a year, according to PCWorld. ICANN plans to post a new TLD application guidebook for hopefuls looking to join the ranks of .org, .net and .jobs as soon as November 9.

ICANN has spoken of adding TLDs to the Internet's repertoire since 1998, and has pushed a few through since then, including .info, .biz and .jobs. While a handful of the new ones have met success, resulting in over a million domain registrations, none have been able to match the runaway .com, which is associated with over half of the 196.3 million registered domain names.

Many entities have professed their desire to apply for TLDs of their very own, including .nyc, .berlin, and .unicef. Even registry operators for large TLDs like .org have expressed an interest in diversifying with variations of the ones they already own.

The ownership scale may go still smaller, to the company level. Canon has announced plans to get its own extension, and IBM may be contemplating its very own .ibm. But that is about where the plausibility of TLD ownership ends— just filing an application for a new TLD will run $185,000, which rules out those of us running websites from our home offices.

Of course, ICANN's dream of offering TLDs to every company has been some years in the making, and each time previous iterations of the guide have surfaced, they've left gaping policy questions unanswered. For instance, there were no rules regarding who could register which kinds of domains, such as whether a company could get a .paris address if the Parisian government owned the extension.

Source
952
Living Room / Re: Google sues the U.S. government
« Last post by Josh on November 03, 2010, 05:56 PM »
Another issue with using FOSS software is that of support. While small tools might work for parts of a business, when a company needs a tool as vital as an office suite, or an operating system platform, support is a must. This could be in the form of support provided by the vendor, or support provided by tech support staff. If the staff is not familiar with the products you use, it costs more to train them. If the products you use are not a common tool in the industry, you will end up paying more for the personnel trained in it. Another issue is that if a problem creeps up when using your products, who do you contact? I've run into this on the consumer end with FOSS software. One response I've been told quite frequently is to just use the community forums or newsgroups. That is well and good if you have an active forum or someone willing to help with your issue.

Many businesses that invest in a product for their core business will often require some form of support or maintenance on that product. Many FOSS products do not offer this. Where do I go for libreoffice support? Is there paid support? Is there a dedicated forum for support for users who choose to use a product in a core part of their company? When a product's primary support is via a user forum, it can make a corporation uneasy. What if there is a major bug with the product? The biggest response I receive is that either A. Wait until it is patched or B. Take the source and fix it yourself. Is this going to work for a business? Doubtful. Whereas, with a proprietary vendor, you will see that if the customers paying for their products say there is a problem, 9 times out of 10 there is someone there to listen and provide either a temporary work around, a patch, or some other fix action. This is NOT ALWAYS the case, but when you purchase support with your product, the issues are generally given higher priority.

Case and point, where on the Document Foundations site do you find support contacts?

http://www.documentf...ndation.org/contact/

No contact information for support. The only support information I can find is mailing list support. So if I as a business owner want to use libre office for the core document production of my business and I run into an issue, I am left with relying on a mailing list.

http://www.documentf.../contribution/#lists

What happens if I get no resolution on my issue?

PLEASE NOTE: This is not an attack on libreoffice, I merely am using them as an example. This can apply to almost any product.
953
General Software Discussion / Re: Google Chrome: Time for a Second Chance?
« Last post by Josh on November 03, 2010, 01:07 PM »
And now, back to the topic of version number whoring, chrome is now at v9 beta.

http://fileforum.bet...rome-v9/1220379960/5

The differences between v6 to v9, I cannot tell. I have installed each and see no discernible differences.
954
Living Room / Re: Where have all the trackballs gone!
« Last post by Josh on November 03, 2010, 09:08 AM »
Every time I get going with it the scrolling ends up throwing me back to my Logitech G9. I think that scrolling - or lack of it, actually - has always been my bane with track balls.
has anyone ever made a two-trackball mouse?  one ball to control cursor, and another to control scrolling/panning?  seems like it might work pretty well, with one big ball and then a smaller ball right next to it, or mounted on the side for the thumb to use.  maybe something for an enterprising homebrewer?  surely someone has tried it..

We can call it Scroll Click and Pan Robot! SCPR
955
Living Room / Re: Where have all the trackballs gone!
« Last post by Josh on November 02, 2010, 02:00 PM »
I have been using the M570 for about a month now and I absolutely love it. It takes some getting used to for the left positioned thumb ball but it is a joy to use. I highly recommend it. I give it to deep fried baby cody wings up!
956
General Software Discussion / Slash your windows boot time
« Last post by Josh on November 01, 2010, 04:39 PM »
screenshots-soluto-beta.png

Soluto, in short, lets users quickly and easily customize the Windows boot process by breaking applications into three categories: Ones that are completely unnecessary to the boot process, ones that are potentially removable, and ones that are absolutely necessary to boot Windows. Soluto collects anonymous user data to give you an idea of what other users do with their applications, so if you have a piece of software that lots of other people pause during startup, you're presented with a pie chart telling you what percentage pauses, and what percentage keeps it in the boot process.

In this latest beta version (1.1.10960,) you can instantly kill Soluto after your PC has started up, search for- and filter applications by name.

Soluto Homepage

Fileforum Source
957
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« Last post by Josh on October 31, 2010, 08:50 AM »
Dormouse: While I agree that a complete rewrite can, and in most cases does, justify a major upgrade...in the eyes of the consumer if nothing changes visually or functionally, then it does not. Most consumers, I say most because like us at DC there are exceptions, expect a visual impact when going from V.X to V.Y. My father once asked me why he should upgrade from diskkeeper 8 to 9 back in the day (before I knew he was buying this and wasting his money) because very little had changed visually. He didn't see what was new during his trial upgrade.
958
Living Room / Re: Limewire shutdown, permanently
« Last post by Josh on October 29, 2010, 08:40 AM »
I wholeheartedly agree y0himba. I love the argument that companies should "Go after the user not the software" when the software, like it or not, is primarily used for piracy. Bit Torrent has many legit uses and is used by corporations across the world to help ease their bandwidth usage. Blizzard uses it for patch and game distribution, Microsoft for product distribution, quite a few movie companies use it for digital distribution of their products to the movie theaters, etc. Limewire, over the entire history of which I have seen the product, has not had a single legit use. Every person I've ever heard mention the product has referenced it in terms of piracy.

As the old saying goes, "If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck...it almost certainly is not a horse". The whole "Hey, there is a linux distribution being shared on there so this service is legit" argument is tired and old. If I place a Linux distribution on an ftp server along with every current Microsoft product (including keys), that does not make the ftp server legit even if I start the ftp server only hosting said Linux distribution. The primary purpose of said FTP server is for piracy of MS products, not linux distribution.
959
Living Room / Re: Limewire shutdown, permanently
« Last post by Josh on October 28, 2010, 02:25 PM »
Stephen, if one case shuts down a service which, while not ADVERTISED to support piracy but information is found which demonstrates the service is intended to be used for such or that over half of the users are using it for such activities, then this could be groundbreaking. Other services would not stand a chance once a case has been won.
960
Living Room / Re: Limewire shutdown, permanently
« Last post by Josh on October 27, 2010, 08:03 PM »
I see a key difference here between all of those other protocols and services like limewire, kazaa, bearshare, etc.

Bit Torrent, HTTP, FTP, etc. were all designed with data distribution in mind. While there was always the underground which had illegal software (shareware copies of scorched earth anyone?) being distributed, it was the minority. The difference nowadays is that many of these tools are designed with piracy in mind. While it is not placed on the homepage of said products directly, you can tell that this is the case when you read the support forums or look at some of the features being implemented.

I have no issues with P2P as a technology, but I do have a problem with programs which are clearly designed to bypass copyright and distribute products illegally. HTTP, FTP and Bit Torrent were NOT designed with this in mind. HTTP was for web traffic, FTP for file transfer (site-to-site) and bit torrent for distributed data distribution. Bit Torrent is largely used by many corporations for data distribution. Microsoft, Sun, Various movie distribution sites use it.

I see a clear distinction here between these services, protocols and technologies when compared to the vast majority of P2P programs out there.
961
Living Room / Re: Can I use a remote pc's static ip because I haven't got one?
« Last post by Josh on October 27, 2010, 05:44 PM »
Would a dynamic ip service work? You can run the client on the server and it updates the ip address associated with the account each time it changes. What do you think? www.no-ip.com www.dyndns.org
962
Living Room / Limewire shutdown, permanently
« Last post by Josh on October 27, 2010, 04:25 PM »
208895-limewiredenied_180.jpg

File-sharing program LimeWire has been permanently shut down after a federal judge found it guilty of assisting users in committing copyright infringement "on a massive scale."

The shut-down is the final chapter in a case brought against LimeWire LLC by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) over four years ago.

The suit, filed by the RIAA on behalf of eight major music publishers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, charged LimeWire with facilitating "pervasive online infringement." It also accused LimeWire of allowing and actively encouraging users to participate in music piracy.

During the court proceedings, the plaintiffs claimed that over 93 percent of the software's traffic was made up of infringing content.

In May 2010, federal Judge Kimba Wood found LimeWire LLC liable for copyright infringement. She also found LimeWire founder Mark Gordon to be personally liable. The RIAA then made two separate motions--one for permanent shut down of the company, and the other for freezing of the company's assets.

More at source
963
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / dot Net complaints
« Last post by Josh on October 24, 2010, 10:43 PM »
TICKED OFF?!?!?!?!? That's no excuse! We should have mouser submit you to torture by cody himself. Let him peck at you until your wallet is empty!
964
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / dot Net complaints
« Last post by Josh on October 23, 2010, 03:06 PM »
What a shame it requires .net framework to run  :(

And what is wrong with .NET? I have each version installed and it causes no problems on my systems. It is actually fairly decent to code in as well (I use C#, F# and VC/VB.NET). This ties right into my topic on the aversion to the .NET Framework. Most complaints about .NET seem to stem from a bandwagon approach of knocking anything MS.
966
Living Room / Re: Desktop Linux: The dream is dead
« Last post by Josh on October 22, 2010, 02:40 PM »
Sorry for the nostalgia, but I am reminded of this video:

Video
967
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: LogMeIn Hamachi²
« Last post by Josh on October 22, 2010, 02:30 PM »
Does anyone know if there are plans an android version of hamachi?
968
General Software Discussion / Re: True Launch Bar v5.0
« Last post by Josh on October 22, 2010, 09:33 AM »
Am I the only who, since Windows 7, has found themselves not really needing this tool anymore? I used to have this installed with XP and Vista, but Win7 makes things so much easier I find myself rarely using this despite owning two licenses.
969
DC Gamer Club / Re: The Ball - Portal-like game with a err.. ball
« Last post by Josh on October 20, 2010, 01:43 PM »
The gun and ball combo can do many things, take a look at www.theballthegame.com :)
970
DC Gamer Club / Re: The Ball - Portal-like game with a err.. ball
« Last post by Josh on October 20, 2010, 08:52 AM »
Already pre-ordered. Thanks for the heads up on IRC lanux!
971
General Software Discussion / Re: Google Chrome: Time for a Second Chance?
« Last post by Josh on October 18, 2010, 02:19 PM »
Google Chrome is the troll of the version world! 1 to 8 in 2 years! That almost sounds like our very own mouser and his sub-version numbers :)
972
Living Room / Desktop Linux: The dream is dead
« Last post by Josh on October 18, 2010, 08:59 AM »
207999-sad-penguin_180.jpg

Despite phenomenal security and stability--and amazing strides in usability, performance, and compatibility--Linux simply isn’t catching on with desktop users. And if there ever was a chance for desktop Linux to succeed, that ship has long since sunk.

Over the past few years, modern Linux distributions such as Ubuntu have utterly transformed the open-source desktop user experience into something sleek and simple, while arguably surpassing Windows and Mac OS in both security and stability. Meanwhile, the public failure of Windows Vista and the rise of the netbook gave Linux some openings to capture a meaningful slice of the market. But those opportunities have been squandered and lost, and Linux desktop market share remains stagnant at around 1 percent.

I should emphasize that I'm not by any means talking about the demise of Linux itself. New projections from the Linux Foundation credibly show that demand for Linux on servers will outstrip demand for all other options over the next few years. And, as I'll discuss at length in this article, Linux has already established itself as a dominant operating system on mobile and embedded devices ranging from tablets and phones to TVs and printers.

More at source
973
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: LogMeIn Hamachi²
« Last post by Josh on October 17, 2010, 07:55 PM »
Hamachi does not come with RDP built-in, however it works fine using the MS Client from any XP/Vista/7/Server machine. I am able to rdp into all of the machines in my hamachi network.
974
General Software Discussion / Re: Google Chrome: Time for a Second Chance?
« Last post by Josh on October 15, 2010, 09:10 AM »
Chrome might go to the wayside if Opera is successful with their implementation of extensions. Opera, in my opinion, with extensions could be superior to chrome and most other browsers if they do it right.

Opera 11 extensions discussion
975
General Software Discussion / Re: Opera to support extensions in V11
« Last post by Josh on October 14, 2010, 03:18 PM »
My favorite quote comes to mind...

"You don't need anything more, opera has everything built in"
Pages: prev1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 131next