topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday June 26, 2025, 1:30 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 106next
926
Living Room / Re: Aspartame: Sweet Misery - A Poisoned World (Wikipedia Abuse)
« Last post by JavaJones on January 12, 2011, 03:53 PM »
Wikipedia is not even intended as a primary source as far as I know. It's intended to give information on a subject then refer to *its* primary sources for further information and proper referencing.

Btw Renegade, I presume you've read the Aspartame talk page, it's pretty interesting to watch the back-and-forth:
http://en.wikipedia....s_raised_by_Arydberg
While I'm not a fan of aspartame in general, I'm also a fan of good science and reliable sources. This is especially true given various recent scandals regarding similar "edge" research, like the vaccine-autism controversy. So I don't necessarily feel the page is necessarily *that* biased, it's biased (theoretically) toward an accepted scientific view ("accepted" here meaning peer-reviewed and not found to be faulty, misrepresented, etc.). I didn't see a lot of good, sourced rebuttal from the opposing side in the discussion page unfortunately; mostly it was the editors saying "give us reliable external sources" and then getting a reply like "check this other page that collects theories about the subject", which of course is neither reliable nor an original source. I'd like to believe the opposing argument *is* stronger than that though!

- Oshyan
927
Developer's Corner / Re: "competitive upgrade" - is it ethical?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 12, 2011, 03:33 PM »
I think you should only "return the favor" if you think it will get you more new and *unique* sales. In other words sales that would not have happened without the discount. Not knowing your product or your competitor's, or the market, I can't say whether this is likely, but hopefully you can reasonably evaluate the likelihood and make a decision based on that.

I doubt you're considering doing it just because they are. There should of course always be a sound sales strategy behind such a move, and ideally your sales strategy would be more proactive than reactive. I guess maybe you thought you should possibly do it too, but were worried about ethical concerns, in which case I think from a customer standpoint people are OK with it, and clearly from a business standpoint your competitor has already done it so it doesn't matter in your case. Just don't let them draw you into a price war...

- Oshyan
928
I think the key is not to do much analysis on the data and to be *very up front and clear with all factors you can think of*, e.g. "tests performed on a Windows 7 x64 system with Google Chrome browser v8.1.512 between 9AM and 12PM Pacific Time in San Francisco, California with web history disabled, all cookies cleared..." etc.

Maybe the Wordpress themes thing is a good test if Google turns up crap for it. The bigger question is whether Yippy, etc. do better. If so that's a potentially compelling argument for all the "Google puts crap sites first because of ad dollars" talk. But I've yet to see any real, compelling, actual, factual evidence on any of that. Does Google benefit financially from sides with Google Ads coming up first? Yes. Does it benefit from *crap* sites with Google ads coming up first? No more so than *good* sites with Google ads coming up first! And since Google owns so much of the ad market, it's highly arguable whether there's any particular incentive for Google to actually not remove the "abusive" sites.

I think it's just a very hard problem to solve, how to get rid of the majority of the bad and keep the majority of the good. Nobody else seems to have managed much better (though people argue otherwise which is why I want to see good tests that show whether this is true or not). If that's true, if nobody else is doing any better, then it just means people hold Google to a higher standard, they expect more because they at one time revolutionized the search engine market, so theoretically they're the experts.

For my part I feel like when the next search revolution arrives, it will be as clear as it was with Google. So far Yippy, DuckDuckGo, etc. are not clear winners by any means, so I don't think they're the "messiah" we're looking for.

- Oshyan
929
Sorry  Bamse, but I think that's a cop-out. After all, we have plenty of weather men/meteorologists who make weather predictions all the time. ;)

But seriously, as long as you perform the tests on the same day, from common criteria, how are they not valid? Yes the results may change in a day, a week, a month, certainly in a year, but that is true of many things that are tested quite often. A more rigorous test would test over a period of months, once a day, automatically perhaps, but even just a single test on a single day would be useful.

I'm just tired of this "Google sucks, DuckDuckGo is definitely better for such and such" assertions when, so far, I have not been able to really find evidence of it. But then I am beginning to feel as if I am DC's resident Google apologist. ;)

- Oshyan
930
Developer's Corner / Re: "competitive upgrade" - is it ethical?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 11, 2011, 03:27 PM »
Well, as someone working for a company that has been on the "other" side of this (we decided to offer a competitive upgrade of our product), perhaps I can provide a useful perspective. Personally I don't see it as particularly unethical, though I will agree I'm not a big fan of doing it, or the need to do it. Nonetheless I recognize it is sometimes a very important and valuable part of the sales/marketing equation, especially for smaller and up-and-coming products/companies.

The thing is large companies are often in a better position to offer such upgrades because they can absorb the cost better, so the balance is maybe not fair. Still it's a valid option for new software, and an important one when you consider the conflicting issues of 1: maintaining value perception of your product (do not price it too low or people will not respect it) vs. 2: providing some incentive for people to check it out/purchase when they may already be customers of an entrenched market dominator who  would otherwise be hard to compete against. I suppose that's really when I see it as most valuable and most ethical is in the case that the market you are in or trying to enter is already largely dominated by someone else. In that situation it's hard to gain a foothold without "unconventional" tactics like this IMHO.

40hz has some good points regarding the reasons why people tend to switch and whatnot. He's probably right, but I do think our short-term "competitive upgrade" sale helped us gain some customers from our competitor(s). The hope is that you gain them and then keep them through the upgrade cycle. Just getting people to try your product can be a struggle sometimes. We do provide a free version, so theoretically people should just decide from that, but the competitive sale did seem to help so it served some purpose. It may be telling that it was only a short-term thing and we're no longer doing it though...

As to the use of the word "upgrade", I think we said "sidegrade", which is perhaps more fair?

- Oshyan
931
I'm quite proud of the fact that I've never seen 2 girls 1 cup, and many of the other Internet horrors. I did see Goatxe (or whatever it ways) and that's pretty awful. But I learned my lesson fairly early, heh.

- Oshyan
932
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 11, 2011, 02:39 PM »
I don't know that the manufacturer's are "afraid" of going with other than 16:9, I think they have good reason to stick to it (several of the reasons already posited in this thread). I think the vast majority of the display market consists of people not well informed (or even particularly concerned) enough to demand something other than 16:9, and in fact many consumers may like that aspect ratio because it's familiar from TVs. While there is a vocal minority like us who wants more height, the overall market doesn't care, and may even prefer widescreen (even if the reason for that preference is not well founded). So there is little or no incentive for manufacturers do to other than 16:9 displays.

- Oshyan
933
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 10, 2011, 06:14 PM »
Sorry, I really don't think this is that relevant to TVs. It's pretty darn hard to find a TV these days without a standard 16:9 aspect ratio, so the diagonal measurement is pretty darn relevant and useful. However I do agree for computer monitors, most definitely. And for me in fact I would prefer to have the diagonal and pixel resolution rather than diagonal and LxW (although having all of them would be even better).

- Oshyan
934
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 10, 2011, 05:44 PM »
Shades, those are some of my theories too. I really should finish that blog post of mine, hehe.

- Oshyan
935
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 09, 2011, 11:54 PM »
No, that's not exactly what I'm saying, though yes even just pushing *pre-rendered*/filmed 1080p video *is* somewhat demanding. But any modern CPU from Intel or AMD can do 1080p just fine in most cases (depending on codec and bitrate).

What I was talking about however with the PS3 is *realtime rendering* of imagery at 1080p resolution (1920x1080 pixels). Essentially everything has to be calculated in realtime, because it's an interactive game and nothing can be pre-rendered (as opposed to video that is just a stream of pre-recorded frames). So you've got a game world, the computer has to figure out essentially the color of each pixel. The more pixels it has to figure out through calculating the game world at higher resolution, the more demanding it is on the CPU to do it at "interactive" frame rates (i.e. 30fps minimum).

- Oshyan
936
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 09, 2011, 11:32 PM »
1080p is a *ton* more pixels than 720p, and it's hard to push 30 frames per second with the additional resource demand. Truth be told 720p actually looks very good at most normal screen sizes, almost indistinguishable in motion from 1080p at average viewing distances. The biggest issue with 720p in 3d rendered images like console games is antialiasing. If you have 720p imagery with good antialiasing, it really won't matter. Problem is *good* antialiasing is often about as demanding as simply pushing more pixels, so you can get 720p with good AA, or 1080p with no AA. Usually 720p with good AA is actually better.

- Oshyan
937
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 09, 2011, 11:05 PM »
I believe "HD Ready" is similar to "Vista Capable". :D

- Oshyan
938
Living Room / Re: Alternate movie subtitles for commentary, trivia, etc?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 09, 2011, 01:25 AM »
Yeah, I'm familiar with those kinds of players and sub sites. Admittedly I haven't checked any of them for this kind of "commentary subs", so good idea there. I'll take a look.

Thanks. :)

- Oshyan
939
No problem. I really wanted to do it anyway for myself, and I might as well share my experiences. Truth be told this is what I do before committing to almost any software, let alone making a big purchase, and there are many similar research "stories" I could tell (and should have told in the past). I hope to share more of my experiences moving forward.

- Oshyan
940
Makes total sense. Go Boxee! Hehe.

Some further commentary on Media Companion:
This one looks promising, but as I said it's kind of in transition, moving to open source. That in itself may be promising, or may not be. ;)

Feature-wise it's decent, but the UI is a bit clunky. I'm also seeing some crashes/errors (running Win7 x64 here). I think they might be permissions issues, but none of the other apps I've tested seem to have such problems, and what issues they have run into generally don't throw "stop" type errors (more like "error accessing file" or whatever).

Media Companion has also had trouble identifying a number of my files just in my test directory. Worse, it seems hard to really correct. I guess just changing the title of the file is what I have to do (rather than the title "alias" that it scans for, which other apps let you do).

Finally, perhaps the biggest irritation is that it dumped a bunch of files all over my media directory. This may well be configurable, and for some people would actually be great (in fact I think this is why it works with XBMC fairly well, because that app reads the files it puts in the media folders), but personally I want my folders uncluttered. It adds not only NFO files for all films, but also a bunch of other files for actors and other things, along with fan art and cover art. All of it in the source folder of the media it represents. If that works for you then Media Companion may be worth a look in a few months once things stabilize, but for now I'd say it's a pass vs. other more mature free options.

I'll get back to Boxee with more detail soon. Still looking good...

- Oshyan
941
Living Room / Alternate movie subtitles for commentary, trivia, etc?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 08, 2011, 09:44 PM »
Does anyone know of any sources of "alternate" subtitle tracks with e.g. movie trivia or other commentary?

The back story: I was sitting here watching LA Story and came to a part where someone is very obviously doing a voice for the mother of the lead actress on the phone, and I wondered who was doing that voice. The thought occurred it might even be Steve Martin, and very probably was at least one of the other actors in the film. Then I thought of the old VH1 show Pop Up Video, which I used to love, how it would probably answer my question if they had pop-up video for movies, and then I realized how cool it would be to have a subtitle track of trivia or even normal "director's commentary" (as opposed to an alternate audio track). So I wondered, does anything like this exist?

I've seen Rifftrax before:
http://www.rifftrax.com/
Which is cool and fun, but for one it's all just jokes, not trivia or serious commentary, and it's also a replacement audio track rather than subtitles.

There's something appealing to me about being able to actually watch the original movie with normal audio, but also see and read the commentary if I want to. And this makes me also wonder if they ever have text versions of director's commentary or other alternate commentary/audio tracks on movies.

Going further with this, it seems reasonable that such a thing could/should/or already would have spawned a community of people making such subtitle tracks. One wonders if they could be somehow "crowd sourced" like IMDB trivia for example. Essentially, think of converting IMDB trivia into contextual, timed subtitles and you have a simple idea of how it might work and the potential appeal. I suppose just assigning a "time code" to a piece of trivia could lead to being able to auto-generate a subtitle track from multiple people's submissions for example.

So has anyone seen or heard of anything like this?

- Oshyan
942
That's a good vote of confidence. :D What is your particular setup? Physical media or file-based (or both)? Going through a large TV? PC-based or Boxee hardware? What other options have you tried?

- Oshyan
943
Funny you should ask Skwire, I am *just* looking at it now after I realized I had forgotten it! It was on my original list of options to try, and then as I was researching PVD integration with XBMC (sadly not yet a truly smooth process), I was led to the XBMC forums, and then to another Cataloging-type app called Media Companion (also currently evaluating), and then finally to Boxee. It was then I remembered it was actually fairly high on my list, but I ended up having so many options it got overlooked.

Anyway long story short it is looking *very* promising. It has a nice UI, different than XBMC and maybe not quite as "pretty" IMHO but still extremely good. It is currently scanning one of my movie folders and is so far doing at least as good a job as any other system at identifying stuff, and more importantly its correction system is probably the best I've seen thus far (with the exception of so far not finding a way to specify alternate sites to scrape info from, but that's not a deal breaker). It also has lots of nice additional stuff built-in like access to line TV shows, Netflix, Pandora, etc. most or all of which are available as plugins for other systems like XBMC, but here they're built in and very nicely integrated. It also has genre-based sorting and otherwise decent search. So far, very, very good, at least the equal of XBMC, and probably better due to superior title correction functions. I'll update this in a few days when I'm further along, but I could easily see Boxee winning in the Media Center app type.

As for Media Companion, it looks ok, but so far is not standing out in particular. It does at least seem to have a decent capability to identify stuff without a lot of manual intervention, which remains my biggest complaint against PVD, but the UI is a bit confusing and clunky, and it's also kind of in development transition right now (going open source) which might threaten its future. The PVD community also seems more significant.

More on both of these later...

- Oshyan
944
Living Room / Re: Fast/Responsive programs: An official SuperboyAC list
« Last post by JavaJones on January 08, 2011, 04:44 PM »
No mayo?  :o I have lost all respect I once had for you. :P

- Oshyan
945
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 08, 2011, 03:10 PM »
with widescreen monitors, the height is very important.
Mine is 16:10, I already miss the height - if it were 16:9 I'd need another one on top...

16:9 should never have been allowed to make its way into the computer world.

Ooo, I have a blog post/rant about that waiting in the wings. I should finish it up and post already, hehe. It's actually been on the back burner for, oh, 2 years or so. Yeesh!

- Oshyan
946
Has anyone actually done any serious, rigorous, side-by-side tests of the various up and coming search engines against Google and Bing? I've seen a Bing vs. Google "showdown" before, but that was mostly a draw, unsurprisingly. And since I like Google's UI better, it wins. I'd love to see how DuckDuckGo, Yippy, and the rest do in actual testing, with specific keywords common across all tested engines, and qualitative as well as quantitative results analysis. I suspect quite frankly that the appeal of DuckDuckGo and Yippy is not so much that they are hands-down better than Google, but that they are *not* Google, and the very fact that they're smaller makes one feel better about using them. For my part, with admittedly brief tests, I have not seen significant differences between them, much less significant advantage for Yippy or DDG.

- Oshyan
947
Glad you found it useful! If your needs are similar to mine, you should be pretty happy with PVD or XBMC. PVD is more customizable and it's easier to edit the data, so that's appealing to me more right now. But it's hard to deny how nice the XBMC UI is and I really hope I can figure out how to use it the way I want in the future...

- Oshyan
948
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 07, 2011, 10:45 PM »
Most screens are widescreen, near or at 16:9 (sometimes 16:10 or close variations) these days (somewhat to my dismay, but that's a later blog post). Non-widescreen displays are increasingly rare, so it's not really that much different than it used to be...

- Oshyan
949
General Software Discussion / Re: Personal Movie Organizers - A quick rundown
« Last post by JavaJones on January 07, 2011, 10:22 PM »
I've just made a large relevant post in this other thread:
https://www.donation....msg230600#msg230600

- Oshyan
950
Ok, I'm back to this subject again, after having spent the last few weeks cleaning up all my file names, removing duplicates, etc. I'll give a quick rundown of my immediate impressions of the various apps I'm trying. Keep in mind these are very far from "reviews", I have fairly specific criteria, and I can't spend a lot of time with each app so I may be missing something that does what I want. I'll apologize in advance, this is going to be a looong one, but hopefully someone finds it useful. ;) As always, I'd love feedback on other people's favorites, experiences with these apps, solutions to problems I ran into, etc.

To start, here's an outline of my situation and needs:

  • I have a media machine hooked up to my TV and stereo for movie, TV and music playback; it's a normal PC with HDMI output and about 20TB of data storage available
  • First and foremost I want a media organizer; playback is a bonus - when you're dealing with 100s or 1000s of media files, you stop wanting to browse by title alone and start to want genre, summary, rating, and other info at your finger tips
  • I have TV, movies, and music to organize, but I'd settle for separate programs for each
  • Organizing movies is top priority, TV shows 2nd, music a distant 3rd (I find a simple folder organization sufficient for now)
  • I have access to live TV through a tuner card, but I very seldom use it and don't really care if the app has PVR capability
  • I have existing software players that I like for all my formats but would be willing to use a fully integrated organizer and player system *if* it has a nice full-screen UI and meets other requirements (and provided it plays all my media of course)
  • The system needs a UI that works well on a 50% screen from 8-10 feet away (this potentially eliminates or lessens the value of many of the straight cataloging apps)
  • I need the organizer to automatically pull as much info as possible from online databases (e.g. IMDB) and ideally it would allow choice of which DB to pull from (on a per-file basis even better), or allow for merging multiple sources intelligently
  • I need it to have reasonably smart name parsing, or at least allow me to choose what online data source title I want to associate my local file to, and it needs to give me enough info to make a smart choice (i.e. not just give me a list of matching titles, for which there may be 10 of the same name, but different years, actors, etc.)
  • It should be fairly intelligent with ignoring or flagging files for later review if it can't reasonably figure out online associations for them, in other words if its level of certainty of the file name association to the online title is not high, it should not fill out the info
  • If the auto-tagging functionality associates a file with the wrong info, it should be easily correctable or removable
  • It should allow manual editing and filling out of the same data that would be pulled from an online DB, and manual updates to data already pulled from online
  • If it's just an organizer, it *needs* to allow direct linking to my files for playback and support playing by the player of my choice
  • If it's a full organizer and media playback system, it needs to play all my formats with full features, including subtitles, multiple audio streams, and chapter markers
  • It needs to support sorting by genre, and preferably ratings as well
  • It should have a good search system
  • It should be fairly customizable
  • It should have good support for things that are half-way between a movie and TV show, like a mini-series such as Children of Dune (3 parts)
  • It should support multi-part video files, such as "CD1, CD2" of a movie rip
  • Support of additional services such as Netflix is a bonus
  • Something that supported Win7 Libraries would be especially nice

And this is what I've tried and my thoughts on each:

First there are the full-screen Windows Media Center type apps (HTPC apps), most notably XBMC, but also including MeediOS and several others, and of course Windows Media Center itself.

Windows Media Center
I'll just get this one out of the way. Windows Media Center (WMC) is ok. The UI works at a distance, and the presentation is not bad. But it doesn't have very good real organization and cataloging functionality by itself. There are plugins that make this much better, but I haven't really messed with them as I'm not a big fan of WMC itself. I also prefer a player interface with more control and functionality (getting subtitle support for example requires additional work). So I didn't really see it worthwhile to keep trying to bolt on stuff to WMC.

XBMC
The grandaddy of many of the other apps out there that are apparently forks of XBMC. It has continued to evolve fairly nicely, and at first glance (and first use) it is one of the nicest and most applicable to my needs. It supports movies, music, photos, and more. It can fetch info automatically from various databases (only one at a time). It scanned all my (large) movie folders and assigned data to them from online matches reasonably quickly, with no errors or crashes. It also appeared to be able to play pretty much every video I had. The problems started to appear when I wanted to edit and correct any of th automatically scraped info. I couldn't find a way to do it. There may well be a plugin that does this, but so far it has stumped me.

I also found some quirks using the UI that I wasn't that happy about, but they may be just to do with me using a keyboard and mouse rather than a remote as I think it's designed for. But certainly I think there are issues with intuitiveness, for example if you right-click a file/entry you get a menu and on this menu one option is "settings". Now this isn't settings for this file, it's settings for the folder. In fact, several of the other options on the right-click menu are for the folder, maybe even half or more, and you can't actually get settings for the folder any other way but visiting the System Settings area which requires a lot more mouse clicks.

I've also found the ability to edit titles to be inconsistent between views, and the settings are not necessarily self explanatory. There is some documentation, but it's hardly comprehensive. All this being said I haven't dived into the forums and asked about anything yet, and XBMC seems promising so I'm putting it on a list to follow-up with a bit later, assuming I don't find anything else that works better first.

MeediOS
I should preface these comments by saying this is app is considered "alpha" status now, so it's not fair to expect too much from it. Nonetheless it's considered to be a good option by many, especially if you want configurability, and it has some nice features that sound pretty useful (e.g. the "Jukebox module"). I think it's a result of it being alpha that it is at present rather complicated to setup and configure, but it seems to be getting better.

First impressions are that MeediOS (MOS) is a bit complicated. It has a separate settings app that you have to run to configure it, which is rather annoying. Many of the settings are thereafter available in the UI, but not as clearly presented or easily navigable as in the separate config app. lThe settings themselves are extremely extensive, which is nice from a theoretical control standpoint, but the actual layout is a bit confusing. Fortunately the layouts are at least somewhat standardized, so even though there's a largely extraneous (for my needs) "permissions" tab on virtually every setting panel, I know I can ignore it. There are a few other points I got hung up in the config, particularly figuring out how to add media to my library, but eventually I figured it out. I also ran into an "unspecified error" upon scanning some of my media, which appeared related to fetching actor info, but that wasn't too big a deal. It is alpha software after all. ;)

In actual use, it looks quite nice. Most of the subset of movie folders I scanned had seemingly correct info, though the auto-scraper had problems with e.g. series of movies (Beverly Hills Cop 1-3 for example). There were also occasional issues with seemingly playing the wrong movie, though I think this may have been due to a bug allowing viewing of the properties of 2 movies at the same time. Overall the UI is good, but I didn't have time to get used to the default controls, nor customize them to my needs. The default setup is not well oriented toward a mouse-based approach as far as I saw, though that's not surprising. My HTPC control setup isn't necessarily typical.

The biggest problem with MOS right now (aside from complexity) may be that the built-in player functionality does not work that well. Fortunately it supports external players through a plugin, so this is not necessarily a show stopper. But it does mean that basically it just gives you a nice full-screen UI to *browse* media, and then you need to drop out of it to play anything. Not quite ideal. Still, I found it better than MediaPortal (below) surprisingly enough (MP is supposed to be more mature than MOS). It's not quite a complete solution yet but it has a lot of promise, so I'm mostly including it because of its future potential. Unfortunately it seems people have been waiting a long time for improvements and they come slowly...

MediaPortal
Well, like MeediOS, this one is complicated. One thing that put me off a bit right away was the need to install MySQL5. It's great they have a robust, standards-compliant DB structure, but at the same time I don't really care to run an SQL server on my media machine. You can use another SQL server I believe, but I don't have one setup, so I had to go with a local service version.

Also like MeediOS, MediaPortal (MP) uses separate config apps, but in this case few - if any - of the settings are available in-app, so the config app is more of a necessity. This is not fundamentally a bad thing, but it does make for more "find setting that needs changing in app, exist and configure, re-start app" workflow, which I find annoying. MOS at least let you change a good portion of the settings in the app, even if they weren't always presented in the best way. Most apps let you just go to a settings area, change something, and see the effect. MP also has a lot of config settings, like MOS, though perhaps a tad less confusingly presented (no seemingly extraneous tabs for example). On the plus side, unlike (seemingly) XBMC, they all appear to be in one place, but there's a lot to digest, and you won't know what many things do until you understand how MP works, what the UI looks like in-app, etc.

Anyway it seemed promising, but ultimately it just wouldn't play the majority of my files, at least not out of the box (many are MKV). I fiddled with a few settings and found some threads indicating you had to install various codec systems (e.g. FFDShow), but I've already got codecs installed and working for the rest of my media players and I wasn't about to fiddle with things just for testing. Then it crashed trying to scan one (just one of 9) of my video folders. It also listed files by drive/folder rather than all together, which kind of defeats the purpose of having it catalog them all. This along with a few other rough edges has put me off it for now. There are of course many plugins to do various things, and no doubt ways to get it to play MKV, but the bottom line is I'm not going to take the time to mess around with all that unless I really have to (i.e. there's no other better option). So far XBMC seems a good deal better than this...

Now on to the "cataloging" apps, akin to Media Monkey, Amarok, etc. for music. Examples include J. River Media Center (although it has some Media Center functionality), Personal Video Database (PVD), and others.

J. River Media Center
I don't really understand what the big deal about this is one is. Everyone seems to speak of it like it's the Cadillac of media center/organizers, but it doesn't even support good remote data checking out of the box. There are plugins that do it, but some are not well supported or abandoned, and the simple fact that there are multiple plugins to check and test put me off it. This functionality should come out of the box.

Other than that issue it does seem to be a reasonably nice app, and includes functionality for video, audio, pictures, and more (e.g. notes). There is a good amount of customizability and the UI is decent, but it just really didn't stand out to me over free options. It's not something I would pay for (though I'm happy to pay for something that fulfills more of my needs if it does it well).

Mbase 2
This one is free and others have recommended it before here on DC. Mbase 2 is your basic cataloging application. It's a decent little app with good basic functionality and a reasonable UI (I don't like the way it switches "modes" for adding movies, but once you figure out how the menus work it's fine). Though it has a built-in player, it's very basic, and it does not have a full-screen UI or other Media Center type functionality. Fortunately it also allows you to "open" the file with the default OS file type association, which opens my normal media player. Lookups for movie info were fairly fast and easy. The show stopper for me was that I couldn't find a way add more than 1 movie at a time. When you have hundreds of movies to add, it becomes a daunting task, and with many other options out there that do have mass-import and lookup functionality, it meant there wasn't much point in me continuing to test it.

Collectorz.com Movie Collector
This is a commercial app, so it better be good if I'm going to stick with it (i.e. better than the freeware PVD below). I was limited in the trial version to 50 movies, but I think it was enough to know that this app doesn't fit enough of my needs. It has a nice UI and works pretty smoothly overall, including mass-import of movies and fetching of data. It also links to my default player, which is a major requirement. The UI is a bit small (text size) for working on a TV, but it's do-able, especially if I don't have to mess with it as much once everything is cataloged. I did increase the font size in the settings, which helped, but it still wasn't ideal - the actual layout of the app is not designed for this use necessarily.

Anyway the biggest issue I ran into, which others have mentioned, is the need to use the proprietary Collectorz.com movie database, rather than IMDB, Amazon, themoviedb.org, etc. Of course I understand why they don't use IMDB or Amazon (licensing costs for the data), but themoviedb.org is free to use and used by, I think, many more than just the collectorz.com customers, and therefore a more useful database. I found the collectorz.com database needlessly confusing and cluttered, just as others have. I don't need to see 50 different versions of a single movie just because some people had slight variations or entered the data a little differently. It seems to me there are many alternate sources of data they could be supporting, but they're not. I don't begrudge them use of their own DB of course, the data is sometimes rather specialized, but at least having the *option* to access other databases would be nice. They could simply limit it to free ones, for example.

The DB issue is not necessarily a showstopper, but ultimately I just didn't find anything in this app that was a significant enough improvement over free options (notably PVD) to want to actually buy it. The attitude of the devs on the forums also didn't encourage me that much - not mean per-se, just a little... snippy, I guess. Certainly it's an app with lots of functionality, and might be particularly of use to those who have more of an interest in cataloging physical as opposed to digital media (which is more its originally designed purpose). For my needs it just wasn't a close enough fit.

Personal Video Database (PVD)
PVD is the app I earlier mentioned that I had been using but had set aside due to some quirks. Having now revisited it, after some cleanup of my video file names and some further updates to the software, I think it's the best option at this point. It seems to have most of the important functionality of Collectorz and Mbase 2, it can import data from a variety of sources and has lots of optional plugins to expand this capability, and its name matching works well enough. More importantly, you can edit all the data if something is matched up incorrectly.

That being said, it doesn't seem to be able to auto-select movie info as often as I'd like. It will do so when there is only one option I believe, as in the case of an entirely unique title, but this is often not the case. When more than 1 option is found it presents you with a list of possibilities, and only after you select an association will it auto-download the data. This is a lot more likely to be accurate each time and forces you to verify each decision so you know when there are problems, but it is a bit more work and can be frustrating when getting started. Still, I figure if I can just get over the hump of properly associating all the data, I'll be home free and adding an occasional new movie won't be a big deal.

As far as the original issues I ran into, I've decided just to try addressing those by changing file names, or removing and re-adding items with different search criteria. No solution seems perfect just yet, but I think I can make PVD work. That being said it was after a week or two of cataloging and tweaking in PVD that I gave up last time, so I may still run into something that makes me set it aside again. If the aforementioned problems become more serious and widespread, it may be necessary just to abandon this project for now. But I'll at least try to put my feedback in to the PVD dev in the hopes he can improve it for my needs and those who have similar usage to mine.

*Phew*! After all that I guess I should have called this a mini-roundup, heh. But honestly I don't feel like I gave every app an equal testing, and what tests I did do are very specific to my particular needs. I also didn't test every app out there, or even every app mentioned in this thread (and others on DC). Having come back around to my original choice from many months ago, I must admit I'm a little disappointed to not discover a "miracle solution". But I see many promising apps, ever-evolving, and am hopeful in particular that one day something like MeediOS will be mature and stable enough to do all I need.

As an aside, I feel like a partial solution to the difficulty of auto-associating movie data should not be that difficult to come up with. The few apps I saw that allowed you to customize this functionality relied mostly on regex or wildcard customization to help translate file names into searches for the DBs. I actually spent lots of time renaming files so I wouldn't have to rely on this, but even still I run into a few name-related mess-ups. More importantly however is that even once the title is interpreted correctly from the file name, there still may be multiple matches, or no exact match. Here's where I think things could be handled much better, and where no app seemed to really have much intelligence.

First, provide controls that allow a user to specify criteria for the DB matches that will increase or decrease "confidence" or "weight" of a match, similar to how SpamAssassin and other tools categorize spam. A good example is that most of the movies I have in my collection are fairly mainstream and are generally rated well, or at least by a lot of people. So this gives me several possible controls to control confidence weighting by, for example: Titles with high user ratings are higher weighted, Titles with more user reviews are weighted higher, Titles with more complete information are weighted higher, Titles with posters/images are weighted higher. These are fairly simple criteria and easy to check, and from my experiences with all these apps they would solve at least 50% of the identification issues. Or here's a no brainer: No titles that are in the future! I saw at least 20 multi-title issues due to titles that *haven't come out yet* (often remakes of older ones, of course). These could easily be filtered out.

Combine these kinds of controls with a "confidence" threshold under which titles would perhaps have the most likely data pulled but also be flagged for later review, and you have a big improvement. Embed the actual confidence rating in each title's data and let people sort and search on it later, and long-term progressive refinement of people's collections becomes a lot more powerful.

Also, being able to simply specify an IMDB, free DB, or other URL or ID makes a lot of sense, but I don't think I saw *any* apps that supported this. Or at the very least none supported it in their auto-scanning mode when an unclear identification was found. In PVD for example if it doesn't know for sure what a title is, it will give me a list of possibilities. I can select one and click a link to view it in IMDB, which is an improvement over many other apps' approach. But there is no option to specify my own link/ID, and it's kind of surprising that this doesn't already exist as it seems so obvious.

I suppose I should suggest these things to the PVD dev...

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 106next