topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday December 4, 2025, 5:27 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 52next
926
Living Room / Re: Anyone here using a standing desk?
« Last post by barney on May 16, 2011, 01:39 AM »
Don't know how I missed this thread  :).

The sitting/standing controversy has been going on for at least a good fifty (50) years.  Prolly longer, but I'm only aware of that time span.  As an old - then young - cripple, I've been through more desk/chair height configurations than most folk even know exist.  There is no single answer, as too much of the answer is dependent upon the physics of a given body.  Someone who weighs 300-400 pounds will not fare well at a standing desk - knees and ankles in particular will suffer, but lower back will be affected as well.  On the other hand, someone 4'11" and ninety (90) pounds will do much better.

The physics - read ergonomics - of any desk have an effect on carpal tunnel, lower back, upper back between the shoulders, neck, shoulders & collarbone area whether sitting or standing.  And the chairs for most desk configurations are seldom optimal for long-term desk usage.  And if it's a standing desk, it had best be the right height for you, or there will be suffering.  (Of course, the same thing is true of a sitting desk/chair combo.)

Over the years, I've used several variants of the ball chair, the knee chair (very good for my back, posture wise, but hell on the knees regardless how well padded), some specialty multi-adjustable office chairs.  The best thing I've found to date - for me - is an old-fashioned stenographer's chair, but they're getting damned hard to find  ;D, guess there ain't any old-fashioned stenographers around any more  ;).

Anyway, half-a-century of direct experience has convinced me there is no one-solution-fits-all answer to this particular conundrum.  Basically, you'll just have to experiment to see what works best for you - but don't expect it to work for everyone - or anyone? - else.

927
Living Room / Re: Anyone here familiar with Synology products?
« Last post by barney on May 06, 2011, 08:10 PM »
Nope, wasn't aware of that site ... thanks for the reference.

Looked at the QNAP line, but Synology seems a bit more appropriate for my usage.  Ordered the DS211 with a WD 2 TB Caviar - I'll add another drive later, of course, and may have to order the wireless printer bit separately if the DS211 doesn't have that capability.  The docs I've seen are a bit ambivalent on that point.  But the Web server capability is important, particularly if I can get remote access to it.  Oh, well ... we'll see <sigh />.
928
Living Room / Anyone here familiar with Synology products?
« Last post by barney on May 06, 2011, 01:25 AM »
I've an old WD WorldBook NAS that has become unreliable.  I've moved everything off it to a Fantom GreenDrive, but I need to replace it with another NAS - the Fantom will not fill that requirement.  I've looked at HP, Iomega, WD, Drobo & Synology.  Synology seems best fitted for my needs, if I'm reading the information correctly.  It'll allow wireless access as well, I thimk, as provide wireless printer access.  However, this is a brand foreign to me, so I'd like to get outside opinions, if any, from someone who's used the product(s).  There's a forum - couple of 'em - on their site, but I distrust vendor-sponsored forae - I've seen more than one that was, uh, cleaned of critical posts.

I'm looking at either a 3TB single drive or 6TB double drive.  Not looking for a RAID configuration if I get the 2-drive model.  My interpretation of the docs implies that I can use a USB dongle for wireless access, and that I can use a 2nd USB port for a printer.  Since this will be across the room from the router, that's gonna be a critical element.

'Preciate any reviews or suggestions.
929
Thanks very much. I fear you're not dealing with the sharpest knife in the drawer
-cranioscopical (April 30, 2011, 08:38 PM)

Judgment reserved on whether you're the sharpest tool in the shed  :D ... but no one who punishes as well as do you could ever be considered dull  :P.
930
mouser, that would be near ideal for me.  Don't know that it would be worth the effort, though, for most users.  While it would be a nice embellishment, it might not be worth the trouble ;).
931
BTW, I know I've been lax about reporting, but the changes to date have afforded me about a 20% time reduction.  That's significant, even though the number seems small.  Any reduction(s) from 6-8 hours to ~4-6 hours is meaningful.  I know I've been lax about reporting, but that's because I've not found any issues with the program as it stands.  One thing that might be useful is a short title, entered at capture time, to define any particular image.  Again, that's from my own usage, not necessarily a thing of moment for the overall user base.  (Yeah, I know, but still ... )
932
a full screen/window gallery of all thumbnails
That's a thing that would be nice in order to avoid duplications.  Not an absolute necessity, but handy.  Mind, I'm looking at this from a purely personal usage perspective, so it might not be worth the effort, but methinks 'twould be a very nice enhancement  :Thmbsup:.
933
Proportional icons?  'Twould be a boon to my usage  :-*.  These old eyes have enough trouble identifying some icons w/o having to account for distortion  ;D.
934
v0.3 2011-04-20 23:11:09

This part concerns mostly drag/drop or copy/paste from Web pages.

Appears to drag links, but not clickable - cursor changes appropriately when moved over apparent link.
Later attempts on same links clickable - time element?  This was a saved note.

Drag does not carry over images - not major, just for info - seems to allocate space for the image, but it grabs the alt value, not the image.  Most of the apps I've used of this nature do pretty much the same.  However, this was only one trial ... more will be forthcoming - different sizes, formats, and the like.  Oh, yeah ... clicking the image placeholder will open the page from which it was dragged.

My normal usage only involves images perhaps 30% of the time, although that usage might increase if it weren't so darned hard to get them in place.
-----
One thing that would be very handy - a couple of lists. One would be a list of available tags, the other would be a tag entry list. 
The tag entry list would enable to pre-enter tags that you'd expect to use. 
Then the available tag list would allow selection of appropriate tag(s) in order to avoid typos.  Of course, you'd still need the ability to add a new ad. hoc. tag to the note if you didn't have a suitable one available.


OK, that's enough for the moment ... me ear is crying to make love to a pillow.  But WikeNotes is looking very good  :up:.
935
Yep, much better ... those first four (4) pics fit quite nicely into the viewport.  The last one is a bit large.

Installing WikeNotes v0.3 now.  Will be back [reasonably] soon with {kudos  :Thmbsup: | comments  :huh: | complaints  :'(}.
936
Looking forward to checking it out, using it.

One comment on the Web site.  It would be much more pleasurable to view if you'd shrink those screenshots by ~60%-50%.  Most folk aren't fond of horizontal scroll bars  :P.
937
General Software Discussion / Re: Is there a better site checker than Xenu?
« Last post by barney on April 15, 2011, 10:51 PM »
K, thx ... I'll run LinkChecker by him, see if it suits him  :-\.
938
General Software Discussion / Is there a better site checker than Xenu?
« Last post by barney on April 15, 2011, 06:57 PM »
CC is asking me whether there's a better application for checking a site - broken links, invalid links, orphan pages & the like - than Xenu's LinkSleuth.  Frankly, I don't know.  I've used Xenu for years.  CC says he finds it confusing - as do I from time to time - and would like something ... better? ... simpler? ... easier?

Is there?  Something later, perhaps easier to configure?  Personally, I think he needs to get off his butt  :huh: and learn to configure the program, but I have thunk that about software in the past and been proved wrong  :o.

To amplify a bit, he has a site with a near myriad of pages, most of which are no longer in use.  He wants to figure out which ones to discard, which ones to save, which ones to relink ... the usual garbage collection for an older site.
939
Developer's Corner / Re: Documenting the Why not just the What
« Last post by barney on April 12, 2011, 10:59 PM »
It's something I learned and tell my devs: try to code -and document- to yourself in 2 years looking back

Hm-m-m ... thought it was just me  :huh:.  I've been chastised in the past - corporate world - for being overly verbose in code.  This, mind you, by fellas that could make neither head nor tail of code they'd written just six (6) months agone  ;D.  External documentation is not my strong suit when it comes to apps I've created, but internal comments have been such that I could come back a decade later and know what - and sometimes the why of it - I'd done.  Thought it was standard practice  :o?  Now I don't feel so bad about some of the Web stuff I've done recently ... seems I'm in popular/common, if not good, company  ;D.

On a slightly different, hopefully related, note ... how much does it matter between having in-line documentation as opposed to external?  Yeah, the obvious bit about not having the separate document, but what else?  The relevance is that I'm showing someone else how to do some rather esoteric Web pages, and we have a constant battle over in-page comments ... she claims they slow loading time.  For that matter, what weight do comments in compiled code have, as opposed to pure code?  Is there really a significant trade-off  :-\?  Or is the reason just laziness?
940
Of course, there is that learning curve ...  :-\  ;D.
941
Bought it.

The recent conflab anent Auspex, Phrase Express, et. al. caused a closer look.  Seems to me the two products are compatible, each with a particular usage that only sometimes overlaps the other.  Might be wrong, of course, but for that significant a reduction in price, it's worth the cost to do a real comparison.  At worst, I'm out ~$50 ... at best, I have a new tool to make everyday life easier (What ... don't you spend all day on a keyboard  :huh:?) and more fruitful  ;).  An easy play  :P.
942
Thanks.

I'd looked at Colorbox ... seems useful for a project coming down the pike ... but it's a bit much for CC.  He's more interested in sailing than Web-ing  :).

BTW, your Unhandled Perceptions is going to be the [financial] death of me  :P.  Every time I hit it, I discover - three (3) hours later! - that I'm behind on my work.  Damn you for presenting such an interesting presence  :-*.
943
Folk,

While there's been some discussion here of lightbox application, none of it seems to fit current needs.  I'm trying to help a friend (CC), but this time of year seems to bestow a dearth of free time upon me  :huh:.

What's needed is a script, or an application to create a script, that will show some Web pages overlaid upon a home/menu page.  Everything I've found so far wants to use images.  Certainly there's a way around that, but time constraints forbid me to experiment right now  :(.

I remember a marketing app from some years back - prolly 2004 or so - that would create appropriate script.  I likely still have it, but don't recall the name, so a local search for it would be time-consuming, to say the least.  I've looked at a jQuery plugin that seems promising, but can't play with it, and while CC is reasonably adept at HTML/PHP he is ... less than conversant with JS, shall we say?

Anyone know of a reasonably simple approach to this?  A well-annotated script, perhaps, or an application to create a custom script?  He's spent a lot of time on Google, but nothing he's found really works for him.

Basically, CC has a primary Web page with a number of menu items.  He wants a half-dozen or so of those menu items to blur/darken the screen, then display a smaller version of the linked page - or perhaps a <div> containing the page.  The purpose here is never to leave the primary page for these particular links.
944
Ahem {continuing DA role}.

Assume I just bought a couple of books on building a Website with PHP & MySQL.  Also assume RTFM has been accomplished.  I'm ready to publish my site, go live with a dynamic, data-driven site.  Y'know what?  It's funny, but there wasn't anything anywhere in those books about how to avert SQL injection if it was mentioned at all.  Now, since I have my site up and running, I'm looking around on various scripting sites to find ways to make my site better, more exciting.  Once again, there's not much on prophylactic measures unless I search on a specific attack.  {Steps out of DA role.}

wraith808 posted a bit of C#(?) code that would easily transport to PHP, so I'm assuming it'll just as easily translate to other Web scripts.  But that's the first piece of [someone else's] code I've seen in years to address the issue.  And of the thirty (30) to forty (40) books in my library dealing with things Web-ish, one - and only one - has more than a paragraph or two (2) dealing with prophylaxis.

So, the end result?  There's little to no awareness of a need for scrubbing inputs until someone gets hit.  And it gets publicized.  Gee, I wonder where the publicity about that danger was, before?!?
945
Nuff said. :)
Well-l-l-l ... maybe not  :).  Most anything I've seen for sanitization involves regular expressions.  Not something many Web masters cleave unto, much less understand.  Until the script providers - PHP, JS, et. al., actually provide cleansing routines, many Web folk just aren't/won't be qualified for cleansing of that nature.  (Of course, if it's provided in the language, any baddie past the script-kiddie stage will likely overcome it unless it's really good  ;D.)

Professional sites have no excuse, of course, but then, how many sites on the Web are really professional  :-\?  And how many of those sites were hit  :P

Injection attacks are no joke, but there's really not a lot out there to make folk aware how dangerous they can be, and even less on practical advice on avoidance of such.  (Learn, as a command, is neither practical nor effective  :(.)
946
General Software Discussion / Re: Advice on a [learning] JavaScript IDE?
« Last post by barney on March 30, 2011, 04:39 PM »
Hm-m-m ... I remember bad experiences with SciTe a long time back.  Perhaps I should revisit it.

Aptana won't work - they cannot get Eclipse to install on their system - a problem I've had, as well, on various boxes.

NetBeans is another that I'd tried, to no good result, in the past.

EditRocket is totally new to me.

Looks as though my next few hours/days are gonna be busy  :o :  retry NetBeans & SciTe, check EditRocket  :'(.

Thanks for the references  :Thmbsup:.
947
General Software Discussion / Re: Advice on a [learning] JavaScript IDE?
« Last post by barney on March 30, 2011, 04:29 PM »
Thank you  :Thmbsup:.  Somehow - why am I not surprised  :-[ - I missed that.

There are three GitHub downloads:  jslint, adsafe.js, & json2.js.  Each is contained in a .zip file, with the only common file being named README - that file should be renamed to your preference for each of the .zips.  Apart from renaming the READMEs, everything works from the same directory.  Threw all files into a directory in the dev server on my laptop and it loads just fine.  Take a bit more work to see how well it performs.
948
General Software Discussion / Re: Advice on a [learning] JavaScript IDE?
« Last post by barney on March 30, 2011, 10:23 AM »
JSLint has saved me many hours in the past.  (I tend to hose JS's camel spelling, especially since I rarely use JS in my primary endeavors.)  However, it is one of those online tools of which I spoke.  While that is usually acceptable for me, this young couple is on a data-capped connection, so online services are, for the most part, anathema to them.  (JSLint also, the last time I used it, has trouble with included .js files - cannot see a directory structure on a local drive, so it cannot detect the almost inevitable path errors/typos.)
949
General Software Discussion / Re: Advice on a [learning] JavaScript IDE?
« Last post by barney on March 29, 2011, 10:15 PM »
If they really want to know JavaScript (in the Neo: "I know Kung-Fu!" sense), then the IDE/Editor is of only secondary concern to actually learning the language!
There's no gainsaying that, but what they want is a tool to assist them in that endeavor.  JavaScript tends to be overly - to my mind - verbose, and if there's a true debugger for it, I've yet to find it.  Given that, an IDE that can point out possible syntax errors could be of inestimable value. 

'Twould seem, however, that such an IDE has yet to be devised.  Logs help, but they are only truly useful if you already know a language.
 
Logs show an end result, but they tend not to show the interim steps to that result.  A decent, dedicated editor could point out potential errors that would not show up in a server log.  There may be a few online, but online services are seldom satisfactory for such purposes - not everyone can be online when need arises.  (Being able to work on code while on a plane or train has saved my ass more than once.)

Hence the search for an IDE or intelligent editor.  It's not to replace learning the language, it is to enhance the process.
950
General Software Discussion / Re: Advice on a [learning] JavaScript IDE?
« Last post by barney on March 29, 2011, 06:56 AM »
Yeah, that's my thinking as well.  An intelligent JS IDE would certainly be welcome in my tool box  :P.  Komodo Edit does a fair job, but nowhere near what it does for other languages.  It's a surprise to me that, given AJAX, JQuery, et.al., no one has produced anything truly functional - perhaps a few online editors, but those are seldom convenient - besides which, I ain't found one yet  ;).
Pages: prev1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 ... 52next