topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday December 17, 2025, 4:53 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 360 361 362 363 364 [365] 366 367 368 369 370 ... 404next
9101
Living Room / Re: The eBook reader wars
« Last post by wraith808 on July 06, 2010, 04:48 PM »
Oh, I know that.  But shifts in price aren't made that quickly (especially in a large company) without a prior plan in place.  It was the *same* day.  And without a promotional build up at all.
9102
Living Room / The eBook reader wars
« Last post by wraith808 on July 06, 2010, 03:46 PM »
So, Barnes and Noble reduces the price of the nook to $199 ($149 for the wi-fi version), and without fanfare, Amazon reduces the price of the Kindle to $189.  What gets me about this, and what no-one has commented on, is if Amazon reduced the price that steeply, that soon- that most likely means they had planned this for a while.  After all, you can't reduce prices without some research into what the minimum price you can charge for an item that has upstream costs without ramifications.  This means that they had the *ability* reduce the price for ... how long?  And kept charging the higher price until someone else moved.  So, if the nook hadn't been reduced in price, they'd still be reaping the extra profits of a higher price...

...and no one is saying anything about this?  Am I just looking at this wrong?
9103
Living Room / More ammunition why patents are EVIL
« Last post by wraith808 on July 06, 2010, 03:43 PM »
07-06-10kindpatp.jpg

http://www.engadget....ted-barnes-and-nobl/

So, let me get this straight.  Amazon had the patent in the pipeline since 2006, without it being revealed, and in the meantime, Barnes & Noble releases the nook, which apparently violates the patent.  How is this fair?
9104
I didn't see the techsmith ad when I googled Screenshot Captor.  I wonder if it has something to do with settings?
9105
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by wraith808 on July 06, 2010, 08:08 AM »
Oh well... I didn't even realize it was my 1000th until Curt said something... then I accidentally replied to the post instead of editing, letting that moment slip by...

wraith808-1001.png
9106
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Mini-Review of JungleDisk and ZumoDrive
« Last post by wraith808 on July 05, 2010, 10:13 AM »
Can someone delete this?  I meant to modify my original post, and instead posted  :-[
9107
Mini-Reviews by Members / Mini-Review of JungleDisk and ZumoDrive
« Last post by wraith808 on July 04, 2010, 05:17 PM »
Basic Info

App NameZumoDrive
App URLhttp://www.zumodrive.com
App Version Reviewed0.987
Test System SpecsWindows XP/iPhone 3GS
Supported OSesWindows (XP/Vista/7), iPhone, Mac, Linux, Android, WebOS
Support MethodsForum, Knowledge Base
Pricing SchemeFree version (1GB + 1GB for completing tutorial) - Free.  10GB - $2.99/month, 25GB - $6.99/month, 50GB - $9.99/month, 100GB - $19.99/month, 200GB - $37.99/month.  500GB - 79.99/month.
Tour URLhttps://www.zumodrive.com/tour/

App NameJungle Disk (Personal Desktop Edition)
App URLhttp://www.jungledisk.com
App Version Reviewed3.0.6
Test System SpecsWindows XP/iPhone 3GS
Supported OSesWindows 2000/XP/Vista/7, Windows Server 2003/2008, iPhone, Mac OSX 10.5 or Later, Linux x86 with KDE or GNOME desktop (GTK2 libraries)
Support MethodsForum, Knowledge Base, Ticket System
Pricing Scheme$3/month + storage fees (see note below)
Other NotesAlso has a portable edition for all three desktop platforms

For a variety of reasons, I’m looking for a Cloud Storage Service.  At one time I was sure I would need two to satisfy my needs, as I need a service that syncs a local folder (preferably several) across machines.  I also need a online storage space for offsite backups- the ability to access it by WebDav is also a nice to have feature, so I can use my own backup software if I want.

Previously, for my first need, I evaluated SugarSync and Dropbox.  In the end, SugarSync was not recommended, as there are very bad issues with the product.  This was going to be a review of an online storage space that looked promising- ZumoDrive.  Then I remembered that I had a licensed copy of JungleDisk that I never used before, and realised that it satisfied both needs.  ZumoDrive comes close to satisfying both needs, but doesn’t quite do it.

ZumoDrive Configuration Screens
ZumoDriveConfig1.pngZumoDriveConfig2.pngZumoDriveConfig3.pngZumoDriveConfig4.png

ZumoDrive Web Interface
ZumoDriveWebInterface.png

ZumoDrive Mobile Screens
ZumoDriveMobile1.jpgZumoDriveMobile2.jpgZumoDriveMobile3.jpgZumoDriveMobile4.jpgZumoDriveMobile5.jpg

The Good
ZumoDrive has a very functional interface, such as it is.  The configuration screens are well laid out and provide a lot of information, while never seeming overcrowded.  The mapped drives clearly show the information on a per-computer basis, so you can tell where the information that you're accessing is from.  The ability to change transfer speed is very welcome, and if you have space for it, the ease at which it integrates into your itunes library and your music in general is very welcome.  The web interface is simple, but allows you access to all of your files, and the sharing functionality is on par with the other options (it was actually better than DropBox for a while until the recent update which allows you to share files).  The iPhone interface looks familiar- I think that all of the options that I reviewed use a similar package for their iphone app.  Their dojo- the training area to the service- is actually quite well done also.

The Bad
The app seems to use an inordinate amount of memory; after having it open for a while, the usage was well over 100M, which seems a lot.  There were also a few hiccups in the beginning with the client being non-responsive, or duplicate clients being opened.  That is now fixed.  The integration with explorer is a bit misleading also- when I copied to the shared drive, the copy finished, but the files were not actually on the drive yet, and didn't show up on the web interface.  It appears that they are cached locally to be transferred, but when I went to look for them immediately, there was no indication of this until I looked in the transfer portion of the configuration dialog.  Also, for my purposes, the link folders bit was useless; it doesn't sync between machines, but instead syncs your local machine to the cloud.

Who is this app for
If you're not looking to sync your machines, but instead are looking for storage space in the cloud that is synced up to your various computers and can be shared, then this app will work for you.

JungleDisk Desktop Screens
JungleDiskConfigurationScreen1.pngJungleDiskDesktopScreen1.pngJungleDiskDesktopWebAccess1.png

JungleDisk Web Screen
JungleDiskWebAccess1.png

JungleDisk Mobile Screens
JungleDiskMobile1.jpgJungleDiskMobile2.jpg

The Good
JungleDisk is simple in it's approach, but very powerful.  It has many options for use, including syncing (to the desktop and other computers - a la DropBox), mapping drives (using your cloud drive like a local drive), and scheduled backups to the cloud.  Getting them setup is very easy, and the interfaces are pretty bare bones at their root, making them easy to navigate.  The pricing is dirt cheap for as much as you want to store, and it has the option of using your own Amazon S3 account, so you have full control over your data.  It's also one of the only services I've found as reliable as DropBox- I worry less and less as I use it about losing data, and actually have items exclusively on their service (cloud-wise) rather than redundantly backed up on DropBox as I've done with the others.  It also gives a lot of feedback as it has errors, but then re-tries until everything is fine, so the feedback it gives you thankfully don't have to use.  It also lets you effectively partition the amount of space you have for different uses, having the concept of drives, and then backing up things based on computer.  You can also sync arbitrary locations, which is a big plus.  Again, the iPhone interface looks familiar- I think that all of the options that I reviewed use a similar package for their iphone app.

The Bad
JungleDisk is definitely a geek's service- from setup to even billing.  The amount of options can get overwhelming if you want to change from the options set up in the wizard.  Even when not on advanced, the options that it gives you aren't for the faint of heart.  For long processes, the speed doesn't seem as fast as other options, though entirely useable.  The pricing is what initially threw me off from using it, and that trepidation still stands.  They charge you for reads, writes, uploads, downloads, storage... then you get charged by JungleDisk and by S3.  Add to that the fact that the web interface is an add-on, so you pay an additional $1 per month for it, and your invoices can get pretty involved.  Then again, even after using it for a while, I'm paying less than $3 a month, so those considerations fade in comparison to that.  Also, note that there are no sharing options with JungleDisk- it's your data, and only you can see it.

Pricing
Since the pricing of JungleDisk is so dissimilar to other offerings, I put it in its own separate area.  The basic price of JungleDisk is $3/month.  If you want web access, you add an additional $1/month.  On top of that, you pay a price for storage.

On Amazon, that price is as follows:
Amazon S3 US - only $0.15 per GB-Month of storage used
First 5 GB Storage FREE

Data Transfer
FREE data uploaded until June 30, 2010! $0.10 per GB of data uploaded thereafter
$0.15 per GB of data downloaded

Data Request
$0.01 per 1000 upload requests
$0.01 per 10,000 download requests

An example invoice is below:
JungleDiskInvoice1.png

Note: This invoice does not include the $3/month because I bought JungleDisk way back when you could get it for a set price for unlimited use.

Who is this app for
If you like the cloud syncing/cloud back up services, but have too much data for their plans- JungleDisk is for you.  Even if you don't have a lot of data- JungleDisk will still work for you.  Only if you need to actually share that data will it not work for you.

Conclusions
ZumoDrive is slick, and has a lot of polish to the presentation.  However, if you need syncing abilities, know that they aren't there.  JungleDisk is cheap, reliable, and just works, with a lot of options for use to boot.  However, if you need to share your data, know that there are no options for that.

For my personal use, I'm going with a combination of DropBox, and JungleDisk.
9108
I have no particular desire to give them a great deal - it's not a buddy-buddy thing - but I don't want to inadvertently rip them off, either.

Any suggestions for a fair price ballpark?

For stuff like this, I charge $35/hr.  It generally clocks in at about 3 hours... though doing the hourly thing helps to keep down changes and the haggling that comes with the extra payments.  If they know its hourly, and you communicate when they ask for changes that this will be X extra time, then you keep down issues, IMO.
9109
Critics say the female condom is not a long-term solution and makes women vulnerable to more violence from men trapped by the device.

I think this is a real concern...

Various rights organizations that work in South Africa declined to comment, including Human Rights Watch and Care International.

I wonder what this means...

As for complaining about "enslavement", geez... It's like they're upset that they can't run around raping anymore. "Enslavement"??? It's a really bad situation. Seems like it's needed there. Badly.

I agree. If this device is necessary then women are already "enslaved" by the fear of needing one anyway.

You sort of echo the other side of the argument, strangely enough...

Kajja said the device constantly reminds women of their vulnerability.

There's also this scary point...

Women take drastic measures to prevent rape in South Africa, Ehlers said, with some wearing extra tight biker shorts and others inserting razor blades wrapped in sponges in their private parts.

This is at least safer than the alternatives, it seems...
9110
More information on the exploit from Tom's...

http://www.tgdaily.c...ro-day-vulnerability
9111
Personally, I don't care either way. I generally read by looking at the new posts regardless of where it is on the forum. It is only when I start a new post, from scratch, that I even look at the categories. I wouldn't be surprised if that is the way most people view this forum. Because of this, I don't know that it will achieve your purposes of reducing "liability" as it were, but it would make the category harder to find for the casual complainer.

+1.  I don't even know where posts are most of the time... :)
9112
For me, the hardest pill to swallow is just how good Apple is at those things they're good at - despite an utter lack of graciousness - and their generally shabby treatment of friend and foe alike.



+1

You can say what you want, but it's more than fanboyism, and it's more than a finger on the cultural pulse.  Both of these only get you so far, and Apple has gone further than that.
9113
P.S. I think Google is only biding it's time and letting the dust settle before they hand Tavis Ormandy his walking papers. To paraphrase The Godfather: Keep your friends close, and keep employees that did something which might get you hauled into court even closer.

You think they'll hand him his walking papers on something like this?  I for one, never associated his actions with Google other than peripherally, and didn't realize that so many people bought into the conspiracy theory surrounding that association.
9114
...He contacted MS who reacted slowly...

Five Three Days.  Now that we're to the "it's MS's bug and he made an error in judgement" phase, how is 3 days slowly?
9115
I'm glad this topic came up, or I wouldn't have even known about this app!  Thanks!
9116
Boy, you guys sure have a lot of certainty at arm's length (or more). I'm afraid I can't compete with that kind of clarity of vision. But the release of demo exploit code is far from unprecedented...

No, not unprecedented.  Not clarity of vision nor certainty on the actual discussions or conversations either.

But the 5 days to release an exploit is the part I'm having a hard time with.  Can you give *any* circumstances where it's OK to release actual working exploit code after 5 days notice?

Let's err on his side.
1. I find an exploit.
2. I contact MS.
3. They're complete and utter douches and won't work with me at all nor give me the time of day.
4. I release exploit code after 5 days.

Even in *that* case, where is the justification for releasing *working* exploit code into the wild?
9117
He communicated with them *for 5 days*, and they weren't playing ball, which if you look around is a fairly common story with MS and security researchers, especially smaller/independent ones that don't represent someone like Secunia, Sophos, etc. I'm not saying he's right or MS is wrong, just that it's not so clear cut as you and some others seem to feel. But then I'm completely on the opposite side of the "government secrets" debate too, hehe.

He communicated with them for 5 days... on and off I'm sure, i.e. 5 days elapsed.  So actually 3 days, since they said they last communicated with him on the 7th and he released on the 9th.  On the 7th, they said that they'd know about their release schedule at the end of the week, i.e. the 11th.  Just because they wouldn't give him what he wanted on his terms, i.e. tell me that it's going to be released on my timetable now without even looking at the problem, he released it.  And why release the exploit code in such detail?  Why not release news of the exploit, then if they didn't come to the table if they were indeed not playing ball, he could release the exploit after giving them time?  That's the part that *is* clear cut.  He released the exploit *code* into the wild and someone apparently used *his* code to craft a drive-by.  How is that *ever* right?
9118
Evidently Ormandy was negotiating with MS for a patch release schedule and published only after he felt that negotiations were not being productive. His tweet about this is here: http://twitter.com/t...o/status/16005411316
And an article with a quote confirming this from Microsoft here: http://www.computerw...y_Microsoft_confirms
Microsoft confirmed that its security team had discussed a patch schedule with Ormandy.

"We were in the early phases of the investigation and communicated [to him] on 6/7 that we would not know what our release schedule would be until the end of the week," said Bryant. "We were surprised by the public release of details on the 9th."

My sense that Ormandy was not so clearly "wrong, wrong wrong!" continues...

Why?  He communicated to them, and they didn't give him an immediate answer that they wanted, so he released it.  How does this change anything?  He couldn't wait until the end of the week?

Technology is Science, not art.

Just to go randomly off the rails here... ;)

Actually, I find that a lot of tech is art. I find that a lot of what I do is art. It might all be tech, but there's structure and elegance in there. I suppose the best sort of analogy is that tech is often like a fugue or canon as they have structure and a mathematical elegance.

I also find that what I do is an art form.  Science is reproducible in the same way by anyone given the same conditions and the same desired result.  As you get into more advanced programming- not so much.  Each programmer leaves his own signature on his code- I don't know that you do the same when dealing with pure science.
9119
Living Room / Re: Apple Attacks Adobe
« Last post by wraith808 on June 15, 2010, 03:12 PM »
Apple's market cap passes Microsoft's... and now their legal woes do too.

Mo' money, Mo' problems.
9120
Living Room / Re: Apple Attacks Adobe
« Last post by wraith808 on June 15, 2010, 09:55 AM »
http://arstechnica.c...tive-code-change.ars

But the changes still don't address the part that I want... MonoTouch!  What's the problem with MonoTouch?
9121
If the drive is write protected, would I have to worry about any of these infections?

No... but I'm not sure that Firefox portable will run on a write-protected drive.  It saves your profile information and cache there if I'm correct...
9122
I would think that Firefox would work in a read-only format though.  It would all take place in the computer memory like everything else (generally speaking - I know there are a lot more variables than that though).  Another option might be to use a read only USB and copy down the portable version to the PC being used, then wipe out the software, but that leaves more traces, not less.

I don't know if firefox would work in read-only mode.  It needs significant cache space for web pages and such, doesn't it?
9123
Public Computers are like Public Toilets, once you sit down you're fully exposed to the last guy's mess.

Talk about uncomfortable analogies...
9124
Living Room / Re: 20 years later, the movie "Total Recall" still kicks butt
« Last post by wraith808 on June 14, 2010, 12:08 PM »
And that goes for the spandex wearing musclebound as well as...umm...their spandex wearing opposites.

That reminds me of one thing I did when I was younger (and so less aware of the fact that some people wearing spandex were not aware that they shouldn't)...

A friend of mine and I went to a gaming convention.  You know the type... where people wear costumes and dress up and play games, etc.

My friend and I dressed up as referees.  Complete with flags and such.  We went around the con finding people that were wearing things that should not have been worn with their ... proportions.  It's amazing how people can think they can dress up as superman or wonder woman and pull it off when they obviously can't.

When we found them, we'd throw flags on the ground like we were calling a football play, and yell out, "Flag on the play!  Illegal use of spandex!"

(I know... pretty bad.  But admit it... you laughed... :))
9125
It really depends on how you set things up.  If you're using truly portable applications, the only things that are used on the host machine should be the processor and the memory.  Of course, this also depends on the computer not being compromised before you start using it- keyloggers are still an issue, and I'm not sure how you defend against such a thing.
Pages: prev1 ... 360 361 362 363 364 [365] 366 367 368 369 370 ... 404next