topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 9:08 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 357 358 359 360 361 [362] 363 364 365 366 367 ... 470next
9026
^Just out of curiosity, what exactly are today's operating systems lacking that major innovation is called for? I'd agree there's always room for improvments in clarity, efficiency and speed. But on a fundamental level, what needs to be changed? And as long as we're sticking with a Von Neumann architechture, what really can be changed?

If we had true parallel processing it might be a different story. But building transputers for desktop and general servers doesn't look to be in the cards any time soon despite the fact we have known how to build them for something like 40 years. Danny Hillis's brilliant Connection Machine is the only parallel system I'm aware of that actually got some traction. But even with all the excitement and press it got, it still only saw limited deployment on some extremely specialized projects.

Which begs the question: How often is parallel really called for?  

Right now it looks like the old fashioned "VN" architechure tricked out with some fancy hypervisor to provide virtual machine environments and limited (as in semi-faked) parallelism is where it's gonna be going. And that's mainly because it's good enough for what we need it for.

And as long as the chips keep on getting faster (and less expensive) - does it really matter? Hardware development costs are cheap when compared to software development expenses. Software costs don't benefit from efficiencies of scale like hardware does. Nor does prior product experience help that much in holding costs down. Software 'reuse' continues to be an elusive goal despite two decades of OOP programming practices. Most system software - and virtually all "breakthrough" applications - are written from scratch because it's still more efficient to do it that way.

And most times it's more prudent to run your "old but working software" on a faster machine than it is to try to improve the code beyond a certain point.  

Your thoughts?  :)  

9027
Living Room / Re: IP address on public network
« Last post by 40hz on June 20, 2010, 03:26 PM »
+1!

It barely qualifies as a dirty trick even though I'd probably give it full points for "DUH!"

Threatening a member of the executive branch in post-911 'after the Patriot Act' USA using a laptop you own from a neighbor's router? Is this guy totally insane or just clueless? We need a new word added to the dictionary for that level of stupidity.

And the reporting...  

Some guy reads a 10 year old issue of 2600 or visits some script-kiddie hax0r website and somebody thinks  what he did required skill? Good grief! Are there still reporters that clueless about how this stuff works after all this time?

(And this reporting website fancies itself a "breaking" tech news website?)

9028
@40hz[/b]:
Doesn't IBM already do this with their cloud services? They've also got a specific version designed for campuses. Bob Sutor talks about this a lot.

Sorta. But they're talking a WebSphere/Notes/Symphony solution that most places aren't that interested in pursuing. Especially after they experiment with Notes and Symphony. The simple fact it's different than what most office workers are used to is enough to sink it. It also doesn't offer much in the way of cost advantage.  And you'd still need Windows to run 95% of it anyway.

The thing that would make this a killer for Microsoft is that they own the Windows Server/Exchange/Office solution most places are looking for. All they need to do is load it on a turnkey box, which they could contract from anywhere. I'd bet HP would jump at the opportunity to do it.

Think about it this way:

Company A wants to upgrade their physical IT plant. They have their IT people do a study. Or they hire some consultants to do it for them. They identify a configuration, shop for then buy the software and hardware, get everything setup, installed, and tested.  Deploy to the pilot group. Test and fix as needed. Deploy to mission critical functions and users. Repeat test and fix as needed. Roll out to the rest of the company. Monitor. Update. Maintain. (yadda-yadda..we all know the drill.)

Company B buys the "Office in a Box" package from Microsoft. Based on its knowledge of thousands of other customer's, Microsoft provides an easily modded base configuration custom tailored to the best practices of Company B's industry segment.

The box arrives on Friday and gets installed overnight. There's no hardware or software to configure since it arrives ready to roll. All that needs to be done is create the profiles and user IDs, the file directories and permissions, and migrate data. The system gets plugged in, powered up, checked for problems and allowed to 'cook' for a bit before the IT department starts setting up accounts and moving files. Come Monday, the new system gets run in parallel for a few weeks just to be sure. Then it gets rolled out to the rest of the company.

Microsoft remotely handles all the software and security updates. The hardware manufacturer handles all mechanical issues via preventative maintenance schedules, and/or as requested by Microsoft on behalf of the customer.

Internal IT staffing needs are now reduced to the small crew needed to handle routine system backups and file/user maintenance. Middle-management IT becomes redundant since Microsoft is now providing that level of business function.

In this brave new world, all that remains are the IT 'grunts' plus the CIO and his entourage.

This arrangement works out well for the CIO, who has now been freed up to focus on the bigger information issues and strategies his company needs to stay on top of. No more staffing budgets, personnel issues, etc. Just pure IT upper level management functions - and keeping the rest of the company happy.

Heck, he's even got Microsoft as his 'fall guy' should things ever bork up big time.

I dunno. It sounds like a natural progression to me. Once you start moving back to the centralized model mainframes used, offering a product/service mix like the old giants used offer also starts making sense. And that's true whether the "mainframe" is one big box or a network of 3000 smaller machines in cloud formation. Distributed, virtual, or cloud computing leverages advances in network technology, software, and hardware. But it doesn't change the underlying idea behind having one central mainframe. It's just a more efficient and resilient way of accomplishing it.

Just my tuppence anyway... 8)
9029
General Software Discussion / Re: how they create such beautiful graphics?
« Last post by 40hz on June 20, 2010, 12:33 PM »
At the risk of sounding trite, they did it by hiring an artist to do it.

The tools are irrelevant. An artist could produce equally stunning visuals using anything from a #2 pencil and sketchpad up to a fully tricked-out digital studio.

Like Gypsy Rose Lee said: It ain't what you got. It's how you use it.

There's just no getting around it.  :)

9030
Living Room / Re: When Social Media Users Hulk Up!
« Last post by 40hz on June 19, 2010, 02:21 PM »
This would be my tweet to Mark Shurtleff (if I used Twitter):

Bravo Mr.Shurtleff!
Your self-serving posturing has earned you a very minor footnote in internet history.
You should feel proud.
   (126 chars)
9031
Living Room / Re: Only take a NO from someone who can say YES
« Last post by 40hz on June 19, 2010, 02:01 PM »
To avoid the people who don't have the money and or authority, the saleforces usually go to the top and work down.

A super-dumb move to be sure. You can't afford to alienate the people who will be using the product or are responsible for "making it happen."

But there's a difference between when you're "selling" and when you're  'wooing', informing, or otherwise educating. You should do the last three with everyone who has a stake in the outcome. These people are all gatekeepers.

The point I was trying to make was that you don't try to sell something to people whose job isn't to buy.

A sales pitch will always include an element of pressure, no matter how slight, that you don't want to introduce until you absolutely have to. And the only time you have to is when you finally "pop the question" and ask for the sale.

My criteria for calling something a "good sale" is pretty simple. A good sale is one that makes sense for both the seller and the buyer. It "makes sense" when the customer's requirements are met or exceeded, at an affordable price and within an acceptable time frame, by a product or service the seller is genuinely capable of delivering - and supporting after the sale.

We usually think of it as: Done correctly, on time, within budget - and no bad surprises.

 8)

9032
Living Room / Re: The proper word is “dependent,” not addicted.
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2010, 02:51 PM »
^No argument from me on any of those points.

I had to deal with a relatively minor addiction (cigarettes) some years ago. It was one of the hardest things I ever had to deal with, but it's nowhere near as difficult a habit to change as I'd suspect some others are. Took me two tries, but I finally did it. (Haven't touched a tobacco product in 20 years as of New Years Day 2010. Yay!)

The way I got through it was by going deeply inwards to examine exactly what was going on so I could reprogram myself to get around it. NLP was a great help in achieving that. It's an interesting moment when you can suddenly perceive the craving as something almost not a part of what you'd normally think of as yourself.

At any rate, I started smoking purely for my own reasons, and I succeeded in stopping purely for my own reasons, so the circle is finally complete. Talk about a "fearful symmetry" as William Blake once said.

An interesting and enlightening experience to go through.

One I wouldn't recommend to anyone.  :)

9033
For me, the hardest pill to swallow is just how good Apple is at those things they're good at - despite an utter lack of graciousness - and their generally shabby treatment of friend and foe alike.

9034
Living Room / Re: The proper word is “dependent,” not addicted.
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2010, 12:20 PM »
Dependent would be if you need something your body or mind cannot produce on it's own.

Very nice! It's also non-judgmental in that it ignores whether the need is intrinsic (e.g. air, food, water); the result of some involuntary body malfunction or defect (insulin, most blood pressure medication); or is a learned or otherwise 'willingly' acquired dependency ('recreational' drugs, alcohol, cigarettes). 

That last category is what I usually think of when I use the word "addiction."

For me to think of someone as being an addict, there has to be an element of personal choice or volition. It could be no more than somebody's decision not to care. Or possibly the decision to not make a decision by allowing certain life events to chart their own course. But there always has to be some volition, no matter how slight, somewhere in the mix.

 
9035
^Bingo! steeladept gets it!  :Thmbsup:

------------------

@CUW... - when I said "best approach" earlier, I meant as in service business model for Microsoft. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

FWIW I also think it makes perfectly good sense for the customer - even though members of the IT department (and independent contractors like me!) wouldn't like to think so.

But you know how it is...we always want to be the ones who own the network.  ;D

 ;)

9036
FlipSuite and Flipbook Printer / Re: possible to save?
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2010, 11:27 AM »
Two free PDF printers are: BullZip PDF Printer and PDFill PDF and Image Writer. Either one is a good choice. I like these because they're completely local on your machine. You don't need to web out to a service to use them.

You can download free versions at these links:

http://www.bullzip.c...roducts/pdf/info.php

http://www.pdfill.com/download.html

:Thmbsup:
9037
Dumping to a text file is easy. You can do a 'Save As' to text or export to a TSV textfile. Don't know how useful that's going to be for what you want to accomplish, but one how-to (with screenshots) can be found here:

http://www.uwgb.edu/...chive_emails_txt.htm

Luck! :Thmbsup:
9038
Sounds interesting. It's too bad you can't even look at the site until you join. Makes it hard to know whether or not you'd want "in" unless you already knew a member.

But I guess that's part of the reason for having an 'invitation only' membership policy isn't it? ;D

9039
^ I was envisioning this more as a service rather than a software product. I also assumed Microsoft wouldn't be too gung-ho on releasing the binaries for Live. Installing on hardware, which could be provided as part of the subscription (much like sat/cable boxes) allows Microsoft to retain full control of the product, yet still address the client's desire to keep their data local.

You could also do it using a virtual approach. But that would mean installing on a server Microsoft didn't have complete control over.

Much as I personally like the notion of virtual (job security!), I'm still not 100% convinced it's the all-inclusive 'optimal solution for everything' that some of it's advocates are making it out to be. Part of that probably stems from the fact I go back to mainframes where everything basically was virtual.

It wasn't a panacea back then. And I doubt it's going to be one now.

But I could be wrong!  ;D
9040
General Software Discussion / Re: SourceForge
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2010, 02:40 AM »
+1 DTA gives you the most flexibility. Great add-on.  :-*

If you don't want to use DTA, you can still get FDM to work.

First, check your FDM monitoring settings to make sure the ALT must be pressed checkbox is enabled:

AA01.gif

Then, after you hit cancel on Sourceforge, hold down the ALT key and click on the direct link. FDM's Add download box should pop open and you can take it from there.

Luck! :Thmbsup:

9041
Of course there's nothing stopping Microsift from doing a version of Office Live to run on a customer owned server (or cloud) rather than their own. That would solve company security and availability issues, eliminate the need for 'thin' client solutions, and still give Microsoft the topside control it's looking for.

The best approach for that would be to sell a turnkey hardware/software combo with a managed "push" type subscription plan. Microsoft could then handle updates and security without the customer needing to worry about it. Plug it in, boot it up, and let your employees get to work. All your data stays local so no worries there. And bandwidth is only limited by the speed of the internal network since nothing is going out on the WAN end.  

Icing on the cake would be if you could have it automatically mirror data somewhere - and have the applications automatically failover to Microsoft's cloud and use that mirrored data should the customer's own server go down.

Talk about 100% uptime!  

Seems like a plan.  
9042
Living Room / Re: 20 years later, the movie "Total Recall" still kicks butt
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2010, 08:29 PM »
^ +1!

Sometimes the lesser the verisimilitude provided by the effect, the more you're  forced to engage the imagination. 

I always found that poorly focused and jerky B&W has a certain nightmarish quality that you don't get from hi-def digital wizardry. Especially effective is the old trick of dropping every third frame to create a subtle but noticable choppiness that gets most people edgy without their knowing why. 

The original Carnival of Souls is a good example of how low-tech produced a film more frightening than its hi-tech remake.

   
9043
Living Room / Re: 20 years later, the movie "Total Recall" still kicks butt
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2010, 05:16 PM »
The medication (legal and prescribed!) sure helps. ;)

^ LOL Good one! :Thmbsup:

laughing-cat-with-bottle-2.JPG

Lucky too...I 'm stuck with OTC.  ;D

(But at least I get to pick the "flavor."  :eusa_dance:  )
9044
Living Room / Re: 20 years later, the movie "Total Recall" still kicks butt
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2010, 04:03 PM »
But no matter the setting or theme, I become agitated very easily when a director/screenplay insults my intelligence by presenting me with people who behave irrationally and illogically without providing a logical reason as to why their cognitive abilities are so impaired.

Wow...

You can get all that just from a movie?

How do you ever manage to make it through a work day? ;) :)
9045
Living Room / Re: 20 years later, the movie "Total Recall" still kicks butt
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2010, 07:01 AM »
It only rates 42% at Rotten Tomatoes, but they're retards.

I prefer the Quiet Earth website for sci-fi and horror reviews.

QELogo.gif

QE is primarily interested in post-apocalyptic themed films. But it also provides a decent amount of coverage for other genres as well. They're especially good at finding obscure indie and non-US movies. They're a good source for pictures that don't get much coverage elsewhere.

FWIW I seldom read or otherwise pay attention to reviews until I see the film. Before that, all I'm looking for is a brief non-spoiler plot synopsis; a few stills so I can get some idea of the overall 'look' and level of production; and a trailer or two. (I love trailers!)

Once I see the film, I'm much more open to reading reviews. But the main reason I do is to see if I might have missed something rather than to seek validation for my own impressions. I'm at the stage where I'm pretty comfortable with just liking what I like.

I find that the very best films are often horror films. Now, 99% of horror films are just drivel, but that rare horror that pokes its head above the crowd really does go beyond.


One of the reasons I've never had much interest in horror films is because most are pretty lacking. But as you noted, that only makes the rare exception even more enjoyable. And when they're good, they're very good indeed.

I never had patience with vampire anything until the lovely Kate Beckinsdale took a crack at it in the first two Underworld installments. I thought the third one lost something, but the first two were very well done. Same goes for Blade and Blade II. Both were way up there for pure entertainment value. (A vampire Pomeranian? Love it! You need a really sick sense of humor to come up with something like that.)

Sci-fi I find are generally more consistently good, but again, rarely truly are "great". Star Wars and Blade Runner are what film makers aspire to. Getting there is another thing though.

The biggest problem with filming sci-fi is the story. It's exceptionally hard to translate something as idea-based as a sci-fi story into something as action-oriented and visual as a movie. As one director pointed out, all you can film are actions and images. There's absolutely no way to film someone's emotions or thoughts. The best you can do is imply them through visual cues.

Then there's the problem of providing context. Since much good sci-fi creates its own universe, there's a huge amount of background information that needs to be conveyed before the reader/viewer can get into the story. Fans of sci-fi have an advantage because they already know certain genre conventions which allow them to enter into the story more quickly than the average viewer. Say "warp drive" and a fan will immediately recall the six or seven fully developed (fictional) ways a starship can be made to hop from star to star. A non-fan will need more hand-holding and explanations. Which takes time away from telling the story. And that's a big problem in the film world.

In the trade, losing footage to provide necessary background is referred to as "laying pipe."  A good example of where it didn't become a problem was in Blade Runner. With a few well chosen scenes and images, Ridley Scott plunked his audience right down into Phillip K. Dick's dystopian future in less than 5 minutes. And with hardly anyone noticing just how strange a world it was.

A good example of where "laying pipe" was a problem was in the film The Minority Report. If you had never read the story, you would have been lost without being filled in on how this weird new method of law enforcement worked. And for it to be believable, you needed a lot of background. Unfortunately, Spielberg spent the first twenty or so minutes providing nothing but background. The real story didn't get started until around the 22 minute mark.

That delay would have been enough to kill The Minority Report for most people - even if it weren't such a lousy movie. (Which it was.)

--------

One interesting option is to blend horror with sci-fi. It's probably one of the toughest tricks in the world to pull off. But it hasn't kept some directors from trying.

Event Horizon tried and failed despite it's huge budget, name director, and excellent cast. Just goes to show that all the acting talent and special effects in the world still couldn't compensate for a fundamentally flawed storyline. It was almost painful to watch superb actors like Fishburn, Neill, Quinlan and Richardson giving it their all - and to no avail.

Event Horizon was one of the few films I ever went to where the audience started walking out before it was over... (The other was Excalibur.)

Carpenter's Prince of Darkness mostly succeeded even though the ending got dragged out longer than it should have. AFAIK, this was the very first movie to posit the notion of evil as being a form of malignant intelligence that exists in a dark parallel universe. And one which is actively trying to cross over into our own.

Shades of the old master: H.P. Lovecraft  :-* with his "Elder Gods"... Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!

I wouldn't mind seeing a remake of PoD. Especially if it were updated to include some of the more recent discoveries in physics. And if they fixed the pacing.

The 2006 movie Pulse actually did succeed in merging the two genres. Fairly believable if you put yourself within the context of the story. It also contains some of the better creepy visuals out there.

Imagine our wireless technologies made a connection to a world beyond our own. Imagine that world used that technology as a doorway into ours. Now, imagine the connection we made can't be shut down. When you turn on your cell phone or log on to your e-mail, they'll get in, you'll be infected and they'll be able to take from you what they don't have anymore -- life.  

This film has some memorable scenes. One of the best takes place during a discussion in a coffee shop in what is now a virtually deserted city following an unexplained  rash of suicides and disappearances. The character Maddie is trying to explain to skeptical computer hacker-extraordinaire Dexter what she thinks she knows about what's happening. A very strange wild-eyed man, half-drunk, and half out of his mind with fear, butts into their conversation:

Mattie Webber: Just like Josh said, he pulled something through...

Dexter McCarthy: Pulled ghosts through the Wi-Fi? I just doesn't make any sense.

Thin Bookish Guy:[adding to their conversation] It makes all the sense in the world. Do you have any idea of the amount of data that's floating out there? The amount of information we just beam into the air? We broadcast to everyone where we are, and we think we're safe? The whole freakin' city is going insane, and we're acting like it's nothing. Well, it's not nothing. It's something we don't understand, and it is coming for us.

There's a clip up on YouTube if you want to watch it. Link here. This scene starts at the 1:22 mark.

Pulse is an American remake of the 2001 the Japanese film: Kairo. It's one of those few times when a remake holds it's own against the original. I have both. I personally think Pulse is the better movie.

You can watch the trailer for Pulse here and the trailer for Kairo here.

-----

One new movie that looks promising is a Columbian military/horror piece called El Paramo.

A special high mountain command composed of nine experienced soldiers is sent to a military base in a desolate high-plains moor of Colombia with wich contact was lost several days ago and was believed to be the target of a guerrilla attack.

Upon arrival, the only person found inside the base is a peasant woman who is heavily chained. Gradually, the isolation, the inability to communicate with the outside world and the impossibility to escape, undermine the integrity and sanity of the soldiers, causing them to lose the certainties about the identity of the enemy and creating them doubts about the true nature of that strange and silent woman.

Prisoners of fear, paranoia and a dark secret that they carry, they will challenge each other becoming animals willing to kill one another in order to survive.

EP01.png  EP02.png  EP03.png

Quiet Earth has a write up and a trailer if anybody's interested. You can find it here.

Looks pretty cool. 8)

9046
Rushing out a patch for an exploit not already in the wild would have been irresponsible on MS's part.

And ironically enough, Microsoft is very likely feeling pressure to rush the patch now that the code is out in the wild. It's become a race between them and the people that will try to take advantage of this vulnerability.

So how again did Tavis Ormandy make things better for everybody by doing what he did?

I think I missed that memo.

--------------

P.S. I think Google is only biding it's time and letting the dust settle before they hand Tavis Ormandy his walking papers. To paraphrase The Godfather: Keep your friends close, and keep employees that did something which might get you hauled into court even closer.
9047
FWIW I doubt very much that Google had much (if anything) to do with what went down.

I think you just had a researcher in Google forget that the rest of the world doesn't operate the way things do inside his company's research department. Especially when it's a company where people are allowed to "run and play" and the open sharing of information and code is the norm. Or at least it is on the "inside."

To my mind, there's nothing intrinsically wrong with living in an ivory tower. Just don't go dumping a chamber pot over the parapet and then expect whoever gets hit not to be upset about it.




9048
General Software Discussion / Re: theremin hero...
« Last post by 40hz on June 16, 2010, 01:36 PM »
BTW: Why is this thread under General Software Discussion?

Oops sorry. Right. Slashdot article. Guitar Hero hack. I knew that. I did. Really. :P
9049
General Software Discussion / Re: theremin hero...
« Last post by 40hz on June 16, 2010, 01:17 PM »
Blues guitarist Joe Bonamassa currently uses a Moog theremin on stage.

There's a "gear interview" up on YouTube that has him talking about it and a bunch of other instruments and equipment he uses.

Link here: http://www.youtube.c.../watch?v=D7S9bQNkr7k

Theremin discussion starts at the 1:40 mark if you're impatient.

There's an nice vid of him playing Spike Driver Blues on baritone guitar  :-* where he uses the Theremin to good effect towards the end. (I'm amazed the Metal crowd hasn't jumped on doing this sort of thing yet.)

IMHO this is probably one of the more viable attempts to integrate something like a Theremin into popular music. Joe's use of the "T" is neither gimmicky nor overwhelming. With him, it's just one more available color on his sonic palette. Very cool stuff. :up:


EDIT: cancel that. Wrong video. The one I wanted has been taken down apparently. This vid is ok but there's not much theremin on it.

Link here: http://www.youtube.c.../watch?v=o9eeRiyjoLw

-----

@Edvard - What, you too?

Over the years I put together two or three courtesy of some electronic magazine articles. But I could never get the oscillators stable or good sounding enough to be musically useful.

Bob Moog was a big fan of the theremin. He maintained that the biggest two problems with the Theremin were that (a) people lacked respect for the instrument; and (b) that instrument companies were unwilling to put the time and money into doing one up right. Which is why he eventually did.

And which isn't much of a stretch when you consider how the theremin is basically a variation of a dual-ribbon controller. And Moog was pretty big on those too if I remember correctly.

 8)

9050
In my case, it's mostly a matter of "When in Rome do as Romans do."
 ;)

The single most compelling reason for me to be constantly upgrading my Microsoft software has little to do with me and everything to do with needing to stay on top of what my clients are using.

Fortunately, Microsoft knows this, so they offer a very generous subsciption program (MAPS) through their registered partner network that makes regular upgrades both workable and affordable.  
Pages: prev1 ... 357 358 359 360 361 [362] 363 364 365 366 367 ... 470next