topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 9, 2026, 7:09 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 ... 118next
901
Living Room / Re: Anybody on DC own an RV/Campervan, or completed a conversion?
« Last post by Shades on August 21, 2016, 12:27 AM »
To be honest, I wasn't aware of such devices. Heat exchangers/heat engines I did know about, but efficiency of such devices is pretty poor (when not in a controlled lab environment).

After skimming over this document (pdf) it says that the efficiency of thermoelectric generators is even worse. Apparently these cost very little, but if the energy returned by these these devices is relatively little, seems to me like a waste of money.

The document also includes a concept from BMW where they their exhaust system in combination with these generators to generate power. Waste heat from an oven or small kitchen device seems to me hardly worth the effort. Besides, whatever waste heat is coming off these devices will indirectly help with heating the inside of the RV. And that goes a long way when the RV is well insulated, as it will help with the expenditure of LPG to keep your RV on the temperature you have set on your thermostat.

Perhaps you would better spend the money you would set aside for those generators om buying thermal underwear. Retaining the heat your own body generates is the most efficient way of keeping yourself comfortable. Your body has no problem heating the extremities (hands/feet) when the torso remains heated. As a bonus, such underwear doesn't get in the way when you move around in the RV. Parking the RV out of the wind will make you spend much less energy than you could ever hope to regain with the use of thermoelectric generators.
902
General Software Discussion / Re: Google killing Chrome apps on Windows/Linux/Mac
« Last post by Shades on August 20, 2016, 11:54 AM »
Which shows that not only Microsoft can make d.ck moves with their software and support.

<rant>
Of course, the software is theirs and both Google and MS can do what they want with it. But if both companies acted with the same mentality in their early years, the computing landscape would have looked very different...no matter how much Balmer would have chanted: "Developers, developers, developers...".

Weren't there also some Google plans to scrap ChromeOS in a year or two, replacing it with their Android product? Now we need only to Apple to come out with 'iOS X' and all of the major OS companies have each only one operating system that drives their phones, tablets, computers and IoT devices.
</rant>
903
Living Room / Re: Anybody on DC own an RV/Campervan, or completed a conversion?
« Last post by Shades on August 20, 2016, 02:20 AM »
Get one where the walls have piping and a pump to push the centrally heated fluids through those. I have spent several days in winter with ice and snow outside (12h a day in the toy expo in Nuremberg, Germany, the rest of the time in the RV) en it was actually very comfortable inside the RV. It used a RV-sized small gas tank and we refilled it once a week. Shower, cooking plate and fridge could be powered by either gas or electricity in that RV, which could handle a max of 6 people sleeping (3x2person bed) in it

Solar energy did cause a problem though. During the day it kept the battery charged, but at night the voltage level dropped, tripping the car alarm, which wouldn't shut off at all. The next day we were rather urgently asked to leave the camping spot and pay a fine for disturbing the rest of the other people staying the night there. Better find out if you have that kind of problem with your RV before you embark on your 12 month journey.

You have different types of solar panels. While most still generate power with daylight alone, some panels are generating more than others. There are even panels that can generate a small amount of power when it rains on them. Those are much more useful in the UK, I would assume.  :P

Depending on the size of the RV/motorhome you will reduce your energy consumption. Mainly because there is much less room to even have big appliances. Or computers. Laptops won't be that big of a deal, energy-wise or space-wise.

Good insulation and electric devices that only use the infra-red spectrum (instead of the common radiating units) help a lot with keeping the RV warm in winter too. These spend much less energy to keep you comfortable, are much more durable than the standard electric heater and you won't wake up with a major headache afterwards. Consider those if you have an RV without plumbing to heat you in winter.

If you must use a fuel powered generator, get an external one and forgo the use of the engine in the RV. External ones are build for the task and are much easier/cheaper to replace if something does go wrong. And make sure you ventilate, day and night if possible.

Last, but not least...keep your spirits up. Living in rather cramped space requires a certain mindset, which a lot of people think they have or can work on. Two/three weeks everyone can handle, but longer periods, such as 12 months in your case, that is much, much harder. Do not underestimate this, the money you'll be saving by living this way, could easily be spent on divorce settlements afterwards.
904
Anyone interested can get a decent, albeit simple explanation about compression in the BBC documentary: 'The joy of data'.

@40hz:
Even if you are not interested in the subject, the woman who does the presentation perfectly fits in your niche... ;)
906
Unsigned...is it not possible to sign extensions yourself? According to Mozilla, you can. This link explains which versions of Firefox allow for unsigned extensions, and behind this link you will find step by step instructions (not specifically for Windows, but the steps are clear).

Just make sure you create a sufficiently strong certificate (RSA 2048/SHA256 minimum), else it is likely Firefox will complain about the weak certificate. The EasyRSA scripts allow you quite some freedom when generating self-signed certificates. At least, I use it myself whenever I have a need for self-signed certificates.
907
At the risk of sounding like a fanboy, here goes:
I manage a total of 28 Oracle DB's and 5 MS-SQL DB's which I regularly make dump files from. Most are around 100GByte in size, but some are close to 1TByte. So you hopefully can understand that the rate of compression really matters. Not only for storage, but also for transfer speed 7-zip is much better than zip for my use case.

The dump files I create are a maximum of 4GByte in size and 7-zip often reduces those files to 200MByte. Zip doesn't even come close. Rar is quite a lot better zip, but it can't match the brute force of 7-zip either. Besides, I have all this scripted, so it is really turning it on at night and being greeted by archived (and backed up) dump files including MD5 hashtags for verification in the morning.

Target is right about PDFs. The same can be said for .xlsx, .docx etc., which are in essence already zipped when you save those types of documents. But text-based log files of several Gigabytes in size, 7-zip often reduces those to only several Megabytes. And its hardly slower than zip when doing so.

Ah well, to each their own.  :)
908
When archiving big dump files from the Oracle databases I maintain, 7-zip is the best compressor. But not with the default settings. The compression level in 7-zip format can also be adjusted. While this can be time consuming, I need to pull those archives through a slow(er) internet connection. The extra time I lose on archiving and unpacking pales in comparison with the time I need to spend on transferring these files.

Two things:
1. 7-zip comes with a Gui application, but also with a version for scripts. When using both applications with the most extreme 7-zip (LZMA) compression setting, it would make sense to expect similar sized archives. Not true, the script version compresses significantly better. After compressing 1.6GByte of executables, dll's, images, HTML and other text-based scripts I end up with an archive that is around 280MByte in size when created with 7-zip GUI version. With the 7-zip script version the resulting archive varies between 180 to 190MByte.
2. Especially with big(ger) data files, you will notice an improvement in compression speed and resulting archive size when you set 7-zip to ultra and change the dictionary size to 32MByte and the word size to 256. Those settings are not the default, but make quite a big difference in my case. Playing with these settings can have both positive and negative effects and compression time and archive size. But it does pay off to play a bit with these settings.

All in all, 7-zip compresses way better than zip does for me. And as I don't have a need for Windows to index my archives, I gain a lot more storage space this way. However, in case you need to have archive content indexed by Windows, as xtabber states, there could be something interesting here at this link. There you can download a piece of software that can replace the Microsoft Zip functionality with the raw power and options of 7-zip, directly from within the Windows Explorer. No, not an extra context menu item, really replace MS zip with 7-zip. That way you have the best of both worlds.
909
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Vopt 9 defragger free
« Last post by Shades on August 12, 2016, 10:23 AM »
On the subject of measuring differences between defraggers:
First start with a bit of a (simplified) background. On Windows it is quite safe to say that the NTFS file system is used the most. Commonly in Linux that would be a heir of the EXT2 file system (EXT3 / EXT4). The base of both file systems exists already for a long, long time. By design the NTFS file system places files on a hard disk in close groups. The design behind EXT2/3/4 file systems leave a lot more "distance" between files on a hard disk.

Imagine a fresh installation of Windows and Linux, each on its own PC, which are the same in every other hardware aspect. Both run fine as long as there are not much files added or removed. And NTFS will have a minor speed advantage over EXT2/3/4 in this particular scenario.

However, after installing programs and the ongoing processing of data/temporary files you will see that all files are getting fragmented much quicker and more severely with the NTFS file system than with the EXT2/3/4 file systems. Leaving "expansion room" between files has beneficial effects on a computer that is actively doing the task(s) it is setup to do. And it gives the user the impression that there is no fragmentation on EXT2/3/4 file systems (which is not true at all). In this scenario the speed advantage goes to EXT2/3/4.

When the hard disk from each PC has less than 10% of free space left, both NTFS and EXT2/3/4 will have matching performance that is quit bad.

So far the simplified background.

The defragger that comes as default with Windows doesn't have too much settings (regarding placement of files) for you to adjust. So if you want to have the advantages of "expansion room" between files, you cannot really rely on the Windows defragger, as it will do its best to give you the best performance it can with a relatively close knitted group of files. And after it finishes the counter is set to 0% (ideally). And the user is under the impression that files are not fragmented.

Other defragmentation software is bound to use the API calls as the Windows defragger does, but most will give you more options regarding the placement of files on the hard disk and which other optimizations should be applied.

Honestly, since Windows 7 the Windows defragger does an adequate job. But for some not enough, hence there still are quite some 3rd party defraggers out. Some would even argue that using a "better" defragger is just an opinion.

Personally, I don't think that is true. Then again, my opinions regarding file placement and optimizations (in a nutshell: Windows itself, programs, (user) data files and temporary files, each stored in their separate partition) are more extreme. In that separation scenario a lot of file fragmentation is completely eliminated, no matter which defragmentation software and/or optimization schemes you plan to use.

I even dare to say that with a strict separation scheme, you'll extend the operational lifetime of your hard disk extensively as you keep the need for defragmentation to an absolute minimum. After all Windows by default does a weekly defragmentation to give the user the impression that Windows hardly fragments files.

Added bonuses of the strict separation scheme are: you'll have an easier time keeping your (user) data safe from almost any operating system mishap and it makes backups much easier too.

Of course, with SSD hard disks most of the above has become a moot point, accessing fragmented or defragmented files on a SSD hard disk hardly makes any difference in time and are much faster than on a standard spinning hard disk anyway.  Still, the added bonuses from strictly separating files are still valid.
910
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Vopt 9 defragger free
« Last post by Shades on August 11, 2016, 03:42 PM »
My bad, I saw this the other day on a different website and considered it was a nice afterthought from the creator. Just thought that I should mention it here. Guess I should have visited the vopt site first before posting.  :-[
911
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Vopt 9 defragger free
« Last post by Shades on August 11, 2016, 02:43 PM »
The creator died and he made clear in his last will and testament that this software should become freeware after he died.
912
'ExamDiff Pro' and 'Beyond Compare' are commercial Differs that do, for my intends and purposes, a very good job on Windows.
913
While the name of the software suites indicate to be more generic design software for furniture, these should also allow you to design your (multi-purpose) workbench from scratch. The last link even has an option to create cut lists, which might prove to be very cost effective, even if the price is not exactly in your range.

http://wooddesigner.org/
http://cabinetdesigner.net/
www.mobi3d.ro
www.pro100.co.nz
http://www.rockler.com/sketchlist-3d-version-4-shop-windows-version

Anyway, have fun designing your workbench  :)

914
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by Shades on August 05, 2016, 07:52 PM »
That makes it then a triple boot setup  :P
915
Oops, wasn't even aware that Everything comes with HTTP server functionality. Ah well, live and learn.  :)

916
Try to get a personal/corporate search engine to index all the documents and offer those results in a webpage accessible to the user. If the user then clicks on the link to the file, the document should automatically open in the defined application on the system they currently work on.

That looks like the easiest way to go about it.

Problem is the search engine. IBM (in cooperation with Yahoo) made one available for free some years back. If you install it on the system that stores these documents your users need access to, you also have the accessible webpage as well. Not sure if there was a file and/or size limit anymore...it has been a couple of years since. :-[   Only thing is that I used it myself and worked well.

There might be some newer ones for you to use. But if there aren't, try to look for: OmniFind and see if you can download it (and try at home or something to see if it is of any use for you).

If memory serves me right, there used to be an older SharePoint server that Microsoft made available for free. That could be another way to tackle your problem.

For what it is worth, I never liked the Windows Indexing feature. Too slow, too cumbersome and not too workable with files stored on the network. At the time I jumped for joy when I could lay my paws on the OmniFind search engine.

Collecting those files in one location makes it (much) easier to backup or even apply versioning if you would be so inclined.   
917
General Software Discussion / Re: how should I roll back java?
« Last post by Shades on July 27, 2016, 08:01 PM »
There is a (free) tool called: JavaRA  which is supposed to be able to cleanup Java installations on a Windows PC.
918
Living Room / Re: Email Naming Convention for Personal Website
« Last post by Shades on July 23, 2016, 01:48 PM »
[email protected] - that is the most formal/professional, even though your domain has the name it has. Which is a good reason to not use your first/last name (or any combination thereof) in a domain name (that you plan to expose to the interwebz) in the first place.

Using your initials...while that might sound good to you, after all, you know and your direct family & friends know these. If you plan to use that account for professional communication, expect errors because your professional contact might know your name, but not your initials. Besides that, most people only have 2 or 3 initials, so those short names are easily guessable for spammers.

How many mail accounts are provided by your ISP (the hoster of your domain)? Even the cheaper ones in the Netherlands give you unlimited mail addresses. With my very reliable host (25 euro/year including taxes and domain renewal) I get a main domain name (.nl), 5 sub-domains, 75GB/month traffic, 5 MySQL databases and unlimited mail addresses on the main and sub domains. All their servers are Linux based and you are able to manage everything for your domain through a CPanel interface.

All I want to say is that it doesn't take that much effort for your ISP to provide you with lots of mail addresses at virtually no (storage/maintenance) cost to them. Especially for a personal domain where traffic will be low (it might seem impressive to you, for your hoster it will be just a drip in a bucket). 25 euro/year translates to about 3 USD/month. That shouldn't break the bank. Even in Croatia you should be able to get similar service for a similar fee.

Of course, you can register your domain and take care of hosting your website (including mail server) yourself. Something you should only consider if you have the know-how and/or need for that level of control. It is definitely not cheaper and maintaining your own mailserver is a time-sink that gives you a headache to boot. Because it is very easy to mess up, as most people don't get the concepts behind DNS and MX records (at least not the first time). However, when done right, you can have as many mail addresses as your hardware/budget allows...
919
Instead of corrupt, I would say deluded. My too Pence on the matter...  ;)
920
It has been years I visited such a type of event. But, unfortunately, not able to attend now or in the near future. No amount of mugs will cure that (for me)  :(
921
UrlSnooper / Re: Embedded flash videos
« Last post by Shades on July 22, 2016, 10:39 AM »
https://www.runtime.org/shadow-copy.htm

Works with any of the Windows versions that supports Shadow Copy functionality (Windows 7 and later).
922
UrlSnooper / Re: Embedded flash videos
« Last post by Shades on July 22, 2016, 12:21 AM »
Got the impression you asked this before.

Anyway, videos are stored (very briefly) in a Temp folder (this could be the Windows temp folder, your user's temp folder or a temp folder (hardcoded) by the player that is used on the web site. Most of the time these files have undescriptive names and file name extension.

You'll need to find out where the video file is written on your system. Make sure the video is completely loaded, but before the video has finished playing you should unlock these temporary files and copy/rename them appropriately in a folder of your choosing. Granted, this isn't the easiest way to get videos, but you'll be surprised how much videos you can get this way.

As you report, you want to get flash videos. Now I'm not the only one who thought of this way to "catch" videos. For this reason flash videos are cut into pieces that get downloaded just before the video player in your browser is about to show that part of the video. This makes "catching" videos harder and as an added bonus, it saves bandwidth on both the transmitting/receiving sides (at the cost of viewing experience for the end user who has no or limited access to high-speed internet at any given moment in time).

For Firefox there is a plug-in
Spoiler
YouTube Control Center

with which you are able to change this behavior of the video-player back to the old-fashioned 'all at once'-method of transmitting/receiving video. Not only Youtube videos, but from other sites as well. Armed with that plug-in and unlock software (or shadow copy software) you should be able to "catch" videos again.

With most videos it just isn't worth the effort or time you'll be spending. But the method does work, so if you are dead set on getting this video, it is a way of going about things.
923
Well, I did download the file, but it is zipped and not even 1 MByte in size. So if you say it was 20MByte or so, that doesn't bode well (didn't extract the archive though). And as previous poster already commented, the term 'demo' in the archive name doesn't inspire confidence either.
924
I have had several cabled Logitech mouses which, after 5-6 years use, did exactly the same. In all of my cases it was the mouse itself that was causing the problem. One of them I could extend the life with a year or so, by changing the complete cable between mouse and PC. Still, the chips in the mouse need to do their work fast and continuously for giving the user a "smooth" movement on the computer screen.

It is my suspicion that Logitech doesn't use chips that are able to do both that long. Nowadays I just go and buy a new (Logitech) mouse after 5 years, no matter if it still works or not.

925
At least it didn't leave him puzzled...  :)
Pages: prev1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 ... 118next