901
General Software Discussion / Re: What makes an application "useful"?
« Last post by cyberdiva on May 19, 2009, 06:25 PM »Yes, App103 hit it on the head for me, too. The only criterion on App's list that wouldn't be on mine is software that's "so intuitive." Mind you, I love it when software just works perfectly right from the start without my having to beat my head against the computer monitor, but App's statement made me realize that at least some of the software I've come to love took me a while to warm up to. DirectoryOpus, Linkman, and ActiveWords are three that come to mind. They seemed too complicated at first, or (in the case of Linkman) had too many features I didn't like, but their complexity turned out to be a virtue: they can do so incredibly much. I use all three constantly, every day. To those I'd add three programs that just worked beautifully for me right from the start: ClipMate, HyperSnap, and Mulberry. Mulberry too is complex, but fortunately its complexity hid itself until I was hooked.
There are other programs I'm enthusiastic about as well, but without these six I'm lost.
There are other programs I'm enthusiastic about as well, but without these six I'm lost.
Recent Posts
I tried several more queries of a different sort, and ended with "What is Donation Coder?" All I can say for W.A. is that it's consistent--it consistently didn't know what to do. By contrast, when I then put "what is Donation Coder?" into Google, its first three hits were to the web site, the forums, and Wikipedia's coverage of DC. Guess I'll stick with Google. 


In each case, system restore proved very helpful.