8926
General Software Discussion / Re: AutoIt3 versus AutoHotKey
« Last post by f0dder on January 29, 2006, 04:17 AM »Well yeah, I think it's a bit bloated... I would compile the script to bytecode, so the output .exe files don't need to have parser+compiler etc., but "just" the VM + engine. LUA would be pretty suitable for this. But well, I have an assembly background, so I might be a bit oversealous wrt. size 
The biggest flaw with AutoIt, IMHO, is that "compiling" doesn't actually compile (and thus, syntax check) the scripts - this sucks if you're 20 minutes into an unattended install, before you realize that your script misses a single string quote character...
LUA - www.lua.org . Lots of software uses it now, including games like Painkiller and World Of Warcraft.

The biggest flaw with AutoIt, IMHO, is that "compiling" doesn't actually compile (and thus, syntax check) the scripts - this sucks if you're 20 minutes into an unattended install, before you realize that your script misses a single string quote character...
LUA - www.lua.org . Lots of software uses it now, including games like Painkiller and World Of Warcraft.

Recent Posts

