topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 10:34 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 351 352 353 354 355 [356] 357 358 359 360 361 ... 470next
8876
Well, that's pretty much how the US military got the bugs out of the early Redstone rockets.  Send in the 'Big Guy with the Hammer'. ;)
8877
General Software Discussion / Re: Sick and tired of this message!
« Last post by 40hz on August 03, 2010, 09:34 AM »
^Yup! What SJ said!  :Thmbsup:

We'd need some of the details in the log. Specifically what failed and what the message(s) said about it. Also which log reported the error: system/applications/security etc. Might want to check them all while you're in there. Anything that occured around when you started having problems is potentially useful info for troubleshooting.  

If you're new to using the Event Viewer or analysing log files here's a very good article to get you started. My GF (who is very smart - but definitely not what you'd call a "computer person") successfully solved her first major W2k3 server problem (all by herself - Yay!) by starting with the advice in this article.  

Link: http://www.brighthub.../articles/42353.aspx
 :Thmbsup:
8878
General Software Discussion / Re: an app to validate email addresses?
« Last post by 40hz on August 03, 2010, 06:50 AM »
G-lock Software's Advanced E-Mail Verifier will do that. They offer free and reasonably priced personal and business editions of this package.  

Info link: http://www.glocksoft.com/amlv/

I don't know if it has a throttle control. But you could break you list into smaller chunks and run them separately if you're worried about pissing your ISP off by looking like you're a spammer. Be forewarned, many ISPs are onto the "slow list" ploy so now they also monitor packet type trending. So doing back to back address "verf" requests may trigger a security alert if your list is very large. When in doubt, let your ISP know what you want do before you do it. It's a pain, but it's still better than getting shut off if they misinterpret your actions.

Just my tuppence.

------------------
Disclaimer: 40hz is not affiliated with G-Lock Software, nor does he get anything for recommending their software. He buys his licenses from them just like everybody else.  ;D  

8879
General Software Discussion / Re: Sick and tired of this message!
« Last post by 40hz on August 02, 2010, 10:08 AM »
Quick question: you mentioned web pages loading slowly.

Is this server also being used as your desktop?  :tellme:
8880
General Software Discussion / Re: Sick and tired of this message!
« Last post by 40hz on August 02, 2010, 09:44 AM »
1.Most likely reason for slow web access is the DNS settings on your internal network interface are configured (or have been reconfigured) incorrectly. The Microsoft knowledgebase has extensive articles on configuration and troubleshooting DNS. Start there. Sorry for not providing direct links. I'm on the road this week so my Internet access is sporadic and limited.

2. Starting and stopping services doesn't always (actually, it very often won't) fix errors on a Win2k server. You need to look at what details the log provides and go from there. If you can get and post the specifics, maybe we can help you out.

FYI: Windows server errors seldom occur in isolation. Usually something will cause an error that causes an error that causes the error you're looking at. So you'll need to go back and see if you can find when the red flags began. That gives you your first clue about what might have changed to cause your headaches. Also look at any warnings and errors that come up near and around the one you're looking at. I had a client that thought his Active Directory was screwed up because he saw an AD error. What he didn't notice was there were earlier errors flagged on one of his NIC cards which resulted in a huge number of time sync, DNS, and replication errors.  Once the NIC was replaced, the server "healed" itself. I only mention this to make the case for looking at everything in the logfiles when you start troubleshooting.  

Addendum:

Just thinking. A device or service failure isn't necessarily a problem. I have one client that is using a document scanning/archiving solution that absolutely requires an oddball proprietary virtual PDF printer be present on the server. It cannot be completely removed even though we don't use it. If it's not installed, the rest of the program flags an error and asks to be reinstalled. As a compromise, we just disabled this virtual printer to prevent it being used. This results in the archive manager throwing a service error everytime it starts up (or the server gets rebooted) since it can't connect the virtual printer. Since it doesn't effect anything we're doing or cause any other problems, we just disregard this particular error message.    
 
8881
I find it kind of amusing how the phrase "open source" got co-opted by people who are fundamentally opposed to the notion of open anything.

Put it right up there with other "made meaningless" words like: green, organic and free.

I remember in the early days of FOSS how there were some very serious discussions about possibly trademarking the term in order to prevent it from being abused by businesses and individuals who were looking to pull a bait & switch move, or otherwise get around the 'give back' part of the deal.

Interestingly enough, the overwhelming majority opposed anything because they felt people should be free to interpret "open source" any way they wanted - and truly believed nobody would be so stupid as not to know when the term was being misused.

Considering the number of bizarre notions so many people seem to have about GPL, I think I can say in retrospect - Boy were we ever wrong!  ;D
8882
Living Room / Re: Testing the internet "kill" switch
« Last post by 40hz on July 25, 2010, 12:09 PM »
^Count on it. 8)

Once you get government $$$ or request classification as a non-profit or other tax exempt entity, the Feds often feel they own you. 
8883
General Software Discussion / Re: Quark Xpress
« Last post by 40hz on July 24, 2010, 08:40 PM »
 Ok. If you're comfortable with basic print design and have some knowledge of typography, you could be fairly productive with a publishing application in a relatively short period of time. If you don't have that background it will be more challenging. InDesign and Quark are just tools. Like a brush or a tube of paint. A painter needs tools to produce a painting. But owning those tools doesn't automatically make someone a painter.

That being said, you should be able to produce something that will at least be acceptable in relatively short order if you put the time in and are organized and focused. You initial efforts may not be up to what a graphics professional could produce, but it should still be workmanlike.

 
8884
General Software Discussion / Re: Quark Xpress
« Last post by 40hz on July 24, 2010, 07:09 PM »
Both are mainstream. Quark is slightly more popular with people whose roots go back to when Quark was the professional's choice. Either is mainstream, with Adobe offering a more complete family of applications and a more comprehensive workflow model.  If I were buying for the first time today I'd probably go with InDesign - but that's just me. Five years ago I would have picked Quark.   

How long it would take to get proficient is a tough question. Depending on what your goals are, and how much typographic, print production, and design background you have, you could be talking weeks or years.

What are you looking to accomplish short and long term?

8885
Developer's Corner / Re: Simple Public License (SimPL)
« Last post by 40hz on July 24, 2010, 12:06 PM »
The GPL is too restrictive.  :D
I'm not a big fan of the the GPL either, but Stallman's "flowery" crap writing style  and manifesto rant to realize what the license is actually saying, so I am all for rewriting it for clarity's sake. Stallman himself should have done so long ago.

Why should he? (Not that he would have the final say on anything anyway. The FOSS model doesn't work like that.)


Rather than blaming Stallman, bemoaning the terms of GPL, or dissing somebody else's license model, I'd like to make a modest proposal.

People can have a software license work any way they want it to.

All that would be required is for someone to write it.  :)

And figure out how to enforce the terms such that this 'better' license actually meant something.  ;)


Now what's stopping anybody, hmmm?  
8886
Agree. It would be insane for most people to expect to just stop relying on Windows and jump exclusively into a whole new OS right off the bat - even though many people have done just that.

I admire my GF's approach to dessert choices: Why settle for either when you can have both?

Why indeed? ;D
8887
General Software Discussion / Re: iAds coming to OSX, possibly
« Last post by 40hz on July 23, 2010, 05:15 PM »
Hopefully, just this once, a patent will be so airtight that nobody will be allowed to copy it.  :P
8888
General Software Discussion / Re: Quark Xpress
« Last post by 40hz on July 23, 2010, 05:10 PM »
Quark Xpress can handle any print design and production job you can throw at it. It is one of the two publishing apps used by most professional designers, publishers, and print shops. The other app is Adobe InDesign.

Arguments about which is better mostly boil down to little more than personal preference and "upbringing" - and make about as much sense as arguments over whether a Ferrari is "better" than a Maserati. Either app is an excellent choice.

If you already own Quark, use Quark. :Thmbsup:

 
8889
^im guessing you've been there too?  ;D
8890
^ yes it is.

I have never been able to get that name straight.  :-[

Thx for pointing it out. :Thmbsup:
8891
+1 for Softperfect Softmaker (see next comment) Office if you need easy no-brainer file compatibility or a decent spreadsheet alternative. If you just need wordprocessing there are several very good alternatives available that won't require you to get involved with heavy horses such as OpenOffice or Symphony.

I personally think Microsoft's move to discontinue upgrade pricing is yet another example of the recent trend of lowering customer expectations some big companies are starting to engage in. The new message (data caps, no free anything anymore, usage restrictions, gag clauses) is: Don't expect too much - and be grateful for what you do get.

It's worked for banks for years. And it depends on the power of inertia. Basically you make it such a real or imagined hassle to switch what you're using that the average person won't. That's why people very reluctantly change banks no matter how expensive the fees or how shoddy their service. It's also why all the perks and deals are only offered to new customers.

Sad state of affairs.

And these same American businesses wonder why the rest of the world is starting to look elsewhere?

      

 

8892
Let those authorities know, that laptop contains a) childporn b) highly confidential material about government etc... and voila, that laptop is being recovered in no time at all...

Not really. If you admit that your own laptop has illegal information (especially of that caliber) on it, they probably don't need the laptop as proof. Your own admission of guilt should be enough for them to arrest you.


Even if it doesn't, it's still illegal in most places to file a false police report. Most jurisdictions would consider any embroidery or embellishment of a stolen laptop report a falsification. In CT, filing trumped up charges can result in a fine - or even get you some 'slam time' if a judge gets really pissed off about it.

If you're insured, letting your insurance company know you have the whereabouts of your laptop and the police are refusing to get involved might get some action however.

The biggest problem the police have is getting a search warrant. Because it's possible to spoof IPs, some judges are reluctant to grant a warrant with nothing other than an unofficial source (i.e. you) providing the location. Cops also hate requesting a warrant unless they're extremely sure it will net something. Searching a place and coming up empty handed makes them look silly and exposes them to harassment complaints. Then there's also the problem with how much stolen merchandise is either acquired or handled by gangs. While most US police departments aren't adverse to showing the badge and drawing firearms when the situation warrants, risking a full scale confrontation over a $1000 laptop doesn't quite qualify as being worth the possible risk of life. And anytime the police engage in an arrest attempt there's always the potential for someone getting shot.

Frustrating as it can be (been there so I know), the sad fact is (barring extenuating circumstances) laptop theft is just too 'small potatoes' a crime for most police departments to get lathered up about.    
8893
Sites whose writing "style" I admire regardless of my opinion about their content.

In no particular order:

http://linuxlock.blogspot.com

http://www.alistapart.com

http://www.shirky.com

http://www.quietearth.us

http://cheaphealthygood.blogspot.com

http://www.seriouseats.com

Cheap Healthy Good has a particularly nice personal style I wish I could emulate.

Ditto for Serious Eats. More hip and occasionally critical in tone - but never obnoxiously so. 




8894
Nothing vague or inspirational in what I wrote AFAICT.

Keep it personal and write to specific imaginary target reader 
Don't overrefine or edit what you're trying to say.
Get an outside opinion before you diss what you've written.
Let your article age for a while before you say it's done.
Forget about writing the perfect article and shoot for writing a very good one.

If you're looking for something to emulate, that's a different story.

Good article styles can be found everywhere on the web. If you have a site whose tone and style you admire, just dissect what they're doing and copy or adapt as needed.

I've got close to 100 books on writing technique. As far as I can see, there's no magic formula for writing anything. The best you can do is avoid the more obvious mistakes these books will steer you around.

Best book on essay type writing  is Sin Boldly by Dr. Dave.

Here's the TOC:
http://www.sinboldly.com/toc/

if you can get past his occasional nods towards "PC" there's a good deal if specific advice there. I personally thought some earlier editions were better (as in less preachy) but it's all still good stuff.   Grab a coffee and skim it next time you're in a bookstore to see if it might be the ticket.

For general writing, I think the single best book on how to nail an idea down is Save the Cat by the late and sorely missed Blake Snyder. Although it's ostensibly about screenwriting, his approach to nailing down a story can be applied to anything. I had a friend use some if it to develop a political speech and also choreograph a presentation.

Yet another book to preview next time you're in B&N. 

Well...that's it from me since I'm seeing double trying to type this on a phone. 'Scuze any missed typos for the same reason.

Luck.  :Thmbsup:     
 
8895
^very good point.  If the big players have their way it will all go over to web-basedor subscription business models. You can already see it with 90% if the new startups. As far as most tech businesses are concerned, the era of "open" anything along with non-proprietary "standards" is over and done with. 

Thank goodness there's at least the BSD/Linux alternative if you still want locally installed apps and ownership of your desktop.
 8)
 
8896
Hey! Maybe you're being too hard on yourself? Maybe you could share something you've written for your blog either here in the forum - or via a PM and get some outside perspective?

I had a real problem a few years back not being able to finish anything I was writing. I basically hated everything I was doing. And the more I revised, the worse it seemed to get. Talk about a major erosion of self confidence. I was about one half step short of being completely "blocked" as the saying goes.

Finally, my GF asked to see some of my screeds. Turns out she amost always thought my earliest drafts were very well-written and 'read' just fine. But she also noticed that the more I futzed with something, the more it seemed to get awkward, start hedging, and ultimately lose its focus. Kinda like pie dough. You have to knead it to get a nice flaky crust. But if you knead it too much, it becomes greasy and tough. So the real secret to making a terrific pie is knowing when to stop kneading the dough.

As far as 'style' went, she felt my absolute best articles always seemed to read like they were personal letters to a very smart friend who I was excited about sharing something with. Don't know if you'd call that a 'writing style' per se, but that's pretty much how I write everything today. Most of the people who say they read my stuff seem to like it just fine.

Eventually, I learned the technique that worked best for me was to write fairly quickly and restrict the number of back-to-back edits and rewrites to a few as humanly possible. Basically, once the grammar and spelling were correct I'd call it a day after a quick buff & shine. Then I'd let it sit for a few days (or weeks) and give it a reread just in case I missed something, totally blew the structure, thought of something clever to add - or completely changed my mind about what I had previously written. Don't laugh! That last one has happened to me on more than one occasion. :redface:

Anyway, it seems I can write once again now that I don't try to write a doctoral dissertation or compose a literary masterpiece every time I launch WriteMonkey or MSWord.

Writing quickly, in a personal letter style, with minimal revisions seemed to work the charm for me.

Seeking perfection can easily become a trap for many well meaning people who are only trying to accomplish some good in their lifetime.

Old I Ching saying: When a single larger vessel is not at hand for making sacrifice to the gods - two smaller vessels will do.

 :Thmbsup:



8897
I will have absolutely zero sympathy for any individual, organization, or business that takes Microsoft up on it and gets burned security-wise down the road.

Everybody bitched about the intrinsic security flaws in XP. Microsoft improved matters and now people are still dragging their feet about switching to Win7 - even if it means buying all their new machines with 7 and 'downgrading' them.

I can understand not wanting to replace an entire PC farm, or have to upgrade one's entire inventory of old hardware to make it work acceptably with the 'new' Windows. But with new PCs shipping with nothing but as their standard build it's high time for whoever plans on sticking with Microsoft to start seriously considering "gettin' with the program" come their next new machine.

(Note: the following is more a comment about and to the people that provide tech support for a living like I do.)

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I know. Switching over does entail some training and support issues and cost. I know because I straddle the fence providing support for XP and Win7. But from what I've seen, the average user catches onto Windows 7 and the new Office suite pretty quickly. So most of the arguments being advanced for taking a "wait and see" attitude are more a case of our fellow ITers doing a CYA move. That or just being lazy IMHO.

And yes...rolling out Win7/Office2k10 is a royal PITA from an IT support perspective. But we shoukl also try to remember it's exactly that sort of thing we (supposedly) get paid to help people out with.

Just my 2ยข  ;) :)



8898
General Software Discussion / Re: weather.com
« Last post by 40hz on July 19, 2010, 10:00 PM »
^What actually happens is we get called by their systems boss when he's in over his head. We tell him what to do and he takes the credit for figuring it all out. And as long as the bill gets paid I have no problem with that.

According to Gerry Weinberg there's no limit to how much influence you can have - or how much money you can make as a consultant - so long as you don't care who ultimately gets credit for the solution. In short, you can have fame or "money and influence" - but not both at the same time with any single client.  

I've found that to be pretty much the case in my work.  8)  
8899
Living Room / Re: Testing the internet "kill" switch
« Last post by 40hz on July 19, 2010, 09:50 PM »
Not a problem. Some of what Uncle Sam is getting up to lately is pretty scary. But the only way the real critics and reform advocates can have any hope of maintaing their public credibility is if they don't fall for straw men or go tilting at windmills. The so-called "kill switch" isn't a real threat to anyone for a lot of reasons. Allowing it to distract people from real issues such as ACTA or the recent trend of allowing private companies to semi-direct public policies and (apparently) some government enforcement actions is a far more serious threat to public freedoms.

Just my tuppence anyway.  ;D 8)   
8900
General Software Discussion / Re: weather.com
« Last post by 40hz on July 19, 2010, 08:33 PM »
@wraith808-

Bingo. This particular client's WAP is locked down so tightly (and excessively IMHO) that it's almost useless. Been a while since I dealt with a school. Forgot how paranoid net admins get in that environment.

Too bad I don't have anything to do with the wireless part of their network. Oh well. Somebody obviously got them to drink the "web is a dangerous place" koolaid.


:Thmbsup:
 
Pages: prev1 ... 351 352 353 354 355 [356] 357 358 359 360 361 ... 470next