topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday June 26, 2025, 3:00 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 ... 106next
876
Living Room / Re: Hosting in the UK
« Last post by JavaJones on January 26, 2011, 12:46 PM »
The most important question is what level and type of hosting are you looking for, basic "shared" hosting, VPS, dedicated server (managed or unmanaged)?

- Oshyan
877
Developer's Corner / Re: Safe programs for File Recovery
« Last post by JavaJones on January 26, 2011, 12:41 PM »
R-Studio is pretty hardcore and should probably be on your list.

- Oshyan
878
General Software Discussion / Re: Simple Photo Resizer - Please Give Feedback
« Last post by JavaJones on January 26, 2011, 12:35 PM »
Honestly there are far too many yahoos out there who would just use max quality because they think it's always better, and there are too many over-large images around as it is. So I'm in favor of the fixed 80% quality.

What resampling algorithm are you using? I haven't tested your app, and the results you've posted above look fine, so I'm sure you're using something decent. But algorithm used in a downsample can have as much effect on the look of the output as the JPG compression ratio. Usually Lanczos is the safest bet, but Bicubic (sharper) or even Bilinear give acceptable results.

- Oshyan
879
General Software Discussion / Re: LibreOffice UI Mockups (with sidebar)
« Last post by JavaJones on January 26, 2011, 12:23 PM »
If this signals accelerated dev for the OOo code base (obviously now under the banner of LibreOffice) then I'm thrilled. I've always seen OOo as having tremendous potential but development seemed rather slow considering how much dev and corporate support their was behind the thing. So far LibreOffice seems to have made more improvements faster than OOo ever did, which is promising. I have yet to test it, I think I'll wait for the next major release, but I'm glad this is happening, not just because it was necessitated by the Oracle buy-out, but because OOo was stagnating a bit anyway.

- Oshyan
880
Finished Programs / Re: IDEA: Drop target to move files to predefined folders
« Last post by JavaJones on January 25, 2011, 04:45 PM »
Couldn't you just make shortcuts to each folder and drag and drop onto them? (yes I tested this, just now :D)

- Oshyan
881
Another interested related app I just read about today:
http://alacritypc.kensalter.com/
Haven't tested.

- Oshyan
882
Living Room / Re: I need advice: which laptop to buy?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 25, 2011, 01:06 PM »
Funny, I like the "joystick"/nubbin pointer on Thinkpads. Always have. I'm out of practice with them, but when I used one regularly I much preferred it to a touch pad. Regardless of my opinion they're still shipping them so I must not be the only one who likes them. ;)

By the way I did end up buying the Lenovo. Should be here Thursday. Woo!

- Oshyan
883
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: Itching to code apps
« Last post by JavaJones on January 22, 2011, 07:56 PM »
Yeah, there are lots of systems that would probably work, and perhaps work better than Redmine. I just liked how easily things could be "promoted" from ideas to fully tracked projects with Redmine. Redmine is actually pretty friendly for a bug tracker too. :D I think with a little tuning, an "ideas" project could be stripped down to be pretty simple and easy to use.

- Oshyan
884
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: Itching to code apps
« Last post by JavaJones on January 22, 2011, 01:04 PM »
Yes, exactly. What I meant when I said "tagged with NANY as appropriate" was that only NANY-related suggestions would be tagged that way, but there would be many more ideas, and even the NANY-tagged ones would still be a part of the greater idea bank.

- Oshyan
885
Living Room / Re: Google? Spam? Ads? No... No Conflict of Interest Here...
« Last post by JavaJones on January 22, 2011, 01:02 PM »
One of the things I need to find is technical info on various laptops.

Try find a manual or upgrade information for a Dell or Toshiba laptop (or any other laptop manufacturer).

I chose those two because they both publish information about their computers beyond the usual user manual (including service manuals).

The results of any search you make in Google ALWAYS come up with the same websites trying to sell freely available stolen information - and often they don't actually have the information you need on the page you are looking at - it is just spam filler to get a result from the search engine.

Conspicuous by their absence are the manufacturer's websites.

Why is that google NEVER EVER points you at a manufacturer's web site in the top ten results even when you put that manufacturer's name as the first search item - and doesn't even do a particuarly good job when you use site:.... to sepcify the site to search manually.

I think advertising and incompetence are rapidly making google's results unusable.

One simple innovation would be to have a thumbs up and a thumbs down link in the search results page for each link so that rubbish can easily be reported*. Bad sites could quickly be identified - and maybe they could then ban those people from the Google Ads system too - oh but that would affect the bottom line so there is no chance of that happening!

* Yes I know this could be abused but there could be safeguards introduced.

I'm curious if you have any better luck with Bing, or even Yippy, DuckDuckGo or other alternative search engines. I guess my question would be, is this a problem unique to Google, or is it a problem of modern search systems on the Internet as a whole?

As for Paypal-like authentication schemes, it becomes a question of privacy and anonymity online. This is a subject I am somewhat no the fence about because spam, malware, etc. do a lot of harm and a fully authenticated and known-identity Internet system would solve a lot of that, but at the same time the Internet is a tremendous tool for the oppressed to gain a voice, and that can only happen when anonymity is possible. Granted Google don't have to be the ones providing it, but it should be available I think. It's a hard question, but I don't think stronger authentication for Google account signup is necessarily the answer. Maybe one could sign up for a Gmail account free, but then using more services like search engine result tuning (that would be incorporated into their rankings, as you say) would require further authentication. That way people can sign up for Gmail accounts easily, but not as easily game the results.

- Oshyan
886
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: Itching to code apps
« Last post by JavaJones on January 21, 2011, 11:59 PM »
Maybe we should bring unused ideas forward? They tend to get lost once the year goes past...

Agreed! I've always wanted a more dedicated "idea bank" area where requests/ideas could be submitted (maybe tagged with "NANY" as appropriate) and stick around persistently, be searchable, etc. If it were done with our existing Redmine system, ideas could even be easily spun out into their own projects, publicly track "percentage complete", that sort of thing. Though that would probably be overkill for most "coding snack" type things.

- Oshyan
887
When I looked into it a year or so ago there were of course several test-case problem files provided with various test result pages, but also I found a few of my own test cases. I can see if I can dig them up now, but I honestly am not sure where they are...

I have a long-term web project in my mind to setup a site that would be explicitly designed to allow sophisticated comparison of these types of things...

- Oshyan
888
Living Room / Re: I need advice: which laptop to buy?
« Last post by JavaJones on January 21, 2011, 05:08 PM »
I am so close to buying that Lenovo I linked to above...

- Oshyan
889
I am super excited about the option to pick demosaicing algorithms. Truth be told I seldom *need* this feature, but I've had call for it often enough in the past that other editors have frustrated me for their lack of choice. I'm not going to use RAW Therapee as a pre-processor, adding yet another to my workflow, unless I absolutely have to. It's also surprising how mediocre or even bad some high-end apps' algorithms are.

I haven't looked at the results from different algorithms and apps for some time, but about a year back I dug pretty deeply into it. Unfortunately I don't recall what my favorites were or I'd make some suggestions. But I'm a big fan of options, so the more (good ones) you can put in there, the better IMO.

- Oshyan
890
Excellent, tooltips working great. Thanks for the quick fix!

- Oshyan
891
Good to know it's not ready for prime time. I suspected as much. Hopefully they continue developing and polishing it. I must say I found their own forums a bit awkward even, just trying to look through them for examples and support stuff.

- Oshyan
892
Sorry Renegade, you fail. : DAny time someone paints the GUI approach with retarded hyperbolic and imaginary difficulties ("Figure out WTF the cursor is on the screen", seriously?), I know they're trying to make the commandline look better than it is. Don't get me wrong, I *am* a believer in the commandline, and it works great for some things, even many things, but you're not doing your argument any favors by making such a biased "comparison". GUIs also work well, and an experienced person working with a well designed GUI vs. an experienced person with a commandline might be a wash as far as speed goes. Perhaps you've just never seen a GUI wiz which, like a commandline wiz, is pretty amazing to watch. Sometimes I even get into a "zone" where I can just whiz around an app like lightning (like say when I'm very familiar with it and know exactly what I want to accomplish).

The real secret, and the reason all the input wars are retarded, is that the fastest is a combination of both! :D

- Oshyan
893
Living Room / Re: Post Your Funny Videos Here [NSFW]
« Last post by JavaJones on January 19, 2011, 05:39 PM »
Hehe, you're welcome. I had to share, it about had me guffawing at work. :D

- Oshyan
894
Thanks, great support. I run Win7 at home, it's just here in the office where we have XP on a number of machines still. I'll test on 7 tonight to confirm.

- Oshyan
895
I don't get any tooltips at all. Must be a bug. I'm running Windows XP with the "classic" theme. I find that can cause problems with some apps at times. Are you using a GUI framework of any kind, or custom-built?

- Oshyan
896
Congrats on getting this out! I'm playing with it for the first time now as I didn't have time to do so with the pre-release. Looking good overall. I can see some areas that need a little polish (or maybe just aren't working quite right?) like tooltips for all the various buttons so I know what they do. But in general I find your approach to e.g. color and exposure correction to be one of the best I've found. Nice work.

One other little niggle: the installer is pretty clunky! Changing path, for example, doesn't allow me to tell it not to install itself in a "19th parallel" subfolder in both the Program Files and Start Menu, both of which are pet peeves of mine, hehe. The installer itself also looks rather outdated. Not sure if that's just because it's been put together quickly, or if you really are using an older or self-built installer. If the latter is the case I highly recommend switching to a more modern and standardized installer like InnoSetup or NSIS (both free).

Congrats again and great work. :)

- Oshyan
897
Joe Wilcox over at Betanews has some concerns about this deal, heh:
http://www.betanews....uy-for-10/1295460604
Nothing surprising mind you, just the usual concerns of yet another company having your email address.

- Oshyan
898
There are some wikis that do natively support WYSIWYG. But MediaWiki being one of the most popular and not supporting it (natively) does mean that most of the wikis one comes across do not have full or even partial WYSIWYG support. There are plugins for MW that handle it, but as far as I know none of the actual wiki syntax based ones are complete yet, they're all still in some stage of development and not necessarily recommended for production use. The HTML-based ones like TinyMCE and the like do work, but they don't maintain the compatibility and portability of wiki syntax (considering compatibility/portability with other wiki systems at least). I don't know if there are issues with differencing, etc. when using the WYSIWYG editors.

Anyway I agree, ideally speaking wiki should not be synonymous with hard to use or obscure formatting.

- Oshyan
899
I'm not a huge fan of wiki syntax either, but I believe it makes it easier to handle history and difference checking, among other things. Once I started using Redmine I liked the other parts of the system enough that I actually learned basic wiki syntax and it's really not too bad, though I once had the same reaction as you (hate it!). Systems that at least have formatting toolbars and format references (like Redmine) are definitely preferable to me still though.

- Oshyan
900
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Image viewer speed benchmark
« Last post by JavaJones on January 19, 2011, 12:15 PM »
Very interesting tests! Surprising that ACDSee is so high and IrfanView so low. FastStone result is also a bit surprising. I'm actually an XnView fan and I find it "fast enough", but I know it's not the fastest.

- Oshyan
Pages: prev1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 ... 106next