876
N.A.N.Y. 2015 / Re: NANY PRE-RELEASE: Dedicated Windows client for Slack
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on March 20, 2015, 10:07 AM »Ah crap yeah, forgot the file was on my old domain...gimme a min and I will drop a link here.
Recent Posts
This looks beyond awesome!...We are just talking about that in #donationcoder-Stephen66515 (February 02, 2015, 04:57 PM)
Cool! - I'll cross reference it in my OP above and direct people there to keep it all in one place.-40hz (February 02, 2015, 07:14 PM)
Sorry if I wasn't clear on that haha 
Certain *seedier* parts of the internet use MPC a lot for this.-superboyac (January 29, 2015, 04:42 PM)
HIV-1 gp120-treated vaginal epithelial cells show downregulation of caspase 8 (CASP8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase) expression as compared to untreated control
For posterity:
(see attachment in previous post)
(... and they both have an '841 at the end?)-tomos (January 16, 2015, 05:46 PM)
In other words, while I'm sure there are some men who would do such a thing no matter the cost, I think most men would only do it to restore some semblance of normalcy if e.g., some accident/injury/birth defect caused them to lose their penis.-Deozaan (January 16, 2015, 01:16 PM)
Or - much like in the woman's case - feelings of inadequacy compelled them to want more.
Woman: Guys wont look at me because flat chested.
Man: I can't get any dates because I'm hung like a pinky.
Does either make any sense in reality? No. But they're both still sales opportunities..-Stoic Joker (January 16, 2015, 02:04 PM)
This is a valid point, but I still feel it's not perfectly analogous. The size/sensitivity of women's breasts isn't quite as directly related to their sexual utility. Breast size is (generally) more for the man's enjoyment. If what she cares about is turning on her man, then reduced sensitivity/feeling in her breasts generally doesn't really affect her enjoyment of sex.
Whereas the size of a man's penis may be related to both the man and the woman's enjoyment (though too large can be painful/troublesome for some women). But the sensitivity is definitely related to the sexual utility! He might not be able to even use it for sex at all if he's got no feeling in it.-Deozaan (January 16, 2015, 05:09 PM)
i love this thread. thanks stephen!!-superboyac (January 16, 2015, 04:59 PM)
PS - as an afterthought, check out this thread.-CWuestefeld (January 12, 2015, 10:54 AM)-bit (January 13, 2015, 10:14 PM)
You're making a habit of starting 'basement-style' threads Stephen :p-tomos (January 13, 2015, 09:11 AM)
... and not starting them in the basement...-wraith808 (January 13, 2015, 09:38 AM)
Yeah. And here I thought it was just me that seemed to be seeing it working way.
-40hz (January 13, 2015, 12:53 PM)
Let's follow the logical outcome:
If the government can read it --> so can the terrorists --> and so can other unfriendly governments --> and if encryption is banned, then the government can't use encryption either --> so state secrets won't be very secret.
Yep. This is definitely for "homeland security" and the children!-Deozaan (January 13, 2015, 12:28 PM)
