876
Living Room / Re: Raspberry Pi 2 Model B on sale now. Lots more for the same $35
« Last post by KynloStephen66515 on February 02, 2015, 04:57 PM »This looks beyond awesome!...We are just talking about that in #donationcoder
Recent Posts
Certain *seedier* parts of the internet use MPC a lot for this.-superboyac (January 29, 2015, 04:42 PM)
HIV-1 gp120-treated vaginal epithelial cells show downregulation of caspase 8 (CASP8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase) expression as compared to untreated control
For posterity:
(see attachment in previous post)
(... and they both have an '841 at the end?)-tomos (January 16, 2015, 05:46 PM)
In other words, while I'm sure there are some men who would do such a thing no matter the cost, I think most men would only do it to restore some semblance of normalcy if e.g., some accident/injury/birth defect caused them to lose their penis.-Deozaan (January 16, 2015, 01:16 PM)
Or - much like in the woman's case - feelings of inadequacy compelled them to want more.
Woman: Guys wont look at me because flat chested.
Man: I can't get any dates because I'm hung like a pinky.
Does either make any sense in reality? No. But they're both still sales opportunities..-Stoic Joker (January 16, 2015, 02:04 PM)
This is a valid point, but I still feel it's not perfectly analogous. The size/sensitivity of women's breasts isn't quite as directly related to their sexual utility. Breast size is (generally) more for the man's enjoyment. If what she cares about is turning on her man, then reduced sensitivity/feeling in her breasts generally doesn't really affect her enjoyment of sex.
Whereas the size of a man's penis may be related to both the man and the woman's enjoyment (though too large can be painful/troublesome for some women). But the sensitivity is definitely related to the sexual utility! He might not be able to even use it for sex at all if he's got no feeling in it.-Deozaan (January 16, 2015, 05:09 PM)
i love this thread. thanks stephen!!-superboyac (January 16, 2015, 04:59 PM)
PS - as an afterthought, check out this thread.-CWuestefeld (January 12, 2015, 10:54 AM)-bit (January 13, 2015, 10:14 PM)
You're making a habit of starting 'basement-style' threads Stephen :p-tomos (January 13, 2015, 09:11 AM)
... and not starting them in the basement...-wraith808 (January 13, 2015, 09:38 AM)
Yeah. And here I thought it was just me that seemed to be seeing it working way.
-40hz (January 13, 2015, 12:53 PM)
Let's follow the logical outcome:
If the government can read it --> so can the terrorists --> and so can other unfriendly governments --> and if encryption is banned, then the government can't use encryption either --> so state secrets won't be very secret.
Yep. This is definitely for "homeland security" and the children!-Deozaan (January 13, 2015, 12:28 PM)
You're making a habit of starting 'basement-style' threads Stephen :p-tomos (January 13, 2015, 09:11 AM)
You're making a habit of starting 'basement-style' threads Stephen :p-tomos (January 13, 2015, 09:11 AM)
... and not starting them in the basement...-wraith808 (January 13, 2015, 09:38 AM)
In wake of Paris shootings, Prime Minister wants to ban encryptions that government can't read in extreme situations
David Cameron could block WhatsApp and Snapchat if he wins the next election, as part of his plans for new surveillance powers announced in the wake of the shootings in Paris.
The Prime Minister said today that he would stop the use of methods of communication that cannot be read by the security services even if they have a warrant. But that could include popular chat and social apps that encrypt their data, such as WhatsApp.
Apple's iMessage and FaceTime also encrypt their data, and could fall under the ban along with other encrypted chat apps like Telegram.
The comments came as part of David Cameron's pledge to revive the “snoopers’ charter” to help security services spy on internet communications today.
He said: “In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people which […] we cannot read?” He made the connection between encrypted communications tools and letters and phone conversations, both of which can be read by security services in extreme situations and with a warrant from the home secretary.
But companies such as WhatsApp have remained committed to keeping their services encrypted and unable to be read by authorities, a project which has stepped up in the wake of the Edward Snowden’s revelations on NSA surveillance.
RE: Beware of Freeware downloads
The title of this post is exactly what freeware authors fear -- that our software will get a bad reputation because of some bad sites.
The lesson is not to beware freeware -- it's to beware these third party download sites.
ALWAYS go to the source, the author of the software, to find the download. NEVER trust a third party source unless it is directly linked from the author's web page.-mouser (January 12, 2015, 11:00 AM)
The problem with this for the average user is Chrome. Not sure if FF/IE do this also, i.e. this file is not one that (we think is) downloaded commonly, so you shouldn't download it.
*sigh*-wraith808 (January 12, 2015, 11:14 AM)
DC should become a freeware download site-rgdot (January 12, 2015, 11:20 AM)
RE: Beware of Freeware downloads
The title of this post is exactly what freeware authors fear -- that our software will get a bad reputation because of some bad sites.
The lesson is not to beware freeware -- it's to beware these third party download sites.
ALWAYS go to the source, the author of the software, to find the download. NEVER trust a third party source unless it is directly linked from the author's web page.-mouser (January 12, 2015, 11:00 AM)
