topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 25, 2025, 8:05 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 ... 42next
851
Yeah, I figured it could, but it could be much easier.  Once you told me where to look, I tried it about 5 times and only succeeded once.  Every other time, it kept trying to capture "object" which was an automated region choice.  Very cool, but not what I was trying to do.  Never the less, thank you for telling me where to look.  :Thmbsup:

EDIT, never mind.  It is late.  I was holding ctrl+click instead of ctrl+shift+click.  Good night.
852
I don't think that would be so useful - after all CamStudio does that really well and is freeware.

What would be fantastic would be something similar only for creating animated gifs.

Typical application I've got in mind: for adding in to html help documents to illustrate a short simple process. Animated gifs are ideal for this as they use next to no memory and don't rely on the user having the right swf or avi player.

I agree with the animated gifs.  There are a few fair to decent gif animators out there, but I think it would be much easier to do it straight from a screen capture, rather than capturing, cropping, setting, then uploading the gifs individually.  Then compressing them all into a single animated gif.  What a bunch of steps.  If this could be streamlined, it would be a great addition.

One other great addition would be a way (or an easier way if I just haven't figured out how yet) to capture an entire web page, instead of just what is onscreen.  I know SnagIt recently added that feature and I think it would be very useful indeed.  Of course I say that not even sure that screenshotcaptor doesn't already, so how much do I really use that feature. ;D :-\
853
I have found that the problem isn't in the burning, etc.; but rather in the autorun part.  Getting it to startup what you want and to get things working properly always seemed to be problematic.  Most programs like this I found either were woefully undercapable, or expensive.  Though I will admit I haven't tried many of the ones others have listed.  I have found a good workaround, though, in AutoRunPro.  It basically starts up, then reads an INI file that then starts any program you list.  Want it start a custom splash screen?  Just make the JPEG (or whatever) and tell it to open that splashscreen.  Want a custom menu?  Create a script or batch file for it and run it.  I am now using it on my USB drive so I can do several things (if I can just get it all to work together  :mad: ).  Once I get it together I will post about it, but not here (no hijack this time  :P ) and not now, since I am not done.
854
Official Announcements / Re: No August 2007 Discounts
« Last post by steeladept on August 10, 2007, 09:34 AM »
Because of your good spirited nature you must not have noticed that I actually addressed mouser in my post.

Otherwise I am sure you would have noted that I am most definitely going crazy and the DonationCoder forums are out to get me.

Personally, I noticed that, but I still thought the second... ;D
855
Living Room / Re: new PC options:-
« Last post by steeladept on August 05, 2007, 06:07 PM »
Given those specs, I would go with the Kensington you are talking about.  It is good RAM and it is fairly fast (at 667 MHz speed) for your motherboard.  Though I do have to say, you probably couldn't go wrong with either choice, so if cost is an issue, go with the cheaper of the two.

Lashiec - I could be wrong, but I think the difference in price can be defined by the speeds it runs at (533 vs. 667 MHz).  The faster speed means the bus can run faster and, all other things being the same, faster overall functioning.  Now I am not saying you would ever notice the difference, but...
856
General Software Discussion / Re: WYFCA?
« Last post by steeladept on August 05, 2007, 04:26 PM »
By that statement I must have a LOT of PICNICs  ;D ;D ;D ;D
857
No, no.  I like this better, just wasn't ready for that much change. :D
858
Wow.  Very different interface now.  Okay, maybe not VERY different, but I was looking around for the buttons at the bottom and they aren't there anymore.  When I stopped ignoring the pictures at the top (which is a nice addition by the way), I noticed that they were more than eye candy :P.  Very nice addition.  :Thmbsup:
859
Living Room / Re: new PC options:-
« Last post by steeladept on August 05, 2007, 08:17 AM »
The key I have found about memory is (for the average user) to make sure you 1) used matched sets (2x1GB for 2GB of memory, for example), and 2) that you use the correct standard (PC2-6800 for example).  Since these are standard interfaces, the memory for that standard should be compatible.  If it isn't, it is a problem with the memory, not the standard.  My experience is - unless you are making a cutting edge gaming system - OCZ and some of the higher lines of memory are expensive overkill.  These memory chips are aimed at this market, and while they uniformly are great memory chips in their own right, they are designed to be stable during overclocking and have particularly low CAS latency settings.  If these are not too important to you (and for most people it isn't), I suggest a value line such as the Corsair Value.  These are great sticks of memory for normal useage (even for most modern games), and are a lot cheaper.  Lastly, I suggest two other related things.  1) Get the memory from a reputable dealer that will take it back if there is some sort of problem.  2) Stick with brand name memory - Corsair, PNY, OCZ, Patriot, Kensington, etc.  They all tend to have really good quality controls that provide good kits by and large.
860
General Software Discussion / Re: U3 Portable Smart Drives pros and cons
« Last post by steeladept on August 03, 2007, 03:56 PM »
Another thread revival :huh:

I just bought a Lexar Lightning drive.  It came with a PortableApps like program called PowerToGo.  Has anyone worked with this?  How does it compare?  It looks promising, but many of the apps look like they are somewhat dated.  However, some look like this is the only way they are available.  I haven't looked into it much yet, but I thought I would throw it out there as I am starting to look towards running applications from the drive now that it is big enough and fast enough to be useful.
861
Living Room / Re: Article: A Woman's Primer for Building Her Own Computer
« Last post by steeladept on August 03, 2007, 03:25 PM »
EDIT:  WARNING - As usual for me, a much longer than expected response....END WARNING....

As someone who does this type of thing every day, I too will side with mouser on the price.  I find Dell, HP, etc. quite a bit more expensive - usually due to warranty and support offerings that smaller integrators don't provide (though they do tend to offer more personalized experiences that allow for similar effects).  Comparing my Newegg purchases and build with a local computer shop came up with prices about the same with more "risk" associated with it.  The "risk" I speak of is in the area of incompatibilities.  However, my experiences also point to 99% of those inocompatibilities stemming from a few avoidable sources.  1) Not doing the research.  If the equipment is not brand new to the market or VERY niche, then there is almost always a good base of compatibility testing available.  Check forums and such to find if there is anyone who has had issues with it in the past.  If you don't find ANYTHING about it, it is likely okay.  That leads to 2) Don't buy anything so new to the market that no one has tested it yet.  This seems like a no brainer, but if you do buy it, you are in for headaches.  Which leads to 3) If you buy it anyway, look for firmware updates.  Firmware updates frequently fix incompatibilities with the hardware.  As the system matures, the firmware makes the hardware work nicely with other hardware. 

I learned this lesson the hard way on my first system.  I bought a new motherboard that looked great on paper (specs).  I shortlisted several video cards and found one was by the same maker as the motherboard.  Among other reasons, I chose that video card because of the likely compatibility from the same manufacturer.  Can anyone say microsoft compatibility testing? Needless to say, the motherboard was bleeding edge.  I started it up several times before I went back to the old PC to look up the website.  It was sparse, but I found WinXP pre-install drivers (who knew I needed those  :P) and more importantly, the firmware update - 4 versions newer.  With those pieces of software installed, WinXP worked like a champ.  Within 2 months, 3 newer versions came out to allow all my SATA drive connectors to work.  Apparently there was a bug in the second SATA chipset that was onboard.  Good thing I didn't try using that ;).  Anyway, I learned from this experience and my work experiences what I stated above.  If you like the bleeding edge, be prepared for that.  If not, just stick with popular hardware that meets your specifications, and do your research.

Oh, and on the article - they are right about the simplicity of it all.  It is the research to ensure compatibility that is a pain.  Once you know the system will work together, the actual construction is a breeze.  Also mouser, there is a second reason to build your own.  So you can match the specs to your needs.  Of course a local computer store that will actually listen to you could do so too, but they usually don't listen because the brands and models your research provided for you to specify are not their standard offerings...
862
I can't seem to find it now, but I thought Firefox had an SMS plugin that would do this, if Firefox is, indeed, and option.
863
Living Room / Re: 10 Tips for Razor Sharp Concentration
« Last post by steeladept on July 30, 2007, 01:48 PM »
Unfortunately, too many jobs are like mine where you are not afforded the opportunity.  "You have to be flexible" or "Priorities change" are all too common of an excuse, yet when productivity drops, heaven forbid you actually bring these ideas to light... >:(

What I would find much more useful would be something like this that tells you how to deal with it when you AREN'T in control of these types of variable.  (At home with kids, at work with the boss, when your primary work is with the telephone but you need to do other concentration tasks, etc.)
864
Living Room / Re: Build a $250 PC That Doesn’t Suck
« Last post by steeladept on July 30, 2007, 01:29 PM »
38 weeks?  You are home free then.  Even if the baby came today, it would be considered at term by most doctors.  Wait, it didn't already come, did it?  :P Good luck.
865
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by steeladept on July 30, 2007, 01:05 PM »
Actually, unlike most people (apparently), I don't mind the rotating banners.  They remind me of the other software that is out there that I might need to try.  So far I have gotten past AlZip and started using AlShow and AlFTP because of that.  I will probably use AlSong once I get my music "server" up and running again, just to try it out as well.  I always liked the autoDJ feature in MusicMatch, but it got so bloated that I went back to version 6 where I first found it until I can find a good player that will provide this feature (and auto-leveling to ripped music).  These are the two features that I used the most when I was setting up the server several years ago.  Hmmm...Something else to look into  :D

Anyway, great software.  Keep it up.
866
Living Room / Re: I have to confess
« Last post by steeladept on July 30, 2007, 12:53 PM »
Wow!  Seems so weird to hear such good news about a company.  Especially regarding phone support.  My experiences here in the U.S.A. have yet to yield a provider that has ANY decent service unless it is an independent, in which case it is neigh impossible to find good bandwidth.  It sounds like IDNet should setup shop in the U.S.A., they would make a killing if they are anywhere near reasonably priced with the competition.
867
Hi justice.  I have been lurking around several posts like this as I am not a developer (though I am trying to learn to be one ;) ).  However, I do my fair share of (X)HTML and CSS and am learning others.  I have found time and again, for a multitude of these types of issues, a good text editor such as TextPad, NotePad++, et. al. are perfect.  They have keyword highlighting, code block insertions and are easy to do search and replace.  If you are trying to do so over several different files, I find a full blown IDE works better.  Refactoring in Eclipse or NetBeans is pretty trivial when working in Java, and Visual Studio can't be beat using any .Net language.  Others I don't know about, but I would guess they would have similar capabilities.
868
A crash is not insignificant to me. Hey, I'm a developer with an attitude! ;)

This reason alone is a good reason to support your work in my Opinion... :Thmbsup:
869
All I can say is from my experiences at work, but from what I have seen, registry cleaners don't really help much except maybe during startup.  When you have tons of dead links because the software did not uninstall everything (including registry files) the registry tries to find those links.  It takes a while for it to time out and go on, so if you have lots, it takes that much longer.  Short of that, I have never seen a need to clean the registry.

That said, I do so on an infrequent basis and can not remember it ever causing trouble, even with the defaults that so many people seem to have issue with.  The only time I ever have caused myself grief during this is when I told it to clean files it didn't consider safe or was unable to determine.  Safe files have never caused issue for me.

Defragmenting, on the other hand, has caused a wide range of issues, and has solved many problems.  My main experience has been that it is good because it speeds seek times significantly.  I even had a few machines (Win2K if it matters) that were over 98% fragmented when I got them because they would not start up.  After troubleshooting and booting to as a slave, we found them so fragmented that we thought, why not - try defragging them.  We did that and it brought them back to life.  I have heard MANY people say it is a waste of time and that it doesn't do anything, but my experiences tell me otherwise; though it needs to be REALLY bad before it is a problem.

Issues that have come from defragmenting almost always arise from one of two issues.  Either the drive is failing and the sector can not be read, or the defragmenter was stopped in the middle of the process and lost the file links.  Either way the links get lost and everything goes to pot.  However, these issues tend to be rare, and you may be able to recover the data before it is lost permanently if you recognize the problem and deal with it immediately before the data gets overwritten.

My last statement has to do with what constitutes a truly fragmented drive.  I have seen many defragmenters deal with organization in different ways.  What one defragmenter considers defragmented another will consider seriously fragmented.  I don't know which one is correct, and my suspicion is both are, they are just organized differently; but in the end, I think it matters more that the files are organized, and not HOW they are organized.  So to be "badly fragmented", IMO, means that most or all data is unorganized creating excessive reads to the hard drive because it is constantly searching for the next block in an area completely different from the last block.  My guess is that most hard drives rarely get that bad.

Could it be something else that explains my experiences?  Certainly.  However, I have not heard a good explaination of why these occur and what my actions did that could have been done differently to the same effect.
870
Living Room / Re: Build a $250 PC That Doesn’t Suck
« Last post by steeladept on July 29, 2007, 08:51 PM »
I know how that goes.   :-\  My last PC build was two years ago when my first daughter was still 2 months due yet.  However, she was born early due to pregnancy complications, and the only reason I could finish setting it up is because she was in the Neo-natal Intensive Care Unit for a month.  I couldn't really sleep much from the worry, so when we weren't with her or at work, I worked on the PC.  Hope yours goes a bit more smoothly :Thmbsup:
871
Living Room / Re: Build a $250 PC That Doesn’t Suck
« Last post by steeladept on July 28, 2007, 07:26 PM »
Hmm.  I don't ever remember hearing that.  To my knowledge, there hasn't been an issue with it, but that doesn't mean much.  I would guess that it is stated due to a block size issue, but I have only heard of that on hard drives, not in memory.  Of course in hard drives, you can resize the blocks to fit your requirements - within reason.
872
Living Room / Re: Build a $250 PC That Doesn’t Suck
« Last post by steeladept on July 28, 2007, 06:11 PM »
Yes, you can use the old one as long as there is an IDE connection on the Motherboard...There should be, but I didn't go look it up.  My only other comment (and I understand that it depends completely on costs) is that you should consider the memory.  Upgrading from 2 2x512 to 1 2x1GB modules would allow for future expansion without wasting the memory later.  My experience with VMWare and Ubuntu (I do that too already  :Thmbsup: ) is that 2GB memory is the MINIMUM you want so that you can give XP 1.5GB and Ubuntu 512MB memory.  I also found out they both work much better with XP@2GB and Ubuntu@1GB.  Of course that could just be my setup, but going with the 2x1GB would allow for the 2x512 addition (or even another 2x1GB) later without wasting anything.
873
Going back to this thread, it looks as though ALZip does this in version 7, which should be out very soon.
874
General Software Discussion / Re: Web 2.0 Poll
« Last post by steeladept on July 27, 2007, 03:00 PM »
I really do think it is bad, and it isn't anywhere near a reality - YET.  However, I think it is coming and we won't easily be able to avoid it.  There are too many advantages to corporations that build the software, and it takes the PC closer to an appliance - a very complex and flexible one, but appliance none the less.  When you can setup a commodity machine with a generic setup and forget about it, because it just works - that is what most people want out of their machine, and the Web 2.0 idea is another step closer to it.
875
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by steeladept on July 27, 2007, 02:28 PM »
YES, YES, YES....

I am just getting into serious server usage now, and I have used AlZip for quite a while now.  LOVE IT!

WinZip and WinRar just don't do it for me for the cost vs. usage.  Maybe that is just me.  The only thing WinRar can do that AlZip can not is create RAR files, but then nothing else can.  However, AlZip can extract MANY more formats than WinRar from what I have seen and the ALZ format seems to work as good or better than RAR for personal useage.  Support for self-extracting files is great and easier for me to use than either WinZip or WinRar, and it is the same SFX format WinRar uses.  I don't see where I can go wrong choosing AlZip over WinRar, and unlike Renegade, I don't work for them or get any compensation.

Enough extolling its virtues.
Pages: prev1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 ... 42next