topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 10, 2025, 6:44 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 46next
826
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Synergy: Sharing your keyboard and mouse
« Last post by iphigenie on October 26, 2007, 05:43 AM »
True

I'm more likely to be playing 2 games in parallel than the same game twice...
827
Living Room / Re: How Google earns money?
« Last post by iphigenie on October 26, 2007, 04:33 AM »
You are right. Google earns money by being, in their own words, the largest advertising agency in the world. They control 40% of online advertising by many estimates. Adsense is only one of their products, it is the one everyone is aware of. But they own products that do more traditional banner/flash advertising, plus products for games, videos etc.

If you read their quarterly report this week, it is all about the ad systems and a little bit about what they are doing with the applications.

There's a reason why google has moved more and more into content (books, news etc.) and that is that it allows them to get ALL of the advertising dollar (well apart possible from ad creative), rather than being just the intermediary. Applications have the same purpose. I am not sure how competing with your customers will work out in the end, but I think they certainly can get away with it.

This is of course the advertiser's wet dream: you get people to spend hours a day on a platform where you control the message. You know what they search for, what they read and write about, what they are working on - and you control the means by which they do all these things and control the messages they see. Imagine going to a widget maker and saying "i can get your ad in front of people who are searching about widgets, but at a higher rate i can get it in front of people who are emailing about widgets, or have received an email about widgets, or are reading a document about widgets, or are writing a memo about widgets." Clearly that is sexy.

But google are going one step further and they are talking about brand message control. And that is worth billions because corporations are totally paranoid and scared witless about the web. Marketing used to be all about message control and they have lost that control... Saying "you can use adsense premium to make sure your message appears on the google ads of any site which might have comments or content criticising your product" - that's print-your-own-money territory. They are not quite there yet (only available on google's own sites atm) but this is where they are going and investors certainly seem to believe they will get there.

 :-\

Google needs things like the summer of code and supporting open source and giving away products for free - because with their size and dominance they could overnight become "the big bad monopoly" in a lot of people's minds.

I must say i dont have a google account, because I don't like my data in the hands of advertising agencies. My data is mine and I dont want it mined and sold, not unless I get some money for it. I know the tools are good and whatnot, but I prefer to pay for my email and have a) a contract that gives me rights over my own data b) a supplier whose livelihood depends on delivering me the service i want, not selling my eyeballs

But then I never trust or like the dominant brand in any field, thats just me...

Also I suspect that a lot of the things in google labs are not being done because of income potential (some are) or not even for image/buzz, but simply to attract and more importantly retain talent - working on the same products gets old and things like encouraging pet projects means people might stay when they might have moved on. And even that hasnt prevented them from losing quite a few of their search engine specialist talent to new startups, which is a mix of economic reasons (the get-rich years are over) and technical (google is not pushing the envelope in search anymore)

828
General Software Discussion / Re: Vanilla: a nice, strange forum
« Last post by iphigenie on October 25, 2007, 11:43 AM »
Well I need to choose and recommend a forum software for the company websites. Some of these are business community websites so they might get quite busy.

Anyway I use SMF on some of my private websites but some of my experiences in the past year (1 installation got hacked in jul 06, for example, via SMF, and that turned out expensive!) make me wary of recommending it for use. It is the one I know best though...

My experiences with some of the commercial ones are not any better, i dont want one that is spammable too much.

SO I had found vanilla as an option, their design would be simple to integrate with a content/news site... but I have the fear that it has not been tested and could have the same kind of security holes - and trust me i dont want our sites hacked into....

What is a good stable forum software which doesnt suffer too much from constant spam abuse, has simple things like tracking, avatars but not necessary bells and whistles?
829
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Synergy: Sharing your keyboard and mouse
« Last post by iphigenie on October 25, 2007, 08:51 AM »
I would love one of these that doesnt need one screen per computer. After all I have screens that can have more than one input, so it should be possible in some way...

As things stand I tend to use either a kvm or remote admin, but kvms are rarely seamless, and remote admin cant handle games...

I almost bought multiplicity a few times but the clutter of multiple screens just stopped me

830
Very subjective - thunderbird is one of the last tools I would want to use to handle my email...   :D
831
Post New Requests Here / Re: Autosave for QuarkXPress 4.x
« Last post by iphigenie on October 23, 2007, 08:45 AM »
You might be better off trying to do a script that takes the documents that quark saves locally and puts them properly on your network, maybe with a timestamp? That should be less intrusive
832
Living Room / Re: Multibooting and Partitioning Experiments
« Last post by iphigenie on October 23, 2007, 08:33 AM »
I have indulged in multi boot and the safer thing is indeed to have one partition per OS

Actually even when I only have 1 OS on a computer I have kept the habit of doing one small partition (about 3gb for xp) for the OS, software/games/data on other partitions.

But when you have multiple OSes it makes even more sense as you can then
- hide each OS's main partition from each other
- share apps and data

Back in the days I had OS/2, Win3 (later XP) and a linux. Nowadays it tends to be one or two windows, the occasional linux (with wine to access some windows apps) or bsd.

Obviously you can do something more clever with virtualisation and/or image tools like FirstDefense - no messing with partitions, just run whatever image you want on top of the same data and app folders. That's what I really want to try next, although it is a lot more work to set up than just installing in parallel.

 

833
General Software Discussion / Re: Veign's Top 15 MySQL Tools
« Last post by iphigenie on October 22, 2007, 03:45 AM »
The obvious answer is... it depends...

That would depend on what features your database uses and what you need. If it is pure data, with very little in the matter of triggers, constraints, simple indexes only, no stored procedures - then is it quite simply a matter of dumping and importing and can be quite painless.

If you have a lot of binary data, complex triggers or constraints, stored procedures... then it is a project and a half since you have to redo all those features.

Similarly, if your database is used by a front end which is not web based, or tightly integrated with SQL server, you might have a lot of rewriting to do on that front.

834
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Synergy: Sharing your keyboard and mouse
« Last post by iphigenie on October 21, 2007, 06:11 AM »
3 computers = 3 screens on desktop  :o

I guess I will stick with remote control (if i need to share clipboards) and/or my console switch
835
General Software Discussion / Re: alternatives to partition magic/paragon?
« Last post by iphigenie on October 19, 2007, 07:24 AM »
I have the vcom partition manager and it has served me well. Switched to it when partition magic let me down, simply because vcom had a special at the time. It comes with boot manager etc.

I just bought the paragon "disk manager" (on special, 49.99 for 3 licenses) and it looks pretty good. Contains a partition manager, partition backup tool and boot manager and supposedly some defrag function. I had never really tried their tool and on first look it looks pretty good - comes with restore CDs images both for normal windows but also for the corporate recovery options. I went to the site interested in the backup tool but when i saw this on special I bought this. Will post notes when I have tried some more.
836
Living Room / Re: How much RAM do you have on your PC?
« Last post by iphigenie on October 19, 2007, 07:17 AM »
just to answer the original question

- media player pc, aka 'anonymous': 512 Mb
- main laptop, aka 'happyfunrock', 2Gb
- main desktop, aka 'imminentdoom', 1.5Gb
- husbands desktop, aka 'charolais', 2Gb
- fallback desktop, aka 'starpoodle', 1Gb

Yes, we tend to be wacky when naming our computers

Please note that these computers are split between 2 locations and each has 2 desktop computers
837
General Software Discussion / Re: What's your preferred File Manager
« Last post by iphigenie on October 17, 2007, 12:07 PM »
Just for the record, I have total commander, wirekeys (which offers quick folders, windows tools, file operation shortcuts), peazip, stardock's extensions for the open/save and keyboad shortcuts and right menu as well as objectbar and windowsblinds, a diff tool, backup tools, a version control system, a rename tool, farr, several image/media managers, some command line smalltools, and a few more tools added recently from this very thread...

and yes, i have tried 10 times this number, easily, i have the lwa records to prove it. so yes i know what you mean  :-\

That is only for file related tasks and only what is installed, not what i have bought or installed in the past and dont use. I think that is it. Until tomorrow.

-- on the traps--
I think the trap also works for non software "organising" systems, everything from "task management" and productivity books/systems/tools to filing supplies. Especially trap #2
838
General Software Discussion / Re: What's your preferred File Manager
« Last post by iphigenie on October 17, 2007, 11:51 AM »
It doesn't justify 30mins - 1 hour of your life to configure/learn about a new program that could potentially/exponentially increase your productivity (such as managing files)? C'mon  ;D

It really depends how much time you spend doing complex file manipulations where said work could make a difference... and how likely am I to indentify which ones will help me...

Yes, somewhere in the options and features of any of these other tools there are probably 1 or 2 functions, or maybe 10! that if I read about them and thought about them in the right way, would save me 30 minutes at some point in the next year. Or maybe 4 hours one day... Problem is, I have to wade through 100 features that won't help me, and by the time I read about the option that would help me, I might not even recognise its potential.

I have a zillion productivity enhancements which all have the potential to simplify and automate some tasks, but the time it takes to figure out which bits really could help me in stuff that I actually do...  I had autohotkey installed for a while and did not do anything with it. I have wirekeys and use about 15% of the features, if that. Same goes for some of the stardock enhancements and the filemanager I own etc.

So yes there are treasure features in the stuff I have that if I only learned about it I might use. But there are several traps in there:

Trap 1: Spending more time reading about a task than it takes doing it. I could spend hours reading feature lists and manuals of utilities to learn things that could come in handy one day. And indeed since I am a bit of a software junkie, sometimes I have done just that. I have lwa collections of annotated webpages to prove it...

Trap 2: Inventing new tasks just because the tool can do it. And sometimes we fall in the trap of embarking on a task which we didnt really need to do and could have happily continued without doing (eg: rearrange and tag hundreds of files one didnt really have a problem managing the boring old way), just cause the tool can do it.

Trap 3: feature envy

So nowadays I tend to go at it the other way around, I wait until there is something that turns out to be a "faff" to do with the tools I own and then I
1) skim through the docs of the stuff I own to see if I might spot a function or option that can help
2) skim through my list of past software notes to see if I spot something there
3) then i go and search the web, starting here and at a few choice sites

Especially with file management - I spend maybe 2-3 hours on such tasks during a week, and most of them are 4 minute jobbies. Even if I could shave 1 minute by having some super clever keyboard system, how long would it take me to come up with the right one?
839
I guess it makes kind of sense - say your machine is messed up and you cannot boot to your installed OSes, you have this rescue option to start a browser and go find help online, provided the right tools are installed. Although as a "rescue" option I can think of some better ones they could put than access to a browser - after all it takes about 10 minutes once to get a nice bootable CD for such a scenario.

I tend to favor asus for many of my components, but this one won't make me shell extra for a particular mobo - on the other hand I can see how it could work in an office environment...
visitor: "can I  use one of your PCs to go online?"
IT: "sure, go ahead"
840
I meant I understand getting the base OS and kernel "hard coded" into a chip, and it will speed up booting
and protect the OS from tampering.

But firefox (which has had as many security issues as ie this year!) or other applications just dont belong on such a thing, as they will change more often. And everytime you have to update the chip bios.

I can see it as a huge advantage to be able to put the core of your OS on your board and keep it safe and efficient. I can see it as a problem to have anything beyond that, as it kind of invalidates the benefits of the os-on-a-chip option.

I don't want my motherboard maker to make my applications choices, either
841
That is certainly something to ponder - although I am thinking about it not from a perspective of reliability (as I can imagine that a company which focuses on technology and provides it to 20 different clients across the coutry -and whose livelyhood depends on this working properly - is more likely to have good architecture and practices than each of those 20 running something independently). No, I am thinking about it from a perspective of accountability - the *staff* in these companies have access to our data, and they don't have the public service contracts/oaths/whatever to limit what they can and cannot do about this data. The potential for a bad apple to take criminal advantage is high. Or maybe I have illusions about public service.

To be honest the data safety probably is a plus for most online apps. When my laptop was stolen and i discovered I couldnt figure out  how to recover my opera notes, sent mail history etc. I was extremely happy that quite a lot of my key files and settings had been uploaded or used on online services and could be recovered.
842
The main advantage of online apps:
- synchronisation between computers.
- works on different OSes, very nice if you mutli boot
- No need to sync and shuffle things back and forth trying to keep your notes / bookmarks / invoices organised
- lots of updates (can also be a negative)
- monthly pricing models add up quickly

The main advantage of offline apps:
- faster,
- functionally richer and more mature apps, on average
- way more choice,
- not everywhere has a connection!
- won't disappear without notice
- I am very keyboard oriented and webapps are usually weak at supporting keyboard commands

theres loads more on each side of course but got to stop somewhere

I still tend to favor desktop because most online stuff is a never finished beta, and I have little patience for a lot of the bad choices made. I am in the field of web development though, so I have very high standards and very little patience for the badly designed, half finished, functionally empty but slick looking apps that are all the rage...

Even "standards" like salesforce.com and zimbra are not as slick as equivalent desktop software.

I do love the webs apps that can be controlled via email though - sending an email or instant message to create an appointment, note, task, website post etc. is brilliant.

The only webapps that i use on a regular basis
- fastmail, but this is on top of my normal mail client, not instead
- link a gogo - this did replace my old bookmark convert/share manager which was GUL, but thats only cause GUL disappeared off the surface of the earth
- librarything - i never managed to get motivated by a desktop cataloger, but librarything pulled it off
- meebo is currently replacing my multi messenger. this is cause i cannot find a multi messenger which is stable and does it all, so i might as well not run a separate program and use my browser
843
linux i understand, but why firefox?
844
I was curious so I gave salamander a try - looks fine but I dont see that much of a difference between that and total commander. Some people said it is prettier but when looking at a 2 pane list of filenames I dont think I really notice the difference.
Some features feel easier out of the box than they do with total commander (eg: scp/sftp), and it is nicely polished.

But it took me exactly 25 seconds after starting it to go "what, no tabs?????????"

Totally subjectively: I would suggest it to people, but I am unlikely to change from TC since I am addicted to tabs.

Will give the 1 week totally subjective test to another one soon
845
General Software Discussion / Re: What's your preferred File Manager
« Last post by iphigenie on October 13, 2007, 10:25 AM »
xplorer2 lite is free. No need to install multiple addons on top of windows explorer when xplorer2 can do it all.

I would tend to agree with you, but then I am the kind of person who registered total commander back in its very early days... Some people take to file managers like a fish to water, others, well... some people will not use an alternate file manager even if you give them one, simply because it does not "jump" at them so they continue to use "my computer" or explorer... for those people it is nice to know a few tools to make their life easier. I just switch to my file manager whenever I am in explorer and it falls short, so I didn't know any good such bars. Now I do :D
846
General Software Discussion / Re: What's your preferred File Manager
« Last post by iphigenie on October 13, 2007, 10:19 AM »
How about some links, because I sure won't find "styler" just by googling/yahooing it

you are wrong

I stand corrected!  :Thmbsup:
So much noise in google lately I often don't even try anymore
847
General Software Discussion / Re: What's your preferred File Manager
« Last post by iphigenie on October 13, 2007, 08:04 AM »
Some of the windows file manager/explorer extensions mentioned here make me curious - what extensions are there out there that can improve life?

When I go and fix someone else's computer I dont particularly want to install any of my shareware on their machine, and it would be nice to have some less intrusive options to make their life easier

So far people have mentioned (without links)

Folderview, QTTabbar, QTBreadcrumbs, FindeXer, Styler

Any others? How about some links, because I sure won't find "styler" just by googling/yahooing it
848
General Software Discussion / Re: ERUNT - Restore Replacement
« Last post by iphigenie on October 12, 2007, 06:02 AM »
I have never had to restore from it but i do run it quite regularly.

I think i have too many backup/restore things especially around the registry / system settings - but then you can never have too much safety!
849
I used to have a tool called webgal which was for storing snippets of web code, way back when...

It doesnt work anymore and they stopped doing it, but I wouldnt mind finding another.

I used clipcache for the same kind of usage for a while, and that worked well for a few months, but then the clipcache database got corrupted (that's a bug it had back then, quite a show stopper!) and i lost it all.

Have put some clips in my editors's collection, and in winorganizer and firefox add ons and opera notes and recenlty evernote, and online examples in local website archive... but never stuck with any long enough to reap benefits :(

Really ought to find one and stick with one...
850
General Software Discussion / Re: Zsoft Uninstaller
« Last post by iphigenie on October 11, 2007, 04:29 AM »
I have the zsoft uninstaller on my work laptop - very useful to monitor stuff but also to uninstall things when windows is playing up and you cant open the control panel apps, which happened twice to me lately on vista.

I found it when looking for a tool as I didnt want to install software that I own a private license for on my work laptop.

When I look at it it does most of what things like the ashampoo uninstaller does, but freeware. Not as pretty but then who cares?
Pages: prev1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 46next