8126
You can find same oppinions about Nvidia drivers f0dder. You are talking about 2.5 year old drivers and a documented known problem (see ATI knowledge base) which I think still is relevant today for some cards. Depend on chipset as well perhaps. Anyway, we are in 2006, PCI-E, new stuffI've had unstable nvidia drivers, but never something that resulted in massive data corruption... and yeah, the issue became documented, but they didn't check for it and they didn't fix it for at least 6 months... so fuck ATI, really.Both Nvidia and ATI have made crap cards and crap drivers. Not really much to do about it.
-dk70 (October 07, 2006, 06:46 AM)

. Oh, and Dell are available in multiple countries, so it's pretty easy to refer to 
blocking cookies by default is a good recipe for not being able to navigate modern websites.-mouser (October 06, 2006, 03:56 PM)
i have a huge host file, 42K entries and i have never had website nagivation problems. 99.99% of tracking cookies/sites/adverts are all blocked.-kimmchii (October 06, 2006, 04:09 PM)

Heh, I don't need it eithermouser, that's where the "paranoid" comes inYeah... we're not all elite users like you!(yeah, I personally find that interesting myself, but regular users don't really need it).
-f0dder (October 05, 2006, 05:09 PM)-Mizraim (October 05, 2006, 05:40 PM)
- in fact I don't run any firewall software now because I find it to be a nuisance, and I'm protected well by my NAT'ing router. (And I'm not elite, really.(I'm just an elitist))
(yeah, I personally find that interesting myself, but regular users don't really need it).Fixed solutions are rarely best buy - even when they do offer choices there are limitations. Important to be aware of them - to get most value or even prevent buying wrong parts for what computer will be used for. You have to investigate a little.-dk70 (October 04, 2006, 10:10 PM)
Remember an LCD almost require you to run games at its native resolution, 1280x1024.Not really - in games you won't generally notice running at non-native resolutions, that's mainly visible when dealing with text. And I doubt you'll find any video cards, even integrated, that can't deal with that properly at native resolution-dk70

And yes if you had both a 17 CRT and 19 LCD plugged so you could compare you would pick 19".Personally I'd pick a 17" TFT with decent refresh rate, then add another when I got the cash. Two monitors rock, and 1280x1024 on a 17" is just fine.-dk70

One thing you will also want...a BIG CASE...and plenty of PCI slots.Agreed. A big case with good airflow so you don't get overheating problems.-app103



The "template" URL for older PSDKs is:
http://download.micr...ate/win98mexp/en-us/build/FULL/PSDK-FULL.num.cab
Now, the build might be:
2601.0 (August 2001 edition)
3590.2 (November 2001 edition)
3639.1 (May 2002 edition)
3663.0 (July 2002 edition)
3672.1 (August 2002 edition)
3718.1 (October 2002 edition)
3790.0 (February 2003 edition)
2600.2180 (PSDK XP SP2 edition)
For each build, the num should be iterated from 1 till you get a cab file smaller than all the others (usually the cab files are 25MB in size).
The last PSDK with htmlhelp v1 is 3639.1 (May 2002 edition).
