topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 21, 2025, 1:01 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309 310 311 312 313 ... 470next
7676
Living Room / Re: Microsoft buying skype for US $8.5 Billion
« Last post by 40hz on May 13, 2011, 09:01 AM »
This was a duplicate.
7677
Living Room / Re: Farewell Skype ...
« Last post by 40hz on May 13, 2011, 09:00 AM »
Is there any chance of merging the two overlapping Microsoft/Skype threads?

Looks like Josh and Carol both started one.  :)
7678
FWIW I hardly see anything Apple makes or does as representing "choice."

Apple's entire ecosystem is closed and proprietary. And their entire culture is based on an unquestioning belief in their innate superiority, which they hold with a conviction that borders on mania.
 :)
7679
(40hz Definition: Pundit (noun) a loudmouth with an entourage. Positive proof you can fool some of the people all of the time - and make a living doing it! )

By any chance is your IRL name Ambrose? :D

(I like that definition!)

No. But Mssr. Bierce is a major role model as you so cannily noticed.  ;D
7680
Nothing much came out of it because there wasn't much to be gained to begin with.

Most of the argument was that Microsoft was depriving consumers of choice. The simple fact 90% of the consumers could have cared less what brand of software they used (as long as it worked) somehow seems to have escaped the would-be regulators.

It's nice that the government wanted to open the software market up to encourage more independent development and alternatives. Too bad hardly anybody took them up on it because - wait for it - most consumers and businesses aren't interested in exploring alternatives - even when alternatives are available.

You can't even argue the money angle. If cost were the sole criteria, every business would be running Linux and Libre Office on the desktop and Centos or BSD instead of Win2K8-R2 on their servers.

Dissatisfaction and demand drives the creation of alternatives. So until there's sufficient dissatisfaction with Microsoft's technologies, there won't be much hope for commercial alternatives springing into existence to address it.

And most people are pretty much 'ok' with Microsoft.

 8)
7681

I've never heard of Barry Ritholtz before...

Neither had I. But he (like Justin Beiber) apparently also has a following.

Read some of his commentary and other remarks. But for the life of me I can't really see what the big deal is about him. Most of what he has to say is 'old' and obvious to anyone who actively monitors the tech world. Maybe to the financial community (who are generally clueless about technology even though they never seem realize it) he sounds like some sort of prophet. But to me, he's just another snarky financial/investment pundit.

(40hz Definition: Pundit (noun) a loudmouth with an entourage. Positive proof you can fool some of the people all of the time - and make a living doing it! )
7682

How Microsoft Caused the DotCom Bubble and why their Skype ‘Hail Mary’ is irrelevant
http://www.ritholtz....d-the-dotcom-bubble/

(see out attachment in previous post)

Microsoft remains hugely profitable today, but increasingly irrelevant. Their purchase of Skype is an attempt to buy back some relevance. They are the rich, uncool fat kid at school, trying desperately to buy their way into some popularity.

Cute sound byte. But like so many clever remarks, it's little more than wishful thinking and a pile of hot air. Microsoft never worried about "relevance" or being "insanely great," or...well, all those other things hipsters so fervently wish were more important to running a business than they actually are. Especially when it comes to successful and very large businesses.

Microsoft doesn't worry much about the things that keep the coffee shop and wine bar crowd from getting a good night's sleep. Microsoft prefers to think about more mundane things. Like ROI and market share.

And (possibly much to the dismay of people like Steve Jobs and Barry Ritholtz) it appears to be working beautifully for Microsoft.

 ;D
7683
Developer's Corner / Re: Apples, Walled Gardens, and Screw Deals - Oh My!
« Last post by 40hz on May 12, 2011, 02:17 AM »
Apple makes it so hard to justify developing for their platforms...

I think it's more accurate to say "impossible to justify" - unless your business 'plan' amounts to little more than: getting as much as possible for as long as possible* while waiting for the inevitable sucker punch.

----------

* Don't laugh. I saw that exact phrase in the business plan of a small tech start-up where it was listed as the key element in their overall strategy. Good grief! And these guys wondered why they were having so much trouble securing venture funding with something as unintentionally hilarious as that?  :mrgreen:
7684
Developer's Corner / Re: Apples, Walled Gardens, and Screw Deals - Oh My!
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 07:00 PM »
The only thing that changed was the payment rules of the platform.

Which the publishers got behind knowing full well it would price iFlowReader out of the market.

That short 8-hour notice before the publishers (as a group) pulled on iFlowReader and went over to Apple was a coordinated and well planned "hit" if I ever saw one. Moves like that don't just happen without extensive prior arrangements being made. Ask anyone who ever managed a major database just how easy a big update like that would be. They'll be the first to tell you all the pieces had to have been in place long before the announced 8-hour deadline went into effect. Those eight hours were probably only used to make the data change "official" and run a final test on it.

And now that the agency model is in place (assuming Apple didn't obtain exclusive or preferential distribution rights like they usually try for) there's no reason why the publishers would want to offer any different deals to the other platforms.

Nor is there reason for any of the other platforms (Android, et al.) to be interested in offering any different deal to their app authors.

As the matter of a fact, why deal with an indy developer at all? Why not just create the app in house for themselves and keep 100% of all revenues including the app sale? After all, if Apple can demand and get 30%, why should the other platforms accept any less - or cut in anybody else in for a slice of their pie?

Like Target pointed out, it's old wine in new bottles.

This particular vintage is called Sorry Charlie Chianti.

7685
Developer's Corner / Re: Apples, Walled Gardens, and Screw Deals - Oh My!
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 06:28 PM »
Yeah I kind of agree. Android is already beating Apples market share, they should have tried switching platform. Though if they didn't write portable code, that could be difficult.

Problem is it isn't just the code. It's obtaining content. That's where they got blindsided.

And Apple wasn't the only guilty party - even if they were the instigator. The other part of the burn deal was how all the major book publishers lined up behind Apple with an agency arrangement that effectively shuts out the little guys.

I think you'll be seeing more independent innovation get swallowed up this way. Small outfits will come up with the idea and the first apps. And the big boys like Apple will then sign them up just to see what happens. Most times it won't be something where they'll see enough profit potential to move in on it immediately. But that doesn't matter because it costs them nothing to adopt a wait & see attitude. And they have all the time they need since they control the platform.

However, once something looks like it will really take off big time, all it will take is a rule change to push the innovators out so the big companies can take over and "properly exploit the opportunities" such an emerging "new use" will create.

In short: only the 'big players' need apply.

Nothing to see here, folks! Just business as usual...now move along!  :-\
7686
General Software Discussion / Re: Software recommendations for writers
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 06:10 PM »
Read another software tip in a magazine today: ImmersEd from www.tajuta.com, that seems to extend the uncluttered writing environment with a few nifty gadgets, that can be helpful when writing, gotta start testing though.

Nice find, Ath!  Tried ImmersEd and LOVE it!  Will use this for the roughing-out of my book-for-Kindle.

Wow Ath! That is an interesting find. The 'folding' feature for notes is unique. WM has a "repository" feature, but it doesn't seem to be implemented the same way. It's more a 'corkboard' either/or toggle type thing in WM.



Embedded Notes – text can be tagged as a note, with a label for easy reference. Notes are folded in the document and can be popped open for editing or reading. A sidebar widget allows you to view all your notes, sort by label or position and to jump to any of them.

Gonna have to take a look at that when I get a minute. Won't be enough to get me off the Monkey's back, (couldn't live without WM's 'jump' feature) but it might make for an interesting suggestion for a future version. WriteMonkey's author has dropped by DoCo a few times under the name iztoks. (Note: There's a bit more discussion (both pro and con) of WriteMonkey to be found under the same thread starting on page 10 AND a whole thread devoted to text editors for writers here if anybody's interested.)

7687
Living Room / Re: Anyone here using a standing desk?
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 05:51 PM »
I watched the trilogy in the cinema, the extended trilogy on DVD (twice) and the extended trilogy on BluRay...Where do I fit in?  :P

You can be President!  :Thmbsup: ;D
7688
Living Room / Re: Anyone here using a standing desk?
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 04:08 PM »
I have actually once watched the Lord of the rings trilogy in a row. That must be close to 10 hours. And loooots of snacks too  :)

It's closer to 12 hours if you have the extended versions.

My brother and I had a tradition every Christmas to watch the LotR movies in the theaters, so the 4th year when they were all released we did the extended cut marathon. :D


Another time a couple years ago my wife and I met a woman approximately our age who was very small and had short curly hair. I later told my wife that this small woman reminded me of a hobbit. My wife didn't know what that was, so I turned on the first movie to show her and we ended up watching the entire trilogy. :-[

You're in too then!  :Thmbsup:
7689
Living Room / Re: Anyone here using a standing desk?
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 03:56 PM »
I have actually once watched the Lord of the rings trilogy in a row. That must be close to 10 hours. And loooots of snacks too  :)

You too? Hail fellow acolyte! Elen sila lumen omentilmo!


Did that ourselves during the last blizzard we had. Watched all three extended cuts. And then watched most of the 'extras' afterwards - with minor breaks for stretching, to prepare meals (eaten in front of the TV), replenish snack trays and drinks, and (human and dog) bathroom breaks. Great way to kill a whole day plus some. Especially when you're waiting for the roads to clear up enough so you can hire somebody to come over and shovel so you don't have to.

So, welcome to The Fellowship of 'The Fellowship of the Ring' Ring.

Boo-Yah Brother Mutant! With compliments from the FOTFOTRR - The Prancing Pony Chapterhouse. :Thmbsup: ;D

You are now 'officially authorized' to organize your own local chapter and make it (at least) an annual event!

 ;D



7690
Living Room / Re: Anyone here using a standing desk?
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 03:43 PM »
I sit almost all day every day and I'm not obese. I'm actually underweight.

That's great!

<**expletive deleted**>

 ;)
7691
Living Room / Re: What's your approach to this help desk procedure issue?
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 03:22 PM »
One if the biggest barriers I've encountered when trying to implement organizational or technology changes is the issue of culpability. Usually those who are most resistant to proposed changes are those who fear getting their tails kicked (or losing their job) once the change takes place - because the proposed change will expose their errors, laziness, or failure to get a jump on something.

One thing I've found helpful is to get a written statement from the highest levels of management guaranteeing there will be no repercussions visited on anyone for past mistakes or oversights - provided they get with the current program and see to it that workable changes and improvements are made.

----------

from: Uncle Ebwart's Rainy Day Fun-Book of Modern Business Management and Other Craft Projects


40hz's Merciful Motivational Maxim:

      A little amnesty goes a long way!

Corollary: Everybody fights back when their livelihood or reputation is at stake.

 8)


7692
Living Room / Re: Farewell Skype ...
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 02:44 PM »
I'm guessing it's going to provide the missing piece for the new Microsoft cloud initiatives (Office 360, etc.) by allowing end-users and SMBs to make voice and videophone calls without the need to set up a server specifically for it.

Microsoft is well on its way to being able to provide a total and seamless computing environment that runs from the desktop to the Internet by way of the cloud with all stops covered in between.

Microsoft!  :tellme:

Is it your one-stop shop for a: Desktop OS? Phone system? ISP? Web host? Telco? Office suite? Server farm? Security management system? Collaboration suite? Videoconferencing center? Instant messenger? Social web? E-mail system? MMORPG? Cloud host?

Could be...and probably will be if they continue in the direction they're going.

Hey Mr. Jobs! How's thinking different working out for ya now that Microsoft's given up on that in order to think BIG?  ;D

7693
Developer's Corner / Apples, Walled Gardens, and Screw Deals - Oh My!
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 02:25 PM »
funny-pictures-ambush-cat.jpg


Sad cautionary tale from Matt Ingram over at GigaOM.

The Danger of Playing in Apple’s Walled Garden

Every so often a news item comes along that reinforces the downside of building your business on someone else’s platform, and this week’s poster child is iFlowReader, an e-book app for the iPhone and iPad. The company behind the app announced today that it is shutting its doors for good, and it puts the blame for its demise squarely on Apple and its new 30-percent levy on in-app sales. The benefits of getting into bed with Apple are obvious: access to a huge universe of motivated users and built-in payment handling. But the downsides for those who play inside Apple’s walled garden should be just as obvious — namely, that you lose control over some fundamental aspects of your business.

The bitterness that iFlowReader feels about Apple suddenly changing the rules of the app game spills out of every line in the company’s blog post, in which the company advises users that it will be “going out of business” as of May 31, and that this is a “sad day for innovation.”

Link here for full article.

Be sure to check out some of the links found within the article.  The blog post making iFlowReader's going out of business announcement is an especially painful read.  I took the liberty of providing a copy below (emphasis added) for reference should iFlowReader's website disappear because it's really worth reading. Especially if you're planning on getting into bed with Apple as a developer.

Full iFlowReader announcement
Dear iFlowReader User,

Thank you for being one of our valued customers. We are writing to you today to make a very sad announcement.  BeamItDown Software and the iFlow Reader will cease operations as of May 31, 2011.  We absolutely do not want to do this, but Apple has made it completely impossible for anyone but Apple to make a profit selling contemporary ebooks on any iOS device. We cannot survive selling books at a loss and so we are forced to go out of business. We bet everything on Apple and iOS and then Apple killed us by changing the rules in the middle of the game. This is a very sad day for innovation on iOS in this important application category. We are a small company that thought we could build a better product. We think that we did but we are powerless against Apple’s absolute control of the iOS platform.

The first of this letter part tells you what actions that you must take before the end of May to protect the books that you have. For those of you who are interested, the second part of this letter explains in detail what happened to us and why we are forced to shutdown.

Actions you need to take before May 31, 2011 to protect your books

Many of you have purchased books and would like to keep them.   You may still be able to read them using iFlow Reader although we cannot guarantee that it will work beyond May 31, 2011. We suggest that you download all of your books to your devices and then do a backup with iTunes.  This should allow you to restore them if you change devices. We also strongly recommend that you go to our website and download all of your books to your computer which will let you access them with Adobe Digital Editions or any other ebook application that is compatible with Adobe DRM protected epubs.  To do this, you will first have to have Adobe Digital Editions running on your computer. This is available for free at:

http://www.adobe.com.../digitaleditions/#fp.

Once you have done this, go to our website at iflowreader.com, log in, and then go to My Books. There, you can select a book and then select “Read on My Computer” and then “Download”.  This will download a small file with the extension “acsm”. You can double click on this file and it should "fulfill" and put a copy of the epub in your Adobe Digital Editions Library. You should then back these files up from your computer. These actions will allow you continued access to your books with Adobe Digital Editions, however, all server-based features of the iFlowReader will unfortunately stop working when we shutdown. There will also be other changes:

    
  • iFlow Reader will no longer be supported and updated. Existing installations may not work in future releases of iOS.
  • We will no longer be selling ebooks from our app or website. Our Website at iflowreader.com will be gone so you will no longer be able to access it import books or download your books to your devices or examine any of your bookmarks.
  • You will not be able to download library books.
  • You will not be able to Sync between devices, and user defined bookmarks will not appear on other devices, only the one where they were created.
  • We will no longer be offering any apps in the iTunes App Store.

Why Do We Have to Shutdown?

The crux of the matter is that Apple is now requiring us, as well as all other ebook sellers, to give them 30% of the selling price of any ebook that we sell from our iOS app.  Unfortunately, because of the “agency model” that has been adopted by the largest publishers, our gross margin on ebooks after paying the wholesaler is less than 30%, which means that we would have to take a loss on all ebooks sold. This is not a sustainable business model.

Where did the agency model come from and what is it? The agency model was created by Apple who made it a requirement for any publisher who wished to sell books through Apple’s iBooks app. The agency model has three key points:

    
  • The publisher is now the retailer of record. The company selling the eBook to the end user is an “agent” of the retailer who receives a commission on the sale.
  • All sales agents are required to sell books at the same retail price, which is set by the publisher. No one can sell at a different price.
  • All sales agents get a 30% commission on the sale of a book. No one gets a different deal. Prior to the agency model, publishers typically offered retailers a 50% discount.

The key point here is that all sellers now get a 30% commission and Apple now wants a 30% fee, which is all of our gross margin and then some. The six largest publishers have now all adopted the agency model. These publishers account for nearly 90% of all ebooks sold. Random House was the last publisher to adopt the agency model, which they did on March 1 of this year. You may have noticed that all 17,000 Random House titles disappeared from our catalog on February 28. They appeared in Apple's iBooks catalog the following day.  We, as well as all other small booksellers, have yet to complete an agency agreement with Random House. Up until February 28, these were our most profitable items because we were still getting a 50% discount on these ebooks. With an eight-hour notice, all of these titles disappeared from our store as well as the stores of all other small ebook sellers.

Five of us spent nearly a year and a half of our lives and over a million dollars in cash and sweat equity developing the iFlowReader app with its unique AutoScrolling approach to reading that many of you really like.  We think that our product is the best one available on iOS for reading ebooks. We had extensive plans to make it even better.  We looked to the future of ebooks for inspiration while Apple and others were looking at the printed books of the past. This explains the cute, but gratuitous page turning animations, and old-timey bookshelves, which are all very amusing at first, but not very useful in the end.

We sent a letter to Apple VP Philip Schiller in September 2009 to confirm our business model. Apple told us they couldn't guarantee anything - submit the application and they'd let us know after submission. We submitted our new iFlowReader app Apple in November of 2010 and they approved it a few days later.  After approval, we made substantial additional investments in licensing fees, integration fees, and server fees so that we could open our ebook store on December 2, 2010. Two months later, Apple changed the rules and put us out of business. They now want 30% of the sale price of any books, which they know full well, is all of our profits and more.  What sounds like a reasonable demand when packaged by Apple's extraordinary public relations department is essentially an eviction notice to all ebook sellers on iOS.  After over three years of developing products for iOS during which we had over six million downloads of our BeamItDown iFlowReader products, Apple is giving us the boot by making it financially impossible for us to survive.  They want all of the eBook business on iOS and since they have the unilateral power to get it, we are out of business and the iFlow Reader is dead.

We put our faith in Apple and they screwed us. This happened even though we went to great lengths to clear our plans with Apple because we did not want to make this substantial investment of time and money blindly. Apple's response to our detailed inquiries was to tell us that our plans did not infringe their rules in any way, which was true at the time, but there is one little catch. Apple can change the rules at any time and they did. Sadly they must have known full well that they were going to do this.   Apple's iBooks was already in development when we talked to them and they certainly must have known that their future plans would doom us to failure no matter how good our product was. We never really had a chance.

Thank You For Your Support

We greatly appreciate your patronage and we sincerely regret that we are forced to do this. We are sorry for any inconvenience that this causes. We had a great product and our customer list was growing daily. We were rapidly adding books to our catalog and we had plans to add many, many more by adding PDF support to the iFlowReader along with many other exciting features. We were also in the middle of discussions with OEM customers in many countries who wanted to license our technology in countries around the world. We had investors ready to invest money in our future. It was the American dream that we all strive for. Sadly, the America that we thought we were working in turned out to be a totalitarian regime and the dictator decided that he wanted all of what we had. Our dream is now over.

If you think that this move by Apple is contrary to your interests as an iOS user then we urge you to email a complaint to Apple by clicking on the link below:

Email to: Steve Jobs, Philip Schiller, and Developer Programs at Apple

If you have any questions about any of this, please send us an email at: [email protected]

Best regards,

The iFlowReader Staff.



Regardless of whether iFlowReader was overly trusting, much too optimistic, or simply naive, Matt Ingram's conclusion pretty much says it all:

Would iFlowReader have failed even without Apple’s new fees? Perhaps. But the fact that the company changed the rules for content-based app makers so dramatically probably pushed it over the edge, and theoretically it could do the same to anyone. That’s just the nature of playing Apple’s game — the house always wins.
7694
Living Room / Re: What's your approach to this help desk procedure issue?
« Last post by 40hz on May 11, 2011, 08:02 AM »
For them, there seemed to be an almost religious (or dogmatic, at least) belief that auto-generating tickets was always a bad thing and that a "real live person" should always be the first line of contact.

That mindset is usually the result of them experiencing a help desk that didn't stay on top of user-generated requests. So for them the only reliable way of having someone respond in a timely manner was by getting a "body" on the phone.

If a user generated ticket system is handled properly, people soon learn to trust it. Once that happens, the support tech will sometimes have to play phone tag with a client rather than the other way around. Also don't be surprised if you start seeing requests that say: "No need to call. Just e-mail me and tell me what I need to do." Having a library of pre-written 'solutions' is worth it's weight in gold once that starts happening. Mouser's form letter gizmo could also work quite nicely for that.

One good thing a user initiated ticket system gives you is a bulletproof timestamp of when the request came in. That's good to have when some executive's administrative assistant dropped the ball on something and is looking for someone to put part of the blame on. Automatically having a system do some CYA is a wonderful thing.

Of course, it cuts both ways. If your helpdesk is in the habit of making people wait or losing requests it will all come out on the weekly management reports.
7695
General Software Discussion / Re: Software recommendations for writers
« Last post by 40hz on May 10, 2011, 06:38 PM »
If I remember correctly, Evernote 2.2 was the last version that was a "proper app" which stored its data locally.  I believe the 3 series is a cloud app.

I'm not interested in cloud apps - why should I accumulate, or generate, content that's useful to me, hand it over gratis to some company, then hire it back again at whatever fee and whatever business model they feel like, both of which they can change at any time?

I understand what you're saying. But you're not handing anything over to them gratis since they're not using your content. They're only storing it.

As far as changing their business plan, that's the risk you take using free services. I'm not enamored of cloud technologies in general. But what cloud services I do use, I make it a point to pay for - for exactly that reason.

Your mileage may vary.  ;D
 

7696
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 7 Power Users Guide.pdf
« Last post by 40hz on May 10, 2011, 06:28 PM »
It's not bad. I'm thinking of passing the link out to a few of my more 'consumer-level gearhead' clients. Might cut down on some of the more mundane configuration support calls.

@Curt - thanks once again for finding and sharing.  :

7697
Odd... Generally nobody cares if you have a trial available... Very odd...

That's a lot more polite than what I called it.  ;D

I'm gonna have to look at the EULA and see what it says about 3rd-party codecs.

I'm also guessing Microsoft will have some stake in whichever codecs are creating the licensing issue. Probably as a member of whatever "industry standards" body owns the codec.
7698
I've got the MS Subscription, but no hardware handy at the moment to run it on. *Shrug* ...Wonder if I can virtualize it. :-\
-Stoic Joker (May 10, 2011, 03:45 PM)

You can virtualize if you like. At least you could with the beta so I can't see any reason why the 'gold' release shouldn't work.

Good how to here if you need one.
7699
What do you think?

I think I'll be sticking to my WHS v1 for a while to come yet.   :P

Copy that!  ;D

7700
General Software Discussion / Re: Software recommendations for writers
« Last post by 40hz on May 10, 2011, 01:50 PM »
Write Monkey is growing on me it really helps to keep me focused.

Nothing works better for a writer than some decent software, a little focus, a chair, and a great big honkin' can of Butt-Glue.  :)

CintaNotes is amazing been looking for a note taking app like this for a while. Wish it had the ability to add styles to text like bold and italic. other than that it's great.

Take a look at Evernote. CintaNotes was based on it. Think of Evernote as CintaNotes on steroids. May not be free depending on which features you want/need.

I personally think it's overkill for what I want. But Evernote is a very popular and well-respected app. Give it a try and see if you like it better.

Evernote's ability to sync over the web is a nice feature although you could always backup Cinta's notes files to a free Dropbox account and get some of that for free, albeit less elegantly and with more hassle.

Luck! :Thmbsup:
Pages: prev1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309 310 311 312 313 ... 470next