topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 21, 2025, 4:43 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 297 298 299 300 301 [302] 303 304 305 306 307 ... 470next
7526
General Software Discussion / Re: web clipping
« Last post by 40hz on June 06, 2011, 09:01 AM »
Sound like its another Apple browser user agent issue although I haven't run into that on my iPhone yet (knock wood).

Guess it's to be expected when you're using a device and software made by a company that thinks the entire universe begins and ends at it's own property line.  ;D

7527
General Software Discussion / Re: Naming one's product
« Last post by 40hz on June 06, 2011, 08:54 AM »
A quarter million posts and almost as many users in something like 6 years? Far too late to change the name now. Especially after the Google search ranking has been established.

Shouldn't that be, "Farr too late to change the name now."   :P

Awesome!  ;D ;D ;D

7528
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Revo Uninstaller Pro at Bits Du Jour
« Last post by 40hz on June 06, 2011, 07:17 AM »
+1.

Some of the reporting and monitoring features could come in handy.

Temptation, temptation, temptation...  :)

7529
Living Room / Re: xkcd - why we should fear the cloud
« Last post by 40hz on June 06, 2011, 06:33 AM »
That line where he says "In the end they're all getting it here." is absolutely brilliant.  ;D

(Now that I've stopped laughing, I'm left with this uneasy feeling it might not be a joke. :o)

7530
General Software Discussion / Re: Naming one's product
« Last post by 40hz on June 06, 2011, 06:27 AM »

The labeling is in Korean as well,


Oh...right...I should have noticed that immediately.  ;D

7531
You might want to look at Canaware NetNotes

A modest rework of that and you have a decent mini-review!  :up: :up:
-cranioscopical (June 06, 2011, 06:19 AM)

I probably should. I've praised it enough. And enough times. Might be easier to just write it once and for all, and then point to it going forward, huh?  ;D

7532
General Software Discussion / Re: Naming one's product
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 08:09 PM »
@Renegade - what is it with Nipponese beverage names anyway?

And beverages too:

20060902115720795041593100.jpg

Mother's Milk: the breast-tasting drink ever!

And now, for something close to the heart... Mother's Milk. Is there anything in the world more wholesome, more natural, more life-giving than mother's milk? Is there anything in the world that would make you drink it from a store bought carton?

Come to think of it - just what is it with freekin' Japan while we're on the subject?

japan_weird_shit.jpg

BTW: Is that poster's spelling of weird as 'wierd' weird or what?  ;)

Check out The Top Ten Weird and Bizarre Japanese Soft Drinks and Ten Even More Weird and Bizarre Japanese Soft Drinks
 
;D



7533
You might want to look at Canaware NetNotes if you're willing to rethink a little of your workflow.

It's more along the lines of one of those tree-notes type PIMS. Left pane is a hierarchical tree (folders & docs). Right pane is the actual document.

NetNotes.jpg

I don't know how much post editing you do. But if you primarily allow the clips to stand as is, then this might be something that would work for you. You don't get tags, but you do have a customizable tree. And you can also have multiple libraries - which can be merged if necessary. Plus, there's a very good built-in search function. The URL is automatically saved for anything you store in NetNotes. (The navigate button will take you directly from the saved page to the webpage in your browser.) Document title is derived from the webpage itself. But you can freely edit and modify it if you like. There's also an edit mode for the clip itself. So you can freely add notes or whatever to the clip. You could even create a doc in it's entirety if you so desired. The latest version has added a few additional features including the ability to edit tables and images in a document.

Going with Canaware would save you the intermediate step of going through CintaNotes because the clips become part of your library the minute they're saved. I initially drop all my clips into a SORT folder. When I have the time, I eventually move these clips (with optional annotations) to their final resting place in my doc tree. Works really well.

I use CintaNotes too. But that's more for quick & dirty grabs of stuff like software I'm interested in looking at. In the past I used to create temporary bookmarks in a "Look at" folder under Firefox. But that got way too cumbersome.

My workflow is pretty straightforward - and constantly evolving.

Right now the main point of entry into my infoworld is an RSS reader (Sage) which I use to stay on top of websites and topics that most interest me.

Anything that catches my eye for serious later reading gets sent to my account at ReadItLater via a FF plug-in or an app on my smartphone. I bought the Digest option from RIL when they offered it at discount (perpetual one-time only license fee) to people participating in their beta. It was only something like $15, so even if they eventually pull an about-face ripoff like so many other "lifetime" offers have, it's not big money we're talking about. (Sorry to sound so cynical - but I am cynical anytime the word "lifetime" gets used in the same sentence as "license.")

Anyway, if it's something that I think worth archiving, it gets sent one of my Canaware NetNotes library folders, depending on the topic.

If it's some info I want to keep - but less permanently - (like the current selections in either my "favorite" or "genuinely interesting" software lists) I'll put that in CintaNotes along with a tag or two.

Don't know if any of this helps, but there ya have it.

That's my story - and I'm sticking to it! ;D

Luck. :Thmbsup:

--------------------------

Note: Canaware's website is a little weird since it's basically a forum. Downloads are here if you're having trouble finding them. Main 'page' is here.


7534
General Software Discussion / Re: web clipping
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 06:55 PM »
I used to use Read it Later until I got annoyed with it crying about a page not being an article.

Eh?  What do you mean?

Yeah! +1. Never had anything like that happen w/RIL. Whassup with that? Was it something like a  PDF that got opened in a browser window?  :huh:

7535
General Software Discussion / Re: Naming one's product
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 06:49 PM »
I've discovered (through bitter experience) that it doesn't pay to be too clever about naming products

Quickly, show that to mouser!
-cranioscopical (June 05, 2011, 06:36 PM)

A quarter million posts and almost as many users in something like 6 years? Far too late to change the name now. Especially after the Google search ranking has been established.  :-\

 :Thmbsup:



7536
General Software Discussion / Re: web clipping
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 04:48 PM »
I don't use the newest Firefox because last time I checked, my mainstay app Canaware NetNotes does NOT work with FF4.x.  >:(

having a look:
it claims to (now) work with FF4
http://www.canaware....px?g=posts&t=534

@tomos- thx! I'll have to try it out on the portable version of FF4 tonight. If it works it may be just enough to get me to go over to the new version once it has a little more time to get the kinks worked out.

7537
General Software Discussion / Re: web clipping
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 03:20 PM »
I don't use the newest Firefox because last time I checked, my mainstay app Canaware NetNotes does NOT work with FF4.x.  >:(

If it ends up not being supported on FF4, I'd rather switch browsers than give it up.  :'(
7538
General Software Discussion / Re: Naming one's product
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 02:30 PM »
I've discovered (through bitter experience) that it doesn't pay to be too clever about naming products or businesses.  Clever 'gets old' fast. And it's a lot more common than you think. I'd hate to count the number of times I've come up with a "really clever" or cute product name and found it (plus a few alternate spellings of the same) already in commercial use.

Also not a bad idea to check and see if there's a trademark registration already issued (or pending) for it. Few experiences are worse than to come up with a name you really like, write the ad copy, design the packaging and website, tell everybody you know about it... and then realize you can't legally use it. About the only thing worse is to first find out about it when you receive a "cease and desist" letter from an attorney. Especially if you got it just after you received your order for a thousand custom printed boxes along with 5000 4-color sales brochures. (I've seen it happen. Talk about "ouch." )  ;D

At the very least, Google the name and see if there's anything remotely like what youre planning to use before you commit to a product name.
 8)



7539
General Software Discussion / Re: Cleaning out old dll files - advice needed
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 09:32 AM »
April and Jessee both agree with me?

Wow! I'm buying me a PowerBall ticket today! ;D

:Thmbsup:
7540
Living Room / Re: Microsoft unveils new UI prototype - Windows 8?
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 09:19 AM »
OK when is Apple going to sue Microsoft on look and feel?
-Carol Haynes (June 05, 2011, 08:47 AM)

Don't you mean when is Apple going to sue Microsoft on look and feel again?

They did it back in 1988 when Windows first started using desktop icons and resizeable windows.

"Look and feel" was a legal argument Apple used to try to find a way around the (former) rule you couldn't patent or copyright an idea.

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, 35 F.3d 1435 (9th Cir. 1994) was a copyright infringement lawsuit in which Apple Computer, Inc. (now Apple Inc.) sought to prevent Microsoft Corporation and Hewlett-Packard from using visual graphical user interface (GUI) elements that were similar to those in Apple's Lisa and Macintosh operating systems. The court ruled that, "Apple cannot get patent- protection for the idea of a graphical user interface, or the idea of a desktop metaphor [under copyright law]..."[1] In the midst of the Apple v. Microsoft lawsuit, Xerox also sued Apple alleging that Mac's GUI was heavily based on Xerox's.[2] The district court dismissed Xerox's claims without addressing whether Apple's GUI infringed Xerox's.[3] Apple lost all claims in the Microsoft suit except for the ruling that the trash can icon and folder icons from Hewlett-Packard's NewWave windows application were infringing. The lawsuit was filed in 1988 and lasted four years; the decision was affirmed on appeal in 1994,[1] and Apple's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was denied.

***
Apple had agreed to license certain parts of its GUI to Microsoft for use in Windows 1.0, but when Microsoft made changes in Windows 2.0 adding overlapping windows and other features found in the Macintosh GUI, Apple filed suit. Apple added additional claims to the suit when Microsoft released Windows 3.0.

Apple claimed the "look and feel" of the Macintosh operating system, taken as a whole, was protected by copyright, and that each individual element of the interface (such as the existence of windows on the screen, the rectangular appearance of windows, windows could be resized, overlap, and have title bars) was not as important as all these elements taken together. After oral arguments, the court insisted on an analysis of specific GUI elements that Apple claimed were infringements. Apple listed 189 GUI elements; the court decided that 179 of these elements had been licensed to Microsoft in the Windows 1.0 agreement and most of the remaining 10 elements were not copyrightable—either they were unoriginal to Apple, or they were the only possible way of expressing a particular idea.


I find it amusing that the courts ruled the one of the few Windows icons that did infringe on anything was the trash can. (Now you know why Windows uses a more 'modern' Recycle Bin icon instead.)  ;D

Who says the law is blind? Or that judiciary doesn't have a sense of humor.  8)

steemed.jpg



7541
Living Room / Re: OK, I know theres 6 month left to go...but...
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 09:03 AM »
I'm already well along on my (or at least one of my) N.A.N.Y. 2012 projects...  :D

Many? Did you say "one of many" ???

You did say that didn't you!!! ... *sigh*
 
40hz once again experiences a sudden feeling of personal inadequacy bubbling up from the effervescent bayous of his mind....

lola.gif

 ;D

7542
Living Room / Re: OK, I know theres 6 month left to go...but...
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 08:38 AM »
I thought it was maybe the end of the world (again)

That's next year. (maybe)  ;D

7543
General Software Discussion / Re: Cleaning out old dll files - advice needed
« Last post by 40hz on June 05, 2011, 08:20 AM »
Unless you have a very sepecific reason why you'd want to remove 'old' DLLs, I think you'd be much better off leaving them in place rather than try to delete them - unless you're very comfortable with what you're doing.

If it's stuff that accumulates from old programs after you've removed them you're worried about (due to half-assed uninstallers that didn't clean up properly), you can get rid of much of it going forward by using a more thorough removal utility like Revo Uninstaller. There's also a Pro version of it available if you need the extra features it offers. For me, the free edition works just fine. More info and download links here.

FWIW, orphaned DLLs shouldn't become active once a program is uninstalled. So this is one of those situations where the old adage: If it ain't broke - don't fix it! is especially relevant. Because you're much more likely to screw things up by inadvertently removing something you need than you are to experience a performance or security problem leaving it alone.

Just my 2¢ anyway!  ;D

7544
General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice
« Last post by 40hz on June 04, 2011, 11:21 AM »
Servers and products in that line of work?

Yes. And more recently, a bit of patent trolling.  8)

7545
General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice
« Last post by 40hz on June 03, 2011, 09:33 PM »
Don't forget that probably half the (small) businesses on the planet using MS Office are still using v.2003< or earlier. For some, you'd think at some point, they'd want to make a clean break and use LibreOffice (or a Web 2.0 solution). Whether they can't afford later versions or don't want the UI or OS upgrade it would require, I'm surprised it's just not considered.


Or that they don't take advantage of SoftMaker's offer for a free copy of their own very capable 2008 Office package, which is available here if they don't like LibreOffice. (There's also a free Linux version available.)

You can now download a fully functional and permanently usable version of the SoftMaker Office 2008 office suite.

SoftMaker Office is a complete and full-featured office that comes with a word processor, a spreadsheet, and a presentation-graphics program. If you like SoftMaker Office 2008 as much as hundreds of thousands of other people do, you should consider upgrading to its successor, SoftMaker Office 2010.

I actually prefer using SoftMaker's wordprocessor TextMaker over Word on older laptops or PCs without much RAM.

Can't afford Office? No need to pirate or complain about price tags. Just grab a free copy of Softmaker's Office suite and be done with it.

 8) :Thmbsup:

7546
General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice
« Last post by 40hz on June 03, 2011, 02:04 PM »
^Ok, I see your point, and I'll concede it can be a genuine problem for some people.  ;D
7547
Living Room / Re: Microsoft unveils new UI prototype - Windows 8?
« Last post by 40hz on June 03, 2011, 12:35 PM »
*Sigh* At least there's still hope for the server OS's (i think...).

There will be until Microsoft decides to drop Windows Home Server. It really is a little gem.  :)

7548
General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice
« Last post by 40hz on June 03, 2011, 12:26 PM »

I think you missed the point. Microsoft could afford to allow piracy 20 years ago because Word and Excel were not their main source of revenue and were not major players in the office market.  They winked at unlicensed users because they knew that would get them a huge share of the market among those who could or would not pay for WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3 or other programs that typically cost $300 and up per user at the time.

Maybe. But having worked as a part of a Fortune 5 (not 500) company team that hammered out one of the first corporate site license deals ever made with Microsoft back in the 80s, saying that Redmond "winked" at bootlegging Office (or was not viewing it as an important part of their revenue stream and overall sales strategy) does not coincide with what we learned about Microsoft, either through official or unofficial channels. Quite the contrary in fact. They were absolutely incensed about it. But there was a looming antitrust issue confronting them, and they decided to let it go until the issue with the Feds got resolved. IBM did the same thing with people cloning its PC design. At the time, it wasn't considered an issue they wanted to bring to a head - for exactly the same reason.

I'm not a Microsoft apologist, but they do have a business to run. And activation and "genuine advantage" aren't too burdensome the way they've implemented it.

Well... That's easy to say when your sitting there with an MSDN subscription and a spread sheet full of keys (which we both have iirc) for anything you might want/need to play with. But the view is not quite as clear cut for everybody. Mind you I'm not disagreeing, I'm just pointing out a teency bit of a glass house factor to the position on something we're sort of insulated from.

I have a little trouble with this new 'grass roots socialism' I'm starting to see, where anytime somebody wants something they can't afford brings up accusations of greed and "not playing fair." One reason I have a problem with that is because there are viable alternatives to Windows and Office which are available for free.

cartman.jpg

And yes it is true that I have a Partner Action Pack subscription (not the MSDN - because I couldn't afford that one - and it's not bloody fair either!  :P) which I use in my business. But it's primarily there to stay up on the Microsoft products we provide support for.

For home and personal use, I'm virtually 100% Linux/FOSS these days.  8)

I'd love to migrate all our internal business systems over to Linux. But I won't for the simple reason it forces us to use Microsoft's technology on a day-to-day basis. If you want to support something it's best you be an actual user in order to not lose sight of your client's perspective. I think the expression "Eat your own dog food" is what the team that developed Windows NT called it.

Regarding activation and WGA, I'll stand by my contention it's not too burdensome. One click and an Internet connection is all it takes. If something screams at you, a call to Microsoft's toll-free number will get it straightened out very quickly and you're off and running. I've never known anybody that had a problem with the way Microsoft handles those calls. Especially since they almost always give the caller the benefit of the doubt, even if they're suspicious. I have heard anecdotal evidence to the contrary. But neither I nor my clients have ever experienced any problems.

Going back to my earlier note, the most common problem is people attempting to migrate a PC manufacturer's OEM copy of Office over to a new PC they bought. Usually they order a new machine and just figure they can use their old copy on that. Unfortunately, the standard OEM EULA specifically says it doesn't allow that.

One of the reasons why those "cheap copies of Office" are so cheap is because they're pegged to the machine they came with. But even then, most times if it's a current Office release, and it's being installed on the same make of PC, it will go on and authenticate without any problems.

Dunno. It still doesn't seem like such a big deal to me  :)

7549
+1 w/Stoic. For many applications, onboard video works just fine. For general business and productivity it's usually all you'll need. :Thmbsup:

7550
Living Room / Re: Microsoft unveils new UI prototype - Windows 8?
« Last post by 40hz on June 03, 2011, 09:36 AM »
So in short, this really is the beginning of the end for computing as we know it.

I many respects, yes.

There seems to be an industry trend where the end-user is increasingly being seen (not without good reason) as a data "consumer" rather than a data creator.

The proposed changes in OS and interface design simply reflect that change in industry perspective.

And now that there's sufficient momentum and numbers in the very industry open standards helped create, there's a concerted effort to move away from those same standards, now that many in the industry feel "open" has served it's purpose. The same thing happened with radio and television technologies.

Even so-called open platforms like Android don't reach the consumer in anything other than locked-down forms as provided by the telcos.

What we're witnessing is the classic "wagon circling" that breaks out once any market reaches a certain level of maturity, and new customers become increasingly hard to come by. Hence the push for proprietary devices and operating systems which are locked into one vendor's app store. Apple did it. And now everybody else seems intent to follow that same business model.

And for those who want to jailbreak their devices, there's still an ongoing effort by many manufacturers to find a way to legally prevent them from doing so. Small surprise when you consider that those who most often argue for legislation and regulation usually came out of the broadcasting, telco, and cable industries.

In an interview, Steve Jobs dissed laptops and netbooks - and held up an iPhone. "This is the future." he said.

There's a good chance he may be right since it seems to be what most people want to buy. Where that leaves us geeks and techno-wonks is anybody's guess. Thank heavens for Linux. Or at least as long as Ubuntu's vision for the Unity desktop doesn't prevail.

 :)
Pages: prev1 ... 297 298 299 300 301 [302] 303 304 305 306 307 ... 470next